# data[].attributes.body
This evidence confirms that there has been illegal littering of refuse and construction waste on the hillside downslope of Nam Long Shan Road. It also says that the drainage pipes are dry and there’s water discharge on the hillside. The refuse and construction waste might have been washed into the drainage pipe by the rainfall from the past few months, and then the drainage channels got blocked with the waste. Now that the channels are blocked, the water cannot enter which lets the channels dry out. However, the water has nowhere to go with the pipes being blocked, so it flows on to the surface of the hillside, creating water discharge. The discharge loosens up the rocks and soil and prepares the weathered rocks for a landslide. Through this entire chain reaction, the root cause leads back to the illegal littering that was caused by humans.

# data[].attributes.headline
Is this source relevant ? - Questions for Evidence (Witness/P.png)

# data[].attributes.subject
Is this source relevant ? - Questions for Evidence (Witness/P.png)

# data[].attributes.body
In the explanation for the evidence, can the information connect to each other?
Yes, it can. The information connects logically and simply, and the information is backed up with evidence and makes sense by itself and when being connected.

# data[].attributes.body
The evidence that this image provides shows that the Fei Tsui Road landslide must have initiated the Nam Long Shan Road landslide to happen. The latter happened a few hours before the former, and since they were close by, some debris from the Fei Tsui Road Landslide must have pushed a loosened rock of some sort to fall down the hill, dragging more destruction with it. That was how the Nam Long Shan Road happened.

# data[].attributes.headline
Is this source relevant ? - Questions for Evidence (Image/A.png)

# data[].attributes.subject
Is this source relevant ? - Questions for Evidence (Image/A.png)

# data[].attributes.body
How does the information make sense?
The information makes sense. The Fei Tsui Road landslide clearly initiated the Nam Long Shan Road landslide, and there is a lot of evidence to prove it. For example, the image I have used is evidence. So are other pieces of evidence using words, like Evidence - "U.png".

# data[].attributes.body
This evidence says that the remains of the landslide were small rocks that can originate from loose slopes. The smaller landslide was in a loose state, communicating that the small rocks could have kicked off the larger landslide to happen. The rock of the larger landslide was already weak and weathered, and a small push can make it happen. That small push was the smaller landslide. Since the smaller landslide is a natural cause itself (being a natural disaster), the larger landslide should be natural caused. The evidence also shows that this slip let the water flowing down Nam Long Shan Road discharge to the upper part of the slope.

# data[].attributes.headline
Is this source relevant ? - Questions for Evidence (U.png)

# data[].attributes.subject
Is this source relevant ? - Questions for Evidence (U.png)

# data[].attributes.body
Does this piece of evidence have holes that might mislead us to the wrong culprit?

I believe it does. My explanation states that the landslide could be naturally caused because the landslide that initiated itself is a natural disaster, but the initiator could be caused by humans. Therefore, this piece of evidence has holes and cannot be used.