# data[].attributes.body
Good things:
Very good use of resources and good knowledge of content through referencing.
Improvement:
Too much use of hand gestures takes away from the impact of the presentation.

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
Very visually appealing
Great back story
Improvements:

# data[].attributes.body
Done well:
good pace, clear voice and volume, simple layout, definitions
Improvements:
didn't notice reference bubble, run out of time

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
Strong start in presentation, good projection.
Putting the arrows in the prezi so it is very clear which bubble to go to next
good use of question time

Things to improve on:
volume on video a bit hard to hear at times due to volume from other group

# data[].attributes.body
Great voice when presenting- very clear, and engaging
The Prezi itself looks very good- it is awesome that you have few words on the slides, as that makes it easier to follow.

Unfortunate for time.
The video sound is quiet, and not easy to hear or understand

# data[].attributes.body
first speaker had a clear speaking voice and had nice eye contact
Prezi was a bit quiet
nice amount of info on prezi but moved to quickly
second speaker was very clear and engagin with audience

# data[].attributes.body
Good to include equity opportunities for students that struggled.
Good use of other technology for the actual assessments
Awesome to have difficulty levels
Nice work in education terminology, but might be a good idea to define them a bit.

# data[].attributes.body
- Good homepage on prezi
- Well prepared 2 minute prezi video
- Good justification of the use of prezi
- Good backing research - prepared Q&A

- probably don't highlight what you could improve on within your speech (Q&A specifically)

# data[].attributes.body
Done Well:
- voice projection
- intro before video
- good justification of why you incorporated certain things
- good recovery, using the question time and having definitions ready.
Improve:

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
-Good introduction
- Good explanation of concepts
- Prezi layout is simple and effective
- Clear speaking and good use of volume
Things to improve on:
- Reduce reliance on palm cards in order to be more interactive
- Better timing of speech
-

# data[].attributes.body
Things did well:
- Introduced all members
- Good explanation of task
- Good use of research
- Good projection of voices for both speakers

Things to improve on:
- Maybe explain the assessment and prezi yourself rather than relying on the video - talking to the audience feels more interactive and personal
- Maybe give less information to the audience and just talk to them rather than at them

# data[].attributes.body
Good things:
-engaging voice
-visually appealing prezi and relevant background
-using references to back up statements
-pop culture: horrible histories
Things to improve:
-avoid 'eh'
-2nd speaker's volume
-some slides contain too much words
-fonts on some slides are too small
-2nd speaker's pace

# data[].attributes.body
Things done well:
- great how
- great signposting
- was just really good in general

Things to improve on:
- maybe watch the amount of hand gesture, can get distracting
- define all terms
- more time on each prezi slide

- slow down speech to give audiences time to digest what you’re saying

# data[].attributes.body
Great eye contact
Volume variation would be good
Fought the questions well and had a good understanding of sources
Maybe didn't fully explain the games etc involved

Overall: 5.7

# data[].attributes.body
good point about self-regulated work and formative assessments used in FINLAND

# data[].attributes.body
things you did well:
interesting prezi background
good linking to ICT elements
good inclusion of challenges the students may face

Things to improve:

# data[].attributes.body
Done well:
volume, clear voice, definitions, engaging presentation, good pace, engaging prezi
Improvements:
more eye contact

# data[].attributes.body
Did well in using a vidoe to explain your prezi, however more interaction was needed with audience during the 2 mins ?
Prezi was really well set out
great speaking voice
unlucky with time

# data[].attributes.body
Good:
- great speaking voice & great pace
- relevant resources in prezi
- great modality in speech

Improvements:
- clearer/less blurry images
- larger text on prezi perhaps
- perhaps more research in response to Q&A and the justification of kahoot

# data[].attributes.body
done well:
-first speaker did well not relying on the palm cards to heavily.
- small intro of what you were talking about before jumping into individual parts of the speech
- talked about the curriculumn
improvements:
- writing on prezi is very small and bunched up, especially in 'learning objective'
- q and a needed a bit more background and explanation.

# data[].attributes.body
Make sure when you give info, reference the source within the speech.
It may not seem like a big thing but be careful not to rock when you speak. Stand strong, what you've got to say is supported, be confident with it.
Be careful of saying "they". Who are "they
Press layout: have a look at font sizes, some things were very small for my blind eyes!
Awesome time management

# data[].attributes.body
hello in finish! hello from finland

# data[].attributes.body
Great speaking by all your presenters.

prezi was well designed

Interesting take on students and their intention span. I thought it couldve been backed up by a source.

Also, perhaps explain why you chose kahoot as method of assesment
Finished within time limit.

# data[].attributes.body
which sauce good sir?

# data[].attributes.body
Good inclusion of sources and very knowledgable.
Well prepared
Good speaking Voices
Kahoot was relatively successful
Good engagement with audiences
Perhaps a little more time could have been taken to explain prezi

# data[].attributes.body
Tristan great speaker, great eye contact and pitch! However need to share the love around of public speaking.
Weldone Ebony, good confidence and eye contact. Just a little louder and slow down a little on speech, however overal great work!

Good work on use of references, plenty of reinforcement of your speech.

Once again great work accommodating a variety of learners.

# data[].attributes.body
I think some more incorporation is needed for refreshing the student. Not allowing for one assessment task. Consider the future, even if hypothetical. Our job as educators is keep educating. Even if it seems repetitive?

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
- well paced speech
- good explanation of prezi
Things to improve:
- more definitions and explanation of terms

# data[].attributes.body
Done Well:
- Speech follows a logical sequences, explaining everything in the prezi
- Good flow between speakers
Can Improve:
- A little louder next time
- Back up definitions with evidence (quotes)

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
- Good speakers, very easy to listen to and follow.

Things to improve:
- explaining task a bit better

# data[].attributes.body
things did well:
-Good introduction
-stated your intentions immediately without waffle beforehand
- good justifications
- prezi and speech compliment each other rather than having the audience focus on two separate things.
improvements:

# data[].attributes.body
Good structure
Explain formative assessment more without saying to stop anxiety
You didn't explain how the teacher is able to get the students results to assess them so add that in if you were to present again.
Good use of colour and layout.

# data[].attributes.body
Prezi was very well laid out
Content was very relevant
however more interaction with the actual prezi is needed

# data[].attributes.body
Good:
- confident presenters with good eye contact
- love how you defined your terms (self-directed learners)

Improve:
- a tad bit louder

# data[].attributes.body
Inclusion of kahoot was great
Maybe make some of the text on the prezi more popping, was hard to read from the back

# data[].attributes.body
The Prezi is really well created
Great use of referencing within the speech.
Good pace throughout the presentation
Maybe speak more to the audience other than just Lauren

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
great referencing back to prezi and it is very engaging
good amount on prezi sections
lots of different styles of learners
To improve:
bit more eye contact, just reading off palm cards

# data[].attributes.body
Clear speaking voices
Good inclusion of sources
Good acknowledgement of each speaker by each speaker

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
Well spoken
Easy to read Prezi
Good acknowledgement of of each speaker

Things to improve on:

Make sure you're using time effectively, don't go over time limit and keep the amount of content spoken about to a minimum to keep people engaged.
Make sure to directly reference who you're getting your sources from

# data[].attributes.body
Great contrast of colours in prezi, it made it eye catching and easy to read
Nice focus on avoiding stress
Very layered and thought-out prezi structure
Inclusion of quiz was great to see

Improvement:
Personally, I would have liked to see more learning sources on the actual prezi, such as images of working, to make it more convenient for students

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
- Well paced
- Nice thing about stress
Things to improve on:
- Projection
- Maybe more use of studies/theories

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
- introducing speakers
- interaction with the prezi
- clear, simple, colourful prezi
- good stance in presenting
- good timing
- great presenting skills

Things to improve:
- better explanation of concept such as learning preferences
-  better plan for Q and A

# data[].attributes.body
Confusing switches, no structure with blocks
Knows speech well; great eye contact
Great use of assessment tasks ie kahoot, investigation etc
Q&A was good, but seemed a little forced, like an extension of the speech
Really great work :D

Overall: 7

# data[].attributes.body
Really great speaking.

Love the use of Kahoot for students making their own quizzes.

The layout of the overall assessment works really well and flows logically.

The Prezi seems very engaging for students and the different activities look very interesting for students also.

# data[].attributes.body
Prezi is visually appealing and thematically appropriate!
Crime scene idea is really cool, and awesome justifying of how pop culture fits with education.

# data[].attributes.body
great prezi- worked well with 'history'  focus, easy to follow and understand.
good use  of Q and A time- kahoot as an assessment worked surprisingly well, i definitely think a student would be capable of doing this assessment.
good speakers- clear and nice projection of volume.
good explanations of how links back to the criteria focus.

could improve on presentation stance ( bit distracting)
font could be bolder.

# data[].attributes.body
Apples has a really calm and confident speaking ability. Made the presentation easy to follow. Only thing I would give as con is the use of certain content like cartoons or jokes about Trump. I'm no sympathizer for him but I can't agree when seeing any political (current) item integrated into education as times right now could give repercussions from possibly the parents, depending on their stance or opinion of their kids being taught specific content.
But overall a good presentation!

# data[].attributes.body
Done well:
- Good showcase of the actual assessment

Work on:
- Dont define things without evidence (quote) to back it up
- Standing in front of board
- Back up why this is apparently 'more interesting'

# data[].attributes.body
Really good structure and good use of resources - well explained their relevance so good job.
Good explanation of TPACK
Good explanation of the criteria chosen
I Like the crime solving activity as form of assessment

# data[].attributes.body
Appleonia spoke well, good strucuturee

# data[].attributes.body
Things you've done well: good use of Q&A
Things to improve: maybe not to focus so much on what prezi is

# data[].attributes.body
Great Speakers, incredible revision of speech. Just be aware of words like "so" and "ah"
Good explanation of Formative and validation of why you're doing that form of assessment.
Love the choice of collaboration and range of assessment activities.
Great inclusion of pop culture to increase the students interest in the assessment.
Incredible work with references and reinforcing "why"
Love incorporating Q n A in 5min speech, prepared for any 'wild cards'

# data[].attributes.body
Done Well:
- Good integration of different search facilities and online resources
- Good rationale of how prezi is effective
- Colourful and interesting prezi
- Good definitions

Improvement:
- Not very much rationale about the types of assessment included - more about different types of learners - not really the task

Overall:
Well thought out prezi, a little bit on a confusing presentation

# data[].attributes.body
Things done well:
- Good justification in regards to the use of internet resources (YouTube, prezi etc.)
Things to improve:

# data[].attributes.body
Good:
- good & intriguing prezi, love the ideas of the prezi
- good references
- love the ideas of your assessment, was great to see your ideas

Improve:
- maybe avoid a4 paper - reduces eye contact & little bit louder please
- I would have liked some more background on the prezi & what the assessments at the beginning

# data[].attributes.body
Things to improve on
- Couldn't see the prezi because talkers were standing in front of it
- knowing the speech better

Things you did well:
- good speaking tone
- Good explanation of what prezi is

# data[].attributes.body
Speech has really clear and loud voices
Really cool Prezi
Good use of referencing within the presentation

Try keep the presentation within time, next time.
Maybe use more eye contact to engage the audience

# data[].attributes.body
good:
- good projection
- justifying the crash course
- good recovery in q & a
- kick starter questions were good
improvements:
- palm cards
- lots of references, try to put in your own words somewhere
- know the speech a bit better

# data[].attributes.body
Did well:
- Well spoken
- Nice Prezi layout
- Prezi layout relevant to topic

Things to improve:
- Make sure to introduce all speakers
- Don't focus so much on palm cards/paper
- Don't talk at the audience, talk to the audience
- Projection
- Work on staying within the time limit
- Stay concise
- Make sure you explain everything you need in the time given: work on time management

# data[].attributes.body
Done Well:
good introduction, colourful and engaging prezi
Improvements:
more eye contact

# data[].attributes.body
Done Well:
- Speaker 1 great pronunciation
- Speaker 2 great projection and eye contact
- Great evidence and quotes to back you up

Work On:
- Dont stand in front of the board - couldnt see prezi

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
- Great justification for use of prezi
- Good incorporation of 'how/why'
- Good projection
- Nice quick explanation during Q&A (awesome projection, nice backing up using sources)
Things to improve:
- Kind of standing in front of the prezi

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
- clear speaking
- good explanation of concepts

Things to improve on:
- Introduction of speakers
- Use palm cards if need them rather than pieces of paper and very large palm cards
- more eye contact
- better use of the prezi (go through the slides through the speech)
- better layout of prezi so it is in an understandable order
- more visuals in the prezi to make it more appealing
- better speech timing
- more of a Q and A

# data[].attributes.body
-First speaker could improve on eye contact and just reading off palm card. clear voice
-Second speaker more engaging voice and better eye contact
- in Q&A speaker was standing infront of prezi, bit hard to see
- Q&A wasn't a q and a, just an extension of speech
-3rd speaker good voice, spoke a little too fast
-nice background, great idea!!

# data[].attributes.body
Done Well:
Good use of readings for support
Good discussion of prezi however perhaps run through of prezi could have started earlier as group ran out of time.

Improvements:
Heavy reliance on palmcards

# data[].attributes.body
Done Well:
Great volume, clear speaking voices
Good explanation of definitions (formative/summative)
Nicely set out prezi, easy to understand, teaches well
Cool shirt
Improve:
Try for a bit more eye contact
Go through the prezi a bit more
Could be more concise, waffled slightly

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:

- Good explanation for all questions asked
- Cool assessment
Things to improve:
- Projection
- Explanation of which source (but nice recovery, good explanation when asked)

# data[].attributes.body
Great work being within the time limit, concise and to the point, easy to understand.
Good layout of prezi, good use and works well as a tool in collaboration with the kahoot assessment.
GREAT effort in taking the time to dress appropriately for the presentation/lesson.
Good eye contact.
I like the incorporation of the video which runs through how to use it.

Could improve on:
pace of the slides (matching up with what the speaker was speaking about)

# data[].attributes.body
Great to see that the background picture is of the roman empire, good backing of why prezi is gr8
Improvements: Time :-(
for next time, try to make your presentation more focused on a single detail of your prezi, and go into heaps of depth on it - try to let your prezi speak more for itself. This will hopefully make time less of an issue

# data[].attributes.body
Good structure, I like you took the synergy advice and explained who Timmy was.
Visually appealing Prezi.
You didn't explain the type of assessment used - summative or formative. Does the teacher get the results from the final quiz?

# data[].attributes.body
spoken well.
nice reference of sources.
good layout of prezi, visually appealing.
great links to the focus.

perhaps dress in appropriate attire? thongs, cartoon shirt, sun glasses on head, bit distracting.

# data[].attributes.body
Good things:
-good use of colours
-prezi is engaging
-prezi flows very well

Improve on:
-avoid' umm'
-volume
-eye contact
-spoke too fast
-use palm cards instead of A4 paper

# data[].attributes.body
Things done well:
- good use of engaging
- good continuing of speech even when wrong prezi slide up

Things to improve:
- make sure to project voice and non-verbally engage with audience
- make sure flow of where speech is going is clear
- numbers for activities and numbers in activities, maybe make this simpler so students can ask what question they’re specifically struggling with (even if just numbers and letters)

# data[].attributes.body
Good that you outlined the ICT Capabilities and Assessment Goals.

Prezi looks really good and engaging for students.

The extra instructions for students who made need extra help is a really good idea and positioned in a way that won't make students self-conscious.

# data[].attributes.body
-Good eye contact
-very clear speaking voices
-The Prezi is well organized and seems easy to follow and understand

# data[].attributes.body
-love your prezi!!!!! super aesthetically pleasing and clear
- first speaker: super clear voice and great eye contact, liked how you didn't read off your palm cards much.
-interesting idea for assesment, very engaging
-second speaker had good eye contact and clear voice.
-third speaker: clear and good eye contact, stand confidently next time--> your information was good and needs body language to back up

# data[].attributes.body
Really great layout, awesome visual design; very engaging!

# data[].attributes.body
Done well:
introduction, clear voice, referencing, good pace, simple prezi layout
Improvements:
volume

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
- great introduction
- good explanation of concepts
- clear speaking, well spoken
- well paced, within time limit

# data[].attributes.body
Done well:
Love the rock in the background
Speaker 1 - Lovely voice, clear, loud
Prezi structured well, simple and concise
Speaker 2 - Again, nice clear voice, confident and loud.
Good explanation of definitions
Speaker 3 - You people are just all good speakers.
Prezi was well explained, went through everything.
Improve:
Yeah nah I got nothing

# data[].attributes.body
Well done:
Strong introduction
Good use of sources
Nice and clear slide headings
Clear speaking voices
Perfectly times

Improvements:
Perhaps a little too much text on some slides

# data[].attributes.body
Nice focus on why both formative and summative assessment is included
Great use of literature, but early on in the speech when source information was mentioned, I didn't hear where the info came from
Neat presentation designed with time in mind! Good job

# data[].attributes.body
Highly engaging
Great use of colour
Great use of narrative/game
Really helps with the engagement
Good use of warmup
Does it teach the ICT skills?
Good use of perscribed reading
Kept going despite noise. Very undistracted

Overall: 5.5

# data[].attributes.body
Good that you have outlined the ICT and learning objectives.

Lots of research and support in your speech which is good.

I really liked the use of powerpoint for your speech - it made it extremely easy to follow and was done very well.

Great explanation of the Assessment.

# data[].attributes.body
Things to improve:
- try not to stress if you dont say word for word what your palm cards say
- maybe too many references / quotes (understandable given how much we need to analyse in such a short time)
- look into research on music (gaming music is made to hold concentration)
- image quality

Things done well:
- awesome use of references and fully explained the ‘how’
- good public speaking habits
- great q and a by speaker (really understood what you were saying)

# data[].attributes.body
Nice sources to support and references were made clear
Clear speaking voices, I could understand everything

Honestly, can't find any negatives

# data[].attributes.body
Good things:
- engaging voice
- good gestures
- visually appealing prezi
- good information/ references to back up statements
- great music
Improve on:
- avoid 'ah' 'umm'
- maybe would be a bit too much instructions for year 8 to follow?