# data[].attributes.body
The selected source describes the history of banning books in America and the court cases that correlate to it. It attempts to make sense of why people in America had problems with certain texts, and how it relates to the history of censorship and its effect on the First Amendment.

# data[].attributes.headline
"Banning books: Unlawful Censorship, or Within a School's Discretion?"

# data[].attributes.subject
"Banning books: Unlawful Censorship, or Within a School's Discretion?"

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Sign in to EBSCO Research Services to gain access to your library or organization's subscription of EBSCOhost Databases, Discovery Service and Explora.

# data[].attributes.body
The overarching question of my source discusses whether or not banning books is within a school’s discretion. Multiple elements factor into the answer to this question; most notable include differences in religion, freedom of speech, past precedent, and discrimination. The legality of censorship is an extremely fine line, and without looking at the United States’ past, it is impossible to make any present decision about the future of literature.

# data[].attributes.headline
The Freedom of Religion: The First Amendment

# data[].attributes.subject
The Freedom of Religion: The First Amendment

# data[].attributes.body
“In these cases, it’s hard not to notice the impact of religion — specifically, the concern that Voodoo (Campbell), witchcraft (Counts), and homosexuality (Case) were anti-Christian" (Kim 2022)

If America was really a place where religions could be celebrated freely, texts that include topics of homosexuality and religions other than Christianity would not pose a legal problem

Freedom of religion does not only affect society on a surface level; education is the root of the future

# data[].attributes.headline
The Freedom of Speech: The First Amendment

# data[].attributes.subject
The Freedom of Speech: The First Amendment

# data[].attributes.body
“But will schools and the law also recognize the need — especially for students without access to the internet or public libraries outside of school — to access materials that differ from, or even challenge, the prevailing views in their immediate communities? Or will access to diverse information and perspectives (much like access to equitable educational opportunities) depend on where a child happens to live" (Kim 2022)

Speech is how we learn

Without diverse education, we do not grow as a culture, as a population, as a society; censoring text with differing opinions from those of older generations does not allow change for the better

# data[].attributes.body
“It’s also evident that discerning the legitimacy of board members’ motivations can be a headache for courts. It’s one thing when there’s plenty of evidence of discriminatory views against specific populations (as in Case v. United School District); but when a challenge to a 26-sentence picture book for young children results in a 70-page judicial opinion (as in ACLU v. Miami-Dade), it’s clear that it isn’t easy for judges to answer the question, What were they thinking" (Kim 2022)

Underlying motives for banning books cause confusion in the courts

Bias manifests controversy; again, if the First Amendment was being upheld in the court, other people’s views would not take books of their shelves

The bias of others should not inhibit education

# data[].attributes.headline
Why is there such a fine line between what can be censored and what can’t?

# data[].attributes.subject
Why is there such a fine line between what can be censored and what can’t?

# data[].attributes.headline
Why is there such a fine line between the legality of censorship?

# data[].attributes.subject
Why is there such a fine line between the legality of censorship?

# data[].attributes.headline
Why, if the First Amendment exists, does some of the American population take issue with the presentation of different ideas in literature?

# data[].attributes.subject
Why, if the First Amendment exists, does some of the American population take issue with the presentation of different ideas in literature?

# data[].attributes.headline
Past Precedent and the Affordable Care Act

# data[].attributes.subject
Past Precedent and the Affordable Care Act

# data[].attributes.body
The goal of the Affordable Care Act

Provides infographics and information surrounding Americans with health care, and what this healthcare entails

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Manchikanti, Laxmaiah; Standiford Helm Ramsin M. Benyamin; Hirsch, Joshua A.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
A Critical Analysis of Obamacare: Affordable Care - ProQuest

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Explore millions of resources from scholarly journals, books, newspapers, videos and more, on the ProQuest Platform.

# data[].attributes.headline
Unconstitutionality and the Affordable Care Act

# data[].attributes.subject
Unconstitutionality and the Affordable Care Act

# data[].attributes.body
The passing of the Affordable Care Act

Constitutionality and "loop holes"

Past precedent and validity of the Affordable Care Act

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The page you are trying to access is no longer available. Please close the tab and open a new product Login page.

# data[].attributes.headline
What the Affordable Care Act Means For Society

# data[].attributes.subject
What the Affordable Care Act Means For Society

# data[].attributes.body
The history of health insurance

ObamaCare's legality

What the Affordable Care Act entails

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Mark A Hall, Richard Lord, Obamacare, BMJ: British Medical Journal, Vol. 349 (20 Oct 2014 - 26 Oct 2014)