# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Matsuda when she said that all of the factors in college can  be a major life stress event.

# data[].attributes.headline
I disagree with this because she IS recognizing the fact that the 1st adm. is freedom of speech; however, she is stating that if that freedom of speech is being used to cause harm, then it should be regulated, which indeed, it should be.

# data[].attributes.subject
I disagree with this because she IS recognizing the fact that the 1st adm. is freedom of speech; however, she is stating that if that freedom of speech is being used to cause harm, then it should be regulated, which indeed, it should be.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Matsuda when she said that unwanted advances leaves a lasting impression on university students.

# data[].attributes.headline
I am in the middle about Matsuda's argument about regulating speech on college campuses. Part of me knows that it is in violation of people's first amendment rights but I also think that people should not be able to say threatening and harmful things. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I am in the middle about Matsuda's argument about regulating speech on college campuses. Part of me knows that it is in violation of people's first amendment rights but I also think that people should not be able to say threatening and harmful things. 

# data[].attributes.body
Being a new college student, this lingers with me because I now have to think about the experiences that I will have. Ultimately her point is made to me

# data[].attributes.headline
I agree with the structure of her speech. For example, she started with what America as a nation stands for, and that is having freedom and equality. Then she translate to what is really happening in the campus and how that reflects the opposite of the constitution and Bill Of Rights. She was also able to connect with her audience by presenting some common issues of the campus life. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I agree with the structure of her speech. For example, she started with what America as a nation stands for, and that is having freedom and equality. Then she translate to what is really happening in the campus and how that reflects the opposite of the constitution and Bill Of Rights. She was also able to connect with her audience by presenting some common issues of the campus life. 

# data[].attributes.body
I don't like the fact that no solution is given

# data[].attributes.body
I find her claims to be solid because when she talks about animosity towards each other limiting our conversations about hate speech, I find that I can relate.

# data[].attributes.headline
Address specific points or claims in Matsuda's speech with which you agree or disagree, and explain why.

# data[].attributes.subject
Address specific points or claims in Matsuda's speech with which you agree or disagree, and explain why.

# data[].attributes.headline
She provided an excellent example of a case Brown V Board of education that aligns with the idea that the humanity of every individual needs to be acknowledged. By utilizing this example , she strengthens her argument  

# data[].attributes.subject
She provided an excellent example of a case Brown V Board of education that aligns with the idea that the humanity of every individual needs to be acknowledged. By utilizing this example , she strengthens her argument  

# data[].attributes.headline
I believe that her using cases like Brown v. Board of Education made her argument stronger because in a way hate speech is separating the targeted groups. This also supports her idea of student having mental distress because of what they have to deal with in a place where they are supposed to feel safe.

# data[].attributes.subject
I believe that her using cases like Brown v. Board of Education made her argument stronger because in a way hate speech is separating the targeted groups. This also supports her idea of student having mental distress because of what they have to deal with in a place where they are supposed to feel safe.

# data[].attributes.body
One of the strongest points I believe Matsuda made was the point about the creation of a safe space within classes. On page 153, she says, "Any university professor has tried..." and she again, basically discusses the need for safe spaces because it is very difficult for some professors and students to lead meaningful discussions due to fear and judgement and counterattacks.

# data[].attributes.headline
She also captured the audience with emotions that can be translated as pathos in the beginning of the speech. 

# data[].attributes.subject
She also captured the audience with emotions that can be translated as pathos in the beginning of the speech. 

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that the constitution and bill of rights also worked against her because she is in agreement with regulating speech on college Campuses and the 1st amendment in the bill of rights includes the freedom of speech. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that the constitution and bill of rights also worked against her because she is in agreement with regulating speech on college Campuses and the 1st amendment in the bill of rights includes the freedom of speech. 

# data[].attributes.body
I think there was a very strong use of pathos when she mentioned the students being "ambushed" out of the blue. This shows that there's a deep hatred of some kind that can and will actually distract the students from their work. It can also lead to depression.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that Matsuda used the Aristotelian appeal pathos when she mentioned both the quantity and quality of hate activity on campus part.

# data[].attributes.headline
I agree with Matsuda when she spoke of college students being prone to physiological change when they are exposed to different types of hate speeches. The induction freshman is a pivotal time in students time because they are somewhat innocent thus when they're exposed to these hates they become prone to harm of their superego. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I agree with Matsuda when she spoke of college students being prone to physiological change when they are exposed to different types of hate speeches. The induction freshman is a pivotal time in students time because they are somewhat innocent thus when they're exposed to these hates they become prone to harm of their superego. 

# data[].attributes.body
- Jade Johnson

# data[].attributes.headline
beginning with Constitution was effective

# data[].attributes.subject
beginning with Constitution was effective