# data[].attributes.body
The authors purpose of this article is that what the author is saying is trying to show how ICE is bad and they should shut it down and also trying to prove that mexicans come to have bright future they come to look for a job and they want a opp

# data[].attributes.body
1.The authors purpose of the article is too show how ICE is not doing what it was meant to do. So some people are trying to abolish or reform it. I do not agree that people should be separated from their family's so yea i do agree with the author.

2. The people working in ICE should be asked how would they feel if they were separated from there family just because they weren't from thus country but been living here most of their life. That should be brought up in a political conversation about immigration

# data[].attributes.body
1)The authors purpose of this article was to inform the reader on whats going on with the whole immigration and Trump issues. Hes also explaining what ICE is doing on separating families apart and them not being able to be with one another. His perspective in all this i think it was to get a type of message across the people because what good was it doing for ICE to separating families that may just have each other. I disagree with this article because there was no need for ICE to be doing such things to people just like us isn't right. 2) My recommendations regarding this whole problem is why was ICE separating families for in the first place .

# data[].attributes.body
1)The authors purpose in this article is to show how ICE is separating families. ICE has already  separated over 2,500 parents from their families at the U.S. Mexico border. The author's perspective on ICE is "How is ICE helping people if they are tearing families apart?" I couldn't agree more with the author because the people that are sent back aren't doing anything wrong and are being separated from their families.
2) My recommendations regarding this are that they should let people stay if they aren't doing anything wrong. Even if it isn't legal to stay it is still wrong to separate innocent people from their families.

# data[].attributes.body
1)The author's purpose for writing this article is to inform readers what is going on, in the detention centers and how ICE is separating families from each other. The author shows both views of ICE and disagrees with separation of families.I disagree with ICE separating families and show focus on trying to catch terrorist.
2)My recommendations regarding this situation is letting families stay trying to seek better lives for their children.I believe that ICE is doing wrong with separating families and try to stop the real problem with immigration.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The Christian Science Monitor Aspired to inform their audience of the type of terrorism ICE, whose purpose is to stop terrorism from entering our country, is inflicting on to immigration because of President Trump's policy. Even though from Trump's perspective, we are solving the problem, but in really we are throwing gasoline on the fire.
2.I would recommend allowing the immigrants in the U.S.A. to remain and enrolled in a new system of documenting immigrants, keep any other immigrants out, and give support to low income communties.

# data[].attributes.body
1)The author's purpose of writing this is to tell you how Ice is so violent of the immigration situation we go through yea by year.The police Ice is just so cruel and that has to change.
2) My recommendations for ICE after I read this article was that they need to make better laws for there will not be so many deaths cause of the hate people have against immigration.

# data[].attributes.body
1)The author´s purpose for writing this article is to show how ICE is separating families apart and have already separated more than 2,500 children from their parents at the U.S .-Mexico border. The Author´s perspective on the matter is ¨How is ICE helping people if they are tearing families apart?¨ I agree with the author because I see it as just separating families and not accomplishing anything else than that.
2) My recommendations in addressing the political conversation about immigration are to actually give people a chance to prove themselves as legal and to be allowed in the United States without having to worry about deportation or someone judging them.

# data[].attributes.body
The author's purpose of this article is to inform the readers about all the  recent problems  that ICE is causing. The author purpose is saying that he his disagreeing with Trump because he is trying to take people away from there families, i don't agree with that because just move the full family so that there won't be separation in families.

# data[].attributes.body
1.The author's purpose of this author to inform us about ICE .The author's point of view is that he disagrees with separating  families.I also disagree with Trump's actions to separate families.  2. My recommendation in addressing the political conversation about immigration is to let the ICE do there intend job that was to stop terrorism attacks from happening.

# data[].attributes.body
1) The authors purpose of this article was to inform the reader about how citizens america, immigrants, and Trump feel about ICE. He also wrote about how some people do not want to abolish ICE. i believe that the fact that the author wrote an article about people from around the world wanting to abolish ICE gives us the authors perspective of ICE. I think the author wants to either abolish or reform ICE. I do not agree with the way that ICE does its job. In this article a quote from Vedant Patel states that ICE is in fact not doing its job. I think that ICE is too big of an organization and it will take forever to abolish. We should not spend a lot of time trying to abolish ICE while people are suffering. I think that their rules or method of separating families and making immigrants suffer should be reformed. They should also give the immigrants a chance to those that deserve it. When addressing this political issue about immigration people should be shown the suffering that families go through when they are taken away from their families and their homes that they worked so hard for.

# data[].attributes.body
1) The authors purpose of this article is to explain and inform the reader about ICE. The author shows both perspectives of who agrees and disagrees about ´´ abolish ice´´. i agree with the author because they´re so focused on separating families when theres so many other things going on.

2) My recommendation is that they should let families stay together cause i dont see why its a problem having them in the US when they do nothing wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
1)  The authors purpose of the article is what our president is doing is not appropriate and that it is not acceptable. The authors perspective is he does not seem to agree with this decision that the president has done. I very much disagree with this article. Trump has became our new president and said that he wants ¨To Make America Great Again" but yet he wants to build a wall in the border line and now he separates children (from the age of 6 and above) from their own parents. What Trump is doing is not acceptable at all and this honestly does not fell like America anymore. People from other countries can not have a new start because  then they would get get deported back from where they came from.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The author's purpose for writing this article was to inform of Trump's laws and movements regarding immigration and the separation of families. His perspective is, that he disagrees with what Trump is doing about the separation of families. I disagree with him.

2. My recommendations regarding this are that the people should just let ICE do their job. They should worry about their family member after the movement is done. If they don't, then immigrants holding contraband will get into the U.S, while ICE is dealing with the protesters.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, the author´s purpose of this article was really to investigate or explore with the reader different perspectives of the controversial topic that is ICE. The article provides different quotes and statements that people against and supporting ICE have uttered. However, with this information, some evidence within the article can inference to the thought that the authors purpose it bring some sort of attention to the matter of ICE.  The author ends with a quote of  a couple suffering of the actions of ICE.

Immigration is such a controversial and sensitive topic that it can be frustrating to talk about. In my personal opinion, ICE is not the problem. The problem is the president we have in the White House ordering these people to commit these actions. In order to fix a problem in the U.S., we need to make sure that we are in check with everything in our power. Once our presidencial problem is fixed, we can work on improving the system of ICE.

# data[].attributes.body
The author's reason behind the article was to shine some light on ICE and how corrupted they're agency is. I agree with what the article said about the problems that Ice faces. People have flocked to america in search of a better life and a better future for they're family only to get here and hind in fear of being detained by ICE agents.
I recommend that more people go and protest, more people try and fight to bring ICE to and end or at least change they're ways. Because what ICE is doing is wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
1.) The author's motive of the article was to familiarize the reader about the problems immigration id facing with ice and how is it overwhelming our communities. The authors clarifies both aspects of the people who are against and for I.C.E. Personally i agree to abolish ice because I think families should be not separated because our presidents has something against immigrates. The are more important things happening in the world that Donald Trump can attend to.

# data[].attributes.body
1.The author's purpose to the article was to bring awareness to the issues going on on ICE. They mention both the opposing and for sides on abolishing ICE. I don't necessarily agree with the idea that ICE should be abolished. ICE was set with the main purpose to protect us from terrorist  attacks but with President Trump in power he manipulated it to something with a different purpose.
2. My recommendations regarding the political conversation would be to get ICE to doing what it was meant to do. It's supposed to watch out for terrorist attacks that could happen, protect us from threats not get rid of innocent people actually trying to make a better life for themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
1. This article is important to show the dangers immigrants are facing and how Trump's unjust agency ICE is treating people unfair. This formed a protest and if it works it can help immigrants get the fairness they deserve instead of harassed and sent back to their origin land.
2.Trump's ideals are far too unfair and unconstitutional so protesters stoop up for what they believed was unjust and formed the"Abolish Ice" protest.

Why is the article important?

What do you think about Trump´s ideals?

# data[].attributes.body
The author's purpose in this article is him saying how the ICE force is separating families and destroying them also because they cant see each other because they are being cruelly treated in some correction. These immigrants come to U.S to get a better employment to help their families and a better education or even safety. They don't come to steal jobs like people say, they actually do the jobs other people don't want to do. I agree with the authors perspective because he wants to abolish the ICE cruelty and there unfairness treatment. In my perspective i recommend that the ICE stops there mistreatment against the the immigrants and focus more on stopping crimes and terrorists.

# data[].attributes.body
The author´s purpose in this article was to inform the readers of what is going on with ICE. The author mentions both perspectives of those who are opposed to Abolish ICE and those who disagree with abolishing ICE. The authors perspective is that he disagrees with what is going on. I am conflicted because I believe that what ICE is doing is wrong, but i feel like they should not abolish ICE.

My recommendations in addressing the political conversation about immigration is they should give people who are not legal chances. Because I believe that if they want a better life they should be allowed it.

# data[].attributes.body
The author’s purpose of this article is to inform readers about the ICE situation going on. The author is saying that Donald trump is not doing a good job as president at the moment. i agree because looking at it, Donald trump is so focused on immigration and has a whole lot more to be worried about. My recommendations on Donald trump and ICE is that Donald trump should let them pass and do what they want as long as its legal because at the end of the day, immigrants only come to the united states because they want a better life, they don't wanna hurt anybody, nor cause problems.

# data[].attributes.body
The author's purpose in this article is to inform the reader of a current event that is immigration how it affects our communities. The perspective of such is showing both sides as opinions of whom are against the idea of getting rid of ICE and the people that say yes to getting rid of ICE as it has become a bigger issue and it should be abolished. In my opinion, I do agree, with the people that want ICE to be abolished since it affects immigrants which Ice plans to send back to their countries. Which I think effects them since they may have migrated to the US for a better employment, education or safety. It shouldn't be happening it’s supposedly the land of free but it hasn't been really as so. My recommendation in addressing the political conversation about immigration is Yes, there should be something done about ICE for everyone peace and safety. I do understand why they started this but it’s gotten out of hand they were supposed to do keep safe from any attacks not home hard working fathers trying to provide their children a better living.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think the author's purpose of the article is to bring awareness on the immigration issue that has currently risen in America. His perspective is that the government should improve the structure of ICE and keep immigrant families together. I agree because I believe ICE has been too harsh and merciless on how they are approaching the issue on immigration and are not even considering keeping the children and parents together.

2. My recommendation in addressing the political conversation about immigration is that everyone should just talk about it with an open mind. I think all party's should just sit down and calmly talk about the issues at hand and talk about what concerns them so much that their views on immigration are so different from the other party's. I think everyone should just listen and if they don't agree then they can come up with a solution that everyone agrees with that will not only make them happy, but make the lives of immigrants so much more easier and they won't have to live in fear of merciless deportation.

# data[].attributes.body
The author's purpose of the article was to bring awareness to the recent issues of ICE. The author mentions both perspectives of those that agree and disagree with abolishing ICE. I would agree that ICE should be abolished. I understand that immigrants have made it to the country illegally but it is no excuse to separate families and throw kids in cages. I would recommend that those in the political figure should differentiate the purpose of ICE and their actions and use those differences to make better changes.

# data[].attributes.body
The author's purpose of the article is to persuade readers to see how an argument is displayed for instance in this article it is about seeing if ICE, Immigration and Customs Enforcement is changing. His perspective is basically saying that taking down ICE is the best thing for most people because it is creating people to protest. I agree that ICE shouldn't be separating families for no use at all which therefore means I agree with the author.

I would recommend in addressing the political conversation and immigration that those from other countries wish to come to the United Sates of America should be allowed to come because there really isn't harm in doing so. And those who are in low income should be provided with better opportunities.