# data[].attributes.body
I think this lesson plan’s objectives are for 7th Grade. In 7th Grade curriculum we focus on adding and substraction algebraic expressions and modelling. In 6th Grade we only focus on the relationship between the algebraic expression and verbal expression. So, this microteaching good for 7th grade curriculum. Because 6th Grade students does not know adding and substracting negative integers.

But Özge’s classroom management is good and she manages the group activity very well.

# data[].attributes.body
Özge your objective was students will be able to explain meaning the algebraic expressions and you did modelling that was good but I think this not related with your objective. you can ask that what x might be represented? I think your lesson were drill and practice not conceptual There is no interaction between you and your student. Before modelling you might explain what x -x is. The interaction with group were not adequate.

# data[].attributes.body
You tried to include most of the students into the lesson. The activity sheet was also good, there were some key questions in there.

Students were active in the lesson but I think there was a lack of discussion in the classroom. I think there were some questions worth discussing more deeply with students. Adding some questions to the plan that would encourage students to discuss more would be very useful.

# data[].attributes.body
I think these objectives were 7th grades objectives.
The first question was hard for 6 th grade students and the question was ambigous
In the third question, there was a question answering to model -x-x-1-1. I think they do not know doing  integer operation.
Mathigon was good to see modeling.

# data[].attributes.body
It was nice to use Mathigon. It attracts the attention of the students. But the lesson was more about problem solving. The first activity should have been done with the students instead of the teacher. She should have asked the students questions that would make them think.

# data[].attributes.body
The worksheet was well- prepared and there are understandable and teachfull questions. Her lesson should be more attractive, also students should use mathigon actively. Except this, this is a good microteaching.

# data[].attributes.body
I think, her interest on us was so good. However, I do not like using mathigon to teach algebraic experessions.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the worksheet was good. Maybe the lesson could be more interactive and interesting. The transforming between mathigon and activity was smooth.

# data[].attributes.body
Mathigon was a good choice for that objective. On the other hand, there was not too much student interaction. Also, she should encourage those who are not volunteer to participate to the lesson. Solving questions on the board is important to reach all students, it was good to see the correct results and possible writings.

# data[].attributes.body
I think this was a nice example of traditional teaching. I think it is too much teacher centered. I could be more student centered and more interactive. Students can use the mathigon application. Overall, micro teaching was stable but nice.

# data[].attributes.body
Gold activities both in beginning part and the group work but the time management is not handled well. It is good for her to solve each question after students came to board and solve the question. Some questions are challenging, she can may stay these question a little bit more

# data[].attributes.body
I think Betül’s microteaching was very good. Betül had a very good plan.  Classroom management was very good.  We did it both as a pair and we had the chance to think individually. I think this idea was effective and supportive. Objective of algebraic identities and their modelling was done with this worksheet and the visual manipulatives

# data[].attributes.body
She was very exciting so she was nervous but the microteaching is good with using virtual manipulatives and worksheet. Modelling is good. I think she could do the activities more slowly and deeply. Also, classroom management could be improved a little bit.

# data[].attributes.body
You were very active as the teacher, you tried to listen ideas as much as you can and explained them in your own word to be sure everyone understood.
I think doing the model can be more helpful to open the expression, I maybe missed that if you said we learned how to write differently first, but it is easier to show the identity with model.

# data[].attributes.body
Time management could be better. The last question she asked was a good one and the students were more controversial. In addition, I like the activity in GeoGebra.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Betül’s microteaching is very good for the objective. She asked related questions to the students and students can think about the identities deeply. Then she used the mathigon for modeling and she used geogebra for validity of identity with the different values. I think these manipulatives are perfect for perfect squares. Then she explained the topic very clearly. The last question about the difference of identity and equation was proper and useful for the objective.

# data[].attributes.headline
There were activities that attract students' attention. Using mathigon was useful and good reprentation. In addition, her behaviour toward groups was good, she used ask and go questions to encourage students to think deeply.

# data[].attributes.subject
There were activities that attract students' attention. Using mathigon was useful and good reprentation. In addition, her behaviour toward groups was good, she used ask and go questions to encourage students to think deeply.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it was a good activity. But some modeling types are difficult to understand. Also, there were no discussion environment. She should have been ask more provoking questions. She should have been summarize the whole activity in the end.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked the design of activity sheet. Also, she used both hands-on materials and digital tools. By this way, the lesson is enriched. The one thing I want to change is the flow of the lesson. I think instructions should give before the activity.

# data[].attributes.body
There is a good lesson plan and microteaching. Her activities are understandable and teachfull for students. Her questions in the activity paper help to students to understand the algebraic identities. In addition, her classroom managment is quite good.

# data[].attributes.body
Modeling was overemphasized a little bit. This kind of expressions sometimes make it more complex for students. Therefore, the main idea could have been given in an algebraic way rather than geometric. Even we were confused while expressing the squares geometrically.

Other than that, instructions and worksheet design could be more clear.

# data[].attributes.body
I think this is a wonderful micro teaching. I like her directions, activities, questions and so on. She really directs us well and promote some new questions. Maybe only the time management is bad but overall I really like her style.

# data[].attributes.body
I think she managed the classroom and activity very well. She was sensitive to what we said. She gave us time to think on the questions, and scaffolded us with further questions. She tried to highlighted the main learning goals. It was good to write on the board and summarize students'responses.

# data[].attributes.body
The activities were good and related with the topic. The questions in the worksheet is good to understand the topic. No calculation idea was good. Summary part was missing. She should do summary at the end of the microteaching.

# data[].attributes.body
Overall i like your lesson. The first activity was wellprepared and you emphasize the what mean is very well. You used mathigon well. You asked the reason when we are solving problems so your interaction with group was good.
Second activity questions were well chosen.
Maybe you asked a student to solve the second activities first question because Some students were talking with groupmates.

# data[].attributes.body
Mathigon activity was impressive I think, merging all the data and distributing them equally is the main idea of avarage and activity represented it perfectly.

You didn’t have much interaction with groups during the group work, you could maybe ask what we are doing and why etc.

# data[].attributes.body
She used mathigon effectively so I liked it. Her gestures was encouraging. Maybe questions should be more clear. We confused about the question on activity sheet 2 q1.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the firsr activity was very well thought since it requires equal sharing without giving a formula.

In the second acitivity I think the first questiom can be confusing since it asks just calculate thr arithmetic mean we do not know which quizzes should we take into account or we could also think it as 5 th quiz grade is 0 and take it into account and calculate the arithmetic mean.

# data[].attributes.body
I think your questions and activities are good. Determining group leader at the beginning is good but the speaker of the group can change for each question. Generally I like your micro teaching. Discovering the average formula really good.

# data[].attributes.headline
She encourage the groups and use some important activities on mathigon and worksheets. Her questions are very good and ease the comprehesion of the concept.

# data[].attributes.subject
She encourage the groups and use some important activities on mathigon and worksheets. Her questions are very good and ease the comprehesion of the concept.

# data[].attributes.body
Activity sheets are well-prepared. Using virtual manipulatives is also good. However, she could be more energic. Maybe this was because of stress :) Also, she could ask more questions when she circulated between the groups.

# data[].attributes.body
Her lesson plan is understandable and have richer context. Mathigon application is useful for this lesson and funny for children. There should be more attractive, except this, this is a good microteaching.

# data[].attributes.body
The questions were good to discuss, but the interaction between the teacher and students were not very effective I think. She should encourage students to participate. Also, the second page of second sheet was too difficult. Choosing group leader is an issue in general. It might be better to choose before and decide different people for different questions.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked the worksheets she prepared. But it was in the form of a lot of questions. She could have told the lesson a little more narratively. Maybe she could get the data from the students.

# data[].attributes.body
The visual representation and algebraic formula could be combined better in my opinion. The transition was a bit sharp. Other than that, everything was fine.

# data[].attributes.body
The examples of the activity are good but she would want students to draw the examples of the graphs maybe. She was clear but she could be more cheerful and help students to be more active.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Beyza’ microteaching was very good. The planned presentatiton was good idea. We focused the board and listened her. The questions were well-preapeared. I like them. But maybe she could use more web tool for this topic. I think this topic need some visual objects.

# data[].attributes.body
There are three different cases in activity for learning the graphs. So, I think it is perfect activity for distinguishing the graphs. The subject of data analysis should have discussion. Beyza’s questions about the cases and graphs are also effective for the topic. But my suggestion about this microteaching is maybe students should draw the graphs of cases and then we discuss on this. At this point each groups should have different case and graph. Then students may present their results, ideas and the own graphs in the class and discuss on this.

# data[].attributes.body
Questions are understandable and they help students to understand to graphs. Her lesson plan was good and her classroom managment was good. Also, we may draw one graph.

# data[].attributes.body
I think discussion part was good. Maybe she could add some interactive technological materials for attracting students' attention.

# data[].attributes.body
I think introducing the types of graphs were not enough to answer to the questions for students who do not know the topic well. Her energy was low and unwilling to teach. That low energy was felt by the students.

# data[].attributes.body
Activity was a good one to decide and understand which type of graph we should use for different situations. And the summary at the end would be useful for the students.
You could more clearly explain or reprase students answers to make it more concrete for everyone.

# data[].attributes.body
You emphasize very important ideas like which graph is appropriate for which. Maybe you can ask differences about line graph and bar graph. Your interaction with group could be better, you can ask why rather just checking we did or not.

# data[].attributes.body
The examples that we discussed were good to distinguish different contexts. It was good for us to discuss our reasoning. We had chance to summarize what we learned. On the other hand, Beyza should be more encouraging especially to involve students who are not volunteer to participate.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the micro teaching in general. Showing all three types of charts is really nice. I like her style.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked different questions for different kind graphs. But there could have been more effective and instructive activities.

# data[].attributes.body
Activity was somehow interesting assuming students have a prior knowledge on this topic.

# data[].attributes.body
I think mathigon algebra tiles is good for algebra in 7th grade. The lesson plan is clear and the worksheet is also good. Especially discussion part of using method and listening students' method is effective for teaching part. Showing +1 + -1 is equal to zero with algebra tiles on Mathigon is perfect. Maybe x+-x might be show with the same way. This might be good

# data[].attributes.body
The topic may be hard for students to comprehend. She did good job when explaining the algebraic expressions. Worksheet activity was good but there is no attracting part to attract students interest. Maybe the content should be more rich.

# data[].attributes.body
In this micro teaching i think activity is missing. It’s look like a question solving session. But directions of teacher are good. She explain questions and give some students a chance to come board. These are nice But again, is that a question solving session?

# data[].attributes.body
I think this is a wrong represtantion of -x and -1. Except this, this is a good lesson. Modelling of x and +1 is also good. Lesson should be more attractive.

# data[].attributes.body
What is the representation of x, -x or 1 ? Measurement, area, or volume or sth. else? I think when modeling are introducing units shoulde be explained. Activity is also was routine. Maybe, activity would be chosen more interesting.

# data[].attributes.body
The worksheet is well-prepared and microteaching is good. However, there are more drawing so this can be a little boring for students. They could show directly on the whiteboard since they can use manipultive and there could be more questions for students to think about concepts.

# data[].attributes.body
You really gave the vibe that you are the teacher. And your questions in the activity sheet were nicely ordered, it think.
We could discuss the questions a little bit more, especially the one that you forget was really an important one i think.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the mathigon part was useful in terms of visualization. The activity sheet was good. Maybe she could give directions at the very beginning of the lesson, some of us missed the instructions.

# data[].attributes.body
Modeling is a good way to teach operations with algebraic expressions. Using mathigon is also effective.

# data[].attributes.body
Your lesson were well designed. You used the mathigon well. The question you asked can we add x and y were good.
You might start with introducing the adding -1 and +1 is zero and -x and x is zero before asked them to calculate.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Tuğba’s microteaching was good. Her plan was planned but it could be more effective and enjoyable.

# data[].attributes.body
Class dominance was good. She made the students think with the questions she asked, but her activity was mostly about problem solving. It should have been a more group and fun activity

# data[].attributes.headline
At the beginning of the lesson, you should first give mathigon examples and then you should distribute the sheets.Showing the mathigon examples is the good idea. During the discussion, giving example is the good part and you support the open-ended questions.

# data[].attributes.subject
At the beginning of the lesson, you should first give mathigon examples and then you should distribute the sheets.Showing the mathigon examples is the good idea. During the discussion, giving example is the good part and you support the open-ended questions.

# data[].attributes.body
Her approach was encouraging. The sheet is prepared as going from easier to harder. Mathigon application is useful digital tool for that objective. However, I think Tuğba's explanations should me more mathematically detailed and she should ask our reasonings more

# data[].attributes.body
Important points are highlighted multiple times. A safe choice in a sense, but variety of tasks could be from a wider repertoire.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Efra’s microteaching was well-organized and planned. The lesson was fluent. I think the objective was done. I like it

# data[].attributes.body
The lesson plan was very proper for the topic. I found the group activity quite effective as it contains a real life example. (Slices of pizza) Maybe it would be better if the Geogebra activity was manipulated, not just to show models, and it would also show its division by larger parts. (25/100)

# data[].attributes.body
She use a good activity and using manipulatives is effective. However, she would ask some questions to students and create discussion environment. Students are not active more in the lesson after the activity. She approached cheerfully.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked the Efra’s microteaching very much. She emphasized the topic very clearly. Her directions about activity was clear to understand. Classroom management is good. The activity about the equivalent fractions was so helpful.

# data[].attributes.body
Activity that includes from daily life concept is the good idea and the interaction with students is good. Your instructions are quite clear. However, maybe, you can emphasize on the simplification and expansion part the concrete examples and you can use the size of pieces of the pizzas.

# data[].attributes.body
the activity is fun and lesson level is appropriate for 5th grade students. she mentioned about important points perfectly. I loved this lesson so much, it was fun and effective.

# data[].attributes.body
Her way for introducing equivalent fractions is so cute, fun and instructive. Her relevance with students was also good. Activity chosen well.

# data[].attributes.body
Your materials were well choosen we can clearly see what equivalent fraction is and we understand that these represented same value.
You can use geogebra more dynamic for different values.

# data[].attributes.body
She was well prepared. She's plan is nice. The event was fun and beautiful. It could have been better if they weren't not only half but also other fractions.

# data[].attributes.body
Activities and the plan were probably carefully planned. I think you nicely presented your activities.
Maybe we could discuss the equivalence more. Some students may find it difficult to see what is equivalent in there, especially in geogebra activity.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't have an alternative now but the logic of expansion could be expressed in a richer and more attractive way.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that was a wonderful micro teaching. Using colorful concrete materials, collecting and showing them on the board are really good. We easily see the equivalent fractions. Really nice. Congratulations.

# data[].attributes.body
-Different representations for the same fraction was good to see the connectşion.
-Geogebra could have been more dynamic in which students can manipulate the fractions.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked Efra’s classroom dominance and the activities in the lesson plan. Creating activities based on pizzas attracts students' attention.

# data[].attributes.body
I very liked the Emine’s microteaching. She touched on so important point in integers. She related the topic with real world which enabled students to comprehend integers strongly. She encouraged us to speak and the activity sheet is also helpful

# data[].attributes.body
Her teaching is clear and fluent. Her approach to students encouraging. She could have emphasized some important points more

# data[].attributes.body
The simulation that Emine used is effective for observing the integers with real life examples. Related questions about the simulation is good for students thinking about the integer concepts. Maybe she ask another example about the negative integers (weather condition etc.)Then last question of the group worksheet match this discussion. And maybe students should show these examples on the number line.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Emine’s energy and interaction with the student was very nice.  The subject was well planned. Using of virtual manipulative is good idea and I like it.

# data[].attributes.body
Communication was not smooth enough in some parts of the activity.

# data[].attributes.body
Her energy is quite positive. I think that activity is confusing, I didn't comprehend this activity. Her classroom management shoul be more active.

# data[].attributes.body
Your interaction with group was nice. Your geogebra activity was good
Some of your questions was not clear i think you should be more specific what you expect. Also, you can give a small task for groups who finished earlier because they might distract other students

# data[].attributes.body
She's application is well chosen. It is very useful to make integer positions understand better. Worksheet questions are appropriate to objective. Her questions can be more clear.

# data[].attributes.body
I love her first geogebra activity to show 0, negative and positive numbers. She explained first activity well. I think the third question on the worksheet is unnecessary. The last question is fun and instructive. Generally, I like her microteaching.

# data[].attributes.body
Activity and questions were good for the purpose I think. And her interactions with groups were very well and she motivated students.

For the activity, the questions you asked could be more clear and specific, some of them were too general I think.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the simulation was good. It looks like a game. Maybe using more interactive activity could be better. Her smiling face and behavior toward students was nice.

# data[].attributes.body
Her interaction with the class was nice. She encouraged students to think by asking questions over a question. This is also an important point.

# data[].attributes.body
I think digital image is good to understand number line.
Maybe, you can direct us in more detail and by doing this you can save time

# data[].attributes.body
Her interaction was very good. She was very funny.

Phet simulation was good since we directly see the signs of numbers as the location changes.

# data[].attributes.body
The visual manipulative was useful to discuss about. The activity sheet contains many mathematical ideas such as the definition of integers, deciding signs from statements about daily life and number line. Her approach was nice and encouraging

# data[].attributes.body
The lesson was planned very well and applied overall. You interacted with groups very well and discussed the answers.

You could be more around us besides the group work, thats one thing that I would change. Teaching while sitting may not be very effective for some students.

# data[].attributes.body
Feyza'a approach was encouraging and motivating. Comparing different shapes that we encounter in daily life is a good idea. She answered our question in a meaningful manner during group work. Students were active during the class. Having a structured sheet helped us to see the relation between different shapes.

# data[].attributes.body
I think real life examples (book, box of pills, box of cream etc.) are perfect for teaching prisms. In addition, maybe students might determine the types of faces of examples. For example box of cream has two squares, 4 rectangles, and book has six rectangles. And maybe one of the example might be cube and they have 6 squares. Students see the example and discuss on it with Geogebra.
Lesson plan is good.

# data[].attributes.body
I really liked the Feyza’s microteaching. She relate the topic with real world and encourage us to think about in what way there is a relation between these prisms’ edges, vertices and faces. Maybe there are more questions.

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe, she would distribute different shapes for fill in the worksheet at the group activity. Her communicatioun with us was so cute. She may provide investigation of why the number of the edges, vertices, and faces are the same. She could provide explanation for the number is related to the shape at the bottom and top .

# data[].attributes.body
You managed the classroom well. Students were active and you expect your students to generalize the features of prisms.
But I think first activity can be changed with different prisms like cuboid and cube. In this way students can generalize more easily.

# data[].attributes.body
-Bringing different kinds of geometric shapes and discussing their features was very good.
- I would prefer showing unfolded cases of these geometric shapes.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Feyza’s microteaching the lesson was very well designed and Feyza was very well prepared.  Distributed prism-shaped items were meaningful in terms of visual support.  It helped us to observe and understand the similarity between shapes.

# data[].attributes.body
Generally this was avery good micro teaching. The concrete objects are really interesting and finding the edges vertices and faces by counting is a permanent way of teaching I think.
Maybe, you can move the objects that you show on GeoGebra before counting.