# data[].attributes.headline
3. Hendrick Hudson central school district v. Rowley 

# data[].attributes.subject
3. Hendrick Hudson central school district v. Rowley 

# data[].attributes.body
Case was brought to trial because Schools were not required by law to provide sign language interpreters.

The outcome of the courtcase was a victory because it led to the creation of I.E.P

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 11 Oberti vs. Board of Education of the Borough of Clementon School District

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 11 Oberti vs. Board of Education of the Borough of Clementon School District

# data[].attributes.body
Rafael Oberti was a child with down syndrome and his parents wanted him in a regular educational setting, but he needed the necessary support that they weren't giving him which caused the lawsuit.
Both federal courts ruled that the school wasn't doing enough in the classroom for Rafael. This case established a test for school districts to see if they were in compliance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 12- 6. Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F (1999)

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 12- 6. Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F (1999)

# data[].attributes.body
The case was brought to trial because the student was in a motorcycle accident and was denied nursing (aide) services.

Outcome- Required public school districts to fund "continuous, one-on-one nursing care for disabled children" despite arguments from the school district concerning the costs of the services."

# data[].attributes.body
- The case was brought to trial because of educational segregation
- It affected special education because civil rights aided with equal education for both groups
- Children deprived of educational resources
- The Supreme Court ruled that separating children in public schools on the basis of race was unconstitutional

# data[].attributes.body
What?- A six year old child, Daniel, who had Down Syndrome, was placed in a half-day special education class with the other half spent in a tradition Pre-Kindergarten program at the request of his parents.
Why?- In Daniel R.R. v. State Board of Education (1989), it was determined that students with disabilities have a right to be included in both academic and extracurricular programs of general education.

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 10. Daniel R.R.v. State Board of Education

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 10. Daniel R.R.v. State Board of Education

# data[].attributes.body
-Why? Handicapped children in the United States were receiving inadequate education or none at all. It was highlighted in the case involving Daniel R.R.v.
What was the outcome? It was determined that students with disabilities have a right to be included in both academic and extracurricular programs of general education

# data[].attributes.headline
5. Oberti v. Board of Education of the Borough of Clementon School District

# data[].attributes.subject
5. Oberti v. Board of Education of the Borough of Clementon School District

# data[].attributes.body
How it started:
-Raphael had down syndrome and wanted to be put into regular classroom setting
-Some school districts have concerns with students with disabilities being in regular classes
-District wanted him in separate school district

Outcome:
-School district did not do enough time for student to do the student
-Raphael was admitted into regular ed class and made sure that he had necessary skills and services as any other student in his class

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 8: PARC vs Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 8: PARC vs Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

# data[].attributes.body
-It was brought to trial to overturn the Pennsylvania law and secure a quality education for children
- Nancy Bowman was told she no longer qualified for public school and didn't receive education for the next 12 years

-It resulted in a content decree in which the state agreed to provide a free public education for children with mental retardation.

# data[].attributes.body
GROUP 9
The case was brought because she tried to have a sign language interpreter. IT affected the students attendance and opportunity. The out come use of FM hearing aid sign language instruction for several teachers, and teletype machines in school for students.

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 2 - PARC (Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children) v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (1972)

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 2 - PARC (Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children) v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (1972)

# data[].attributes.body
This case was brought to trial, because people with disabilities were denied access to attend public schools.
The outcome was, Pennsylvania opened up their schools to give opportunity and change the lives of students with disabilities.

# data[].attributes.body
The case was brought to trial following public school district in Topeka refusal to enroll the daughter of Oliver Brown at the school closest to their home, forcing her to ride a bus to a segregated black elementary school that is not as close. The outcome of the case was the court declaring the act unconstitutional due to the declaration that segregated public education was unequal.

# data[].attributes.headline
6. Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F(1999)

# data[].attributes.subject
6. Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F(1999)

# data[].attributes.body
This case was brought to trial because there was a disabled kid who was in a wheelchair, and his mother asked the school if they could provide care for her child because he's unable to do things for himself. The school said no and the mother of the child took it to court

The outcome of this case was that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) was required school boards to provide continuous nursing services to disabled students who would need it in the school day.