# data[].attributes.headline
 Michael.R 1. She doesn't really show any form of biased she seems as if she is overreacting of that is a good thing to make your forehead an advertisement

# data[].attributes.subject
 Michael.R 1. She doesn't really show any form of biased she seems as if she is overreacting of that is a good thing to make your forehead an advertisement

# data[].attributes.body
2. I think that it is a good idea that they are giving 10% to charity because they are helping others and as well as for their travels. But there is a possibility that the person who is commenting could be lying and not giving to any charity

# data[].attributes.body
I think that what is being. Sold is your forehead. I think that no one is going to go to adidas after seeing someone put the adidas symbol in their forehead. Sure there would be confusion and MANY questions but all in all only the foreheads are being sold. Yes, there is bias in this blog. I think this because the author states that she thinks I would be dangerous to promote companies that have been accused of unethical practices.

I don't know, I have mixed feelings about this because they don't say which charity and there is a possibility that they might just be saying it so that people don't judge them as much, and so that they look good. Also, companies will think they're better people and then the girls have a better chance to get paid by bigger companies.

# data[].attributes.body
She is donating to charity so that people think she is doing it for a good cause

# data[].attributes.body
1. Mila and her friend really want to go on vacation which made them sell theirselves to advertisers and they are letting them control what their face is going to look like to get money in return.
2. Giving a percentage to charity makes it sound better because they are helping others in need of the money.
I do think Mila is bias because they are making it sound like it's not a big deal even though they are selling their forehead

# data[].attributes.body
1. Mila and her friends are the real ones being sold. They are selling themselves to be Abe to go on vacation. There is bias in her article is where she thinks ands says that's it ok, where as some people think that's it's not and would be against the idea. There is also bias in the comments coming from two sides. I don't think that Liah has done this intentionally she was just stating her ideas and opinions. She could have known that some people would be against the idea she just wanted to do what she wanted.

2. I don't think that just because they are donating a portion to chairing makes it ok. They just want people to not think that they are selfish .

# data[].attributes.body
1.)Brands ar being sold and yourself because you are letting brands tattoo your face. I think tat she's being bias because she is saying that it is okay to sell yourself. I think she is doing a little bit intentionally to make it seem like its okay.
2.) No because we dont know what charity she is donating to and what if you dont agree with that charity. I think that they mention it because it makes them feel like what their doing is okay.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The idea of allowing others to own you for money is being sold. I don't think that having an logo on your forehead is promoting the company too much.
2. I don't think that donating 10% to charity turns the situation around. I personally think that the idea of putting a temporary logo on your forehead is fine just to go on a vacation, but to others with different opinions, I think that giving 10% to charity doesn't change anything. If you're just doing this to go on vacation, why would you mention that you're donating to charity? I think they included that just to look good.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  I think Mila presented some bias in her article

# data[].attributes.body
I think that giving a percentage to charity makes it sound better because you are helping advertise and your also helping people in need of the money

# data[].attributes.body
1. What's being sold is that it's okay to tattoo yourself for money. Mila's article doesn't seem bias. She talked about both the good and bad about tattooing your forehead for money.
2. One of the bloggers mentioned that Chloe and Liah will donate a % to charity. Although they may have wanted to do a good deed donating the money makes it seem like they want you to be okay with them tattooing their forehead for money.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Milia and her friend are the real ones being sold they are selling themselves so that they can travel. Mila is being quite bias as she is saying that it's ok to sell yourself to earn some money. Some people think it's not, due to their religion and culture, as well as their self esteem and conscience. I do think

# data[].attributes.body
2. Because they are giving to charity it makes them seem more better ,but if they don't it seems like they are poor and weird..

# data[].attributes.body
1. Idk
Never mind. Within all their donations and promotions, they simply want to collect money for their travels and their own personal gains. This may add exposure to companies that approach them, however even if it benefits them, it benefits the company as well.
2. Donation or not, it still is okay to do this form of advertising.

# data[].attributes.body
1 I think that the only reason that they are donating is to convince people that what they are doing is okay but they didn't mention what charity it would go to and they are only giving 10%. Thier foreheads are being sold

# data[].attributes.body
1)- the idea of the article is that 2 girls r willing to label brands on themselves to make money for a trip. They're giving up their fore heads to advertise, but this really is being taken out of proportion as they're not being innapropriate.
2)- the girls want to mention that they're giving away to charity so as to make the idea of tattooing themselves less proposterous to others. This doesn't change the idea itself, but at least now the money earned isn't only self profitable, and is being sent out for a noble cause.

# data[].attributes.body
1. In my opinion, what is really being sold is that it's fine to sell your body for money. Mila does present some bias in her article because she states that, personally, she thinks that it might be dangerous to promote cooperation that have been accused of doing unethical practices.

2. I don't think that

# data[].attributes.body
1. The object that is really Being sold is your fore head. you are giving up your forehead to advertise the ads that you are getting paid for. Mila Is presenting some sort of bias in her own article by telling everyone that selling your forehead can be okay.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The student's foreheads is what is being sold. I think Mila does present bias because she is leaning more towards the advantages of tattooing your forehead, rather than the disadvantages. I think she did do this intentionally so that others think that what she is doing is good and only good things can come out of their choices.

2. If you donate some of the money that you make to charity, then you are not being as selfish. You can give back to others that need help, because others are helping you as well. So it goes both ways. Although, it is a bit inappropriate to sell your self out just to earn money, especially if you don't agree with the company and what they are selling. They also don't mention what charity they are donating too, so you don't know if their donation is going to a good cause.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Their foreheads are being sold to make lots of dough.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think what is being sold is the idea that selling your forehead to make money, is ok. Although i think that it is ok to advertise on your forehead, I believe Mila has put a bias in her article. i feel she believes that it is ok to tattoo her forehead, and there should not be a problem with it. She has done this intentionally so that the other people reading the blog would be on board with selling their foreheads.
2. They have mentioned that they are donating 10% of their funds. Although this a noble act, it does not make selling their foreheads seem better than it is. I think that they mentioned this because they want people to see that they aren't just selling their foreheads for themselves but they are being somewhat charitable and trying to help others.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The object that is really being sold is the person themselves, the foreheads specifically. Mila does present bias in the article. The bias she clearly represents is that Mila does not approve of the girls tattooing their foreheads. She clearly states "They are promoting the idea that selling yourself is ok."
2. They may just be stating that they will donate, however they actually may not. They want to make themselves sound good and very polite and generous. People will be sucked into the message that girls are sending. Some people will start to believe that this is actually for a good cause.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is being sold is the idea of being paid to tatoo yourself. Is the blogger seems to be opposed to the idea as she is always giving little jabs and making small comments about them being fishy. I think partially what is being sold is as well the advertisers. This is kind of like free promotion to any company as a way to promote any product for money.
2. Sure they are doing charity, but how much? Oh yeah....10%...why not more??? Maybe because they want more money for themselves and they think by adding the fact that they are donating 10% of their money to charity will show people that this idea is benefitting others as well. I honestly think this is a way to just make themselves look better. Do you think that charities want money from people that are tattooing themselves.