# data[].attributes.body
I was unsure of the result I was going to be given after completing the assessment centre.

Once reading my comments I was pleased to see my engagement and communication was seen - due to being in such a large group at times it was hard to get your voice heard.

Although my score isn't as high as possible, scores and comments show my participation.

When it comes to graduate jobs and application processes, now that bootcamp is over, I am able to reflect on and put my skills set learnt from it.

# data[].attributes.body
I reflected after finishing the interview 360 and found it to be incredibly helpful.

Because of the fact that it is only an online practise, I wasn't sure whether I would feel any benefit completing it, but now I'm going to make it a goal of mine to complete these various interviews at least once a month up until graduation. I can practise and gain more confidence by doing this.

Regarding my confidence level - I answered 3 questions regarding 'If I had to go for an interview tomorrow, how confident would I feel', and I selected 5/10.
I do not think I could fully reach my potential in an interview if I had one tomorrow as I need to prepare some basic answers for these types of interviews (which is why I set myself the monthly goal).
With more practice and preparation my confidence would have been marked to a 7 or 8, but I know I would need that extra preparation time, in comparison to others.

# data[].attributes.body
To briefly explain our group task in our selected groups we were asked to work as a team to select 10 candidates to be selected to be taken into space due to a new planet:

We decided as a team to first read over all candidates, and once read one person would read there name, and we'd put our hands up to vote on each person.

The candidates with the most votes would then be put into the list of 10 for our presentation.

The presentation was under time pressure so we had to work quickly to figure out a way for everyone to be involved within the presentation.

We were able to split up the candidates and each person was able to explain reasonings with a introduction and conclusion all within 10 minutes.

When I was first told I was being split into a group to present I was slightly apprehensive and at first didn't fully understand the task. I spoke to someone who helped explain it to me then I got going and voiced my opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
PR team email:
We had a time limit to send a PR email relating to negative information being realised about a brand.
- The brand was a womenswear brand, which we had to name and create a logo for.

I felt more prepared for this task as writing professional emails is something I've had to do within my part time job.

The time limit didn't give us much time to plan or think off a logo etc, however I think I completed the task well, given the amount of time we had to complete it.

I found this task helpful, as it is a 'real life' scenario that could occur within a job, and something I could have to deal with.

# data[].attributes.body
When I first heard of this test, I had forgotten that it was something that I had completed before (in L4).

The test is still something that takes time and concentration to complete, but when I started I knew there would be a pattern or rhythm I would have to find.

I found I understood I couple more than from previously doing, but with the timer countdown it puts pressure on you when working out the pattern.

I think this is something that can help with working under pressure and gives you time to reflect on how you work in this situation.

# data[].attributes.headline
Project management simplified: Christ Croft 

# data[].attributes.subject
Project management simplified: Christ Croft 

# data[].attributes.body
I found this course really informative. At first I was slightly taken back by the amount of information, however once broken down into steps i found it helpful for when it comes to managing projects as a whole, in this assignment (and how I can use certain skills in other assignments or work).

# data[].attributes.body
My result of my professional CV (attached below) was 88%.

The feedback caught errors that I made when proofreading my work, giving me greater assurance that it has been thoroughly reviewed before being submitted to a potential employer. It lacks professionalism, especially if errors are found.

# data[].attributes.body
Word Document - available for employers to be able to view if put into a system.

# data[].attributes.body
Even though more score is a pass, some suggestions were still included which I have now altered to gain improvements.

Some were simple, for example making sure the document is saved as the best name for employers - mine was saved as 'cv360' ready for this task, however have now changed it to 'Alana Grou- 02.02.23', so it is clear as to who's CV is is, and this was the date it was created.

Or for example, some suggestions were something I completely missed when reading over: shown in the photo I didn't include the job brand clearly enough, which was a fast change to make to the document, but something employers would be looking for.

# data[].attributes.body
Tool used when it comes to planning a project and measuring its progress.

# data[].attributes.body
The most common comments I received from each section of the interview was that I was enthusiastic and calm, and my speech rate remained 'well paced' but one.

When answering questions I do tent to add filler words which is something I'm aware off, and within a professional setting need to work on.

Overall, I'm pleased with the feedback on each response; however, after finishing the interview, I've realised that I need to practise my responses as well as my confidence, because upcoming  graduate positions are competitive and I will be beginning to be apply for them in the following months.