# data[].attributes.body
These 4 sources show that London wasn't a very nice place to live in, in the 18 - 1900's.

In source 1 it shows a very compact ally way. There are lots of kids standing about all together, there clothes are all dirty.

Source 2 shows 2 children, 1 looks to be about 6 and the other is a baby, the girl is holding the baby in her arms, the 2 children are very dirty, the older girls foot is all black, because of the horrible dirt.

Source 3 shows people sitting down in the streets of white chapel, in very bad conditions, some mothers are holding their baby's outside, in the merky conditions of London.

Finally source 4 shows 3 men, but not in well conditions, there is 1 man on the floor looking like a mess, then the 2 standing men are slouching looking very tired and not being able to work.

# data[].attributes.body
And someone who wouldn't donate or help poverty

In source 1 the title is just the name of the place and the year, this says th

# data[].attributes.body
That really didn't care about them and wasn't the type of person that would give them money

In source 1 the only title is the place and the time 1920, this says that someone took this picture to let people aware of what's going on and feel bad for them and allow others to feel bad too.

# data[].attributes.body
Source 1 shows how crowded the slums of London were. The pictures show people and a range of other materials in the the middle and at the sides of a narrow street. It's dated to 1902, white chapel, and is a photograph, so it is likely reliable. The photo was likely taken to show others unaware of the conditions what life was like.

Source 2 shows a young girl cradling a baby in her arms. Both are wearing old clothes and are covered in mud. It shows how poor the conditions people had to live in and how hard life was for young people in 1880. It is possibly a reliable source, however the picture has very little background, and so could've been set up. It was likely there for a similar reason to source one; To try and get people to help with the poverty these people were living in (even if they had to exaggerate).

Source 3 is a picture of a slightly bigger street with beggars and a few passers by in the street. The street seems covered in rubbish and the air looks like their is something in it (smog, maybe). It is likely a reliable source, as it is dated to 1890 and is a photograph of a whole street. It was likely taken to show what a street was like in the morning.

Source 4 is a cartoon of 3 men looking rather depressed while stood and sitting outside what appears to be a shop. This is not a reliable source, as it is a cartoon rather than a photograph, however that does not mean that it is a bad depiction of what life was like. It was likely created to show what life was like in

# data[].attributes.body
This says that poverty increased from 1880 onwards-

In source 2 the title is named 'slum children' this picture was taken by someone more higher up and of more importance

# data[].attributes.body
In these four sources they show how poor the conditions actually were in the slums of london.

In source one it shows us how dirty the slums were.I think we can trust this source as it has an address and a date at the top of the photo.

In source two you can see that little children were not only scruffy but also on their own, maybe even living on the streets wuth no parents.

In source three it shows us how cramped and how many people lived on the streets. You can also see hoe dark it was which could be smog.

Finally in sounrce four its showing us three men very fed up and sad. We can't trust this source fully as it is a cartoon.

# data[].attributes.body
These four sources show that London was dirty and crowded place to be. Families were living on the cold streets of London.

Source 2 shows that they might not have parents or any family. They look very young so this tells us that people in London had to defend for themselves.

Source 1 shows that it was a very crowded and cramped and many might be homeless.

Source 3 shows us in 1890 the streets weren't so busy, but there seemed to still be people around the streets.

The cartoon source 4 1899 shows us that they are sad and look quite depressed. Also they look wrinkly and worn out.

For the Dickens bleak house "black , dilapidated street, avoided by all decent people" shows that the streets weren't for posh or decent people because it was dirty and crouded.

For Dickens second bleak house " fog everywhere" shows that the smog got everywhere. This was a yellowy green smog which killed many people across London.This could be a primary source because Dickens wrote from his experiences in London and around the streets; that's why most of his stories are based on the Victorian era in England.

For the Dickens Oliver Twist "The kennel" is used in his writing to show it was a compact small area without much room. This also refers to the people being dogs or animals. Again this shows a bad side to Victorian England.

Lastly the Dickens Pickwick papers states"murky atmosphere" this tells us that it was dark murky and very grim place to live in. The air was thick and full of smog. You wouldn't be able to see as far as a arm's length because of how dirty it was.

Overall Victorian London was a dingy atmosphere and a unhappy place to live in because of how dirty the air and surroundings are. England in the Victorian's was not the place to be because of its health and Jack the ripper. He made it uncertain for people to live in London.

# data[].attributes.body
Sources show how people in London were not usually looking very happy and looking very dirty. We can see they are not so happy because they are not shown smiling.

In source 1 the street is covered with mess and rubbish, it is also very cramped. This was taken in Dorset St, Whitechapel in 1902 this is reliable because it gives us the name and date.

The children in source 2 have dirty feet and dirty clothes. They also have very messy hair, looking tired and sick.this is from the 1980s which isn't very reliable, as it doesn't have a specific or accurate date.

People in source 3 are looking miserable and very tired and worn out. They are all looking very bored and having a tough day to day life, this may be because it looks like there is much smog in the air making them Ill. We can alsonsee there are much less people here than in source 1, which was taken in 1902. This source is quite helpful by telling us it was taken in Whitechapel backstreet in 1890.

Source 4 shows us 3 miserable men. Who are east end loafers. The men are looking sick and tired much like everyone else in other sources and just standing around. This is a cartoon from Phil May 1899, which could not be 100% accurate as it is not a photo or a primary source.

Overall we can see how life in the 19th century was unpleasant because of the deadly smog and the many, many poor, dirty people on the streets. These photographs show the significant change in London over the past centuries.

# data[].attributes.body
The four sources show that London is a very cold, dark place and not a good place to live. Source one shows that it was a very poor place and not a very hygienic place you can tell this because they aren't in homes they are in the street sat on crates. Source two shows two children that look hungry and homeless and have no one to look after them you can tell this by the fact they are sat on their own. Source three shows a street with people sat at the side and the sky looks smoggy and the people look ill you can tell this because in between the buildings it is in clear and dirty. Source four shows three men looking miserable and they look like they are waiting for something this shows us that in 1899 it wasn't clean and bad time to live. People would have taken these photographs to see the changes in London.

# data[].attributes.body
Source 1 shows that it was tightly packed in the small alleyways.

The2 kids in source 2 are dirty and sad, they might be orphans and the older girl has to mother the baby.

The streets seem to be dark and gloomy in source  3 this is probably because of smog. There is also a lot of people on the streets.

In Source 4 the men are outside looking sad and tired or worn out

# data[].attributes.body
This shows us that the fog was very dangours and thick to breath in, this smog Was agreed yellow colour which killed many people around London. This could be a primary source because Dickens wrote about his experience in London

"Oliver twist " the Kennal is used in his writing to show that is was a very small compact area, this shows us that it was a bad side to Victoria England .

Last the dickens pick wick papers state "merky atmosphey" this tells us it was a very dark, murky place to live. The smog was so thick you could hardly see a thing !

# data[].attributes.body
Out of the 4 sources it shows how poor the conditions were in the slums of London.

In source 1 it shows how cramped the slums were. I think it is a reliable source because it has a date and address at the top, this photo also looks realistic not a cartoon.

It shows in source 2 that even children would be on the streets living. I think people would take these photos so other people can see what it is like to live a slum.

In source 3 you can see how dark the slums are and how the slum people don't like living there at all. It also shows the smog in the air, this would be extremely bad for the people on the slums.

Source 4, the cartoon source, shows the men are very sad and fed up. This source isn't very a reliable because it is a cartoon.

# data[].attributes.body
It shows how people in London were not usually looking very happy and looking very dirty. Also no one is smiling on any of the sources

In source 1 the street is covering with mess and very cramped. This was taken in Dorset St, Whitechapel in 1902 this is reliable because it gives us the name and date

The children in source 2 have dirty feet and dirty clothes. They also have very messy hair, looking tired and sick. This is from the 1980s which isn't very reliable as it doesn't have a specific or accurate date.

People in source 3 are looking miserable and tired people are not looking like they have a very interesting day to day life. The men in source 4

# data[].attributes.body
These four sources show that the London slums in 1902 were very crowded with people and also furniture and other objects, but in 1890 the streets were very bare and the people that were in the streets were mainly children who looked homeless. In the second source it shows that this girl had to look after a baby by herself and they obviously hadn't been showered or fed in ages. In source 4 it shows some men standing outside some place in scruffy clothes but still weren't as bad as other people showing that those three men maybe had a little more money than most people. All the kids have dirty chlothes on and no shoes. Not many had parents and the majority of them were homeless. In source 3 you can see that the London slums were filled with smog and were very dark and gloomy. People would've taken these photographs so that in the future you could see the changes made in London and to show how dirty and badly children were treated back then and it shows how much life in London and for children has improved.

# data[].attributes.body
The sources show that the London slums were a horrible and unhygienic place. It also shows that people that lived there were poor and the streets were really dirty and that it was not a nice place to live. In the first source it shows us how poor people were because they had to live on the streets. The second source shows us that kids would have to look after younger siblings because their parents either left them or are dead. Source C shows people living on the streets and how dirty it was. Source 4 shows us three poor men not looking very happy. These four sources show us that the London slums were a very crowded and dirty place to live in and if you did live there you were more likely to die at a young age

# data[].attributes.body
That the children were sad and dirty. I can see this by source 2

# data[].attributes.body
It shows that it wasn't a very nice and tidy place.The girl who is holding the baby has dirty feet and her clothes are all dirty , London slums were filled with people living on the streets and some with no parents. People wouldn't of had very good jobs if they were living on the streets. The time of Jack the Ripper would've been very dangerous for these people not having any security. These 4 sources show that London was a very dirty place in the 18 - 1900's. In source 1 it shows white chapel, it looked very compact and dirty. On source 2 the little girl is holding the baby, but they are both very dirty, especially the girls feet. On source 3 it looks quite dull, some mothers of baby are sitting on the pavement of the street, but she does look homeless. These four sources show that London was dirty and crowded place to be. Families were living on the cold streets of London.

Source 2 shows that they might not have parents or any family. They look very young so this tells us that people in London had to defend for themselves.

Source 1 shows that it was a very crowded and cramped and many might be homeless.

Source 3 shows us in 1890 the streets weren't so busy, but there seemed to still be people around the streets.

The cartoon source 4 1899.

These four sources show us that London was a vary dirty and crowded place to be, family's were living on the dark streets of London.source 2 shows us that they might not have parents or any family, they look very younge and scared, so this tells us that people in London had to deafened for them selves. Source 1 shoes that it was a cramped place to be and many might be homeless. Source 3 shows us that in 1890 was not as cramped and busy, but their was still homeless on the streets. In source 4 the cartoon 1899 shows us that people were very sad and depressed. The Children in the second picture to the right , look poor and very unfortunate but not homeless , they may be ill and unhealthy but still have some sort of home. The source is reliable because it is primary . It was a picture taken at the time and it isn't a fake , it was taken to show how children looked and if you look at how dirty they are and how shabby they look , you can take an educated guess on how they lived.

It shows how people in London were not usually looking very happy and looking very dirty. Also no one is smiling on any of the sources

In source 1 the street is covering with mess and very cramped. This was taken in Dorset St, Whitechapel in 1902 this is reliable because it gives us the name and date

The children in source 2 have dirty feet and dirty clothes. They also have very messy hair, looking tired and sick. This is from the 1980s which isn't very reliable as it doesn't have a specific or accurate date.

People in source 3 are looking miserable and tired people are not looking like they have a very interesting day to day life.

# data[].attributes.body
London slums were filled with people living on the streets and some with no parents. People wouldn't of had very good jobs if they were living on the streets. The time of Jack the Ripper would've been very dangerous for these people not having any security. A common job would've been prostitution as people wouldn't of had much choice for jobs. Source 1 shows people very cramped together with very little space, source 2 shows a young girl holding a baby - this might mean they've lost their parents or that their parents died which most likely hapened a lot during this time period and left a lot of children as orphans. Source 3 shows a lot of smog and bad air, which we now know is a bug killer and was very dangerous. People then might not of know this very well and they couldn't see smog if it was closer than arm length away. Source 4 is a bunch of men stood around, possibly looking for women which was a common crime in the 18th/19th century. These pictures would've been taken as proof of how much London has changed from then to know and shows how badly people were roughing it.

# data[].attributes.body
This shows that it wasn't a

nice place and was really

crowded ! All the kids have old

and dirty clothes on and no

shoes. Not many kids had

parents and they all lived on

the streets , all of these

sources show that London

slums were very dark and

filled with smog . London was

also crowded with furniture

and rubbish , in one picture

there is a girl looking after her

baby by herself who

obviously hadn't been fed in ages !

# data[].attributes.body
All the sources show that London was very dirty and a dark place the baby's look like there homeless with no food or water and the streets are messy. Source four looks like there in a alright house and good cloths and they might have water and the man who is sitting looks very tired.

# data[].attributes.body
These 4 sources show that London was very cramped and children were dirty and unhappy.

Source 1 shows that the streets of London are very crowded and there would have been a lot of homeless people on the streets. This source was produced in 1902 in Dorset.

Source 2 shows that 2 slum children living on the streets, the children would have been dirty and unhappy

# data[].attributes.body
The sources show that it wasn't a very nice and tidy place.source 2 has a girl who is holding the baby has dirty feet and her clothes are all dirty and her face is dirty as well so some children might not of had parents source 2 was produced in the 1880's and it is a photo of the slum children.Source 1 looks very crowded on the streets it's dark and everyone looks dirty.Source 3 is dark and there are people living on the side of the streets.There are some people that are on the streets who just have a child like there a family that is just a mum and a baby, no dad.Sorec 3 was preduced in 1890 and it's a photo of the with chapel street.In source 4 they look dirty and not very happy with the state that they are in.

# data[].attributes.body
the cartoon (source 4) is different to actual pictures because in the cartoon they are inside and are very wearing hats which shows that they are of more importance.

Source 1-The place is very crowded not just from people but from all the rubbish like the example in source 1- covered in pillows and blankets and rubbish. This source is realiabe because this picture was actually taken in 1920 in Dorset street, Whitechapel.

Source2- the children have dirty feet and dirt all over them, because of there dirty feet this suggests that they can't afford just buy shoes and the older child looks very weak while also having to care for the baby- there is no mother there and the children are probably starving yo deaths which is what this suggests, this isn't as reliable because

Source 3-this shows all the sick and the homeless all lying on the street whilst people are caring for them and that in 1890 there weren't as many people as in 1920( source 1) where there are very cramped

# data[].attributes.body
These four sources show us that London was a vary dirty and crowded place to be, family's were living on the dark streets of London.source 2 shows us that they might not have parents or any family, they look very younge and scared, so this tells us that people in London had to deafened for them selves. Source 1 shoes that it was a cramped place to be and many might be homeless. Source 3 shows us that in 1890 was not as cramped and busy, but their was still homeless on the streets. In source 4 the cartoon 1899 shows us that people were very sad and depressed,

For the dickens bleak house "black dilapidated street, avoided by all these decent people "shows that the streets weren't for posh or decent people because it was very dirty.

For dickens the second bleak house" fog everywhere " shows that the smog got everywhere "

# data[].attributes.body
These four sources show that London was dirty and crowded place to be. Families were living on the cold streets of London.

Source 2 shows that they might not have parents or any family. They look very young so this tells us that people in London had to defend for themselves.

Source 1 shows that it was a very crowded and cramped and many might be homeless.

Source 3 shows us in 1890 the streets weren't so busy, but there seemed to still be people around the streets.

The cartoon source 4 1899 shows us that they are sad and look quite depressed. Also they look wrinkly and worn out.

For the Dickens bleak house "black , dilapidated street, avoided by all decent people" shows that the streets weren't for posh or decent people because it was dirty and crouded.

For Dickens second bleak house " fog everywhere" shows that the smog got everywhere."

# data[].attributes.headline
Look at these four sources. What do they tell us about the London slums in the 19th C? Comment on what you see and provenance - remember the 9 source questions (Check on MBC if you don't remember them!) How do these tie in with the cartoon and the quotes from Dickens in how we understand the East End in the 19th C?

# data[].attributes.subject
Look at these four sources. What do they tell us about the London slums in the 19th C? Comment on what you see and provenance - remember the 9 source questions (Check on MBC if you don't remember them!) How do these tie in with the cartoon and the quotes from Dickens in how we understand the East End in the 19th C?

# data[].attributes.body
Source 3:  Dorset St, Whitechapel, c. 1902

# data[].attributes.body
Source 1: Whitechapel Backstreet, c. 1890

# data[].attributes.body
Source 2: Slum children - 1880s

# data[].attributes.body
Source 4: East End Loafers - cartoon from Phil May 1899