# data[].attributes.headline
How has TikTok influenced American culture and society, especially in terms of trends, politics, and identity?

# data[].attributes.subject
How has TikTok influenced American culture and society, especially in terms of trends, politics, and identity?

# data[].attributes.headline
1-How TikTok creates and propagates trends, whether it’s music, dance or even viral challenges.

# data[].attributes.subject
1-How TikTok creates and propagates trends, whether it’s music, dance or even viral challenges.

# data[].attributes.headline
2- The influence of TikTok on the US political landscape, including the dissemination of political views, youth engagement, and debates about censorship and data monitoring.

# data[].attributes.subject
2- The influence of TikTok on the US political landscape, including the dissemination of political views, youth engagement, and debates about censorship and data monitoring.

# data[].attributes.headline
3- How TikTok affects the construction of young Americans' identity, through the way they present themselves and interact on the platform.

# data[].attributes.subject
3- How TikTok affects the construction of young Americans' identity, through the way they present themselves and interact on the platform.

# data[].attributes.body
I am going to present the theme of society, focusing particularly on TikTok's influence on American culture and society, especially in terms of trends, politics, and identity.

TikTok is the most popular social media platform in the world, particularly in the United States, with over 170 million users as of January 2025, according to Euronews. While American TikTok content influences the entire world, the government fears that ByteDance, the Chinese company that owns TikTok, might be sharing American users' private data with the Chinese government. This leads us to ask: How has TikTok influenced American culture and society, especially in terms of trends, politics, and identity?

I have selected three documents that illustrate TikTok's influence on American culture and society:

1. A CNN survey published on April 2, 2023, analyzing the major ways TikTok has changed American culture

2. A graphic by Pew Research Center showing how TikTok users view and experience the platform

3. A CBS News article examining the temporary TikTok ban and its underlying reasons

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
1. How TikTok users view, experience the platform

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Most use it for entertainment and say people feel free to talk politics there. But users have mixed views on TikTok’s impact on American democracy.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The biggest ways TikTok has changed American culture | CNN

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
TikTok has contributed to the cultural conversation and changed how entire industries operate. It has affected what we eat, watch and buy. Even if you don’t use the app, something in your life has likely been altered by TikTok’s potent influence.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Why is TikTok banned? What’s behind the law that shuttered the app

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
U.S. officials have long feared that the widely popular short-form video app could be used as a vehicle for espionage.

# data[].attributes.body
Tiktok’s algorithm is designed to surface content tailored individuals users’ preferences. when a trend starts gaining traction and pass the 3 barriers, the algorithm amplifies it by showing it to more users, even those who may not follow the original creator. The algorithm prioritizes content with high engagement (more likes, comments or shares and watch time). If a trend resonates with a small group, it can quickly spread to a wider audience.

# data[].attributes.body
Tiktok has become a major driver of music discovery. A catchy song or soundbite can go viral when paired with a dance, meme or challenge. Artists and record labels often leverage Tiktok to promote new music. Short audio clips from sounds, movies, or even user-generated content can become viral sounds, inspiring countless videos and trends.

# data[].attributes.body
How influencial is football in the american society and economy ?

# data[].attributes.body
Firstly the Super Bowl generally has a larger global audience than the UEFA Champions League Final.

For exemple the 57th Super Bowl attracted approximately 200 million viewers worldwide and around 113 million viewers just in the United States wich represent 33% of the population of the United States

The 2023 Champions League Final attracted around 150 million viewers in Europe wich represent 20% of the population of the Europe

sources : uefa,FOX

# data[].attributes.body
Moreover, this year 95% of the USA's best TV audience is about NFL, it show that NFL is folow by a major part of the americans

sources : match texans vs chiefs

# data[].attributes.body
This map show every NFL team and and the state who cheer them. In addition of create entertainment, the NFL create unity. Indeed, the inhabitants of a same state or region are untite to support a same team. And if you don't like the team from your state, doesn't matter, there is 31 other team to support with their own community.

# data[].attributes.body
Even NCAA wich is the equivalent of UNNS in France make a big audience. On this document we can see that the NCAA football is follow by millions of personnes, it even fills stadium.

# data[].attributes.body
Furthermore, there is some some special event along the season that make a big audience. There is the Pro bowl Games which is a game with every best NFL players, the MVP award wich praise the most valuable player of the seasons and there is special event during Banks holidays.

# data[].attributes.body
Thanksgiving is a national bank day. During the 4th thursday of november, americans gather with their family.

# data[].attributes.body
The thanksgiving game on FOX between the Giants and Cowboys averaged 38.8 million viewers.

sources : FOX

# data[].attributes.body
3 matches instead of 1 during thanksgiving

# data[].attributes.body
Since 1953 it's a tradition to watch football with their family during the preparation of the meal and after the meal.

# data[].attributes.body
Since 2020 there is some games on christmas day

# data[].attributes.body
The average ticket price for an NFL game is $151

# data[].attributes.body
source : statista

# data[].attributes.body
In 2023, the 32 teams of the National Football League (NFL) generated a total revenue of approximately 20.2 billion U.S. dollars.

# data[].attributes.body
In 2024, the average cost for an 30 secondes AD was $7 millions

There is famous actor,singer or athlete in these AD

For Super Bowl 57, US broadcaster FOX raked in nearly $600 million from advertisements.

sources : dazn ; statista

# data[].attributes.body
Good morning,

Today I want to talk about something that's been causing a lot of debate in college sports - whether NCAA football players should be paid.

You know, it's pretty interesting when you think about it. The NCAA football league has been around for over 150 years, creating jobs and opportunities for lots of people. Some have even become quite wealthy through college football. But here's the thing - while coaches can earn millions of dollars, the players themselves don't get paid at all. And these are the people actually out there on the field!

So the big question I want to explore today is: How could paying NCAA football players help them build their future?

I've brought three documents that I think really help us understand this issue:

First, I have this fascinating infographic from Statista showing just how many people watch NCAA football championships on TV

Then, I have a ranking that shows the huge financial gap between the richest and poorest teams in the league

And finally, I've got this map that shows where each team's fans are located across the country

I'll be focusing on three main questions in my presentation: First, why should the NCAA start paying their players in the first place? Then, how could they actually set up a payment system that works? And finally, what difference would this make in these players' lives?

Before I dive in, would you like to take a look at these documents with me?

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
The repartition of the team influences in America.

# data[].attributes.body
This shows the importance of football in the country, unlike the NFL, NCAA has a lot of teams to cheer on.

# data[].attributes.headline
1/ Why should the NCAA start paying their players ?

# data[].attributes.subject
1/ Why should the NCAA start paying their players ?

# data[].attributes.body
- Their names and faces are used to sell a lot of product (video games, shirts, games broadcasted on TV... )

- More than 1 Billion dollars made thanks to college football.

- Sportmans are often paid deppending on their skills and the amount that their team will win thanks to them.

- They are barely all adults, the age gap goes from 18 to 23 yo wich mean that they can legally get paid.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
NCAA college football national championship TV viewers in the United States from 2017 to 2024

# data[].attributes.body
This infografic outlines the fact that the NCAA football league is really successfull and that they earn a lot of money from the games .

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
NCAA Finances: Revenue and Expenses by School

# data[].attributes.body
This one is the most efficient to see the amount of money that NCAA football teams make, even the poorest one make more than 2,5 Million dollars a year.

# data[].attributes.body
- In may 2024 after a vote, an agreement was made between the NCAA and principle college directors in the country to pay their athletes.

- They could pay the college student the same way they pay pro players.

# data[].attributes.body
- With 15,588 NCAA players and only 195 players drafted to the NFL, students only have a 1.6 % chance to acceed to the NFL and have a professionnal carreer.

- Each year, more and more students are struggling with debts and since 2014 the national student debt has increased a lot in America, reaching last summer 1,7 trillion dollars. Paying the players, even just a little, would help them a lot getting out of their debts once they leave college.

# data[].attributes.body
This news article is about the latest agreement between NCAA dirigents an the most important college directors

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Close

ESPN Staff Writer

Covers the Big Ten

Joined ESPN.com in 2014

Graduate of the University of Notre Dame

May 23, 2024, 07:34 PM ET
The NCAA and its five power conferences have agreed to allow schools to directly pay players for the first time in the 100-plus-year history of college sports.

The NCAA and its leagues are moving forward with a multibillion-dollar agreement to settle three pending federal antitrust cases. The NCAA will pay more than $2.7 billion in damages over 10 years to past and current athletes, sources told ESPN. Sources said the parties also have agreed to a revenue-sharing plan allowing each school to share up to roughly $20 million per year with its athletes.

"The five autonomy conferences and the NCAA agreeing to settlement terms is an important step in the continuing reform of college sports that will provide benefits to student-athletes and provide clarity in college athletics across all divisions for years to come," NCAA president Charlie Baker and the five power conference commissioners said in a joint statement Thursday evening.

"This settlement is also a road map for college sports leaders and Congress to ensure this uniquely American institution can continue to provide unmatched opportunity for millions of students. All of Division I made today's progress possible, and we all have work to do to implement the terms of the agreement as the legal process continues. We look forward to working with our various student-athlete leadership groups to write the next chapter of college sports."

All Division I athletes dating back to 2016 are eligible to receive a share as part of the settlement class. In exchange, athletes cannot sue the NCAA for other potential antitrust violations and must drop their complaints in three open cases: House v. NCAA, Hubbard v. NCAA and Carter v. NCAA.

The settlement terms must be approved by Judge Claudia Wilken, who is presiding over all three cases. That process is expected to take several months, and sources said schools likely will begin sharing revenue in fall 2025.

The NCAA's board of governors and leaders from the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC and Pac-12 voted to accept the general terms laid out in a 13-page document. Notre Dame also agreed to the settlement as a member of the ACC.

"The settlement, though undesirable in many respects and promising only temporary stability, is necessary to avoid what would be the bankruptcy of college athletics," Notre Dame president John I. Jenkins said in a statement. "To save the great American institution of college sports, Congress must pass legislation that will preempt the current patchwork of state laws; establish that our athletes are not employees, but students seeking college degrees; and provide protection from further antitrust lawsuits that will allow colleges to make and enforce rules that will protect our student-athletes and help ensure competitive equity among our teams."

The agreement does not resolve all the pending legal issues that have revolutionized the business of college sports and destabilized the multibillion-dollar industry. Athletes and their advocates are still fighting to become employees or find other ways to collectively bargain in the future, which could reshape a revenue-sharing agreement. This week's agreement, though, potentially decreases the NCAA's exposure to antitrust litigation, which has been the most powerful tool in pushing schools to provide more for athletes.

"We recognize that we're just on the front end of this entire process," said Illinois athletic director Josh Whitman, who recently took over as the chair of the NCAA's Division I Council. "There's a lot to be sorted out as we try to really wrap our arms around some of the details that we're putting in place now."

Steve Berman, co-lead counsel for the athletes alongside veteran antirust attorney Jeffrey Kessler, said this week's agreement feels like a "finish line" but that the cases won't be officially closed for several more months. Other antitrust attorneys told ESPN that the deal could unravel if athletes opt out to join a separate and pending antitrust case or if Wilken rejects the settlement terms. Berman said he remains confident their deal will hold.

"I'm hugely proud," Berman said. "This is a revolutionary change I never thought would happen when I started this. I'm thrilled for the student-athletes because this will be life-changing for all of them."

By the end of this week, the parties plan to alert Wilken -- who has presided over the most impactful antitrust cases of the past decade -- that they will submit final details to the court in the next 30 days.

If Wilken approves those details in a preliminary hearing, which is likely to occur in July, Berman said the plaintiffs' lawyers will publish a website and distribute a notice to all players explaining the potential benefits of remaining in the class and options for objecting or opting out.

Class members usually have a window of more than 30 days to raise objections or opt out of a settlement. If players opt out, they will give up any money they would receive from the damages but retain the right to sue the NCAA and its schools in the future for antitrust violations.

What To Know

* The agreement, which still must be approved by a judge, will settle three pending federal antitrust cases -- but not all legal issues the NCAA is facing.

* Under the terms of the agreement, the NCAA will pay more than $2.7 billion in damages over 10 years to past and current athletes, sources said.

* The agreement includes a revenue-sharing plan allowing each school to share up to roughly $20 million per year with its athletes, sources said.

* All Division I athletes dating back to 2016 are eligible to receive a share as part of the settlement class -- but if they do so, they cannot sue the NCAA for other potential antitrust violations.

* Athletes can object to the settlement or opt out of the settlement class.

* A series of formulas devised by a sports economist will be used to decide how to split the money among more than 10,000 former and current athletes.

* Schools likely will begin sharing revenue in fall 2025, sources said.

There is at least one other pending antitrust lawsuit not covered by this week's agreement. Former Colorado football player Alex Fontenot is suing the NCAA for restricting how it shares TV rights revenue with players. The NCAA and the attorneys in the House case argued that Fontenot's claims should be consolidated with the other lawsuits because they are very similar. However, a judge in Colorado denied that request Thursday morning.

Garrett Broshuis, Fontenot's attorney, who helped negotiate a major settlement on behalf of minor league baseball players in recent years, told ESPN that they are monitoring this week's agreement closely. They might consider opting out once they see the terms of the deal, which would make the peace the NCAA and its conferences hope they are buying very short-lived.

Berman said he believes the judge in Fontenot's case could change her opinion once the terms of the settlement are approved. He also said he thinks it's unlikely many athletes will pass up the potential settlement money and take on the risk of joining Fontenot's case.

"Some athletes could be getting tens of thousands or over a hundred thousand [dollars] in the settlement," Berman said. "They'd have to choose to see if they could do better on their own."

Berman told ESPN that a series of formulas devised by a sports economist will be used to decide how to split the $2.7 billion in damages among more than 10,000 former and current athletes. He said some money will be split evenly among all members, but other parts will be allocated based on the athlete's market value. Metrics such as career snap count or a player's star rating in recruiting might determine their payout, he said.

Gathering data to plug into that formula could be a complicated process, and Berman said he is hoping schools will provide "granular data" rather than requiring players to submit claims by themselves.

The settlement terms provide a 10-year window to fully pay out the $2.7 billion. Berman said each player in the class will get an annual check worth 10% of the money they are owed. He said Wilken will approve how much money will go toward attorneys' fees.

Several athletic directors told ESPN that they are hopeful the settlement lays the groundwork for a system in which success on the field is less dependent on which schools can spend the most money. Sources said some of the challenges to solve include figuring out how to distribute the revenue-sharing money in a way that meets market needs while complying with Title IX laws and whether schools can regain control of the marketplace for college athletes, which has been outsourced during the past three years to booster collectives, which pay athletes via name, image and likeness endorsement deals.

Berman said the settlement includes a "mechanism" that he believes will make it easier for schools to rein in the marketplace for third-party NIL deals. He declined to provide any further details. Several athletic directors told ESPN this week that they were optimistic but uncertain about whether the settlement would give them enough legal room to regain control.

"I think we have a chance right now to really reshape the model in the most meaningful way of any of our lifetimes, and maybe the most meaningful way there has ever been," said Whitman, the new Division I Council chair.

Asked whether he thought the settlement provided the tools the NCAA and its schools need to take back control of the market for college athletes and add stability to the new world for college sports, Whitman said: "We'll find out."
ESPN's Heather Dinich contributed to this report.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
NCAA, Power 5 agree to let schools pay players

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The NCAA and its leagues are moving forward with a multibillion-dollar settlement agreement that will allow schools to directly pay players for the first time in the history of college sports.

# data[].attributes.body
ESPN website

USA Today

TD Actu

# data[].attributes.headline
How has the rise of streaming platforms transformed Hollywood?

# data[].attributes.subject
How has the rise of streaming platforms transformed Hollywood?

# data[].attributes.headline
Bonjour, pouvez-vous corriger s'il vous plait? 20/02

# data[].attributes.subject
Bonjour, pouvez-vous corriger s'il vous plait? 20/02

# data[].attributes.body
Good morning,

This is a copy of my folder for you with the documents i have chosen.

Today I want to talk about how streaming platforms have transformed the Hollywood film industry.

You know, it's remarkable how much the entertainment world has changed in the last two decades. These days, instead of heading to movie theaters, many of us turn to services like Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Disney+ to watch our favorite films and shows. This shift hasn't just changed how we watch movies - it's completely transformed how they're made and distributed.

The main question I'll be exploring today is: How has the rise of streaming platforms transformed Hollywood?

I've organized my presentation into three main parts.

First, I'll look at the emergence of streaming platforms and why they've become so successful.

Then, I'll analyze how this has affected traditional movie theaters.

Finally, I'll discuss how streaming and cinema are learning to coexist in today's entertainment landscape.

Before I start, I have some interesting documents I'd like to share with you that I'll reference throughout my presentation.

# data[].attributes.body
I have carefully selected (...) documents that illustrate the changes that Hollywood has undergone as a result of the emergence of streaming platforms.

# data[].attributes.body
The first is a press article from Medium (...)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Are Streaming Services Killing Cinema? A Deep Dive into the Evolution of Film Consumption

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The rise of streaming services has revolutionized the way we consume movies and TV shows, leading to a significant impact on the traditional movie industry. With platforms like Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and Disney+, viewers now have unparalleled access to a vast library of content, changing the dynamics of how movies are produced, distributed, and consumed. In this article, we will explore the various effects of streaming services on the movie industry and the broader entertainment landscape, discussing both the challenges and potential solutions.

1) Disrupting Traditional Distribution Channels: Streaming services have disrupted the traditional distribution model of movies, challenged the dominance of theaters and altering the way films reach audiences. This shift has both positive and negative implications.

a) Theaters vs. Streaming: The rise of streaming services has led to a decline in theater attendance. According to the Motion Picture Association, global theater attendance dropped by 4% in 2021, partly due to the availability of films on streaming platforms. The convenience and affordability of streaming services have attracted viewers to opt for at-home entertainment.

b) Direct-to-Streaming Releases: Streaming services have provided an alternative distribution channel for filmmakers. Rather than navigating the challenges of securing theater releases, independent and niche films can find a platform and audience through streaming services. This has resulted in greater diversity and access to a broader range of content.

2) Changing Business Models: Streaming services have introduced new business models that challenge the traditional revenue streams of the movie industry. These changes come with their own set of benefits and challenges.

a) Subscription-Based Revenue: Streaming platforms primarily rely on subscription fees, offering unlimited access to a library of movies and TV shows. This model provides a steady revenue stream for content creators, enabling them to produce original content and take creative risks.

b) Revenue Sharing: Unlike traditional models where studios received a significant share of box office revenue, streaming services typically license content from studios and production companies. The revenue-sharing model in streaming can be less predictable and potentially less lucrative for content creators.

3) Impact on Filmmakers and Content Creation: The rise of streaming services has affected the film industry and content creators in several ways, influencing production decisions, creative freedom, and financial stability.

a) Changing Creative Landscape: Streaming platforms often prioritize serialized content and binge-worthy series over standalone films. As a result, filmmakers are increasingly drawn to long-form storytelling or episodic formats, impacting the diversity and scope of movie production.

b) Financial Challenges: Traditional funding models for films relied on theatrical releases and box office performance. Streaming platforms have different financial structures, impacting the revenue potential for filmmakers and potentially affecting the budgets and scale of their projects.

4) Challenges and Potential Solutions: While streaming services have brought about significant changes, challenges remain that need to be addressed to ensure a sustainable and thriving movie industry.

a) Revenue Transparency: Content creators and filmmakers often face challenges in understanding how revenue is generated and distributed by streaming platforms. Increased transparency in revenue sharing and reporting mechanisms would allow for better negotiations and a fairer distribution of profits.

b) Compensation for Creators: As streaming services continue to expand their libraries; creators are grappling with fair compensation for their work. Developing standardized royalty rates and ensuring equitable compensation for artists would help support the creation of high-quality content.

c) Supporting Independent Filmmakers: Streaming services can play a crucial role in supporting independent filmmakers and promoting diverse voices. Dedicated initiatives, funding opportunities, and curated sections for independent films on streaming platforms would encourage the production and discovery of unique content.

Streaming services have undeniably transformed the movie industry, providing viewers with unprecedented access to diverse content. While the impact on traditional distribution channels and business models is significant, there are challenges that need to be addressed. By fostering greater transparency, fair compensation, and support for independent filmmakers, the movie industry can navigate the changing landscape of streaming services. Collaboration between streaming platforms, studios, and content creators is essential to ensure a sustainable and vibrant entertainment industry that benefits both creators and audiences alike.
Sources:

1. Motion Picture Association. (2022). Theatrical and Home Entertainment Market Environment Report 2021. [Link: https://www.motionpictures.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/MPA_2021-Theatrical-and-Home-Entertainment-Market-Environment-Report.pdf]

2. Barnes, B. (2021). Streaming's Once-Inevitable Future Is Suddenly in Doubt. The New York Times. [Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/30/business/media/streaming-movies-pandemic.html]

3. Gaudreau, J., & Akindele, A. (2021). The Impact of Streaming Services on the Entertainment Industry: A Case Study of Netflix. International Journal of Business and Applied Social Science, 7(7), 50-62.

4. Smith, R. (2022). Disruption in the Film Industry: Streaming, Subscription, and Revenue Models. Journal of Film and Video, 74(3), 25-39.

5. Madrigal, A. C. (2020). Streaming Killed the Cinema Star: The On-Demand Disruption of the Film and Television Industries. Television & New Media, 21(8), 907-923.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Impact of Streaming Services on the Movie Industry: Transforming Entertainment as We Know It - Social Cinema

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The rise of streaming services has revolutionized the way we consume movies and TV shows, leading to a significant impact on the traditional movie industry. With platforms like Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and Disney+, viewers now have unparalleled access to a vast library of content, changing the dynamics of how movies are produced, distributed, and consumed.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Film distribution is evolving rapidly. The entire film distribution process has changed dramatically since the birth of Raindance in 1993.

# data[].attributes.body
2 press article avec sondages

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What Is The Impact Of Streaming Platforms On Cinema?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Have you ever wondered how streaming platforms have influenced the world of cinema? Well, you're in the right place! Today, we are going to explore the impact of streaming platforms on cinema and dive into the exciting changes they have brought about. Streaming platforms like Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Disney+ have revolutionized the way we consume movies.

# data[].attributes.headline
1/ The rise and advantages of streaming platforms

# data[].attributes.subject
1/ The rise and advantages of streaming platforms

# data[].attributes.body
The first popular video streaming platform, YouTube, was founded in 2005 by Steve Chen, Chad Hurley, and Jawed Karim.

It marked the beginning of a new era in media consumption. As internet speeds improved, streaming technology became more accessible, and platforms like Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Disney+ emerged.

Each of them offering on-demand content at a lower cost compared to traditional services.

# data[].attributes.headline
Accessibility, convenience, and lower costs for consumers

# data[].attributes.subject
Accessibility, convenience, and lower costs for consumers

# data[].attributes.body
Streaming platforms provide viewers with 24/7 access to a vast library of content at a fraction of the price of cable TV or cinema tickets.

With a monthly subscription model, they offer a low-cost alternative for viewers who wish to avoid expensive cable packages and movie tickets.

# data[].attributes.headline
Variety of content and original productions offered by platforms such as Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Disney+

# data[].attributes.subject
Variety of content and original productions offered by platforms such as Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Disney+

# data[].attributes.body
Streaming services have expanded the types of content available to audiences, providing a mix of movies, TV shows, documentaries, and original productions.

Platforms like Netflix have also embarked on the creation of their own original content, such as Stranger Things and The Crown, which have received critical acclaim and attracted large numbers of subscribers, further increasing their appeal.

# data[].attributes.headline
2/ New distribution models and the decline of Movie Theaters

# data[].attributes.subject
2/ New distribution models and the decline of Movie Theaters

# data[].attributes.body
The growing popularity of streaming platforms has contributed to a significant decline in cinema attendance.

Many moviegoers now prefer the convenience of watching films from the comfort of their homes, leading to reduced ticket sales and fewer visits to theaters.

# data[].attributes.body
Movie theaters are facing increased competition from streaming services, as more films are being released directly on platforms rather than having a theatrical release.

High-profile releases, such as Roma and The Irishman, made their debut on Netflix instead of traditional cinemas, bypassing the box office entirely.

This shift has created financial challenges for movie theaters, which now have to compete with streaming platforms for viewers.

# data[].attributes.body
In response, many studios have adopted a hybrid model, where films are released in theaters for a limited period before being made available for streaming (e.g., Black Widow on Disney+).

This strategy allows filmmakers to capture box office revenue while still providing access to a broader audience through streaming platforms, balancing the two distribution models.

# data[].attributes.body
Big-budget blockbuster films, such as Avengers: Endgame or Top Gun: Maverick, continue to dominate movie theaters, providing a cinematic experience that cannot be replicated at home.

These films rely heavily on theatrical releases for maximum financial success, with theaters offering the large-scale, immersive viewing experience that streaming cannot match.

# data[].attributes.body
The rise of streaming services has also had a significant impact on film festivals and awards. Films that debut on platforms like Netflix (e.g., Roma) and Amazon (e.g., The Big Sick) have been recognized at prestigious festivals like Cannes and the Oscars.

This trend has challenged the traditional notion of "theatrical exclusivity" and has paved the way for streaming platforms to be recognized as legitimate players in the film industry.

# data[].attributes.body
While some audiences continue to prefer the theater experience, particularly for large-scale productions, streaming platforms cater to those seeking flexibility and convenience.

The shift in viewing habits has led to a more diverse approach to entertainment, with some viewers opting to watch films and shows on their own time, on multiple devices, rather than adhering to rigid cinema schedules.

# data[].attributes.body
How Hollywood productions have adapted to streaming platforms. And how their audiences have changed as a result.

Are budgets different?

Do films gain more visibility

and last longer?

# data[].attributes.body
1 press article

pourcentages

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
When VHS was introduced in 1977 and DVDs burst onto the scene 20 years later, consumers were presented with the first viable alternatives to a movie theater. Though seen as revolutionary then, watching movies at home and bypassing theaters continues to grow. Streaming services have been available since 2005 when YouTube burst on the scene, and its pickup continues to increase sharply, particularly in the past few years. Over the last decade, movie theater attendance has declined sharply, and the list of streaming services seemingly grows every day.

The film industry is undergoing radical change. of consumers preferred to watch a movie for the first time in a movie theater, compared to only 15% who favored streaming. However, COVID-19 devastated theaters due to closures and the apprehension people felt about returning to theaters after the lockdown. Case in point: In 2020, after closing their doors due to the pandemic. By June 2020, the percentage of adults who strongly preferred seeing a movie in a theater some theaters lost billions fell to 14%, with 36% choosing to stream movies instead.

For better or worse, streaming has significantly impacted the film industry in terms of how films are produced and distributed and how audiences consume them.

How Streaming has Impacted Production and Distribution

Streaming services facilitate the production and distribution of more diverse and niche content. In addition, because they are not as limited by the traditional Hollywood studio system, streaming services can take more chances on relatively unknown filmmakers and projects, which might have a more challenging time securing funding or distribution through conventional channels. A broader range of voices and perspectives are now represented in film and television. It has made it easier for underrepresented groups to find content that echoes their experiences.

In our post, The Evolution of Storytelling and its Impact on Rights Management , we discuss how the pandemic accelerated changes that have been coming for years, such as the collapse of the theatrical window and moving to video-on-demand, into a relatively short period of time. Now every major player has a video-on-demand platform, whether it's a sell-through platform like iTunes, where users can purchase something to watch, a subscription-based platform like Netflix or Amazon Prime, or a combination of both.

With more and more people choosing to view films and television shows online , the number of people going to movie theaters has dropped, leading to a decline in box office sales. Television networks are also losing audience numbers as more consumers get entertainment via streaming services. However, although streaming services have led to a drop in traditional revenue, they have also introduced new revenue sources, such as subscription fees and advertising t ailored directly to viewers' interests.

How Streaming has Impacted the Audience

Streaming services like Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Hulu have transformed media consumption. Instead of going to a physical location to rent or purchase a movie or television show, consumers can now access a vast library of content online with just a few clicks. As a result, practices like binge-watching have become common.

One of the drivers of this change could be price: The average cost of a movie ticket at the theater is , compared to $6.99 for a basic monthly Netflix subscription. Thus, some view the growing preference for streaming services as a positive - movies are becoming more widely available and accessible for everyone.

However, streaming has also significantly impacted viewer experience and entertainment culture. Since films and television shows can be watched online, the traditional experience of traveling to a theater, purchasing a ticket, and watching a movie on a big screen is becoming less common, lessening the sense of community that watching a film with others provides.

How Streaming Might Impact the Future of the Film Industry

Streaming services have become movie-making powerhouses - Netflix alone has produced over , including television series, documentaries, movies, stand-up specials, and interactive specials. According to Netflix, should the company continue this trajectory, it will likely hit the following milestones in the next few years:

Streaming services are now challenging traditional studios as prolific producers of films and television shows. Should streaming services continue investing in original content production, this could lead to an even greater diversity of voices and perspectives represented in the entertainment industry. As these services grow in popularity, their impact on the film industry will continue to evolve, requiring traditional distribution channels to adapt and find ways to coexist.

The Evolution of Film & TV Rights

Entertainment rights management has become increasingly fraught with complexity in tracking various rights and royalties. Our ebook, Complex Film & TV Rights Management: History, Current Tracking, and 21st Century Solutions , explores this evolution and looks at what a modern rights management platform should give you and how to shop for one. Dive in and download the ebook!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Streaming Platforms and Their Impact on the Film Industry

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Discover how streaming revolutionizes film production and distribution, a must-read for media professionals adapting to digital trends.

# data[].attributes.body
5 press article

also talks about AI, but still provides interesting information

# data[].attributes.body
Focusing on the financial impact of streaming platforms on Hollywood

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Scarlett Johansson and Walt Disney Co. settle lawsuit over “Black Widow” release

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Johansson filed the lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court two months ago, saying the streaming release of the Marvel movie breached her contract and deprived her of potential earnings.

# data[].attributes.headline
The impact of AI on English soccer and especially in the Premier League

# data[].attributes.subject
The impact of AI on English soccer and especially in the Premier League

# data[].attributes.headline
I/ The role of AI in performance analysis and player's selection

# data[].attributes.subject
I/ The role of AI in performance analysis and player's selection

# data[].attributes.headline
III/ The importance of AI in coaching and team strategy

# data[].attributes.subject
III/ The importance of AI in coaching and team strategy

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Department of Computer and Information Sciences
Encompassing work in artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer forensics and cyber security, digital networks, social computing, human-computer interaction, games, internet of things, big data and information sciences.

This is the place to find all the latest news releases, feature articles, expert comment, and video and audio clips from Northumbria University

Northumbria University News is packed full of news and features covering everything from research projects and business partnerships to student and staff awards.

Open Days are a great way for you to get a feel of the University, the city of Newcastle upon Tyne and the course(s) you are interested in.
Research at Northumbria
Research is the life blood of a University and at Northumbria University we pride ourselves on research that makes a difference; research that has application and affects people's lives.

Find out what life here is all about. From studying to socialising, term time to downtime, we've got it covered.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
EXPERT COMMENT: How AI can dramatically reduce the time it takes to make VAR offside calls in Premier League football matches

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In this article originally written for The Conversation, from Northumbria University, Shanfeng Hu, Assistant Professor, Computer and Information Sciences, and Mark Middling, Assistant Professor of Accounting, discuss the effect of AI on VAR offside calls in Premier League matches.

# data[].attributes.body
Today I want to talk about something really exciting - how artificial intelligence is changing the game in English soccer, particularly in the Premier League.

You know how AI is everywhere these days - in our schools, our factories, even in our phones? Well, it was only a matter of time before it made its way into sports. And in soccer, especially in England, AI is becoming a game-changer - quite literally!

The big question I want to explore today is: How is AI reshaping English soccer and the Premier League?

I've brought four fascinating documents to share with you:

First, there's a recent article from The Times about new AI systems being used by referees

Then, I have this interesting photo showing how VAR (Video Assistant Referee) actually works during a match

I also have an article that reveals how Premier League clubs are using AI to plan their game strategies

And finally, there's this cool infographic that shows exactly how AI is being used on the field

I'll be breaking this down into three main parts:

First, we'll look at how teams are using AI to analyze player performance and choose their lineups

Then, we'll explore the controversial world of AI in match officiating - you know, things like VAR

And finally, we'll see how coaches are using AI to outsmart their opponents

Would you like to start by taking a look at some of these documents?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Google DeepMind and Liverpool FC create TacticAI

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Researchers at Google DeepMind have engineered an advanced AI system designed to offer tactical advice to football managers.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Premier League to use AI and ‘force fields’ to cut offside delays

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Premier League hopes new semi-automated system will cut delays in offside decisions by 31 seconds next season with 3D graphics being shown to fans in stadiums

# data[].attributes.headline
Surfing in Australia could be in danger  ?                               1-The impact of humans on surf spots                              (Tourisme; A number of surfers increase; surf spots restricted)                                      2-Restricted spots due to cilamte change                          (rising waters; storm more frequently; pollution)           

# data[].attributes.subject
Surfing in Australia could be in danger  ?                               1-The impact of humans on surf spots                              (Tourisme; A number of surfers increase; surf spots restricted)                                      2-Restricted spots due to cilamte change                          (rising waters; storm more frequently; pollution)           

# data[].attributes.body
Icône de validation par la communauté

# data[].attributes.body
This is a copy of my folder for you with the documents i have chosen.

i am going to present the theme of the environnement in mutation. And i especially focus on the The impact of humans on surf spots and Restricted spots due to climate change

# data[].attributes.body
Some surf spots could close and therefore cause surfing to disappear in Australia due to human construction like the beach of Martha Lavinia and Kirra.

The spot Martha Lavinia is threatened by the construction of a salmon farm which will be located a few meters south of the spot.

With a 22-cage project, there are close to 1 million salmon that could soon be found in these waters. The location of this salmon farm will have the direct consequence for surfers of blocking for approximately 5 kilometers the southerly swells. In addition, with so many individuals of salmon in a restricted space all the fauna and flora are threatened.

Others spots like this Kirra spot could disappear with a construction of a marina. A marina project has once again threatened this legendary wave. Despite an initial mobilization against this project last year, it seems that it has been relaunched for good.

# data[].attributes.body
Here are over 30 million surfers worldwide and surfing has become more accessible thanks to the growing number of surf schools and teachers. Australia has around 2.5 million amateur surfers.

# data[].attributes.headline
Thématique 2 : Représentations Axe d'étude 1 faire entendre sa voix : représentations et participation.

# data[].attributes.subject
Thématique 2 : Représentations Axe d'étude 1 faire entendre sa voix : représentations et participation.

# data[].attributes.headline
Problem : To what extent have some American metal/rock bands helped improve their fans' mental health ? 

# data[].attributes.subject
Problem : To what extent have some American metal/rock bands helped improve their fans' mental health ? 

# data[].attributes.headline
Example of Linkin Park lead singer ( Chester BENNINGTON )

# data[].attributes.subject
Example of Linkin Park lead singer ( Chester BENNINGTON )

# data[].attributes.headline
Example of Sum 41 lead singer (Deryck Whibley)

# data[].attributes.subject
Example of Sum 41 lead singer (Deryck Whibley)

# data[].attributes.headline
Document 1 : Infographic of the benefits of listening to music

# data[].attributes.subject
Document 1 : Infographic of the benefits of listening to music

# data[].attributes.body
In this infographic, we see that listening to music helps improving mental health

# data[].attributes.headline
Oral presentation (uncompleted) Correction needed please ! 

# data[].attributes.subject
Oral presentation (uncompleted) Correction needed please ! 

# data[].attributes.body
Introduction :

This is a copy of my folder with the documents I have chosen to support my speech.

I am going to present the theme of Representations, focusing particularly on the intersection of mental health and metal music.

In a society where mental health is often overlooked or undervalued, metal and rock bands have brought significant attention to this crucial issue. From Des Moines, Iowa, in the United States to Moscow in Russia, metal bands have encouraged their fans to consider their mental health and provided support for improvement.

This leads us to ask: To what extent have American rock and metal bands helped improve their fans' mental health?

I have carefully selected six documents to support my presentation:

1. An infographic illustrating the benefits of listening to music

2. A second infographic showing the correlation between musical preferences and self-reported mental health across different fan communities

3. A press article from ICP (a French association) featuring testimonials from rock and metal fans about how this music has improved their mental health

4. Selected song lyrics that demonstrate how metal and rock music addresses mental health issues

Through these materials, we will explore how rock and metal music serves as a tool for mental health awareness and improvement.

Let's start by examining how song lyrics are treatments for mental health. Many rock and metal bands use there song lyrics to send messages to their fans or simply to explain their problems. The song "Crawling" by Linkin Park is a great example for that. In the first verse, the singer Chester Bennington explains his feelings. He says " There's something inside me that pulls beneath the surface ". This part of the lyrics raised in fans head a feeling of belonging. In fact, with this, fans could finally see that they're not alone in their misery.

# data[].attributes.headline
Document 2 : Fandoms mental health compared their musical taste

# data[].attributes.subject
Document 2 : Fandoms mental health compared their musical taste

# data[].attributes.headline
Mental Health improved by metal and rock music (testimonial from a fan) 

# data[].attributes.subject
Mental Health improved by metal and rock music (testimonial from a fan) 

# data[].attributes.headline
Chorus from the song "Crawling" (2000) by Linkin Park from the album "Hybrid Theory" (2000) about the pain felt by the singer

# data[].attributes.subject
Chorus from the song "Crawling" (2000) by Linkin Park from the album "Hybrid Theory" (2000) about the pain felt by the singer