# data[].attributes.body
SIGMA SIGMA BOI SIGMA BOI SIGMA BOI

# data[].attributes.body
I don't really know I like the idea of people exploring space but something might happen up there or could go smoothly

# data[].attributes.body
logic because it tells us that robot should go to spece

# data[].attributes.body
logic because it tells us that robot can go up to space without risking a life in hand and would gather more data than the human can carry.

# data[].attributes.body
The author used logos specifically from previous human space exploration. For example in paragraph 1 it says "in 1969, enthusiasm for new discoveries soared

# data[].attributes.body
I guess low go

# data[].attributes.body
logic because it tells us that robot can go up to space and then after that without risking in a life in hand and would gather more data than the human can carry

# data[].attributes.body
the author try to perswade us to go to space so it logo.

# data[].attributes.body
The author used logos in the text, a detail that shows this is in paragraph 1 it says "After the real-life Apollo 11's moon mission in 1969, enthusiasm for new discoveries soared. " This shows that the author is using logos in this detail by using numbers.

# data[].attributes.body
maybe I guess logic

# data[].attributes.body
The author used logos in the article a detail that shows this is in paragraph 1 it says ''After the real-life Apollo 11's moon mission in 1969, enthusiasm for new discoveries soared'' this show that he is using logos by using numbers.

# data[].attributes.body
The rhetoric the author used was logos, they use numbers and timeline and were stating facts and also using logic. One detail from the text states,"which has made more than 1.3 million observations since its mission began in 1990". This shows its logic and facts.

# data[].attributes.headline
Estefany the text was all logo but not paragraph 11. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Estefany the text was all logo but not paragraph 11. 

# data[].attributes.body
Yes I am convinced by the authors argument because many things can go smoothly when humans explore Outer space and if robots go explore Outer space many things can go wrong like a part of them getting broken or there battery getting low while exploring.

# data[].attributes.body
the author used "Logos" Some evidence tha supports is from paragraph 4 it says "A prominent example is the hubble space telescope, which was made more than 1.3 million observations since its mission began in 1990 it has traveled more then 4 billion miles, sending back stunning photos of faraway stars and galaxy" This supports because its including numbers, and logic.

# data[].attributes.body
no I am not convinced by the authors argument because it is still dangerous to go to space you wont know what can happen a asteriod may even hit your rocket ship a black hole can appear or your engines can fail and you can get stuck.

# data[].attributes.body
The type of rhetoric that the author uses in the article is logos because the author logic and numbers to persuade the reader about their claim. I say this because on paragraph 3 it states” After the explosions of the challenger in 1983 and in Columbia in 2003 the program will shut down in 2011.This shows how the author uses logos to use Logic , numbers and graphs to support his/her claim to a reader

# data[].attributes.body
I don't really know I like the idea but I feel it would be more safe if robots went to space to not risk life's in hand of NASA

# data[].attributes.body
logic because author is telling

# data[].attributes.body
I like it

# data[].attributes.body
the government doesn't support space travel because they are afraid something is going to happen and they are going to lose money

# data[].attributes.body
the rhetoric was logos because there were numbers also they used logic to pursuade us . for example numbers . "in the text it says "A prominent example is the hubble space telescope , which has more than 1.3 million observations since its mission began in 1990 . it has traveled more than 4 billion miles."

# data[].attributes.body
I desegree with the author humans student take a risk just to go to space they might get lost.

# data[].attributes.body
I dissagree

# data[].attributes.body
The government might have shifted from supporting space travel through NASA to prioritizing commercial travel because they don't have enough cash to pay the expenses and they think it is also dangerous to travel to space because anything can happen.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't know because the author gives good evidence but you don't know what might happen in space a lot of things can happen in space. It's really dangerous to go to space

# data[].attributes.body
the type rhetoric they the author uses is logos because in the text they use numbers to show and logic. One detail from the text is in paragraph 4 it states " which has made more than 1.3 million observations since its mission began in 1990" this is logical and it has a number of how many missions that began in 1990.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes I am convinced by what the author has said because since robots are made by technology and these parts might have gone wrong and the mission could go the opposite. While a human can so smooth.

# data[].attributes.body
the author thinks humans should go to space because the author thinks that it good going to space.

# data[].attributes.body
they want to go to speca

# data[].attributes.body
That people want the water back on Mars again because they want life back on Mars to have a another place to stay

# data[].attributes.body
that people want the water back on Mars but how do we know there is a water source on Mars

# data[].attributes.body
The government has shifted from supporting space to prioritizing commercial travel because maybe they might get a lawsuit because people could die out there and that is really dangerous.I say this because on paragragh 3 it states"The international space station suffered 2 terrible loses .After the explosions of the challenger in 1986 and Columbia in 2003 the program was shut down in 2011 ". This shows that they don't want any accidents or casualties so they went to a different mission for extra precautions.

# data[].attributes.body
logic because they want to send robots to the scape

# data[].attributes.body
The connection between mars and water In paragraph 8 is they want water on earth as a back up to humanity if something happens it'll be another we can stay at.

# data[].attributes.body
logic because "is the Hubble space telescope, which has made more than 1.3 million observation"

# data[].attributes.body
yes im convinced because everything is tested before launching the rocket and its professionals who were trained for many things and trained for any situation that happens, also the astronauts choose to go to go by there free will also to become an astronaut knowing everything that can happen. And all the scary stories that show danger in space is when they didnt check the rocket or didnt plan enough or think about what will happen.

# data[].attributes.body
logic because they want to send robots to space so they humans don't die.

# data[].attributes.body
Logo because the author includes numbers.One peice of evidence that supports my answer is in paragraph 1 "After the real-life Apollo 11's moon mission in 1969,enthusiasm for new discoveries soared". The detail supports my answer because it show logo with numbers.

# data[].attributes.body
The government doesn't support the space travel anymore because he is scared that something will go wrong and will lose money. one detail is that ''The International space station, suffered two terrible losses''this show that he he scared that something will go wrong again.

# data[].attributes.body
The author uses logos because in paragraph 4 it says "A prominent example is the Hubble Space Telescope, which has made more than 1.3 million observations since its mission began in 1990"

# data[].attributes.body
when people went on a mission to Mars they thought there was evidence of water in the surface below Mars for example in paragraph 8 it says "these missions showed possibility of liquid water below the surface of Mars" this show the connection between Mars and water

# data[].attributes.body
For this just look at paragraph 3 its because the comine NaSa SaId ThAt going to space is risky and they don't want people to die in space

# data[].attributes.body
the author used logic because the author used numbers to try convince us

# data[].attributes.body
The government might have shifted from supporting space travel through NASA to prioritizing commercial travel because they don't have enough cash to pay the expenses and they think it is also dangerous to travel to space because anything can happen.

# data[].attributes.body
the author believes that there possibly liquid on Mars like water below the surfece and they want life on mars.

# data[].attributes.body
The connection between Mars and water because the space station had a possibility that water could be under the ocean. I say this because on paragraph 8 it states " early missions to Mars such as Mars odyssey were designed to make discoveries under the theme of follow the water these missions showed the possibility of liquid water below the surface of Mars".This shows that Mars could be inhabitable and might be able to have life on Mars and and that humans could live there.

# data[].attributes.body
The connection between Mars and water is that there is water below the surface. one piece of evidence is ''these missions showed the possibility of liquid water below the surface of Mars'' this show that we can live on Mars because there is water there

# data[].attributes.body
logic because they want to send robots to space.

# data[].attributes.body
The government has been changing from supporting the space shuttle program into not supporting this is because the government doesn't want people to get hurt and its supporting through NASA prioritizing commercial travel. Also the government doesn't have enough expenses into buying it.

In paragraph 3 it says " International Space Station, suffered two terrible losses. After the explosion of the Challenger in 1986 and Colombia in 2003 the program was shut down in 2011." This is proving that the government is saying that its too dangerous.

# data[].attributes.body
the government is afraid to lose money for that they doesn't support space

# data[].attributes.body
The government doesn't support space travel because they are afraid to lose money

# data[].attributes.body
The government have shifted from supporting space travel through NASA to proritizing commercial travel because they don't have enough money to pay the expenses.

# data[].attributes.body
yes i am convinced by the author's argument because besides negitive things there theres postive things that robots can help us with discovering new things and seeing how things work . also things can go wrong like the batterys can go low or a part of the robot can break or get broken apart .

# data[].attributes.body
espanol

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
30+ Datos sobre el espacio para obtener un 10 en astronomía

# data[].attributes.body
I think the government might have shifted from supporting space travel through NASA to prioritizing commercial travel because he might be scared something might go wrong.In paragraph 3 it says " The international space station, suffered two terrible losses" this shows that he is scared something might go wrong again.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the government might have shifted from supporting space travel through NASA to prioritizing commercial travel because he might be scared something might go wrong.In paragraph 3 it says " The international space station, suffered two terrible losses" this shows that he is scared something might go wrong again.

# data[].attributes.body
pocoyo

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
POCOYÓ en ESPAÑOL - ¡Canta con Pocoyó en Apple Music! CANCIONES INFANTILES y CARICATURAS para niños

# data[].attributes.body
it logic

# data[].attributes.body
the author did logos for the text and details that will show in paragraph 1 where it says "after the real-life Apollo 11 moon mission in 1969, enthusiasm for new discoveries soared." and this show that the author is using logos in detail by putting numbers.

# data[].attributes.body
The connection between Mars and water is that there is water on the surface of mars one detail that shows this is ''these missions showed the possibility of liquid water below that surface of Mars'' this shows that we might be able to live on Mars

# data[].attributes.body
I am convinced because the author gave us many reasons to believe them.

# data[].attributes.body
the government shifted from supporting space travel through NASA to prioritizing commercial travel because people died. in paragraph 3 "suffered two terrible losses. after the explosions was shut down in 2011"

# data[].attributes.body
the connection between Mars and water is that water on the surface on Mars one detail that will show this is "these mission s that showed the possibility of liquid water that is below of surface of Mars" and this shows that we will might be able to go on Mars and live

# data[].attributes.body
I'm not convinced by the authors argument because in the text it shows that they want to explore space and go to Mars but they are trying to keep it safe because of the the two accidents and also they need high tech to keep themselves from dangerous and I don't think they are trustworthy .

# data[].attributes.body
the government shifted to travel because they dont have money

# data[].attributes.body
people who go on missions for discovering water showed the possibility of liquid water on mars and signs of life and think maybe we will see life on mars.

# data[].attributes.body
the goverment doesnt support space travel because it was way to dangerous because of the 2 explosions of 1986, and 2003 and because of that they were afraid they were going to lose money.

# data[].attributes.body
yes I am convinced by the argument that the author has said because since robots are made by technology then one of the parts from the robots can get broken or can get stuck and the mission can go really wrong but with humans it can go smooth or maybe have some trouble can happen

# data[].attributes.body
The connection between Mars and water is there is water on surface of Mars one detial that shows "there missions showed the possibility of liquid water below that surface"

# data[].attributes.body
I am not convinced because in the text they are trying to keep the space exploration safe so that no accidents happen like they did already and they also are using high technology to stay away from any type of on space danger so they need a lot of stuff just to stay safe when traveling to space.