# data[].attributes.headline
First Speaker of Affirmative Team - ARRIDJAL NURZIKRI

# data[].attributes.subject
First Speaker of Affirmative Team - ARRIDJAL NURZIKRI

# data[].attributes.body
Good morning, ladies and gentleman. My name is Arridjal Nurzikri, and I am the first speaker from the affirmative team. The motion of today's debate is This House Believe that moving the capital city to Kalimantan can create equality and social justice. Our team concurs with the statement that relocating the capital city to Kalimantan is a wise and beneficial move for Indonesia. We believe that this relocation will have a positive impact on national development, economic equity, and environmental conservation.

Our team will present our arguments in three parts. First, I will discuss how the relocation of the capital to Kalimantan can enhance national development. Second, our second speaker, Rizky Febriansyah, will explain how this move can foster economic equality among the Indonesian islands. Third, our third speaker, Siti Rahma Dewi, will respond to the counterarguments and summarize our debate.

Now, let me begin with my first point. I will demonstrate that the relocation of the capital city to Kalimantan can enhance national development using the following facts. According to President Joko Widodo, the primary reason for moving the capital is to relieve Jakarta's burden as the center of government, business, trade, and services. By relocating the capital to Kalimantan, the government can build more modern and efficient infrastructure in a region with significant development potential. Furthermore, the relocation can improve connectivity and integration between Indonesia's regions. This indicates that the new capital city in Kalimantan provides an opportunity for Indonesia to address existing issues in Jakarta and advance national development as a whole.

# data[].attributes.body
Good morning ladies and gentleman, the member of this house. Good morning (Mam. Atty) as the chairman and (Ms. Aisyah) as the time keeper. Thank you for the opportunity that has given to us. Today, we are going to deliver our speech. First, let me introduce our team.

I'm Nauval Agistian as the first speaker will deliver my argument from positif impact Moving Capital City to Kalimantan will reduce the economic and social disparities between java and other regions in Indonesia. And Salsabila Shofiy as second speaker, who will deliver arguments from the positif impacts moving the capital city to Kalimantan will foster a more balanced and sustainable development for the whole nation. And last Lexa Alexandra as a third speaker who will deliver more proof and brief summary of our arguments.

Ladies and gentlemen. our motion is This House Believes that Moving the capital city to Kalimantan.

The definition of Motion is :

• Moving : changing, or causing to change, place or position.

• Capital City : the most important city or town of a country or region, usually its seat of government and administrative center.

• Kalimantan : 3rd largest island in the world, in the western Pacific to the north of Java, largely covered by dense jungle and rain forest, part of the Malay Archipelago.

From the motions, we will give our theme line: That we as the affirmative team absolutely agree that the capital city of Indonesia should move to Kalimantan. we will present our arguments to convince you why this is a good idea for Indonesia. Our main argument is that moving capital city to Kalimantan will reduce the economic and social disparities between Java and other regions in Indonesia.

First of all, let us look at the current situation of regional inequality in Indonesia. According to the World Bank³, Indonesia has one of the highest levels of income inequality in the world, with a Gini coefficient of 0.397 in 2016. This means that there is a huge gap between the rich and the poor in this country. Moreover, this inequality is not only about income, but also about access to basic services, infrastructure, education, health, and opportunities. Eastern Indonesia, which includes Kalimantan, lags behind other parts of the country, notably Java. The relatively low consumption growth of Indonesia’s poorest 40%, and resulting inequality, may begin to adversely affect social and political cohesion³.

Secondly, let us examine the causes of regional inequality in Indonesia. According to Indef², a major factor that contributes to regional inequality is the concentration of economic development and investment in Java, especially in the Greater Jakarta region. Java, particularly the Greater Jakarta region, contributes about 60 percent to the total Indonesian economy². This means that Java receives more resources, attention, and benefits from the central government than other regions. This also means that Java has more power and influence over the national policies and decisions that affect the whole country. As a result, other regions, such as Kalimantan, are left behind and marginalized in terms of economic growth, public services, and political representation.

Thirdly, let us propose the solution of moving capital city to Kalimantan. We believe that this will be an effective way to reduce regional inequality in Indonesia for several reasons. First, moving capital city to Kalimantan will create a more balanced distribution of economic activity and investment across the country. By relocating the administrative, political, and financial functions of the capital city to Kalimantan, the central government will be able to allocate more resources and attention to the development of other regions, especially in Eastern Indonesia. This will also stimulate the growth of new industries, businesses, and jobs in Kalimantan and its surrounding areas, creating more opportunities and income for the local people. Second, moving capital city to Kalimantan will enhance the social and cultural diversity and integration of Indonesia. By choosing Kalimantan as the new capital city, the central government will show its respect and recognition for the rich and diverse cultures and traditions of the people in other regions, especially the indigenous and ethnic minorities. This will also foster a sense of belonging and identity among the people in other regions, who will feel more represented and included in the national vision and agenda. Third, moving capital city to Kalimantan will improve the environmental sustainability and resilience of Indonesia. By relocating the capital city away from Java, the central government will be able to reduce the pressure and pollution on the overcrowded and sinking Jakarta, which is facing serious problems such as traffic congestion, flooding, land subsidence, and water scarcity. This will also allow the central government to plan and design the new capital city in Kalimantan with more green and smart features, such as renewable energy, waste management, and urban planning, that will minimize the environmental impact and maximize the quality of life for the people.

Therefore, ladies and gentlemen, we have shown you why moving capital city to Kalimantan will reduce the economic and social disparities between Java and other regions in Indonesia. We have presented the facts and figures that support our argument, and we have explained the benefits and advantages of our solution. We hope that you will agree with us and vote for the affirmative team. Thank you for the attentions, It will be continued by the second speaker later.

# data[].attributes.headline
First Speaker of Constrative Team - Krisna Adhi Saputro

# data[].attributes.subject
First Speaker of Constrative Team - Krisna Adhi Saputro

# data[].attributes.body
Hello everyone, i am Krisna Adhi Sapitro as the first speaker from the opposition team. We oppose the motion "This House Believes that moving the capital city to Kalimantan can create equality and social justice."

Before that, i want to introduce our team-line and team-split. I'm Krisna Adhi Saputro as the first speaker. Also there is Dafin Raditya who will be the second speaker, that will refuse the arguments of affirmative side and then will deliver new arguments about  economic, social, and the physical impact. And the last is Sophia Nur Syifa as the third speaker that will add and summary our argument.

Next, I have several argument about economic preference that will support our argument that we shouldn't move our capital city to Kalimantan.

Firstly, the relocation of capital is a massive undertaking and will require substantial financial resources. Critics argue that the enormous costs involved could strain the national budget, diverting funds from other essential projects, such as healthcare and education. President Jokowi revealed that the IKN transfer project will cost a budget of IDR 501 trillion. Of course, the amount of these costs will cause the APBN to increase sharply. And this causes the amount of government debt to increase. And, besides that, Moving the capital also means uprooting government institutions and employees, which could lead to significant administrative disruptions. It may take years to fully transition to the new capital, causing inefficiencies in governance and public services during the process.

# data[].attributes.headline
Second Speaker of Affirmative Team - Rizky Febriansyah I

# data[].attributes.subject
Second Speaker of Affirmative Team - Rizky Febriansyah I

# data[].attributes.body
As the second speaker of the affirmative team, I would like to rebut the argument that the relocation of the capital city will strain the national budget. The government has stated that the relocation of the capital city will not burden the national budget and will be financed through a combination of state budgets, private investment, and public-private partnerships. The relocation of the capital city is a long-term investment that will benefit the country in the future. Moreover, the relocation of the capital city will create new economic opportunities and stimulate economic growth in the region. Therefore, the relocation of the capital city is a necessary step towards a better future for Indonesia.

To emphasize that moving the capital to Kalimantan is the right step, I have 3 arguments to support it. Firstly, moving the capital city to Kalimantan can reducing regional disparities. Indonesia has long grappled with regional disparities in terms of development and access to resources. Jakarta has been the center of economic and political power, resulting in the concentration of wealth and opportunities in the Java region. Relocating the capital to Kalimantan can help address these disparities by promoting economic growth in other parts of the country, thus contributing to a more equitable distribution of resources and opportunities.

Secondly, Jakarta has been facing environmental challenges such as severe traffic congestion, pollution, and sinking land due to excessive groundwater extraction. By moving the capital to Kalimantan, the government can take a more sustainable and eco-friendly approach in city planning and development. This can lead to the preservation of natural resources and ecosystems, ensuring that all Indonesians, regardless of their location, can enjoy a healthier and more sustainable environment.

And then lastly with moving the capital can empower local communities in Kalimantan by generating employment opportunities, stimulating local businesses, and enhancing education and healthcare infrastructure. As the new capital city is developed, it can create a more inclusive and diverse society, fostering a sense of belonging and shared prosperity among the Indonesian population. That also lead to improvements in social infrastructure, including schools, healthcare facilities, and housing. These enhancements can contribute to a higher quality of life and better access to essential services for all Indonesians, regardless of their geographical location.

# data[].attributes.headline
Second Speaker of Constrative Team - Dafin Raditya

# data[].attributes.subject
Second Speaker of Constrative Team - Dafin Raditya

# data[].attributes.body
The Constitutional Court (MK) held a formal and material review hearing for Law Number 3 of 2022 concerning National Capital (UU IKN). In the hearing it was said that the formation of the IKN Law violated the principles set out in the applicable laws and regulations.

Moving the country's capital to Kalimantan will risk damaging the environment, destroying fauna and flora. This is the impact of city development, residential housing, shops and markets. Kalimantan's forests, which are known as the lungs of the world, could become just a memory in the future due to human activities. In the current situation, there are already floods in Kalimantan, especially if the capital city moves to Kalimantan.

Apart from that, from another aspect, moving the capital means uprooting government institutions and employees, which could result in significant administrative disruption. It may take years to fully transition to a new capital, causing inefficiencies in governance and public services during the process. That alsp could disrupt people's lives in Jakarta and create social challenges. Many residents depend on capital for their livelihoods, and this movement can cause social dislocation and economic uncertainty for them.

# data[].attributes.body
Moving the capital is not only about economic and environmental benefits but also about redistributing political power. It can help ensure that the government is more accessible to people from various regions of Indonesia, giving a stronger voice to diverse communities and enhancing social justice in political decision-making.

In summary, the relocation of the capital to Kalimantan has the potential to enhance national development, address regional disparities, preserve the environment, empower local communities, improve social infrastructure, and redistribute political power. All these factors contribute to the overall goal of promoting and creating equality and social justice in Indonesia.

So, in the end, we from the affirmative team absolutely agree with the motion "this house believes that moving the capital city to Kalimantan can create equality and social justice." We are sure and believe that this motion should stand until the end.

# data[].attributes.headline
Third Speaker of Constrative Team - Sophia Nur Syifa

# data[].attributes.subject
Third Speaker of Constrative Team - Sophia Nur Syifa

# data[].attributes.body
So, after we looking at various aspects such as internal sustainability, economic, social and political aspects, we remain firm in our stance that moving the capital city to Kalimantan should not be carried out because it has a very big impact, such as destroying nature due to the conversion of forests, and then moving the capital city also requires very large costs while many people will be disrupted by this issue

# data[].attributes.body
Please share your a case building results here!

1. Write your speaker position including your name

E.g:

First Speaker of Affirmative Side - Aisyah

First Speaker of Opposition Side - Nabila

Etc....

2. Drop your arguments in sequence!

# data[].attributes.body
First Speaker : Rizky Aditya

Arguments : Social media is a negative medium because a lot of negative news appears and it turns out that the news is a hoax. Apart from tarnishing the good name of potential candidates, this method can reduce public trust. In fact, some people immediately lost respect for it.

# data[].attributes.body
Second Speaker : Riva Trinovrizal

Arguments : Another negative influence of the use of social media on general elections is that netizens will continue to look for news related to potential candidates. So, when a candidate has made a mistake, netizens will look for other mistakes from that candidate. In fact, it can end up involving the candidate's family who actually have nothing to do with it.

# data[].attributes.body
Third Speaker : Muhammad Alvian Syahputra

Arguments : It is not surprising that the world of elections in the current era is considered cruel. This is because netizens are not playing around in looking for potential candidates' mistakes. Especially if they praise a candidate or party too much. As a result, other parties will be affected by individuals who do not use social media wisely. In fact, the influence of social media on general elections goes back to each user. How they behave determines how strong their influence will be when the general election occurs.

# data[].attributes.body
First speaker: silviana

Arguments: Social media would bring positive impact on Indonesia election.

social media can be used as a campaign strategy tool. Due to developments in the times that require the use of technology, strategies are more effective with online systems. However, prospective candidates still have to carry out offline strategies in areas that cannot use internet access.

The goal is not only to be known by more people, but also to be successful in getting lots of votes. Especially if they are able to attract public sympathy through real actions and not just promises. Currently, campaign strategies can be done in many ways. Especially if the prospective candidate has a side business.

Of course, this method will bring many benefits. Apart from being close to the community through side businesses, the community can also judge whether the candidates deserve to be a winner or not. Apart from that, campaign strategies can be carried out through useful posts and building closer relationships with followers.

# data[].attributes.body
Second speaker: faudzan

Arguments: The positive influence of social media can lead prospective candidates to carry out new innovations. The reason is, to be able to attract people's attention, different innovations are needed. Apart from making people believe, they also believe that the candidate they choose for is not something wrong and will be regretted later.

Carrying out new innovations can be done by asking followers for their opinions regarding what to expect when the candidate win the election. Try to choose to realize some of the people's answers to gain their trust. Because quite a few candidates only make sweet promises and then forget about their responsibilities.

social media can have an influence on society regarding opinion formation. When they see prospective candidates who are actively promoting themselves in a positive way, the public will definitely feel the same way

# data[].attributes.body
Third speaker: laudzan

Arguments: So, social media not always give negative impact on Indonesia election. With the use of social media the prospective candidates can be more interactive with the people and would be known by many people and Also can become more close with the people and follower. Because the use of social media the people could give their opinion about the prospective candidates and thus making people more convinced about who to vote for. In the end, social media is a very strong tool to make the candidate and the people more close together making the voters could judge which candidate is more worthy to be voted for

# data[].attributes.body
First speaker - Dhafin Dhiwa

Junk food advertisements can encourage unhealthy behavior such as overeating, eating foods high in fat, sugar and salt, and consuming unbalanced foods. Eating unhealthy fast food and excluding healthy alternatives can lead to long-term health problems, such as obesity, memory impairment, concentration difficulties, digestive disorders, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure and other chronic diseases, which in turn can burden the healthcare system and lead to increased medical costs. The nutrients absorbed can have a long-term impact on a person's IQ, if you regularly consume junk food you tend to have a lower IQ. High consumption of saturated fat and simple carbohydrates found in junk food can damage the hippocampus, a part of the brain that plays a role in memory and learning. Society is the main actor in the successful development of a country. Low IQ in society can have a big impact on various aspects of life such as the quality of education and economic growth. By banning junk food advertising can encourage people especially children to consume healthy and balanced foods to support their cognitive development.

# data[].attributes.body
First speaker - Inava Valenia

# data[].attributes.body
Second speaker - M. Reyvaldi

Attractive and tempting advertisements can increase people's demand for junk food. This can lead to an increase in sales of junk food and other unhealthy foods. Exposure to these food advertisements has a "direct, unconscious effect" on a person's choices, preferences and eating behavior, especially children and teenagers. If they are often exposed to junk food advertisements, they will have consumer behavior that tends to prefer unhealthy food to healthy and nutritious food. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has warned that a lack of nutritious ingredients in these types of food can cause a decrease in agricultural productivity, a decrease in agricultural productivity can have a significant impact on a country's economy, decreased food security, increased imports, decreased GDP, decreased employment, and increasing poverty rates in the community, especially local farmers

# data[].attributes.body
Okay, ladies and gentleman. We are from the opposition team that against this motion. We are strongly disagree that Moving capital city to kalimantan can create equality and social justice. Before we deliver our points of arguments, I want to introduce our team-line and team-split.

Our team line is we just strongly oppose that Moving capital city to kalimantan can create equality and social justice.

And our team split, I’m Ardheva as the 1st speaker. Secondly, there is Elisa who will refuse the arguments of affirmative side and deliver new arguments and the last is Haidar as the third speaker that rebuttals all points of affirmative side and brief summary of our arguments.

Next ladies and gentleman, firstly I will refuse the affirmative side:

Let’s first examine the current situation of regional inequality in Indonesia. As per the World Bank, Indonesia has one of the highest levels of income inequality worldwide, with a Gini coefficient of 0.397 in 2016. This stark disparity is not limited to income alone but extends to access to basic services, infrastructure, education, health, and opportunities. Eastern Indonesia, which includes Kalimantan, lags behind other parts of the country, notably Java. The relatively low consumption growth of Indonesia’s poorest 40%, and resulting inequality, may begin to adversely affect social and political cohesion.

Next, let’s delve into the causes of regional inequality in Indonesia. According to Indef, a significant factor contributing to regional inequality is the concentration of economic development and investment in Java, especially in the Greater Jakarta region. Java, particularly the Greater Jakarta region, contributes about 60 percent to the total Indonesian economy. This means that Java receives more resources, attention, and benefits from the central government than other regions. As a result, other regions, such as Kalimantan, are left behind and marginalized in terms of economic growth, public services, and political representation.

Finally, we propose the solution of moving the capital city to Kalimantan. We believe that this will be an effective way to reduce regional inequality in Indonesia for several reasons. First, moving the capital city to Kalimantan will create a more balanced distribution of economic activity and investment across the country. Second, moving the capital city to Kalimantan will enhance the social and cultural diversity and integration of Indonesia. Third, moving the capital city to Kalimantan will improve the environmental sustainability and resilience of Indonesia.

In conclusion, we firmly believe that moving the capital city to Kalimantan is a step in the right direction for Indonesia. It is a move that will not only address the regional disparities but also pave the way for a more inclusive, diverse, and sustainable future for all Indonesians.\

Next ladies and gentlemen, I will deliver our points in individual perspective.

First of all, moving the capital city to Kalimantan is unrealistic because it requires a huge amount of time, money, and resources that Indonesia does not have. According to the government's own estimation, the project will cost at least $33 billion and take up to 10 years to complete. This is a massive burden for a country that is still struggling with poverty, inequality, and corruption. How can the government justify spending such a colossal amount of money on building a new city, while millions of Indonesians are still living in slums, lacking basic services, and facing discrimination? How can the government ensure that the project will not be plagued by delays, mismanagement, and corruption, as many other infrastructure projects in Indonesia have been?

Secondly, moving the capital city to Kalimantan is detrimental to the environment because it will destroy the fragile ecosystem of Borneo, which is home to some of the most biodiverse and endangered species in the world. According to environmental experts, the new capital city will require at least 256,000 hectares of land, which will likely come from clearing forests and peatlands. This will result in massive deforestation, carbon emissions, soil erosion, water pollution, and loss of habitat for wildlife. Moreover, the new capital city will also increase the demand for energy, water, and transportation, which will further strain the natural resources and contribute to climate change. How can the government claim that they care about the environment, when they are willing to sacrifice one of the most precious and irreplaceable natural treasures of Indonesia?

# data[].attributes.body
First speaker - Kahila ummi

Modern society tends to choose junk food because of its abundant availability, influencing advertising, and busy lifestyle. These factors make junk food an easy and fast food choice, especially in situations that require convenience and speed, such as outside the home or when traveling. Facts show that junk food is popular because of its wide availability, appetizing taste and convenience in consumption. The excess calories and sugar in junk food can also provide instant energy, especially when people feel tired or hungry.

# data[].attributes.body
Second speaker - Audia Sativa

You need to know that junk food advertising can make a significant contribution to the economy of fast food company owners and junk food producers. By marketing their products widely, companies can increase sales and profits. This creates jobs and can fuel local economic growth in the regions where these companies operate. Additionally, advertising also plays an important role in building a brand and increasing consumer awareness about a product, which in turn can increase customer loyalty and long-term sales.

# data[].attributes.body
Third speaker - Rakha Adhyasta Removing junk food ads completely is not a simple and practical solution. The fast food and junk food industry is an important part of the global economy, creating jobs for millions of people and contributing significant income. Additionally, this sudden elimination could have far-reaching economic impacts, including job losses and local economic instability. By limiting advertising, we also limit creativity and innovation in the world of advertising

# data[].attributes.headline
Affirmative - Second Speaker - Salsabila

# data[].attributes.subject
Affirmative - Second Speaker - Salsabila

# data[].attributes.body
Argument :

moving the capital city to Kalimantan will foster a more balanced and sustainable development for the whole nation.

# data[].attributes.body
Firstly, moving the capital city to Kalimantan is detrimental to the Indigenous people because it will violate their rights, culture, and livelihood. According to human rights activists, there are at least 401 Indigenous groups in Kalimantan, who have been living there for centuries and have their own customary laws and traditions. However, these groups have been marginalized and oppressed by the government and corporations, who have taken over their lands for logging, mining, palm oil plantations, and other development projects. Moving the capital city to Kalimantan will only worsen this situation, as it will displace more Indigenous people from their ancestral lands, disrupt their social and spiritual ties with nature, and expose them to more exploitation and discrimination. How can the government respect the diversity and dignity of the Indigenous people, when they are planning to impose their vision of modernity and progress on them without their consent?

Secondly, moving the capital city to Kalimantan is detrimental to the national unity of Indonesia because it will create more regional disparities and conflicts. Indonesia is a vast and diverse country with more than 17,000 islands and 300 ethnic groups. One of the main challenges for Indonesia is to maintain its unity in diversity and prevent separatist movements from threatening its territorial integrity. Moving the capital city to Kalimantan will not solve this problem, but rather exacerbate it. It will create a new center of power and wealth in Kalimantan, while leaving behind other regions that are already lagging behind in development and welfare. It will also increase the resentment and distrust among different regions and ethnic groups who may feel neglected or exploited by the central government. How can the government foster a sense of national identity and solidarity among Indonesians when they are dividing them into winners and losers?

# data[].attributes.body
Argument :

moving the capital city to Kalimantan will enhance the national identity and unity of Indonesia.

# data[].attributes.body
First speaker - Luki Darmawan

Many people choose junk food without fully realizing its negative impact on health. This can be caused by various factors, including aggressive advertising, the easily accessible availability of junk food, and its often more affordable price compared to healthy food. It is important to increase public awareness about the harmful effects of junk food through better nutritional education, information campaigns, and promotion of healthy lifestyles.

# data[].attributes.body
Second speaker - Nabil F

A potential reason for banning junk food advertising is to protect public health, especially children. Children are often the main targets of junk food advertising, and repeated exposure to these ads can increase their interest in unhealthy foods. By banning junk food advertising, governments and health agencies can help reduce children's exposure to foods high in sugar, salt and fat, which can reduce the risk of obesity and other health problems later in life.

# data[].attributes.body
third speaker - sulthan nazmi

Junk food advertisements often show fast food that looks delicious and tempting, often accompanied by discount promotions or prizes to attract customers. However, this advertisement does not always reflect the reality about the negative impact of consuming junk food on health. Therefore, it is important for consumers to be more aware of the health risks associated with consuming fast food and choose healthier foods.

# data[].attributes.body
First Speaker: M. Rama

Good morning ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for the opportunity.

Next, I would like to give our motion today. Our motion today is “This House Believes that social media has many negative impacts on Indonesia election ” .

The definition of Motion is:

• Social media : Social media refers to the means of interactions among people in which they create, share, and/or exchange information and ideas in virtual communities and networks.

• Indonesian election : Elections are the formal process of selecting someone for public government office and accepting or rejecting political propositions through voting.

• This whole definition is : We on affirmative team, strongly support that social media can have a negative impact on elections in Indonesia

From the motions, we will give our theme line: That we as the affirmative team absolutely agree that The impact of social media on local communities can have a negative impact on elections in Indonesia

# data[].attributes.body
Second Speaker: Rafly

I’m as the second speaker affirmative. At the first i want to refuse the opposition side i have 3 points.

Social media has a complex impact on elections in Indonesia. While there are great benefits in terms of political campaigns and community engagement, there are also negative impacts that need to be taken into account

Provocative and Violent Actions: Social media can be used to provoke riots or violent actions related to elections. Messages containing incitement to hatred can spread quickly

Manipulation of Public Opinion: There is a risk of manipulation of public opinion through social media campaigns driven by certain unseen parties. This can influence the election results in a way

# data[].attributes.body
Third Speaker: Manda

Social media has a complex impact on elections in Indonesia, but there are also negative impacts that need to be considered. Provocative and violent actions on social media can contain incitement to hatred and can spread quickly and there is a risk of manipulation of public opinion through public media campaigns. This can influence election results.

# data[].attributes.body
First Speaker: Argi

Good morning ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for the opportunity.

Next, I would like to give our motion today. Our motion today is “This House Believes that social media has many negative impacts on Indonesia election ” .

The definition of Motion is:

• Social media : Social media refers to the means of interactions among people in which they create, share, and/or exchange information and ideas in virtual communities and networks.

• Indonesian election : Elections are the formal process of selecting someone for public government office and accepting or rejecting political propositions through voting.

• This whole definition is : We on Opposition team, strongly support that social media can have a positive impact on elections in Indonesia

# data[].attributes.body
Second Speaker: Putri

As a second speaker against the motion that social media has a negative impact on elections in Indonesia, I would like to present some arguments in favor of the positive impact of social media on elections in Indonesia.

First, social media can mobilize and engage voters like never before.

Second, social media provides a space for open debate and discussion, allowing citizens to better understand the issues and make informed decisions.

Third, social media can attract more participation from young people or gen z, where from bps data the total population of gen z is around 74.93 million people, or 27.94% of the population.

# data[].attributes.body
We have shown that relocating the capital city to Kalimantan is impractical due to the enormous time, financial, and resource investments required, which Indonesia currently lacks.

We have also highlighted the adverse environmental impact, as it would jeopardize the fragile ecosystem of Borneo, home to some of the world's most biodiverse and endangered species.

Additionally, moving the capital would infringe upon the rights, culture, and livelihood of Indigenous people.

Furthermore, such a move could potentially exacerbate regional disparities and conflicts, harming national unity.

As a result, we strongly urge you to reject the motion proposing the relocation of the capital city to Kalimantan as a means to achieve social justice and equality.

Contrary to this proposal, we firmly believe that true social justice and equality are achieved through different means:

- It is not about building a new city from scratch but about enhancing existing cities and regions.

- It is not about relocating the government and elites but about empowering people and communities.

- It is not about sacrificing the environment and the rights of Indigenous people but about preserving nature and culture.

- It is not about dividing the nation into winners and losers but about uniting the nation in diversity and solidarity.

For these reasons, we oppose the motion.

# data[].attributes.body
Third Speaker - zakia

The third from the affirmative team said that there is a negative impact that we need to be aware of regarding elections in Indonesia, namely that there will be provocative actions or violence on social media itself. But there is also a positive impact, namely that we can open up space for open debate and discussion which allows the public to better understand the problems and make the right decision so that later not many people choose to abstain.

And from here we can judge that the impact of social media on elections in Indonesia is not only negative or positive, when we do something, it will have an impact, be it positive or negative, for example, at the moment we are doing it. Election activities in this modern era mean that several people will discuss on social media and will produce many impacts, one of which is the positive impact, namely opening up space for open debate and discussion which allows people to better understand problems and make the right decisions, especially now, many Gen Z children already have quite critical thinking in the field of politics or government.