# data[].attributes.body
Acknowledge that it's hard and new to do build test learn at this scale

# data[].attributes.body
Shorter consistent approval chains

# data[].attributes.body
More "wins" with the model! (as it stands we are waiting 2 years to get any sense of accomplishment which can lead to demotivation)

# data[].attributes.body
Feedback is genuinely needed when it's asked for
Data collection not performative
Sometimes actually change the decision!
Knowing what extent of feedback is needed

# data[].attributes.body
- how can we break this down into smaller chunks to make it feel a) like we are making progress and b) things are more achievable

# data[].attributes.body
- less need for 800 line Excel worksheets with several layers of approval and request to plan 1 yr in advance (although this has improved a little already between Y1 and Y2)
- less time on financial and technical monitoring, which is often not meaningful
-

# data[].attributes.body
- Knowledge management - where do I find information quickly
- Org chart - who do I go to for XYZ
- Knowing who is the final decision maker
- Less hierarchy in our approach where possible

# data[].attributes.body
Not expecting country teams to jump when the regional team says jump...for example not giving enough time to put together administrative documents or expecting teams to move quickly at a last minute's notice to participate in a training or workshop

# data[].attributes.body
- getting rid of 1hr meeting defaults
- more in-person meetings
- clear and timely communication 'from the top' on what is happening, when direction changes etc
- 'task forces' working on smaller deliverables (together with external partners)
- not forcing progress for the sake of it, but embracing iterative approach (going back to the drawing board is normal!)

# data[].attributes.body
Less lip-service about partnership and teamwork and more action, respect, listening, and shared decision-making

# data[].attributes.body
- Lets just do it! Bring things to the field early
- Draw on existing materials (lets not reinvent the wheel)
- Nothing is perfect
- Open to feedback
- Less meetings unless they have clear purpose
- Where can we cut the red tape?
- Clear channels of communication to keep people updated

# data[].attributes.body
More openness about disagreements and/or misunderstandings about different visions and ways of working across partners and staff members

# data[].attributes.body
- Less focus on organisations, more focus on workstreams
- opportunity to get to know small group of people you work with
- accepting that someone will set the strategic direction which the whole consortium will work towards

# data[].attributes.body
- Underlying assumption that we are all coming at this project with good intent
- Understanding of what people are passionate about (this might help us understand trigger points)
-

# data[].attributes.body
Being ok with failure and really embodying iteration and change

# data[].attributes.body
Learning from what has gone well and what hasn't so far

# data[].attributes.body
Cohesive vision by the consortium...at the moment too many cooks

# data[].attributes.body
- more travel for all teams
- smaller deliverables
- smaller teams working on time bound deliverables
- Clear vision
- Clarity on WHY

# data[].attributes.body
Consulting communities on a regular basis

# data[].attributes.body
Actually listening to and utilizing data from the project

# data[].attributes.body
Strong strategic leadership with a clear vision

# data[].attributes.body
Less energy spent on big workplans

# data[].attributes.body
Instead of needing to start meetings with activities, there is an inherent sense of playfulness and joy within the project and schools

# data[].attributes.body
We have a set of content/ activities that 'work', that government/ other counterparts are excited about and see value in.

# data[].attributes.body
I would also like to see results of what didn't work about the project and how the project adapted. So much focus is on finding "what works" or forcing something through for the sake of pleasing the donor or "getting things done". My dream is to be honest and clear about what failed and didn't work and why, and to see the project truly adapt and change course based on community needs and feedback.

# data[].attributes.body
In two years time, I would hope that we could follow the learnings, advice and experiences of those implementing LtP rather than leading

# data[].attributes.body
Everyone works within a role that they have the motivation and skills for - where they can enter a state of 'flow'

# data[].attributes.body
Rather than strangers - consortium partners can go to different schools and know educators, community leaders and have connections with them

# data[].attributes.body
I would like to see fewer global/regional staff on the project and see the country teams take ownership and run with what works best in their context.

# data[].attributes.body
Focus on-person collaboration, across organisations, but by country?

# data[].attributes.body
Relationships with people as people, esp those from dif background.
Open ended problem solving. Informal problem solving.
Opportunities to be together for longer periods of time.
Change default from 1 hour meeting. Wasting 10 mins on intros.
Knowing what’s happening, hearing it directly from people.

# data[].attributes.body
Working in person made a huge difference to our work, we value:

Cross-team relationships
Personal in person relationships
Sense of each others humanity

# data[].attributes.body
What 3 words capture the positive future vision of Play Matters for you?

# data[].attributes.body
Budgets, reporting, decision making, structure

# data[].attributes.body
Ways of working, the vision, the work we're doing

# data[].attributes.body
Relationships, mindsets

# data[].attributes.body
Inherent trust in one another
Sense of shared purpose
Trust in others good intentions
Being organised: knowing how things will be done, and why
Clear overall objective