# data[].attributes.body
The issue was that the number of elks growing and it was disturbing for the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
The issue is that the natural balance is disturbed due to a growing number of elks

# data[].attributes.body
The problem is that since wolves were hunted  , deer or elk populations grew by the time. Disturbing the environment system.

# data[].attributes.body
The issue was that wolves could not live in Yellowstone. due to the worries of people living around Yellowstone. Elks were growing in number and upsetting the natural balance.

# data[].attributes.body
(MYP 1-B)

# data[].attributes.body
The issue is that because the wolves were extinct, elks were growing in number and upsetting the natural balance.

# data[].attributes.body
The issue is that elks were growing in number and upsetting the natural balance

# data[].attributes.body
Wild animals like bears and wolves are being removed and hunted because of the danger that they might kill innocents, now will no longer live. The herbivores' population grew so much that it causes a reduction of plants.

# data[].attributes.body
What is the issue the issue is that the elf’s are growing more in numbers and that was disturbing the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim: Hunting of wolves destroyed wild life.

# data[].attributes.body
Because of the enormous number of elks, wolves were hunted and killed, and wild life was unbalanced, putting many bears, fish, and other species in trouble.

# data[].attributes.body
Whenever the Elks would come to the river they would pollute the river and the fish.

# data[].attributes.body
claim: Due to the hunting of the wolves the elks population grew through out the years, which had disrupted the natural balance.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim -
The wolves are being hunted down and due to that the natural balance is being disturbed.

# data[].attributes.body
The claim is, that introducing wolves back to Yellowstone, managed the balance.

The evidence to support the same is that 17,000 elves became four thousand, and nature in the Yellowstone park was balanced once again, because of the wolves being introduced to it again.

# data[].attributes.body
The issue is reduction of wolves equalling to overpopulation of Elks also equalling an upset ecosystem.

# data[].attributes.body
the problem is that the wolves could not live in the Yellowstone because of the worries of the people living around the Yellowstone Elks are growing in number and  upsetting mother nature cycle.

# data[].attributes.body
With wolves back in Yellowstone national park the ecosystem is balanced again.

# data[].attributes.body
The claim is that the wolves and bears came back to the yellow stone national park and maintained the ecosystem

# data[].attributes.body
Whenever the Elks would come to the river to Drink water it would pollute the rivers which would affect the rivers and also the fish which would affect many animals, birds diet as for some of the fish is the only source of food, especially in the sea population and fishes also need to live.

# data[].attributes.body
The wolves have been forced to hunt the wild animals for food and like this, except wolves, the wildlife is getting destroyed.

# data[].attributes.body
The evidence to support the same is that 17,000 elves became four thousand, the beavers didn't have trees to build there habitats for, and that upset the balance, in Yellowstone, but when the wolves being introduced to it again, it balance the Yellowstone park's nature once again.

# data[].attributes.body
whenever the Elks come to the river they pollute the river and the fish, with causes the fishes to eventually die.

# data[].attributes.body
The evidence behind this is that 17,000 elves became 4,000, and nature in Yellowstone Park was again balanced as wolves were again to see their home, and the bears, fishes, and animals, were able to live properly and the environment was balanced.

# data[].attributes.body
The thing that supports the claim is that the wolves are trying to live in such a difficult place so they had to hunt the herbivores for food.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Environmental Factor

2. Social Factor

# data[].attributes.body
My 2 Factors: Moral and Social

# data[].attributes.body
1. Environmental factor
2. Wild life factor

# data[].attributes.body
Factor I chose:
Social Factor
Environmental factor

# data[].attributes.body
Hunting of wolves resulted in an increase in elk population up to 17,500. They ate the grass, so no berries for the bears and birds. They polluted water so fish, amphibians, and otters could not take shelter in the dams built by beavers.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence 1: with wolves back the Elk population decreased dramatically from 17,000 to just 4000 healthy Elks which balanced the ecosystem.

Evidence 2: lots of animals lost their habitats, food and even lives due to the Elk’s overgrazing, with the wolves back there’s clean water, lots of grass, etc

# data[].attributes.body
Environment (Social)
Economy

# data[].attributes.body
Factor 1: Environmental
Factor 2: Social

# data[].attributes.body
The issue is that the number of elks were going which disturbed the natural balance.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Environmental factor
2. Social factor

# data[].attributes.body
Claim:

Hunting wolves disrupted the natural balance.

# data[].attributes.body
Science has been applied to see how the removal of tertiary consumers affects the food chain. First of all, the elk population has been reduced making it a better habitat for all the animals around thus leading to a positive social/environmental impact. It also attracted many tourists to the park that led to a positive economic impact. However, I can find one negative economical impact which is the fact the park owners had to pay a lot of money to buy the wolves from other areas. There is also one negative social impact which is that the neighbouring areas might have to face the fearsome wolves again.

# data[].attributes.body
1. social 2 environment

# data[].attributes.body
A positive implication on Economy is more people visiting the Yellowstone national park 🏞 and a negative implication on the environment is more air pollution.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Environmental factor
2. Wild life factor

# data[].attributes.body
1) Moral
2) social

# data[].attributes.body
The economic implication will be:
negative: What will happen to the people that live around Yellowstone National Park?
positive: lots of visitors and people are visiting yellow national park as the wolves were removed from the yellow national park ecosystem.
solution - The return of wolves is the solution. It is the key to a healthy food chain and the solution is to hunt deer, which will fix the problem by maintaining a balance between herbivores and carnivores.

# data[].attributes.body
my claim: whenever wolfs hunted it would effect the wild life

# data[].attributes.body
Hunting wolves is not nice and it disturbs the nature.

# data[].attributes.body
The solution is the reintroduction of the wolves it was the solution as it will balance the environment/eco-system

# data[].attributes.body
1. Social
2. Environment

# data[].attributes.body
when the elks would come to the riving to drink water it would be very polluted which would effect the life of the fish which would also effect the food chain.

# data[].attributes.body
Reason: Hunting wolves is not good because it makes other animals grow much.

# data[].attributes.body
We can use factors.

# data[].attributes.body
The solution is reintroduction of wolves, and it will solve the issue by keeping the balance through herbivores and carnivores. Since, wolves entered, the number of elks have reduced, and as an outcome the numbers of trees, and much more has increased.

The implications are....

Positive ( For environmental factor)-
It is balancing the balance between herbivores and carnivores
Negative ( for social factor)-
How the people around Yellowstone national park will get affected.

# data[].attributes.body
Environment Factor

Health Factor

# data[].attributes.body
the solution is the reintroduction of the wolves. it is the solution to a balanced food chain.

# data[].attributes.body
When the wolves were banished from Yellowstone, the elks grew a lot in number and the natural balance was disturbed.

# data[].attributes.body
There is a scientific action that has taken place in the situation of the destruction of plants in Yellowstone National Park. Now this action has saved the National Park from getting destructed. All the destruction is caused by the overgrazing of the dears, the hunting of wolves has decreased this as the dears aren't much for overgrazing. This explains that wolves even though they're predators, they are helping us.

# data[].attributes.body
Science has been applied to see that how adding of the apex predators has balanced and continued the food chain. First of all the population of elks has decreased and the food chain is continued but adding the apex predators has affected tourists' safety. Thus fewer visitors came to the yellow stone national park

# data[].attributes.body
The solution to this problem was re-introducing wolves to Yellowstone national park.
Science was used in this by balancing the food chain by bringing wolves back.

# data[].attributes.body
The solution would be to bring the wolves back to Yellow Stone national park, then the ecosystem will again balance itself. Through science, we analyzed the facts and concluded that this would be the best solution.

The factors on which I would analyze the implication of the suggested solution are social and environmental.

Social: When the wolves came back, the ecosystem was rebuilt.
Economics: When the wolves left, there was great damage to the park, many animals died and this undoubtedly hurt the economy of Yellow Stone Park.

# data[].attributes.body
The solution- The elk’s population was outgrowing as it had disrupted the natural balance as they were eating the other animal’s food as they need for hibernation the prey can’t hide as they eat grass and other things. They had started to be a big problem for other animals. The scientists had reintroduced the wolves to the Yellowstone national park. As they are the elk’s apex predator they can lower down the population of the elk’s keeping the natural balance.
The implications-

Environmental-

Positive- The reintroduction of wolves can keep the natural balance.

Economical-

Negative- Now though the wolves are back they are still a problem to the humans living near the national park.