# data[].attributes.body
1. Must be specific, but open to interpretation.
2. Straight and to the point

# data[].attributes.body
- not yes or no
- open ended
- multiple answers
-  make you research
- not too specific or not too broad
- allows for different opinions

# data[].attributes.body
1. Avoids assumptions or biases (Why do we not have programs thay other schools have?)
2. Something that can hold your interest.
3. Needs to be Researchable!!

# data[].attributes.body
-multiple answers
-NO yes it no questions
-Leads you to other questions

# data[].attributes.body
1. open ended
2. controversial

# data[].attributes.headline
What makes a good inquiry question with Mihail and others 🔎

# data[].attributes.subject
What makes a good inquiry question with Mihail and others 🔎

# data[].attributes.body
1. Is not inherently obvious
2. Multiple arguments to be made
3. Researchable!

# data[].attributes.body
1. not a yes or no questions - many outcomes
2. can't be too broad
3. Controversial (to an extent)

# data[].attributes.body
A good inquiry question is: 1) open ended
2) can be challenged
3) debatable

# data[].attributes.headline
A good inquiry question: Bailey Yumna Esra

# data[].attributes.subject
A good inquiry question: Bailey Yumna Esra

# data[].attributes.body
Initiates discussion/debate

Makes you analyze what's below the surface or in plain site

# data[].attributes.body
A good injury question has multiple answers and it makes you research the topic.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Good Versus Bad Inquiry: Humorous Example from a Keynote by John Austin

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
http://www.tripletranslation.com. John Austin gives a humorous example of a good question and a bad question from his time as a lifeguard while in college. Good inquiry drives focus and flexibility. Learning to ask the right questions allows one to quickly deal with uncertainties in a new environment.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
What if you use this question as the basis for your research, only to discover that is isn't true? A better alternative might be: What influences the percentage of our brain that we use? This questions doesn't make any initial assumptions and leaves room for many possible alternatives.