# data[].attributes.body
Professionals who have knowledge about the program that they are evaluating - ex: experts reviewing early childhood classrooms and preschools who actually have experience or at least a background in young child development.

# data[].attributes.body
Both internal and external reviewers. Parents, staff, district leaders, students, community members, as well as an external professional evaluator who can be objective.

# data[].attributes.headline
Successful educational administrators from progressive schools--both internal and external

# data[].attributes.subject
Successful educational administrators from progressive schools--both internal and external

# data[].attributes.body
Expert

# data[].attributes.headline
Definitely individuals who have knowledge and an understanding of education.

# data[].attributes.subject
Definitely individuals who have knowledge and an understanding of education.

# data[].attributes.headline
Individuals that have expertise of the school/organization

# data[].attributes.subject
Individuals that have expertise of the school/organization

# data[].attributes.headline
Educational experts and experts on the school itself. (culture, background)

# data[].attributes.subject
Educational experts and experts on the school itself. (culture, background)

# data[].attributes.headline
I would want there to be local stakeholders along with outside experts. The collaboration between these groups would give a local and big picture. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I would want there to be local stakeholders along with outside experts. The collaboration between these groups would give a local and big picture. 

# data[].attributes.headline
Education experts, curriculum, technology,  professional development 

# data[].attributes.subject
Education experts, curriculum, technology,  professional development 

# data[].attributes.body
I think it would be important to have a combination of both.

# data[].attributes.body
someone who knows evaluation theories and methods for judging

# data[].attributes.body
Probably a professional evaluator- someone who can give an unbiased  outside perspective.

# data[].attributes.body
Depending on the situation, an outside expert may be preferred. Sometimes, having an internal expert is too close or involved in the program/etc.

# data[].attributes.headline
I would trust an expert of the organization and I think everyone else would take the information in the evaluation with more openness. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I would trust an expert of the organization and I think everyone else would take the information in the evaluation with more openness. 

# data[].attributes.headline
Individuals with knowledge of our school and other successful programs

# data[].attributes.subject
Individuals with knowledge of our school and other successful programs

# data[].attributes.headline
I think it depends on the situation--external experts can be unbiased and bring now information, while internal experts know the organizational well and have the necessary background knowledge

# data[].attributes.subject
I think it depends on the situation--external experts can be unbiased and bring now information, while internal experts know the organizational well and have the necessary background knowledge

# data[].attributes.headline
Someone with extensive education experience.

# data[].attributes.subject
Someone with extensive education experience.