# data[].attributes.headline
Mariana Lizeth Valdivia Silva, Sofía Cardenas Alcalá, Ana Sofía Molina Bojalil

# data[].attributes.subject
Mariana Lizeth Valdivia Silva, Sofía Cardenas Alcalá, Ana Sofía Molina Bojalil

# data[].attributes.body
6I SI

# data[].attributes.body
Example

# data[].attributes.headline
Text analysis strategies/Notes of the video

# data[].attributes.subject
Text analysis strategies/Notes of the video

# data[].attributes.body
Reading comprehension is the understanding of what is being said or read.

Literal comprehension is what the author is saying

Inferential is how it says it, you have to read between the lines and make inferences about things not directly stated.

Critical what it means, why the author is saying what he/she is saying.

Why is knowing this important ? Improves reading. Strong readers make good writers, expands vocabulary.

# data[].attributes.body
For literal questions make sure to use words like, WHERE, WHO, WHEN, for inferential use WHAT IF , WHY, WHICH ONE, and for critical questions use WHAT DO YOU THINK OF , WHAT ARE YOUR BELIEVES IN , if you have this in mind  is going to be where more easy to read texts and identified them, and also to create questions.

# data[].attributes.body
Video

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Literal, Inferential, and Critical Reading--Three Ways of Thinking

# data[].attributes.body
Video

# data[].attributes.body
-If there are a lot of authors cite them all unless they are 7 or more
-Always include date
-If there is no date use (n.d)
-If there is no author check for institutions or organizations that published it

# data[].attributes.body
3. Establish hypotheses of theintention of the text. What type of questions do you have to formulate, literal or inferential? I think it depends on what you want to know from the authors point of view on the subject. You may have very literal questions like, so you are not a mother and you don't want to be one ? or you can have questions about the things you interfir from the reading that can be more personal depending on the way you read the text and if it made you think of an experience you had. 

# data[].attributes.body
Go back to the original text “Motherhood Who needs it” in order to analyze the text from these perspectives:

It seems like the reading uses the point of view of professionals in order to prove a point, it has more of a literal interpretation. The inferential parts of the readings are never the same between the readers, because what I might have sense from a text is not the same as yours. So the reports on the reading might vary.

# data[].attributes.body
Graphic organizer

# data[].attributes.body
- An expository essay helps students to investigate an idea and make a profound argument regarding it, by building the essay in a concise manner so they can fully understand and analyze such an idea and argument. Helps students to properly
execute and deliver an essay with the correct structure.

# data[].attributes.body
Article

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Expository Essays - Purdue OWL® - Purdue University

# data[].attributes.body
2. Explain and argue the literal and inferential parts you have retrieved, give examples.
You can find literal parts in the reading almost everywhere, for example ; “Anyway, what an expert cast of hundreds is telling us is, simply, that biological possibility and desire are not the same as biological need. Women have childbearing equipment. To choose not to use the equipment is no more blocking what is instinctive than it is for a man who, muscles or no, chooses not to be a weightlifter.”  With these exact same example that I extract from the text we can have a inferential point of view for example what I´m sensing is that the text is telling us that it is okay not to have a great desire to be a mother because it is not even something biological, so you don't have to feel bad about not having this need to be a mother.