# data[].attributes.body
Based on all the previous material, I think the United States/Jackson was not justified in removing the Native Americans because there is no strong reason. Just because Whites wanted more land, a president can't just simply remove a whole civilized community to fulfil the request of other residents. People were dislocated from their homes without knowing where they are headed, how the conditions and circumstances would be. Some even didn't had the chance to gather their families. The act of Indian Removal was not justified.

# data[].attributes.body
1) When Andrew Jackson said “Circumstances . . . render it impossible that you can flourish in the midst of a civilized community.” , he meant that its beyond the human laws to let them stay in their homeland as they don't belong where they are.

2) When Jackson referred to the Cherokees as “my friends,” people had serious concerns about his sincerity because on one hand, he was removing and forcing Native American to move from their homeland. And on the other hand, he was calling them his friends as he was truly worry about the situation. It must've hard for other to determine if he was truly concerned about Indians moving or not.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Indian Removal Act did happened because of President Jackson because he was the president of that time. He signed the bill which led to the Indian Removal Act. "In 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. The Act passed 28 to 19 in the Senate and 102 to 97 in the House." - paragraph 3. Andrew Jackson was the president during 1830, he signed the bill and Indian removal occurred.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson was a good president because he always supported common man. He had strong opinions and always takes risk for the betterment of country. For example, he said no to any legislation that he thought might not benefit common man.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think it was justified for the Indian Removal Act just because the whites wanted for land.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it was not justified, reasons were to get more land for settlers, and the settlers were not allowed so it had failed.

# data[].attributes.body
1.Jackson was telling the Cherokees that they would not be able to survive in a more civilized country. That they would be better off in the West.
2.The Cherokees were concerned because he had threatened them, and he called them uncivilized and that they should move to the West or they will be forced to follow the states laws and suffer the consequences that are applied with the laws.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson was a good president or at least that's how they described him in the video. Someone who thought of the people and fought for what he wanted. Someone who believed the US shouldn't be run by money and only those with education.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Jackson basically said that the cherokees wouldn't be able to survive and expand the tribes with the whites and that they don't belong here.
2. The cherokees were concerned because Jackson literally threatened them saying the fate of the people depended on the decision they made of whether to move or not.

# data[].attributes.body
1830 most of the native tribes have been sent away but some still stayed. The South wanted to get their hands on the lands of those Native Americans who live in that land. In 1828 they elected Andrew Jackson, who wanted to free that land. The first act Andrew Jackson signed was the Indian Removal Act. All 5 tribes were going to be sent to federal land.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it was not justified because , The reason was to get more land for settlers. Let the settlers were not allowed so it was not succeeded.

# data[].attributes.body
1. When Jackson said that he was trying to tell the people what was happening would be good for them and it would have mattered at that time. But at the same time I believe that Jackson wanted them to leave their separate ways so they can also be protected.                                     2. The Cherokees We’re concerned because they didn’t know if he was trying to be kind and sincere or if he was playing games playing sides Information.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the Indian removal act was stated because of Andrew Jackson. The citizens one of the native Americans to leave because they thought they were in danger. Or the natives being around them were no help. Andrew had a lot of say to whatever was happening. But he also listen to the people about the bill and did whatever to please the citizens. That could be why

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson was a good president. He was always so thoughtful of the people and their desires. Want to protect the citizens as well. Want to protect the citizens as well. He solved many issues as well.

# data[].attributes.body
He could have been Called “ King Andrew” because , he considered the citizens thoughts and always wanted to better the political and government system to make things more complex. Another reason why he could’ve been called  “king Andrew “ , he showed strengths of qualities of being a king like protecting his country and supporting them through whatever.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Jackson wasn’t  a known man because of he was not rich not as wealthy. He worked himself to the top to become great. And do great things . 2.  He was a man of the people because he participated in things , events , worked his way hard to the top to become who he really wanted to be . And he helped lots of citizens. People admired him for that because most people can’t work their way to the top to desire what they want in life but he could because he imagined it before it came to life.

# data[].attributes.body
I would say Jackson is the

# data[].attributes.body
I think the video was about how the people wanted territory and southerners were mostly against a lot of things. Andrew Jackson helped negotiations and other thing including helped people stay in their land when the people were told to leave their homes. Southeast native Americans moved to lower land like worst land .

# data[].attributes.body
The Indian Removal Act did happen because of Jackson

# data[].attributes.body
Jackson was a good president because he fought for the country for example, he got shot 3 times.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson might have been called king Andrew" because of the veto powers he used. He used his powers more often to support than any other president.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew jackson was leading

# data[].attributes.body
1. What jackson meant was circumstances that are caused by the Cherokee makes it impossible for them to develop in a more well mannered community.
2. The Cherokees had serious concerns about jackson because the cherokees did not trust or believe what Jackson was saying.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Andrew jackson was

# data[].attributes.body
no because, the indians were reliable and useful for workers and was completely unreasonable

# data[].attributes.body
Jackson was a good president because he was for the people, relatable to the people by not being educated and wealthy, being strong minded, and etc.. But, he made the Indian Removal Act which makes it seems like he is a bad president too. So for me he is in the middle.

# data[].attributes.body
Jackson was named "King Andrew" because he was a man founders of the nation feared of.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson Was a good president. Andrew Jackson was a good president because he was willing to take risk.. He fought in a war. He changed the overall view of a president. And he only wanted what was best for the people.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the story is about the Indians and when they had their land taken away from the settlers at those times.

# data[].attributes.body
1.)Andrew just says that the indians dont belong
2.) the indians were worried about jackson because he said he was a man of the people and he isnt showing that cause of how he is treating the natives

# data[].attributes.body
Absolutely not. Ask anyone anywhere in the United States if they would want to be kicked out of where they live by complete strangers who have just moved in, they will object.

# data[].attributes.body
1. that the Indians don't belong is what he had said.

2.Indians were concered upon Jacksons actions because he was suppose to be the common an who helps everyone and he is pushing away all the indains

# data[].attributes.body
The Indian Removal Act happen because of Andrew Jackson, he was president at the time so he had to sign the papers for this to go into act. "In 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. The Act passed 28 to 19 in the Senate and 102 to 97 in the House... "A barbarous people, depending for subsistence upon the scanty and precarious supplies furnished by the chase, cannot live in contact with a civilized community.”" Paragraph 3.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the story about white people taking what they want from others whether its right or wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Andrew Jackson was not a wealthy, educated or from a east president like the first 6 president. He was a common man before becoming a president of the US, he represented the common man and is considered a self-made president.

2) Andrew Jackson was considered a  man of the people as he was a military hero and frontiersman. He helped people in economic, political, and social factors.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the Indian Removal was not justified. The Indians had brought great potentiaal and hardworkers to America. Because of this, they seemed like a threat to Americans. However this does not mean they deserved to be just thrown out of America. As shown in the video, "The Indian Removal Act", it was stated that the indians gave the Whites a run for their money because of their hardwork and dedication to thier jobs. As they grew in numbers many northerners grew in fear of them taking their jobs and wanted them out. Although this may be true, this is not justifiable and holds no valid reason for removing the Indians from America. Especially as harshly as they did.

# data[].attributes.headline
Did the Indian Removal Act happen because of Jackson?

# data[].attributes.subject
Did the Indian Removal Act happen because of Jackson?

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, The Indian Removal act did happen because Andrew Jackson. signed the removal act. while he was president which kick the indians out.

# data[].attributes.body
The Indian removal act was not justified. i don't think the act was necessary couldn't they have shared the land instead of kicking them out. The Indians were also born there so they deserve the same rights as the Americans.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Jackson pretty much said that the Indians dont belong with the Americans.
2. the Indians had concerns because Jackson is supposed to be a friend to everyone but he was trying to make them leave still.

# data[].attributes.body
The Removal of the Indians was not justified because the main reason for the removal of the Indians was to free up their land for the settlers. The Indians were treated unfairly because they were violently forced out with weapons and was not allowed to do anything about it.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The Indians were seen as racially inferior and were judged because they had a different way of living than the settlers. So, Andrew Jackson meant that the Cherokees could not be apart of the southerners civilized community because they would not be able to be happy in a community that had a different way of living and different views.
2. The Indians had concerns about Andrew Jackson's sincerity because he claimed to be a friend of the Indians, yet he was forcing them to leave and were going to let the Southerners take over the Indian's homeland. Also, the Indians knew that Andrew Jackson had violated prior treaties.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson caused the Indian Removal Act to happen because he signed the act. The Southerners wanted the Indians to leave because they wanted their land and believed that the Indians were racially inferior. Even though the Southerners wanted the Indians to move, it was Andrew Jackson's signing of the Indian Removal Act that forced the Indians out. On page 1 in paragraph 4 of the article it says, "Soldiers were told to swarm Cherokee houses without warning, giving the Indians no time to put up a fight or even pack their belongings. Families would be taken at once and brought into one of several camps. The men must be polite and not use profanity.”

# data[].attributes.body
Overall, Andrew Jackson was a good president. Jackson was the father of the Jacksonian Democracy and wanted the common man to benefit from new legislation, which is why he disapproved of legislation that expanded the federal government. He also defeated the Second Bank of the United States because he believed that it only benefited rich people and left out the common people. I disagree with Jackson's decision to sign the Indian Removal Act because it caused lots of Native Americans to lose their lives on The Trail of Tears.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson might have been called "King Andrew" because he was a man of the people and valued the protection of the common man. Jackson's leadership skills and strong personality made people view him as a King.

# data[].attributes.headline
in my opinion it was not justified since personally there was no reason for them to make them leave since they were born there and deserve the same rights as we do and they couldve traded or maybe even gotten their way in a different way instead of making a lot of native american lives die 

# data[].attributes.subject
in my opinion it was not justified since personally there was no reason for them to make them leave since they were born there and deserve the same rights as we do and they couldve traded or maybe even gotten their way in a different way instead of making a lot of native american lives die 

# data[].attributes.body
1. andrew jackson was trying to say that they do not belong in a civilized  white community and do not belong there with them and is impossible for them to live happy and good with them so they should just move
2.they are concerned about his sincerely because they didn't know if he was being nice or not to them and if it was actually true

# data[].attributes.body
1. What Jakson meant by this quote was, He was trying to help better the indians by getting them out of that climate because americans did not necessarily enjoy them being around. And thought by signing that act to remove all indians would help. did not work in his best itress.
2.They had serious concerns about Jackson because as he referred to the cherokees as ¨friends¨  he also removed many indians from there home where they were living and sent them off. now that doesn't sound like something a ¨friend¨ would do. So that's why they had concerns as to when Jackson called them my friends.

# data[].attributes.body
I personally would have to say it was not justified because it's not fair in any shape way or form to .push out one race completely because they need space. There could of been many other ways to go about this situation rather than kicking these indians out of there land and leaving them with little to no options.

# data[].attributes.body
Honestly it was not justified because the Indians were not causing any harm and didn't deserve their removal. The Whites benefited from the removal act, they gained more land and the effect of this was hurt Indians. Some evidence to support this is,  “I saw the helpless Cherokees arrested and dragged from their homes and driven at bayonet point into stockades. And in the chill of a drizzling rain on an October morning I saw them loaded like cattle or sheep into six hundred and forty-five wagons and headed for the West.” This just simply shows how badly they were treated in their removal.

# data[].attributes.body
1.Andrew Jackson had his beliefs and those were that the indian americans would be better off heading west.  If the indians didn't go west they  wouldn't make it out of the war, Jackson believed they had to be separated so they could survive and this was the only way.

2.The Cherokees had major concerns about his sincerity because Jackson referring them as his friends didn't make sense. The Indians didn't have it easy when they were removed from their homes because they were abused a lot by the soldiers.

# data[].attributes.body
The indian removal happened because of Andrew Jackson singing of the act. The soldiers were specifically told what to do in this removal on pg 1 were it says, “Soldiers were told to swarm Cherokee houses without warning, giving the Indians no time to put up a fight or even pack their belongings. Families would be taken at once and brought into one of several camps.¨ All these actions were done as they were planned to be done.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson was not a good president because I believe the Indian Removal Act was unnecessary and it caused a lot of problems between the Indians.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson was viewed as a leader amongst the citizens. The qualities Jackson possessed a great personality and a goodwill which is a great example of a king.

# data[].attributes.body
While Americans benefited because of the removal of the Native Americans I personally do not believe that one person's gain is worth the pain and suffering of another. Americans did not even try to compromise with the Native Americans that were there first. Americans  just went straight to forcefully taking the Native Americans from their homes. Not only that but, "...soldiers often raped, robbed, and murdered the Cherokee (The Cherokee Trail of Tears). Andrew Jackson demanded peace from the Native Americans but when it came down to it they treated the Native American with absolutely no respect or humanity. That is why I believe it was not justified because of the inhumane way Andrew Jackson and his troops treated the Native Americans.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What Andrew Jackson meant when he said this was he didnt believe that they would do well in the new environment and community he was building. He was trying to convince these people that  what he was going to do to them was going to benefit them long term. Jackson was just trying to  justify or excuse the fact that he was ripping thousands of people from their homes.
2. They had serious concerns about his sincerity because he was calling them friends but then taking thousands of innocent people and ripping them from their homes. Not only that but many of the Native Americans were raped,abused,and killed in the process of "peacefully" removing them. If he was so sincere about them being friends the Native Americans wouldn't have suffered so much for the gain of Andrew Jackson.

# data[].attributes.body
The Indian Removal Act happened because of Jackson. I say this because in the text it says, "The United states Ary rounded up the Cherokee who were living in Tennessee,Georgia,North Carolina, and Alabama" (pg1). The U.S army is in parts controlled by the President and for an act to be passed the president has to agree with it. Therefore Andrew Jackson passed that act because he supported it so the act happened because of him.

# data[].attributes.body
I personally think he was not justified to removing the indian because there was no need to push another race out because there is no room. They can share the land. But it was the Indians land first so they must respect that but they had not. SO with these thou I say he was not justified.

# data[].attributes.body
Jackson was the president at this time and he represented his people so if they wanted the bill to pass he most likely listened to them about it .

# data[].attributes.headline
Did the Indian Removal Act happen because of Jackson?

# data[].attributes.subject
Did the Indian Removal Act happen because of Jackson?

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, the Indian Removal Act did happen because of Andrew because during that time Jackson was president and he was the one who had decided on the law and passed it to congress, and since congress passed the law the act happened. In the text it states "In 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act" (pg.1 paragraph 3). This shows that in order for congress to get a law it has to be sent from the president.

# data[].attributes.body
The indian removal act did happen  because of andrew since when he was president he passed the indian removal act and even said that many of those native americans were kicked out

# data[].attributes.body
i think he was a good president he represented his people well. He was in a war and people seemed to like him.

# data[].attributes.body
While Andrew Jackson forced thousands of Native Americans out of their land I believe that Andrew Jackson was a good president for his own people. He believed in helping the common people and not just the rich and that's why so many people respected him. He looked out for the people who were not of high status while the other presidents who came from wealth only looked out for the wealthy people.

# data[].attributes.headline
Did the Indian Removal Act happen because of Jackson? 

# data[].attributes.subject
Did the Indian Removal Act happen because of Jackson? 

# data[].attributes.body
The act happened because of Jackson hands down. It happened because he had alot of power at the time which meant he could have the ability to put something like that into play. So for the native americans they were forced to leave and make a trip somewhere else because the act did not want them there.

# data[].attributes.headline
Did the indian removal act happen because of Jackson?

# data[].attributes.subject
Did the indian removal act happen because of Jackson?

# data[].attributes.body
I think Jackson was a cause of the act because he was the man of the people so what the people wanted is what he wanted and in 1830 the indian removal act was passed and if he did not liked it he couldve vetoed it.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Being different from the other 6 presidents as Andrew Jackson didn't fit that mold of being wealthy and having the top of the line education.
2. Andrew Jackson was a mad of the people as he was very similar to them as he didn't grow up in a rich home instead growing similar to the people.

# data[].attributes.headline
He was called ¨king Andrew¨ because of the image he painted for the citizens. He helped alot of people out with many different situations and they kinda just looked up to him after doing so as a king/president.

# data[].attributes.subject
He was called ¨king Andrew¨ because of the image he painted for the citizens. He helped alot of people out with many different situations and they kinda just looked up to him after doing so as a king/president.

# data[].attributes.body
i think the story is about indians getting their land taken away from white people.

# data[].attributes.headline
1. What made Jackson a common man? 2. Why was he  a man of the people

# data[].attributes.subject
1. What made Jackson a common man? 2. Why was he  a man of the people

# data[].attributes.body
1. The aspect that made jackson a common man was that he would fight anyone and didn't care if he'd get hurt or not.
2. He was the man of the people because he sided with the people the most.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Andrew Jackson was self-made and did not have a wealthy and educated background like the former presidents.
2. Andrew Jackson was considered a man of the people because he was liked by most people and he came from similar backgrounds as the common people.

# data[].attributes.body
Is andrew Jackson a good president? in my opinion, no he is NOT a good president. Even though he did help fight in a war and helped his fellow citizens out, it doesn't hide the fact that he made thousands of Native Americans to leave their land, which in fact is THEIR LAND and how can you just kick someone out of their land if its not even yours. In my opinion he was already a terrible president for even doing that and was very unnecessary.

# data[].attributes.body
1. When Jackson said this quote he was expressing to the Native Americans that he is not against them and that he has no intention to decieve them but due to the circumstances it is not possible for the Native American tribes and the white citizens to survive and thrive with everyone in one setting. This caused Jackson to remove the Native American tribes.

2. When Jackson referred to the Native Americans as his "friends" it caused suspicion of his sincerity because it seemed as if he was being sarcastic to get Native Americans to not be upset about this move. He wanted the Native Americans to understand that this was a strategic move and not personal toward them or their cultural backgrounds. Which might not have been all the way true anyway.

# data[].attributes.body
He was called "king Andrew" because Jackson had a strong will and he vetoed bills he thought werent right.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was a good president. He had fought in war and he only wanted laws that benefited the people .

# data[].attributes.headline
Did the Indian Removal Act happen because of Jackson?

# data[].attributes.subject
Did the Indian Removal Act happen because of Jackson?

# data[].attributes.body
While I believe Andrew Jackson pushed for the 'Indian Removal Act" since he was a man for the people and that's what they wanted but heir were other factors such as The Act passed 28 to 19 in the Senate and 102 to 97 in the House.

# data[].attributes.headline
Was Jackson a good or bad president, why?

# data[].attributes.subject
Was Jackson a good or bad president, why?

# data[].attributes.body
Jackson was a good president, because he had took many risks, he was strong minded, he also had fought in the Revolutionary War when he was 13 years old and the war in 1812

# data[].attributes.body
I think the story was about white people wanted moreland. So it did not matter, if they were poor or rich they still gave them land. The land of the indians and made them move elsewhere.

# data[].attributes.headline
did the 'Indian Removal Act' happen because of jackson

# data[].attributes.subject
did the 'Indian Removal Act' happen because of jackson

# data[].attributes.body
yes, the indian removal act happened because of jackson because jackson was the president during this time and made all the big plays in his role. because jackson was a people person he agreed with the majority of the people who said they did not like natives

# data[].attributes.body
1. he wasn't like the other presidents and jackson wasn't rich.
2. he wasnt as educated as the other presidents but everyone still seemed to like him maybe because those people could relate to him.

# data[].attributes.headline
Did the 'Indian Removal Act' happpen because of Jackson

# data[].attributes.subject
Did the 'Indian Removal Act' happpen because of Jackson

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, the "Indian Removal Act" did happen because of Jackson. Jackson was president at this time and called all the shots in the White house. Jackson was a common man for the people. Majority of the "People" wanted Native Americans gone because they felt threatened by them and that the Native Americans were taking their land.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was called "King Andrew" because that is how the people and the public saw him. Andrew did so many things for the people which made them look at him in a "King" type of way.

# data[].attributes.body
1. He was a self-made man who declared education an unnecessary requirement for political leadership.

2. Jackson wasn't like the other presidents so he had the same view of the world as a regular citizen.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew was called a king in his lifetime because of how good of a leader he was for not only his people but people in the political office.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the Indian Removal Act did happen because of Jackson because he signed the act to get it passed. He is also the head leader of the United States Army. " the United States Army rounded up the Cherokee who was living in Tennessee, Georgia, North Carolina, and Alabama like herded cattle. The soldiers would often 🤬, robe, and murder the Cherokee."

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson was called King Andrew because instead of just listening to congress like previous presidents he used his power to pursue his agenda. He used his veto powers to cancel bills that he did no agree with but his opponents accused him of crushing the constitution.

# data[].attributes.headline
1.He wasn't wealthy,educated,or from the east like the previous presidents before.

# data[].attributes.subject
1.He wasn't wealthy,educated,or from the east like the previous presidents before.

# data[].attributes.body
2. Since he wasn't wealthy he saw the world from the view of a regular citizen.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Jackson was a "common man" because he was self educated and made education unnecessary requirement to become a political leader.
2. Jackson was the man of the people because he was a military hero, frontiersman, and a populist.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson might have been called "King Andrew" because he thought of the people

# data[].attributes.body
1. Andrew jackson was built different because he was not as educated or wealthy as the previous  6 presidents.
2.Jackson was now able to govern the US nation and the people around him had no problem at all with him.

# data[].attributes.body
i think this story is about how the indians were getting pushed away from their land. There were still a couple tribes left Jackson made an indian removal act so the rest of them got pushed out.The Native Americans went to court to fight but that didn''t work so the rest of the tribes were eventually all gone.

# data[].attributes.headline
Was Jackson a good president why or why not?

# data[].attributes.subject
Was Jackson a good president why or why not?

# data[].attributes.body
This can go either way, but I would have to say he was a good president for the most part. Jackson was a real honest president that was honest with his citizens. But on the other hand he had an act passed which meant the Native Americans had to migrate other where. And that doesn't look good on him because they were there first and for them to just have to up and leave isn't really fair. So overall Jackson was a good president.

# data[].attributes.body
Jackson might been called King Andrew because he had led with the idea that with only having a strong congress could represent the people best. Jackson also felt like congress wasn't representing the people so he had stepped in to take over

# data[].attributes.body
He might have been called king because he was a leader to the people and a good one. He fought for his people and that is why he was called king.

# data[].attributes.body
Jackson was a good president. He took risks, he defeated stereotypes, and took on many issues head on with immediate decisions. Any person who is willing to use their power to make risky choices is brave and should be admired. Despite the talk and ideas of people not believing Jackson was "fit" to be president, he still came in and changed the world and stereotype of the president having to be this super smart and rich guy! And did it by still keeping our country in one piece. This led him to make history.

# data[].attributes.headline
Andrew Jackson, was he a good or bad president?

# data[].attributes.subject
Andrew Jackson, was he a good or bad president?

# data[].attributes.body
Although one could argue in favor of either I think he was a bad president. While he was strong-minded which is a good trait, he took too many extreme action, and did not speak for all people just the people that resembled himself. He did complete some successful treaties I believed he caused unnessaccary conflicts and caused Native Americans Tribe to lose their homes.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Andrew Jackson considered himself as a spokesman who was different from the other presidents before him and thought that he was above the political system
2.Andrew considered himself a man of people since he was a populist who enchanted the people with what they wanted to hear and what they wanted to happen in order for him to get a good vote

# data[].attributes.body
he was a people president if that makes sense, he put us as people in the middle of things well if your skin tone was a lot like his but he was also a bad one because of his overly strong belief in states rights and his act which kicked natives off their own land

# data[].attributes.headline
Was Andrew Jackson a good, or a bad president?

# data[].attributes.subject
Was Andrew Jackson a good, or a bad president?

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson had the makings of a strong leader, with what he was capable of. However, this did not completely translate into his ability as President. The Indian Removal Act was evidence of this.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson may have been called ¨King Andrew¨ because he made such a big impact on the commoners and how much he changed the government.

# data[].attributes.body
1. he was an unpopular man who made something of himself
2. He made himself known and he worked hard to get on top of the political chain and he looked for any fights he can join,