# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Google, Deloitte, Goldman Sachs & 30 more employers are meeting students in London — 18th July

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
FAO: Careers Leads & Students (Y11, Y12, Y13)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Norwegian teen ‘got into a pickle’ over assassination plot

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Johannes Natland, from Norway, denies coming to the UK to carry out a ‘hit’ on an unknown target.

# data[].attributes.body
This is examinable - Paper 1 Part A booklet 2 Criminal Courts and Appeals

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Attorney general to review Fordingbridge teen boys’ rape sentences

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The three teenagers were not given custodial sentences for their roles in the rape of two girls.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Unprecedented employment tribunal delays lead to five year waits

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Employment tribunal service delays mean people bringing unfair dismissal claims are waiting up to five years in England and Wales.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Jury fail to reach verdict in trial of brothers accused of assaulting officer | ITV News

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Mohammed Fahir Amaaz and Muhammad Amaad have both been on trial over allegations they assaulted PC Zachary Marsden causing actual bodily harm. | ITV News Granada

# data[].attributes.headline
LLB Taster Session: Inside Criminal Law 10 June 2026

# data[].attributes.subject
LLB Taster Session: Inside Criminal Law 10 June 2026

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Join us for this engaging online taster session where you’ll explore real criminal cases and discover how lawyers build arguments, interpret evidence, and apply the law. Whether you’re thinking about studying a Law degree on-campus or online, this taster session gives you a hands-on look at what it’s like to be part of the legal world. No experience needed—just an interest in justice, crime, and how the law works in real life

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Washington rapist jailed for deliberate HIV infections

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A judge says Adam Hall took away the futures of his victims, including boys aged 15 and 17.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Our Employability Director, John Watkins, said that Podcasts are increasing popular in 2018 as they appeal to the communication preferences of the modern day student.

"The attraction is partly by topic but also in the nature of delivery - both features needing to be distinctive to capture and retain attention. As with more traditional messaging, interpretation is quite personal and what works for one may not for others. Thus there is real benefit in variety and being efficient - short, sharp insight is the easiest to digest," he said.

Here are John's top picks of the legal podcasts our students have been listening to:-

Law in Action

Law in Action is BBC Radio 4's long running legal magazine programme, hosted by ULaw alumnus Joshua Rozenberg. The podcast features reports and discussion on all matters relating to law, from questioning if the use of facial recognition technology by the police infringes on the Human Rights Act to an interview with the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales Sir Ian Burnett.
Well produced, thoughtful and east to follow, Law in Action makes for interesting listening whether you are heading towards a career in law or not.

Serial

Serial is the most downloaded podcast of all time, investigating the murder of 18-year-old Hae Min Lee in 1999. Her classmate and ex-boyfriend, Adnan Syed, was arrested and convicted of her murder. He has always protested his innocence but he can't remember what he was doing on the day of her murder.
Journalist Sarah Koenig re-examines the case by going through the evidence and interviewing the people involved. Did the justice system fail Hae and Adnan?
This American piece of investigate journalism blends together law, crime and storytelling to make addictive listening.

The Hearing

The Hearing is a Thomson Reuters podcast hosted by lawyer and social media commentator Kevin Poulter. This ongoing series began earlier this year and includes stories of industry trailblazers, uncovering the latest insights in legal innovation, and discussing the hot topics of the legal profession.
So far episodes have included fascinating guests such as Dame Fiona Woolf, Lord Michael Howard, Ayesha Vardag and Rt. Hon. Kenneth Clarke. Kevin Poulter's enthusiastic but laidback style of interviewing warms him to both his guests and listeners. We're looking forward to seeing who he talks to next.

Law Pod UK

Law Pod UK is a podcast from the creators of the UK Human Rights blog and produced by barristers of One Crown Office Row. Host Rosalind English discusses all aspects of UK civil and public law with legal professionals, professors and specialists.
Running since mid-2017 there are currently 40 episodes available so lots to catch up on; including subjects such as 'Will AI outwit our laws?', 'A patient's right to experimental medical treatment' and it recently covered Brexit two years on. Law Pod UK is relevant and informative listening for everyone studying law.

Lawyer 2 Lawyer

Lawyer 2 Lawyer is a US based award-winning legal podcast hosted by Massachusetts attorney Bob Ambrogi and criminal defence lawyer J. Craig Williams. Launched in 2005, Lawyer 2 Lawyer is one of the longest-running legal podcasts.
Ambrogi and Williams invite industry professionals to examine and debate current hot topics and recent rulings within the legal industry. Detailed analysis of well-known cases such as the Bill Cosby sexual assault trial and the 'Making a Murderer' trial of Steven Avery are peppered among the more common subject discussions, such as the legalities of Amazon's Echo and gender discrimination in the workplace. They're also keeping an eye on how the SQE is progressing and its impact on UK law, keeping it relevant to listeners this side of the pond too.

RightsUp

RightsUp is a podcast from the Oxford Human Rights Hub that aims to provide global perspectives on human rights at the Faculty of Law, University of Oxford. It delves into some very interesting and relevant subjects such a sex education in school, the future of the UK Human Rights Act and Holding Corporations Accountable for Human Rights.

The very first episode covers the hot topic of Revenge Porn and the Law, it's a fascinating subject to start with considering the recent attempts at and it set. RightsUp is clear, concise and thought provoking, making it one of the best UK legal podcasts out there.

Here at The University of Law we inspire and support our student's ambitions every day. To find out more about studying law take a look at our legal courses from undergraduates and postgraduates.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Listening to law podcasts is a great way to learn on the move, so if you're ready to listen, learn & be inspired, subscribe to these top business podcasts.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Thousands of lawyers oppose jury restriction plan

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Lawyers including top barristers and retired judges urge the government to drop a plan to abolish some jury trials.

# data[].attributes.headline
BVL - work experience, mooting, competitions etc

# data[].attributes.subject
BVL - work experience, mooting, competitions etc

# data[].attributes.body
Unreasonableness and Procedural grounds - legitimate expectation?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Mr Justice Kimblin said that "the protection of children was a core duty of each of us and our institutions, including our government institutions".

He decided there should be a judicial review of whether the government had failed to meet a "legitimate expectation" that it should take forward the findings of the child abuse inquiry.

However, the law does not require ministers to do exactly what public inquiries recommend.

The judge rejected two specific legal challenges to the government's decisions on recommendations from the inquiry.

The inquiry panel recommended the creation of a single core set of data about child abuse, an issue which has become highly controversial due to the racial profiles of offenders in "grooming gang cases".

The government commissioned Baroness Louise Casey to carry out a "rapid audit" of the available data, and says it will act on the review.

The foundation argued in court that there was no single data set and this remained an urgent issue.

But the judge refused a judicial on this point saying the actual policy responses to inquiry recommendations were for the government, not the court.

He also rejected a challenge relating to the law on whether courts can make decisions about children in care, again saying this was a matter government policy.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Judicial review over whether government failed to act after abuse inquiry

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Maggie Oliver Foundation has campaigned for tougher action against grooming gangs.

# data[].attributes.body
Tuesday 3 March 2026 🕔 16:00 - 17:00 GMT 💻 Virtual

Explore Law is happening next week. If you're in Year 10 to Year 13 and thinking about a career in law, this is your chance to get complete clarity on routes into the profession, the qualifications you'll need, and what a legal career actually looks like.

You'll discover:

⚖️ Clear overview of routes into law and which might suit you best
📚 Qualifications you'll need and how to get them
💼 Exciting areas of law you could one day specialise in
🗣️ Live Q&A with a trainee solicitor who'll share real insights into their working week

Why you shouldn't miss this:

✅ It's happening during National Careers Week - the perfect time to explore your future
✅ Hear from people doing the job - not just theory, but real world insight
✅ Get your questions answered - this is your chance to ask what you really want to know
✅ Start planning your path - leave with clarity on your next steps

Don't miss out. Your journey into law could begin right here.

👉 Register now

Event Countdown

Book your place now

Meet our speakers 🎤

Laura Healy - Law Lecturer

💬 Called to the Bar in 2011, Laura holds a masters in Employment Law and an LLB in Law with American Law, which saw her spend a year studying at South Texas College of Law in Houston. Laura worked in the public sector before moving into private practice where she specialised in Personal Injury. Now a lecturer at The University of Law, Laura teaches on both undergraduate and postgraduate courses, predominantly in Public and Employment Law, and is passionate about making legal education engaging and accessible.

Alice Anderson - Trainee Solicitor, Wedlake Bell

💬 A University of Law alumna, Alice is now a trainee solicitor at Wedlake Bell. She'll be answering your questions about what her working week actually looks like, the real responsibilities she takes on, and sharing the advice she wishes she'd had when she was in your shoes.

# data[].attributes.body
The placement spans over:

12th May

28th May

27-30th July

26th October

On completion, with full attendance and engagement in all dates of the placement shown above, students will receive a £400 bursary.

We're aware that many students are looking to apply for Work Experience this term, so this could be the perfect placement for students in Y12 (England & Wales) S5 (Scotland) and Y13 (Wales), who are particularly interested in a career in Law.

There is strict application criteria for this placement and we require educator and Parent/Guardian confirmation that they meet one or more of the following:

• Have been, or are currently, in local authority care.

• Are currently in receipt of, or have previously received, free school meals, Pupil Premium, Education Maintenance Allowance and/or 16 to 19 Bursary.

• Are, or have been, a full-time or part-time carer.

• Came to the UK as a refugee or asylum seeker.

• Live in a household where the occupation of the main household earner is categorised as a routine or manual occupation

• Grew up in a household where no parent or guardian attended University.

If you are supporting a student's application, please stipulate which of the criteria they meet within the cover note.

The application closing date is 3rd April but could close early if there is significantly high demand, as this is a popular date Programme with limited places. We encourage students to apply as soon as possible.

Your support in circulating this opportunity would be most appreciated, to students  you know would be interested and the appropriate colleagues who could support in sharing this opportunity.

Please get in touch if you would like a reminder on the student application journey, the teacher approval process or on anything in general regarding our Work Experience placements, or Speakers for Schools Programme, I'd be happy to help. To apply click here.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Spruce Law Course – Student Pre-University Court Exposure

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Spruce Law Course | Student Pre-University Court Exposure

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Obscene Publication Act and the Internet: A Legal Analysis of the Case of R v GS

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Criminal Offences relating to the publication of obscene material have long existed. The test for obscenity was devised by Cockburn CJ in the case of Reginav Hicklin (1867-68) L.R. 3 Q.B. 360:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Get Into Law Virtual Work Experience Jan 26

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Law Show - The law under fire - BBC Sounds

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Do political attacks on the law put legal professionals in danger?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Law Show - Immigration and the law - who stays? Who goes? - BBC Sounds

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
How do UK immigration laws work, and are they fit for purpose?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
ByDominic Casciani , Home and legal correspondent and Tom McArthur

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Jury trials scrapped for crimes with sentences of less than three years

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The reforms are being brought in to tackle unprecedented delays in the Crown Court.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Insight into Slaughter and May Virtual Event

# data[].attributes.headline
Fragomen Insight event - 5, 12, 19 November 2025

# data[].attributes.subject
Fragomen Insight event - 5, 12, 19 November 2025

# data[].attributes.headline
University of Law - Talks and Open Day 11 November

# data[].attributes.subject
University of Law - Talks and Open Day 11 November

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.law.ac.uk/open-days/undergraduate/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
ULaw Undergraduate Talks and Workshops Guide 2025-26

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
A&O Shearman Virtual Law Event + In-Person Opportunity

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Insight into the Solicitor Apprenticeship Programme with Linklaters

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Law Careers - Websites and Podcasts - Mr D - 2025

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Explore today’s real world issues in Law, Criminology, Psychology, Business and Computer Science. With inquisitive minds, we will question the world and form our own opinions. We’ll debate systems, procedures and behaviours. You may arrive at these events with questions, but you’ll leave with an ability to answer.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Browne Jacobson Virtual Law Work Experience

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Web survey powered by SurveyMonkey.com. Create your own online survey now with SurveyMonkey's expert certified FREE templates.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Snowflake solicitors are destroying a once proud profession

# data[].attributes.headline
Vicarious liability - Barry v BXB - summary of the law

# data[].attributes.subject
Vicarious liability - Barry v BXB - summary of the law

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Latest Guideline Judgment of the Supreme Court on Vicarious Liability

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Damian Powell considered the Supreme Court’s decision in Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v BXB [2023] UKSC 15.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Mock Trial Competitions are our longest-running active learning experiences. Since 1991, we've provided unparalleled exposure to the judicial system, its venues and access to senior legal professionals.
We supply our youngest citizens with specially written cases so they can try the law against their peers in courthouses around the UK. It's not just for those interested in studying law - we encourage students of all kinds to engage to build their confidence, understanding and interest in the law.

"It is an amazing opportunity even if you are not interested in a law career and it is a lot of fun. It is also great to put on CVs to demonstrate you have a wider understanding of the law."
Student, 14, The Holt School

Society is coming together to educate the pupils on law and the judicial system. It is truly making a difference. Students notice the impact and value they are receiving by participating in the mock trial events. It's an opportunity to build their skills such as critical analysis and teamwork that are useful whether becoming a well-rounded citizen or for their future career.

Magistrates' Court Mock Trial

The Magistrates' Court Mock Trial competition is for 12-14 year olds from non-fee paying schools in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Find out more including entry dates and the location of your nearest heat.
Visit the website

Bar Mock Trial

This is open to 15-18 year olds from non-fee paying schools in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Find out more about the Bar Mock Trial competition including entry dates and the location of your nearest heat.
Visit website

Independent Schools Mock Trial

The Independent Schools Mock Trial competition replicates the Bar Mock Trial competition with 15-18 year olds, however it is for fee-paying schools only. We coordinate regional heats based on school interest. See if we're running an event in your area or register your interest today.
Visit website

Lessons, Understanding Rules & The Law, KS4 (ages 14-16) Mock Trials Classroom Pack

Running a Mock Trial - Classroom Pack The Mock Trial Competitions are our longest-running active citizenship experiences. Since 1991,...

Lessons, Understanding Rules & The Law, KS4 (ages 14-16) Mock Trials Classroom Pack

Running a Mock Trial - Classroom Pack The Mock Trial Competitions are our longest-running active citizenship experiences. Since 1991,...

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Want to keep up to date on our free resources, programme launches and the world of youth social action and citizenship? Sign up to our newsletter today.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Mock Trial Competitions are our longest-running active learning experiences. Since 1991, we've provided unparalleled exposure to the judicial system, its venues and access to senior legal professionals. We supply our youngest citizens with specially written cases so they can try the law against their peers in courthouses around the UK.

# data[].attributes.headline
Jury trials - key article for Paper 1 Part A, AO3

# data[].attributes.subject
Jury trials - key article for Paper 1 Part A, AO3

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Sima KotechaSenior UK CorrespondentPaul GlynnBBC News

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Jury-free trials recommended to save courts from ‘collapse’

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A senior judge recommends a shake-up of the system, but some barristers argue juries are essential for fair justice.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The University of Law Summer 2-Day Work Experience

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The University of Law Summer 2-Day Hybrid Work Experience 2025

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The LNAT is used by universities to help them select people for their undergraduate law courses.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
UK Supreme Court rules legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex - live updates

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In a landmark ruling, the judges say it is not a triumph for one side over another and the law still gives trans people protection against discrimination.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Spruce Law Course | Student Pre-University Court Exposure

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Carolyn Atkinson and Ben RobinsonFile on 4 Investigates

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Autistic woman wrongly locked up in mental health hospital for 45 years

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
“Kasibba”, who is non-verbal and had no family to speak for her, was one of hundreds wrongly detained.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
What Is The Watson Glaser Test?

The Watson Glaser Test measures the skills required to present a certain point of view in a clear, well-structured, well-reasoned, and persuasive way to convince others of your argument.

Originally created by Goodwin Watson and Edward Glaser, the test is designed to assess a person's critical thinking abilities - among other things - and is widely used across legal practices. It is a comprehensive aptitude test that helps law firms to create a shortlist of candidates deemed likely to have what it takes for training contracts and vacation schemes.

In a law-based scenario, your critical thinking ability is extremely important. The Watson Glaser Test assesses your ability to:

Think critically

Come to conclusions

Analyse strong and weak arguments

Recognise assumptions

Evaluate arguments

What Does The Watson Glaser Test Involve?

The Watson Glaser Test follows a multiple-choice format and can feature up to 40 or 80 questions split into five sections, including:

Assessment of inferences (5 questions*). Test questions are focused on a single statement that you must assume is true. You are not able to use any outside knowledge to influence your answer. The single statement is then followed by a series of inferences relating to it, which you will be required to label either true or false.

Recognition of assumptions (12 questions*). You are issued with another statement to assess and you are then given a number of assumptions related to that statement. You then need to deduce whether assumptions have, or have not been made.

Deduction (5 questions*). You are presented with a passage and a series of proposed conclusions to the passage. You will need to determine whether the conclusion follows or doesn't follow the information contained in the passage.

Interpretation (6 questions*). You are presented with a passage in which you assume everything to be true. You must then determine the level of importance of the information provided and apply it logically - analysing whether or not the conclusion follows.

Evaluation (12 questions*). From the information provided, you must be able to decide whether the argument presented is a strong one or a weak one.

*based on 40 questions being asked.

How Long Is The Watson Glaser Test?

The standard time given to complete the Watson Glaser Test is anywhere between 30 and 60 minutes - depending on the number of questions being asked. You will be given a deadline or time limit for completing the test by the law firm you are applying to for a training contract or vacation scheme.

Why Do Employers Use The Watson Glaser Test?

More candidates are applying for training contracts and vacation schemes every year. With critical thinking being a key component of the legal profession, the test has become a great assessment tool not only to assess a candidate's critical thinking ability, but to speed up the candidate application process.

Watson Glaser Test Results

A good Watson Glaser Test score depends on the quality of your Watson Glaser Test answers and the firm that you are applying to. The pass mark for the test varies from year-to-year based on the average Watson Glaser test score achieved by candidates across each law firm.

To give yourself the best chance of being chosen for a training contract or vacation scheme, a Watson Glaser Test score of 75% or more is what you should aim for. However, you shouldn't solely rely on passing the test to secure a job offer from a law firm as candidates are assessed across all areas of the recruitment process, including the quality of training contract applications.

Watson Glaser Test Example Questions

Assessment of Inferences Sample Question

Statement: Two hundred students in their early teens voluntarily attended a weekend student conference in a city in England. At this conference, the topics of race equality and means of achieving lasting world peace were discussed, since these were the problems the students selected as being most vital in today's world.

1. As a group, the students who attended this conference showed a keener interest in broad social problems than do most other students in their early teens

PROBABLY TRUE

We know that the students 'voluntarily' attended so this implies they are interested in the broad social problems. We are also told that the problems discussed were selected by the students themselves. These points do not definitively prove that the statement is true. But they suggest it is likely the case

5. Some teenage students felt it worthwhile to discuss problems of race equality and ways of achieving world peace.

TRUE

It is explicitly stated in the text and we are told that 'the students selected [these issues] as being most vital in today's world'

Recognition of Assumptions Sample Question

Statement: We need to save time in getting there so we'd better go by plane.

Deduction Sample Question

Statement: Some Sundays are rainy. All rainy days are boring. Therefore:

Interpretation Sample Question

Statement: A study of vocabulary growth in children from ages eight months to six years old shows that the size of spoken vocabulary increases from zero words at age eight months to 2,562 words at age six years.

Evaluation of Arguments Sample Question

Question: Should all young adults in the United Kingdom go on to higher education at university?

Watson Glaser Free Online Practice Test

To help you prepare for a Watson Glaser Test and to improve your chances of achieving a good test score, try our free Watson Glaser online practice test.

Alternatively, try out Job Test Prep's bank of Watson Glaser questions to help you increase your score.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Watson Glaser Test measures the skills required to present a certain point of view in a clear, well-structured, well-reasoned, and persuasive way to convince others of your argument. Originally created by Goodwin Watson and Edward Glaser, the test is designed to assess a person's critical thinking abilities - among other things - and is widely used across legal practices.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Free Law Guides to Help You on Your Career Path | The Lawyer Portal

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Read our free guides on all stages of getting into law, including law at university, LPC, BPTC, training contracts, pupillage - all regularly updated!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Mishcon Solicitor Apprenticeship is a six year Level 7 programme at the end of which you will qualify as a solicitor.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
MASSOLIT - Rules of Criminal Law: Substantive Criminal Law | Video lecture by Prof. John Child, Birmingham University

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Prof. John Child at Birmingham University discusses Substantive Criminal Law as part of a course on Rules of Criminal Law | High-quality, curriculum-linked video lectures for GCSE, A Level and IB, produced by MASSOLIT.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Duncan LeatherdaleBBC News, North East and Cumbria

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Darlington play-fight claim dad jailed for murdering daughter

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Simon Vickers, who claimed his daughter’s stabbing was accidental, is sentenced.

# data[].attributes.body
Clifford Chance Virtual Work Experience Rare Opportunity for Year 11 & 12 Students

Exclusive Law Work Experience – Register Now for February Half Term

FAO Careers, Y11 and Y12 Students

Hello,

Hope you are well. We have a fantastic February Half Term Work Experience Programme with Magic Circle Law Firm Clifford Chance.

This is a rare and exclusive virtual insight event for your students to spend a whole day with Clifford Chance on Friday 21st February, 10am -3pm.

This is a free event to attend with limited places.

Many thanks for sharing the below email

Best Regards

Dan / Young Professionals

—————-

Hello,

Are you an aspiring legal professional in Year 11 or 12 searching for some much-needed work experience to add to your CV? Then we have the perfect opportunity for you!

Whether you’re considering a solicitor apprenticeship or exploring the traditional university route, this exclusive Clifford Chance Virtual Work Experience Day is your chance to gain first-hand exposure to the legal world during February half term.

This one-day virtual programme is designed to help ambitious students like you develop key legal skills, learn from leading solicitors, and understand the different pathways into the legal profession.

Event Details

Date: Friday, 21st February
Time: 10:00 AM – 3:00 PM
Location: Zoom (Virtual)
For: Year 11 and 12 students

Why You Should Attend:

Law work experience is rare – secure this now to strengthen your future applications

Explore Clifford Chance’s practice areas and take part in interactive legal case studies.

Practical workshops to develop your legal skills

Learn about the ACCESS & SPARK Programmes on offer– a direct route into law with Clifford Chance

Advice from professionals on securing top legal opportunities

Boost your applications for law programmes and university with real experience

Why This Matters for Your Future:

Law firms are highly competitive, and work experience like this makes your application stand out. If you’re serious about a legal career, this is your chance to connect with a Magic Circle firm, learn from the best, and take your first step towards a successful career.

Law work experience is incredibly rare—don’t miss this opportunity to gain hands-on insight at one of the world’s top law firms!

Know friends who are interested in law? Share this with them!

Register now to secure your place before it’s too late.

Register Here:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CliffordChance-WEx-Day

We look forward to welcoming you to the Clifford Chance Work Experience Day!

Best regards,

Dan Miller

Founder and CEO

W: young-professionals.uk

Instagram: @youngprouk TikTok: @apprentice.pathfinders

# data[].attributes.headline
Lloyds Bank Legal - work experience 10-14 February 2025

# data[].attributes.subject
Lloyds Bank Legal - work experience 10-14 February 2025

# data[].attributes.body
An exclusive work experience programme is available with Lloyds Banking Group's Legal team in Leeds. LBG has developed a specialist work experience programme as part of the legal sector's PRIME initiative, which aims to increase access to the legal profession for students.

Key aspects of the opportunity:

Developed by LBG's legal team

Structured program to encourage diversity in the legal profession

5 day programme from 10th – 14th February

In order to further our discussions and potentially allocate spaces, if we are able to be involved, we need to know what the uptake will be. If you would like to take part in this opportunity, please register your interest on the form below. Please note that it does require availability on the final week of this term, so please do not register your interest if you will not be able to travel independently to and from Leeds, and if you are not able to attend the full five days (external exams, previous commitments etc.)

Register your Interest:

https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=CCE9ruiSt0Cc_JtGPyH9N3xsT-8KtmBEhGq3It3LAQNUOFRVRUFHSjJJWjFUT0daNjRFNU9KSTdLQy4u

# data[].attributes.body
Log into Unifrog and scroll down to "Unifrog events"

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Keep up-to-date on the latest legal victories, client wins, firm expansions and appointments, as well as all of the corporate social responsibility work being undertaken on behalf of worthy causes and charities. Yorkshire Legal is a platform for solicitors, barristers and junior lawyers in the region to discuss, debate and educate this highly important professional sector.

Subscribe to the Yorkshire Legal email newsletter

Subscribe to the Yorkshire Legal Newsletter

# data[].attributes.body
Please see below from the University of Law:

Happy New Year from The University of Law!

I hope this email finds you well and that you had a restful holiday season. We are thrilled to share some exciting updates and opportunities for your Year 12 and Year 13 students.

Please see below for our upcoming events:

Legal Personal Statement Workshop (virtual) 09 January 2025 16:00-17:00 – Book here

Real World Lecture: Is prison an effective form of punishment? – 12 February 2025 16:00-17:00 – Book here

Our ‘Explore’ Program offers students the change to delve into various career pathways and discover what is possible for their future:

Explore Law (virtual event) 03 March 2025 16:00-17:00 – Book here

Explore Policing (virtual event) 04 March 2025 16:00-17:00 – Book here

Explore Psychology (virtual event) 04 March 2025 16:00-17:00 – Book here

Explore Business (virtual event) 06 March 2025 16:00-17:00 – Book here

Explore Criminology (virtual event) 06 March 2025 16:00-17:00 – Book here

Open Days are the perfect opportunity for students to find out more about our courses, speak to tutors, hear from our employability team & student ambassadors, and have a tour of the campus.

Wednesday 8 January Leeds campus (16.00-19.30) can be booked onto by clicking here

Wednesday 15 January Virtual event (16.00-18.00) can be booked onto by clicking here

Additionally, we are pleased to announce the opening of our new building! Yorkshire House, just across from our current building on Park Row will provide even more opportunities for Undergraduate and Postgraduate students to engage in dynamic learning environments and events as we continually diversity our offerings at The University of Law. See attachments for some photos.

Please get in touch (adele.kirby@law.ac.uk) if you would like further details about these initiatives or if I can assist in any way to support your students. I look forward to working with you and chatting to your students in 2025.

Best wishes

Adele

Adele Kirby

Student Recruitment Officer - Leeds
The University of Law

Leeds Campus
15-16 Park Row

Leeds LS1 5HD

# data[].attributes.headline
Olliers Solicitors event - 6 January 2025

# data[].attributes.subject
Olliers Solicitors event - 6 January 2025

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Law Show - Joint enterprise - what is it and why is it controversial? - BBC Sounds

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Joint enterprise is a powerful prosecution tool - but why is it controversial?

# data[].attributes.headline
Paper 1 A - Juries - Bushell's case and jury advantages 

# data[].attributes.subject
Paper 1 A - Juries - Bushell's case and jury advantages 

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Law Show - Jury conscience, resolving conflicts in space, and the law of Treasure Trove in Scotland - BBC Sounds

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Juries and conscience, liability in outer space and Scottish Treasure Trove.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Browse our collection of 33 Law courses, each designed and delivered by a top university professor.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
A first-year student’s guide to opportunities in law

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Read this essential advice for first-year students covering legal work experience, extracurricular activities, law fairs and more. For lots more information and advice, see our dedicated first-year student hub.

# data[].attributes.headline
Slaughter and May - Insight virtual event Wednesday 13 November

# data[].attributes.subject
Slaughter and May - Insight virtual event Wednesday 13 November

# data[].attributes.body
Insight to Slaughter and May Virtual Event

Wednesday 13th November - 5:00pm - 6:30pm

Work for one of the UK’s Elite Law Firms

FAO Careers & Y11, Y12, Y13 Students

Hello,

Hope you are well and have had a great start to the week.

Please could our Virtual Get into Law Event taking place with Slaughter & May on Wednesday 13th November 5pm – 6:30pm be passed on to students in Y11, Y12 and Y13.

This is a very rare and unique opportunity for your students to hear from one of the leading magic circle law firms. During the event they will hear about the solicitor apprenticeship options, in-person events at their offices as well as work experience opportunities.

Many thanks for sharing.

Dan / Young Professionals

----

Hello,

We’re excited to invite you to an exclusive opportunity with one of the most prestigious law firms in the world—Slaughter and May! If you’re a Year 11, 12, or 13 student with an interest in commercial law, this event is for you.

Event Details:
Date: Wednesday 13th November
Time: 5:00pm - 6:30pm
Location: Virtual via Zoom (link will be provided upon registration)

Why Attend?
At this event, you’ll get a unique chance to dive deep into the world ofSlaughter and May, one of the UK’s elite law firms. Known for their innovation and expertise, Slaughter and May has been at the fore front of the legal industry for decades. They handle some of the most complex and high-profile cases globally, working with top-tier clients from every industry. This is your chance to hear directly from professionals who have shaped their careers at one of the most influential firms in the world.

What You’ll Learn:

Career Opportunities: Discover what it’s like to work at the  firm, and gain an insight into the solicitor apprenticeship programme that can kickstart your legal career.

A World of Difference: Hear about the four distinct differences that set Slaughter and May apart from other global law firms

Exclusive Networking: Gain access to legal experts and discover how you can stand out in the competitive world of law.

Additionally, we will be hosting an in-person event with Slaughter and May before the end of the year, and attending this virtual insight is the best way to learn about it and how to apply for a chance to attend. Students must attend the online event to be eligible for the in-person event.

This is an unmissable opportunity to learn what sets Slaughter and May apart, and how you can become part of one of the world’s most respected law firms. Secure your spot today and get ready to take your first step toward a future in law.

Register now:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Slaughter-and-May

We can’t wait to see you there!

Best Regards,

Dan Miller

Founder and CEO |

W: young-professionals.uk

Instagram: @youngprouk TikTok:@apprentice.pathfinders

E: dan.miller@young-professionals.uk

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Law Show - Sewage-polluted waters, Divorce and financial orders, Leasehold reform - BBC Sounds

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Conversation about the laws making headlines, and the laws that shape everyday life.

# data[].attributes.headline
7 November - Leeds Family Court Open Evening

# data[].attributes.subject
7 November - Leeds Family Court Open Evening

# data[].attributes.headline
Y13 - Private nuisance - Fearn v Tate Gallery

# data[].attributes.subject
Y13 - Private nuisance - Fearn v Tate Gallery

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Neo Bankside development ("the Development") consists of four purpose built residential towers on Holland Street, London. A stone's throw from the south bank of the River Thames. Each has 21 floors and is designed to maximise the area of glass on each floor thereby giving the occupier a panoramic view of the city. Each tower was completed in 2013 / 2014 and subject to long leaseholds. Leases of many of the flats within the Development sell for over £1 million.

Across Holland Street and next to the Millenium Bridge is the Tate Modern gallery. In 2016 Tate Modern completed the construction of the Blavatnik Building. This is adjacent to the main building and in the form of a twisted pyramid including a 360 degree viewing gallery open to visitors. Block C of the Development ("Block C") is the closest to the Blavatnik Building. The gap between the two is about 34 metres. The viewing gallery is at the height of floors 18 and 19 of Block C.

The Development and the Blavatnik Building are substantial developments and planning for both took a long period. There was an overlap between the applications for planning permission. At one stage there was a proposal to include angled glass and like features in the viewing gallery. However, this proposal was not pursued in amended plans. Thereafter, neither the planning consultants for Tate Modern nor the local planning authority considered in any detail the desirability of restricting viewing in the direction of the Development. Even after the Development opened, the plans for the Blavatnik Building could have been amendment, but were not.

The Court considered the relationship in space between the Development and the Blavatnik Building in detail, but it is not easy to see the problem without the benefit of Google Maps. A visitor to the viewing gallery would want to look downwards to the North to view the river. Such a visitor would also want to view the Houses of Parliament and the London Eye to the South West but these are some distance away. The visitor would probably be content to view these distant landmarks without looking down. In principle, the viewing gallery could have been designed to prevent viewing downwards in the South West direction (or indeed Southwards generally). Putting the matter another way, there is not much to look at immediately to the South of Tate Modern.

Once opened, the viewing gallery became very popular with visitors of Tate Modern. At any one time the viewing gallery could accommodate up to 300 visitors. Such visitors watched, filmed and photographed residents of Block C on a virtually constant basis. Some even used binoculars. For the affected residents of Block C, the intrusion was relentless and akin to being in a zoo. Tate Modern did put up signs in the viewing gallery suggesting that the privacy of the residents should be respected. These were largely ignored.

The residents of Block C most affected (ranging from floors 13 to 21) commenced proceedings to require Tate Modern to cordon off part of the viewing gallery so as to prevent the viewing referred to above.
Initial observations
At first sight, one might be forgiven for thinking that the issues of the claim would be limited to the required remedy and that liability would not be a serious issue. The claimants were leaseholders of flats within Block C (with exclusive possession) and have a sufficient proprietary interest to bring a claim in private nuisance (see Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] AC 655). The types of activity giving rise to private nuisance are not closed. In principle, private nuisance could apply to interference with television signals (see Hunter v Canary Wharf). It could apply to damage caused by Japanese knotweed (see Williams v Network Rail [2019] QB 601). Private nuisance ought to apply to viewing in an appropriately extreme case.
The standard test or methodology involves asking three questions being as follows:
1) Is the defendant's use of its land "common or ordinary" in the locality? Some cases use "or" and some "and" without any discussion of the differences. If the defendant's use of its land is "common or ordinary" then it may be able to avoid liability by relying upon the defence of "reasonable user" or "give and take" that is to say user necessary for the ordinary or common use of the land (see speech of Lord Goff in Cambridge Water Co. v Eastern Counties Leather PLC [1994] 2 AC 264 at page 299E).

2) Is the claimants' use of their land "common or ordinary" in the locality?

3) Is there a substantial interference with the use of the claimants' land?

The creation and use of the viewing gallery is now unlawful and might be desirable from a commercial perspective, but it is hardly "common or ordinary" in this or any other locality. It is unique and this is its selling point. The interference is substantial because it deprives the residents of flats from being able to use them in the usual way that people do. For some residents, it made their life a misery. Insofar as this might be relevant, Tate Modern had every opportunity to design the Blavatnik Building so as to mitigate the effects on the residents of the Development, but did not to do so.

However, this is not the way in which the case proceeded until the Supreme Court decision on 1st February 2023.
The decision of Mann J at first instance ([2019] Ch 369)
The claim was brought on two bases. The first was that Tate Modern was undertaking "functions of a public nature" and thereby bound to act fairly under section 6(3)(b) of the Human Rights Act 1998. It was claimed that it had not done so by facilitating viewing of the nature described. The second was that the acts constituted private nuisance and that the Court was entitled to take into account the right to privacy under article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") in order to extend if necessary the remit of private nuisance.

The Judge found that Tate Modern was not undertaking "functions of a public nature" even though it was publicly funded. This would only apply if the functions were of the nature normally undertaken by a Government agency.

As to private nuisance, the Judge considered that the requirement for the protection of privacy under the Convention enabled him to extend the tort of private nuisance (if necessary) so as to include viewing which interfered with such privacy. However, the Judge concluded that there had been no substantial interference with the claimants' reasonable user of the flats for the following reasons:

1) The way in which the viewing gallery had been operated was not unlawful or "unreasonable".

2) The claimants had created a "self-induced sensitivity" to viewing by deciding to live in flats which had been constructed so as to maximise glass frontage.

3) The claimants could take steps to deal with the problem whether by installing tinted glass or curtains other otherwise.

Accordingly, the claim was dismissed.

I found the decision at the time troubling.

1) As to the first point, the reference to user which was not "unreasonable" seemed to be misplaced. Mann J did not conclude that Tate Modern's user was "common or ordinary". Accordingly, "reasonable user" or "give and take" should not apply.

2) As to the second point, this is normally an argument which judges hate. The amount of glass used in the construction of the towers enabled the residents of to enjoy their flats to their best advantage. Nothing more. Some years ago, I acted for an offal factory which had increased its production intensity. Nearby residents brought claims against it for private nuisance relating to noxious smells and noise. One of the arguments which the offal factory used was that these residents had created or worsened the problem by installing patio doors in their homes which they liked to keep open during the trading hours of the offal factory. As might be expected, this argument went down like a lead balloon. In my experience, similar arguments normally do. As a general rule, judges are the sort of people who like to enjoy their homes to their best advantage and empathize with a claimant who wishes to do so. There is also an element of blaming the victim, which is unattractive.

3) This seems to be an issue as to remedy rather than the existence of a cause of action.
The decision of the Court of Appeal ([2020] EWCA Civ 104)
Before the Court of Appeal, the case took a different direction.

All three judges disagreed with the approach taken by Mann J as to substantial interference. None accepted that the claimants had created a "self-induced sensitivity". The claimants were just enjoying their flats as people do.

However, all three judges concluded that the weight of judicial authority was to the effect that "mere overlooking" from one property to another was not capable of giving rise to a cause of action in private nuisance. Article 8 of the Convention could not assist in extending the ambit of private nuisance because concepts of privacy under the Convention were distinct from property rights protected under the law of private nuisance. Privacy is attached to the person. Private nuisance is a property tort linked inextricably with rights to enjoy property.

I found the decision at the time troubling because the essence of the tort of private nuisance is that it evolves with time, technology and the innate ability of the species to interfere with the rights of neighbours. It clearly applies to vibrations on one property which affect the neighbouring property. This type of vibration would not have been dreamt of when the tort originated. Neither would residential tower blocks lined with glass. In any event, the viewing by visitors was not "mere overlooking" in the sense that it arises merely because one property is higher than another. It was deliberate and intensive viewing for pleasure or amusement. Tate Modern had effectively encouraged its visitors to do so.
The decision of the Supreme Court
All five judges concluded that the tort of private nuisance was wide enough to enable a claim relating to viewing provided that it was sufficiently intensive. Insofar as this was relevant, the actions of the visitors of Tate Modern amounted to far more than the facilitation or encouragement of "mere viewing". The fact that there had been no reported case to date relating to such a claim was not important. Article 8 of the Convention has no part to play in assessing the scope of the tort or private nuisance or any similar property tort.

The majority of the Supreme Court (Lords Leggatt, Reed and Lloyd-Jones) accepted the criticisms of the Court of Appeal with regard to the decision of Mann J and concluded what there had been substantial interference with the claimants' "common or ordinary" user of their flats. While there was a balance between the conflicting right of neighbouring owners to be maintained (see Sedleigh-Denflield v O'Callaghan [1940] AC 880) the balancing exercise required the Court to intervene and relief would be granted. Lord Leggatt, who gave the speech of the majority, was scathing about the judgments below and considered that they may have been motivated by a desire to prefer the rights of the many visitors to Tate Modern at the expense of a few rich residents of the flats. In this regard, Lord Leggatt may be inferring more than is obvious from the judgments themselves. It is an unfair criticism of the Court of Appeal as all three judges would have found for the claimants but for the fundamental issue as to the nature of the actions giving rise to a private nuisance claim.

The speech of the minority (Lords Sales and Kitchin) is not easy to follow. They do not appear to have accepted the argument that the claimants created "a self-induced sensitivity". However, they refused to interfere with the judgment of Mann J on the basis that private nuisance involves at its very essence the concept of "reasonable user" or "give and take". For the minority, these concepts were not limited to actions required for "common or ordinary" user. The minority considered that residents of the flats were in a position to take steps to mitigate the problem and they should do so rather than Tate Modern.
The analysis of the minority is perplexing for a number of reasons including the following:
1) The natural reading of the speech of Lord Goff in Cambridge Water limits "reasonable user" or "give and take" to actions required for "common or ordinary" user. No judge took the view that there was "common or ordinary" user of Tate Modern's land.

2) Extending the defence of "reasonable user" or "give and take" to situations where the user is not "common or ordinary" creates uncertainty and changes the whole nature of the liability. A person who constructs a property which is not "common or ordinary" in the locality (or commences a use which is not "common or ordinary" from an existing building) ought to assess and mitigate the consequences for his neighbours of such use. He is best placed to do so and mitigation can be filtered into the cost. One might be forgiven for thinking that these steps would be taken in conjunction with (or at the direction of) the planning authorities. On the facts, Tate Modern had been given every opportunity to construct the Blavatnik Building in a way which mitigated the obvious potential damage to the residents of Block C caused by hundreds of visitors gawping at them. It had taken none of these opportunities and had made no proposals to restrict the usage of the viewing gallery thereafter.
The law after the judgment
In a case with just two issues, it is surprising to find such fundamental difference of approach by the judiciary. As to the two issues, the nine judges considering the same decided as follows:

1) Nuisance applies to viewing (6 to 3).

2) There was substantial interference (6 to 3).

However, there were only three judges who found both. Fortunately, they were all in the Supreme Court.
The following can be said in the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court:
1) The boundaries of the law of private nuisance are not closed. In appropriate circumstances, viewing can amount to private nuisance.

2) Article 8 of the Convention is of no assistance in determining the ambit of private nuisance or any other property tort.

3) Reliance upon "self-induced sensitivity" arguments as regards residential properties is likely to be very difficult.

4) The standard test for substantial interference is to be applied that is to say the defence of "reasonable user" or "give and take" only apply to actions required for the "common and ordinary" user of the claimant's land.

Sean Kelly

Parklane Plowden Chambers

22nd February 2023

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Nuisance after Fearn v Tate Gallery - Parklane Plowden

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Parklane Plowden's Sean Kelly provides an article on Nuisance after Fearn v Tate Gallery.

# data[].attributes.body
Check out this podcast to listen to discussion of all different types of law and what is changing in our current world!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Traumatised jurors, prenups and Japanese knotweed

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Episode · The Law Show · Weekly conversation led by Dr Joelle Grogan to give you an in-depth understanding of the law stories making news and the legal decisions that could have a bearing on everyone in the UK. This week: Traumatised jurors: new research has found that as much as half of people who serve on the juries of gruesome criminal trials, such as child murders or rape, can suffer symptoms of vicarious psychological trauma as a result. A pilot scheme to offer free counselling to affected jurors has now been shelved in England and Wales due to the election. But in Scotland and Northern Ireland support is available. Joelle discusses all this and what else happens on jury service with criminal defence barrister and part-time judge Charlie Sherrard KC, and with author, commentator and barrister Dr Sam Fowles. Prenuptial contracts: what is a “prenup,” as they’re often called? Should you get one even if you’re not wealthy? Are they legally binding in the case of divorce, or not worth the paper they’re written on? What do you need to do for the courts to uphold them in the various parts of the UK? Family law solicitor and social media’s “legal queen” Tracey Moloney has the answers. And: Japanese knotweed, a fast-growing invasive species so tough it can only be successfully removed by professionals. A Scottish couple has been granted permission by an Edinburgh sheriff to sue the previous owners of their home, who had not declared that there is Japanese knotweed on the property. This case centres around whether or not it counts as an “infestation”. Other home seller packs ask about knotweed explicitly. Dr Sam Fowles explains the law, and who you can sue if you find yourself with unwanted knotweed after all. Presenter: Dr Joelle Grogan Producers: Ravi Naik and Arlene Gregorius Editor: Tara McDermott Production co-ordinator: Maria Ogundele

# data[].attributes.headline
Paper 1 - high cost of civil court action

# data[].attributes.subject
Paper 1 - high cost of civil court action

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Rebekah Vardy challenges Coleen Rooney’s £2m legal bill

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Footballers’ wives return to High Court over cost dispute with claimed costs including stay at Nobu Hotel.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Argument with neighbour over dog leads to formal warning for magistrate

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Magistrate’s repeated emphasis of her knowledge of the law was ‘inappropriate’, JCIO rules.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
"You can't have a say at the table if you don't have a seat at the table. So these programs and these opportunities for people who look like me, act like me and think like me, are an opportunity to have a seat at the table so we can have a better future for the people behind us."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Free Virtual Work Experience Programs from Top Companies - Forage.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Legal Cheek - news, commentary and law careers advice

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Legal news & gossip, cheeky commentary and careers advice

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
It’s time to take control of your future | Springpod

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Springpod is a careers platform where students can experience the world of work and university before they apply. Rated 4.9/5 on TrustPilot.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Apprenticeships.co.uk | Powered by Young Professionals

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
BBC Radio 4 - File on 4, Lucy Letby: The Killer Questions

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
File on 4 reveals new concerns over evidence in the Lucy Letby trial.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Ofsted, 2021

Leaders and governors foster a culture of exceptionally high expectations for students' academic success

Ofsted, 2021

Students enjoy their lessons, which are taught by skilled, enthusiastic and knowledgeable teachers

You're treated as an individual... Everything is geared towards getting you ready for life and the staff really help prepare you for your exams

Ofsted, 2021

Leaders and staff create an exceptionally safe and welcoming culture

Ofsted, 2021

Students participate in an extensive range of activities and projects that develop their confidence and broaden their interests

Ofsted, 2021

There exists an ambitious curriculum that equips students exceptionally well with the knowledge and skills that they need to progress

Ofsted, 2021

Students thrive in the academy's calm and harmonious environment

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Trinity Sixth Form Academy - Outstanding Sixth Form in Halifax

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Ofsted, 2021 Leaders and governors foster a culture of exceptionally high expectations for students' academic success Ofsted, 2021 Students enjoy their lessons, which are taught by skilled, enthusiastic and knowledgeable teachers You're treated as an individual...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Law Textbooks and Resources for AQA, OCR and WJEC.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Explore our range of Secondary Law books, online Boost and Magazine resources, along with CPD tailored to your exam board.

# data[].attributes.body
Welcome to Law - we hope you have fun with the activities available - all designed to get you thinking about the vibrant and interesting course you'll be starting in September.

contactus@sixth.trinitymat.org

# data[].attributes.body
Another career path you may not have considered is being a Paralegal - check out what it's like!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Life as a Paralegal | Alice Robinson | Slater and Gordon

# data[].attributes.headline
Has your lake overflowed into someone's mine? Here's what to do...

# data[].attributes.subject
Has your lake overflowed into someone's mine? Here's what to do...

# data[].attributes.body
An intro to a case in Tort Law!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Rylands v Fletcher | An Extension to Nuisance

# data[].attributes.headline
So you've found a snail in your gingerbeer... what's the law on that?!

# data[].attributes.subject
So you've found a snail in your gingerbeer... what's the law on that?!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
0:00 / 1:48•Watch full video

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
24 Questions in 2024: With Joy Elson, BPC student

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Episode · The University of Law Podcast · In this episode, Clubs and Society coordinator Emily Lewis is joined by BPC student Joy Elson, who currently works as a Legally Qualified Disability Advocate for social enterprise, PIP Professionals. Joy shares her journey to studying law, achieving the Anthony Walker and CPS Scholarships, and how this inspired her to a career in law and promoting diversity and inclusion.

# data[].attributes.headline
Killed your husband out of fear?? Check out this case summary...

# data[].attributes.subject
Killed your husband out of fear?? Check out this case summary...

# data[].attributes.body
This case contributes to something called 'diminished responsibility' - where a person cannot wholly be blamed for their actions (in this case - murder).

# data[].attributes.body
Here you can access helpful hints and tips for Paper 1 !

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Paper 1 Revision Clinic | OCR A-Level Law Revision for 2024