# data[].attributes.body
In Project Two, I wrote about if abortion should be legal or not the origin of how the Supreme Court established the right to abort in the country. This rhetorical situation reflects on this situation and uses a lot on pathos the emotional side of my project and also logos with the logical of reflecting on the situation and evolution within it.

# data[].attributes.body
Johanna Schoen wrote and shed some light on a studied experience of what is was to perform and receive abortion care from the 1970s where it was a period of hopefulness about the future of abortion, to then have the rise of the antiabortion movement and the enlarging of antiabortion tactics in the 1980s to the 1990s and after that. Not everyone agrees with the fact of having the kill a baby but even though we may not know why it is that these women may do it. Some may think that aborting these children is unliving a living thing, but it is not that, for many of these women they don’t have this option and, they let this fetus be born, and they aren't able have an option for mother. In the end it’s not fair for that mother or the child because we may not know what the mother environment looks like if it’s even fit for the child to be born in. In the 80s and 90s they were having threatening attacks on abortion clinics and providers that did the abortion procedure which providers led to a new articulation of abortion care as moral work. This connect to my Project 2 because it talks about the aftermath of how people reacted some more negative than positive when the Supreme Court of the United States established Roe vs Wage, as the constitutional right to abort in the country and how it affected the clinics and provides that did the abortion procedures and what happened politically in the United States.

Project MUSE - Abortion after Roe

# data[].attributes.body
This picture that is shown is a good representation on what in looked like when women were protesting for their rights and how abortion should be a choice for a woman and not something that they have to beg for. In these times and still today some women don’t have the option to be able to have an abortion. Women would organize rallies, lobbied policymakers and raised public awareness to be able to move the changes in abortion laws, and actually making it look at it as a fundamental issue of human rights and social justice. Behind these protest women believed that they should have a right to what they do with their body and not the government interfering their choices. I just feel that this picture is a great example on how women fought for their right to get what they wanted and made that best decision for themselves and also future women.

Review: 'Defenders of the Unborn' and the Secret Progressive History of the Pro-Life Movement - The Atlantic

# data[].attributes.body
Jane Roe is shown in this photograph with her attorney Gloria Allred in front in the US Supreme Court building in Washington DC, a couple minutes before arguing the 1973 landmark abortion decision which legalized abortion in the US. Before this day had a ever come in 1971 Jane Roe filed a case against Henry Wade who was the district attorney on Dallas County at that time. Which Wade enforced a Texas law that prohibited women to have abortion except if it was to save a women’s life. This case was about two years until the Supreme Court of the United States affirms the legality of a woman's right to have an abortion under the Fourteenth amendment to the Constitution. But still to this day we argue about this decision and have made more rules on which money can get it due to their situation. This picture show where it all started who was the women that had spoken up to make a change in women rights.

Roe v. Wade Fast Facts - CNN

# data[].attributes.body
As I was doing this project, I really did enjoy using that app Padlet. I had never used it before, so it really was a learning experience for me. It was a fun way to be able to represent my topic, a digital audience being able to talk about Abortion and the history behind and why I feel that it should be legal this is definitely a way to show that. I really like how easy it was to use and how you’re able to put a little, picture and your writing all in one place. So, the audience can know what it is that you are talking about in a visual and also in writing. I made it similar to the original essay with having a 1) introduction 2) evidence and 3) my reflection on rhetorical appeal. But now it’s just more visual with having the pictures that I chose.