# data[].attributes.body
As a Research Analyst at McLennan Community College, I work within the field of institutional research in higher education. My primary responsibilities include analyzing and reporting survey data, managing federal compliance reporting such as IPEDS, and upholding regulations such as FERPA. These tasks require both technical precision and ethical awareness, especially when handling sensitive student information that informs decision-making, planning, and resource allocation.

Audience

This information is directed toward higher education stakeholders, including faculty, department heads, administrative leadership, and compliance professionals. These individuals each rely on accurate institutional data to make decisions and are responsible for ensuring the ethical use and legal protection of that data.

Topic

“Ethics and Integrity in Institutional Research: The Stakes of Data Accuracy”

Why I Chose This Topic

I selected this topic because it directly relates to the dual responsibility I hold in my position: ensuring accurate, compliant data reporting and protecting student privacy rights. Reporting mechanisms like IPEDS are governed by strict federal mandates under the U.S. Department of Education (U.S. Department of Education, 2020), while privacy protections under FERPA (20 U.S.C. § 1232g) establish legal boundaries around how student data is accessed and shared. Failing to uphold either can result in institutional harm, legal consequences, or a loss of student trust (National Center for Education Statistics, n.d.). This topic allows me to highlight how ethical principles and legal compliance are deeply interconnected in institutional research, especially when the stakes involve student success and public accountability.

References

Ginder, S. A., & Kelly‑Reid, J. E. (2017). History and origins of survey items for the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) (NCES 2017‑063). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017063.pdf

National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). IPEDS overview. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/

U.S. Code. (2024). 20 U.S.C. § 1015: Improvements in market information and public accountability in higher education. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1015

U.S. Department of Education. (2020). Statutory requirements for reporting IPEDS data. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data/survey-components

U.S. Code. (2024). 20 U.S.C. § 1232g - Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1232g

# data[].attributes.body
Federal Governing Agency: U.S. Department of Education

The U.S. Department of Education is the primary federal agency overseeing compliance in higher education, including both data reporting (IPEDS) and student privacy protections (FERPA). Within the Department, the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) manages IPEDS, while FERPA compliance is overseen by the Family Policy Compliance Office (FPCO).

·         Ensures accuracy, transparency, and comparability in postsecondary data across the nation (NCES, n.d.).

·         Monitors compliance with 20 U.S.C. § 1015 regarding public accountability in higher education.

·         Enforces FERPA (20 U.S.C. § 1232g), protecting student educational records and governing who may access or disclose them.

·         Provides technical guidance and compliance tools for institutions like community colleges to meet data quality and privacy standards.

Texas State Governing Agency: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB)

The THECB is the state-level agency responsible for higher education policy, data oversight, and reporting requirements in Texas.

·         Requires institutions to submit accurate and timely data through CBM reports (Coordinating Board Management Reports), which often parallel or support IPEDS data submissions.

·         Aligns institutional planning and funding decisions with verified data accuracy and compliance.

·         Provides training and audit procedures for data integrity and state-level reporting compliance.

What I Learned About Governing Bodies and Accountability

·         Accountability is layered: Institutional researchers must meet both federal (IPEDS, FERPA) and state (THECB) requirements, and failure at either level can result in penalties or loss of credibility.

·         Compliance is not just about legal guideline, also ethical: These agencies emphasize transparency, fairness, and protection of students’ rights as essential to the mission of higher education (U.S. Department of Education, 2020).

·         Oversight builds trust: The role of these agencies is not only to enforce rules but to equip institutions with the resources and guidance necessary to make ethical, informed decisions that benefit students.

References

National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). IPEDS overview. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/

U.S. Department of Education. (2020). Statutory requirements for reporting IPEDS data. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data/survey-components

U.S. Code. (2024). 20 U.S.C. § 1232g - Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1232g

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. (n.d.). Data Resources. https://www.highered.texas.gov/our-work/data/

# data[].attributes.headline
Slide #3: Federal & State Constitutional Laws

# data[].attributes.subject
Slide #3: Federal & State Constitutional Laws

# data[].attributes.body
Federal Constitutional Law

Source of Law: U.S. Constitution, 14th Amendment – Equal Protection Clause

(U.S. Const. amend. XIV)

Link to full text: https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv

Key Legal Points:

·         Prohibits states from denying any person “equal protection of the laws.”

·         Provides the constitutional foundation for privacy protections in education.

·         Supports the legal reasoning behind FERPA, ensuring students’ rights to confidentiality and equitable access to education.

·         Institutions must apply data policies and practices without discrimination or bias in how student information is used or disclosed.

Texas State Constitutional Law

Source of Law: Texas Constitution, Article 1, Section 19 – Due Course of Law (Tex. Const. art. I, § 19)

Link to full text: https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CN/htm/CN.1.htm

Key Legal Points:

·         Mirrors the due process clause in the U.S. Constitution.

·         Requires that individuals (including students) not be deprived of liberty, property, or rights without legal justification.

·         Reinforces the need for institutions to handle student data lawfully and fairly.

·         Any collection, use, or disclosure of student data must follow established legal procedures and safeguards.

These constitutional foundations support federal and state laws like FERPA and 20 U.S.C. § 1015, guiding how institutions protect students' privacy and report accurate information. As a research analyst, these principles emphasize the importance of ensuring both data integrity and fair, lawful handling of sensitive information in all reporting practices.

References

U.S. Const. amend. XIV. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv

Tex. Const. art. I, § 19. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CN/htm/CN.1.htm

U.S. Department of Education. (2020). Statutory requirements for reporting IPEDS data. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data/survey-components

U.S. Code. (2024). 20 U.S.C. § 1232g - Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1232g

# data[].attributes.headline
Slide #4: One Statute One Administrative Law

# data[].attributes.subject
Slide #4: One Statute One Administrative Law

# data[].attributes.body
Federal Statute

Source of Law: 20 U.S.C. § 1232g – Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)

In-text citation: 20 U.S.C. § 1232g

Link to full text: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1232g

Key Legal Requirements:

Grants students the right to access their educational records and request corrections.

Prohibits the disclosure of personally identifiable information without prior written consent, with limited exceptions.

Institutions must annually notify students of their FERPA rights.

Violations can result in loss of federal funding.

Ensures ethical standards in the handling, reporting, and sharing of student data.

Administrative Law

Source of Law: 34 C.F.R. Part 99 – FERPA Regulations (Administered by the U.S. Department of Education)

In-text citation: 34 C.F.R. § 99

Link to full text: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-34/subtitle-A/part-99

Key Legal Requirements:

·         Provides detailed implementation guidelines for FERPA.

·         Defines key terms like “education records,” “directory information,” and “school officials with legitimate educational interest.”

·         Clarifies conditions under which data may be shared (e.g., with authorized representatives for audit/evaluation).

·         Requires reasonable methods to protect data privacy and restrict access to only those with a legitimate need.

·         Directly impacts how research analysts and institutional researchers manage, share, and secure student data.

These laws not only guide day-to-day data use but also reflect the ethical responsibility to protect students’ rights while supporting institutional accountability.

References

U.S. Code. (2024). 20 U.S.C. § 1232g - Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1232g

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. (2024). 34 C.F.R. Part 99 – Family Educational Rights and Privacy. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-34/subtitle-A/part-99

# data[].attributes.body
Common Law / Case Law

Source of Law: Gonzaga University v. Doe, 536 U.S. 273 (2002)

In-text citation: Gonzaga Univ. v. Doe, 536 U.S. 273 (2002)

Link to full text: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/536/273/

Summary of the Case:

·         A student sued Gonzaga University after a university official disclosed personal information from his educational record during a teacher certification process.

·         The student claimed the disclosure violated FERPA and sought damages.

·         The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that FERPA does not create individual rights enforceable under Section 1983, and therefore students cannot sue for monetary damages under FERPA.

Key Legal Takeaways:

·         FERPA is enforced administratively by the U.S. Department of Education, not through individual lawsuits.

·         Institutions that violate FERPA risk losing federal funding, but students cannot claim personal compensation under federal law.

·         Reinforces the importance of institutional safeguards to ensure FERPA compliance, especially for professionals handling sensitive student data.

·         This case serves as a reminder that legal compliance is not just a legal duty—but also an ethical one, as violations can still result in reputational and institutional harm.

References

Gonzaga Univ. v. Doe, 536 U.S. 273 (2002). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/536/273/

U.S. Code. (2024). 20 U.S.C. § 1232g - Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1232g

# data[].attributes.headline
Slide #6: Federal  Regulation or Mandate

# data[].attributes.subject
Slide #6: Federal  Regulation or Mandate

# data[].attributes.body
Federal Regulation or Mandate

Source of Law: 20 U.S.C. § 1015 – Improvements in Market Information and Public Accountability in Higher Education (IPEDS Reporting Requirement)

In-text citation: 20 U.S.C. § 1015

Link to full text: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1015

Key Legal Requirements:

·         Mandates that institutions receiving Title IV funding must participate in the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS).

·         Requires submission of accurate, complete data on enrollment, completions, graduation rates, finances, institutional characteristics, and student aid.

·         Serves as a federal transparency initiative to inform the public, policymakers, and prospective students.

·         Inaccurate or missing data can result in federal review, potential funding loss, or public accountability measures.

·         Establishes a legal foundation for institutional researchers to maintain data accuracy, consistency, and transparency in federal reporting (U.S. Department of Education, 2020).

This regulation is particularly important for professionals in institutional research roles, as it legally reinforces the need for ethical data practices, institutional accountability, and public trust in higher education reporting. Errors, intentional or not intentional, can damage both compliances standing and institutional credibility.

References

U.S. Code. (2024). 20 U.S.C. § 1015 - Improvements in market information and public accountability in higher education. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1015

U.S. Department of Education. (2020). Statutory requirements for reporting IPEDS data. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data/survey-components

# data[].attributes.body
Local Policy

Source of Law: McLennan Community College Board Policy Manual – FERPA Student Records Policy (FL series)

In-text citation: McLennan Community College, FL(LEGAL), FL(LOCAL)

Link to full text: https://pol.tasb.org/PolicyOnline?key=1100

Key Policy Requirements:

·         MCC complies with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) by restricting the release of educational records without student consent.

·         Designates specific directory information but allows students the right to request withholding of that information.

·         Outlines procedures for students to inspect and review their own records and request corrections.

·         Clearly defines who qualifies as a “school official” with a legitimate educational interest.

·         Emphasizes employee responsibility in protecting student data, aligning with federal and ethical standards.

This local policy reflects MCC’s commitment to upholding both federal law and institutional ethics. For research analysts and data professionals, it serves as a day-to-day guide to ensure that data handling practices align with compliance expectations and student trust.

References

McLennan Community College. (n.d.). Board Policy Manual – FL(LEGAL) & FL(LOCAL): Student Records and FERPA. Retrieved from https://pol.tasb.org/PolicyOnline?key=1100

U.S. Code. (2024). 20 U.S.C. § 1232g - Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1232g

# data[].attributes.body
Three Risk Management Strategies for Data Accuracy and FERPA Compliance

1.       Conduct Routine FERPA and Data Ethics Training for Staff

·         Ensures that all employees handling student data understand legal obligations under FERPA.

·         Reinforces the importance of ethical data use, not just technical compliance.

·         Helps prevent accidental disclosures, especially of directory information.

·         (U.S. Department of Education, 2020)

2.       Implement Data Validation and Internal Audit Procedures Before Submission

·         Prior to submitting IPEDS or CBM reports, conduct internal reviews to verify accuracy.

·         Protects against misreporting, which can harm institutional credibility and result in federal review or funding consequences.

·         Encourages a culture of shared responsibility across departments.

·         (Ginder & Kelly-Reid, 2017)

3.       Limit Data Access Based on Legitimate Educational Interest

·         Use role-based access controls in data systems to ensure only authorized personnel can view or manipulate sensitive student data.

·         Supports both FERPA compliance and ethical data governance.

·         Prevents misuse of student information and aligns with 34 C.F.R. § 99.31.

·         (34 C.F.R. § 99; National Center for Education Statistics, n.d.)

These risk management strategies highlight that legal compliance is only part of the picture. Institutions also have an ethical obligation to build a culture of accuracy, transparency, and student centered data use.

References

34 C.F.R. § 99. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-34/subtitle-A/part-99

Ginder, S. A., & Kelly‑Reid, J. E. (2017). History and origins of survey items for the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017063.pdf

National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). IPEDS overview. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/

U.S. Department of Education. (2020). Statutory requirements for reporting IPEDS data. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data/survey-components

# data[].attributes.body
Overview of My Connection

As a Research Analyst at McLennan Community College, I work directly with student data, institutional reporting, and federal compliance. Through this role, I have gained firsthand experience in navigating the legal expectations of FERPA and IPEDS as well as the ethical responsibility to uphold accuracy, transparency, and student privacy. My educational journey has allowed me to understand how these laws operate not just as rules, but as frameworks that safeguard trust and accountability in higher education. Mainly I appreciate learning more about these things because during onboarding and while working we here things like IPEDS, compliance, and policies. However, everything moves so fast that I never truly understood how all of these things impacted my job and my ability to do it.

My Reflections

·         Learning how these laws apply in real-time made me more aware of how quickly an error or oversight can become a compliance issue or an ethical breach.

·         I’ve come to see that protecting student information is not just a task, it’s a duty of care that we owe to every learner we serve.

·         These connections have inspired me to pursue leadership roles where I can promote a data informed culture built on both legal compliance and ethical excellence.

# data[].attributes.body
Ethical Code Item

Source: Association for Institutional Research (AIR) Code of Ethics

In-text citation: Association for Institutional Research [AIR], 2022

Link to full text: https://www.airweb.org/docs/default-source/governance/code-of-ethics.pdf

"Institutional researchers must strive to ensure the integrity and accuracy of data, the clarity of communication, and the transparency of methodology." (AIR, 2022, p. 2)

Connection to the Topic

·         This ethical principle directly aligns with my Padlet topic on “Ethics and Integrity in Institutional Research: The Stakes of Data Accuracy.”

·         As a research analyst, I have a duty not only to comply with legal regulations like FERPA and IPEDS, but to ensure that my work upholds professional integrity and can be trusted by students, staff, and the public.

·         Ethical lapses such as misreporting, manipulating statistics, or overlooking context in data interpretation. Even if not explicitly illegal, these things can violate the trust outlined in this code.

·         This code reinforces that accuracy and transparency are not just best practices, they are ethical imperatives.

References

Association for Institutional Research. (2022). Code of ethics. https://www.airweb.org/docs/default-source/governance/code-of-ethics.pdf

# data[].attributes.body
Best Practices for Ethical and Legal Compliance in Institutional Research

·         Provide Mandatory FERPA and Data Ethics Training for All Employees

Ensure staff understand privacy regulations and their ethical responsibilities when handling student data (AIR, 2022; 20 U.S.C. § 1232g).

·         Create and Follow a Standardized Internal Data Audit Process

Review data for accuracy before submitting reports like IPEDS or CBMs to avoid misreporting (U.S. Department of Education, 2020).

·         Implement Role-Based Access Controls for Student Information Systems

Only individuals with a legitimate educational interest should access identifiable student data (34 C.F.R. § 99.31).

·         Maintain Clear Documentation of Data Sources and Methodology

Transparency in reporting builds trust and aligns with AIR’s ethical expectations for institutional researchers (AIR, 2022).

·         Regularly Review and Update Local FERPA Policies

Ensure institutional policies remain in alignment with current federal and state laws (McLennan Community College, n.d.).

·         Avoid Using Aggregated Data to Mislead Stakeholders

Be cautious of "data cherry-picking" that presents incomplete or distorted pictures of student outcomes or institutional performance.

·         Engage Stakeholders in Data Use Discussions

Foster a culture of collaboration where faculty, staff, and administrators share responsibility for ethical data practices.

·         Treat Directory Information with Caution and Student Respect

Even if legally releasable, always consider context and potential harm before sharing (20 U.S.C. § 1232g).

·         Monitor Legal Updates from NCES and THECB

Stay current on changes to IPEDS and state reporting requirements to maintain compliance and credibility.

References

Association for Institutional Research. (2022). Code of ethics. https://www.airweb.org/docs/default-source/governance/code-of-ethics.pdf

McLennan Community College. (n.d.). Board Policy Manual – FL(LEGAL) & FL(LOCAL). https://pol.tasb.org/PolicyOnline?key=1100

U.S. Code. (2024). 20 U.S.C. § 1232g - FERPA. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1232g

U.S. Department of Education. (2020). Statutory requirements for reporting IPEDS data. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data/survey-components

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. (2024). 34 C.F.R. Part 99. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-34/subtitle-A/part-99