# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis Khan was a vicious barbarian because he was very vicious and killed many people with gruesome methods and the video said he even killed unborn children and even with the benefits this is very unacceptable .

# data[].attributes.body
Genghis Khan was a vicious barbarian because he caused the deaths of an enormous number of people using atrocious methods, including throwing infected bodies into enemy cities, making his actions largely unacceptable regardless of any positive outcomes or reasons for his reign.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis Khan did kill a lot of people but many of his actions had purpose or positive reprecussions on today's modern world. for starters mass murder was nothing uncommon at the time. many large states like what we know of as France or Spain let the black plague run rampant so large populations dying wasn't uncommon. many of his actions were driven by justice and many were (most likely) spared from death to be captured. he also possibly had an impact on technology at the time. his spree could have made china and Russia push for more effective weaponry to stop him. he also made them form a friendship that lasts through and probably beyond, the 21st century. I consider him to be bad but not the worst

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis Khan is both a unifier and a vicious barbarian because he did really bad stuff like ripping unborn kids from their moms and killi a lot of people but he also created a strong empire and treated his people well.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Genghis Khan was a unifier because he built the largest land empire in the world.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis Khan was a vicious barbarian. Although his reign did have some positive effects and reasoning, a lot of the stuff he did was just terrible. He killed an incredibly large amount of people, some with atrocious methods such as throwing infected bodies into enemy cities, and it was just to bad to be excusable. - Ranon

# data[].attributes.body
Genghis khan is a vicious barbarian. This is because he used his own infected soldiers to hurt others. And he murdered 10% of the population.

# data[].attributes.body
I think genghis Khan is a vicious barbarian because he killed over 40,000,000 people that is 10% of the worlds population.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis Khan was both because even tho he killed a lot of people, he then united other people and forged an empire.

# data[].attributes.body
T think he was a vicious barbarian because he killed 2/3 of the china population. Khan and his army wiped out hundreds of china city's. 40 million people were killed from his vicious conquest.That is what I think.

# data[].attributes.body
He was a unifirer because he only killed them if they rebelled and also he trated his people well and woman also had it goo. and they saved doctors and other people to help them so yes he is a unifier.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis Khan was a barbarian.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Genghis Khan was a vicious barbarian because he killed and attacked millions of people, He also wiped out many cities. about 10% of the world was killed. This is why I believe that Genghis Khan was a Vicious barbarian.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was a vicious barbarian because he wiped out cities and killed many. He killed 2/3 of north china population. He also took women and killed their unborn children.

# data[].attributes.body
i think he was a viscous killer because he killed up to 40 million people . and launched people with the plague over a wall .

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis was a barbarian he killed Millions and wiped out cites. He use human as shields.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis Khan is a unifier because he created a large empire with loyal people. He also strongly believed in religion and law and made China and Russia stop fighting and made the two countries unified states.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis is a vicious barbarian because he killed many people

# data[].attributes.body
I think he is a vicious barbarian as he killed many people and he also killed 2/3 of North china. He also did inhumane activities like using people as human shields.

# data[].attributes.body
Genghis khan is a viscous barbarian and killed millions of people

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis vicious barbarian because killed millions, and left nothing but destruction.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis is a vicious barbarian because he threw bodies and killed a lot of people

# data[].attributes.body
I think that he was a vicious barbarian as he and his army killed %10 of the world, and would purposely kill people with infected people.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis is a vicious barbarian beucase him and his army went and killed so many people and left them almost nothing.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis Khan is a unifier because he created a very large empire with loyal people in them. He also strogly belived in religion and law.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis Khan was a Unifier who paved the way for the modern world because he made China and Russia stop fighting and made them unified states.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was a unifier because he created the worlds greatest empire and let people surrender first. He also upheld culture and law.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was a unifier because he created such a strong empire. He also believed a lot in loyalty, law, and religion.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis Khan was a vicious killer who mauled his opponents. He killed 2/3 of north china's population.That is why I think he is a killing machine.

# data[].attributes.body
I know he was a vicious barbarian because he killed so much people along with cities.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis Khan was a vicious barbarian who went in to city's with his military and killed millions and leaving nothing besides destruction. That's why I believe he was a vicious barbarian.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis Kan was a savage barbarian because he killed many people and when the black plague can and affected people he threw the bodies as chemical weapons,he killed unborn babies and destroyed cities with Their people. This is why I think Genghis Kan was very bad

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Genghis Khan was a unifier who believed in religion devoutly and believed in law as well even though he killed a lot of china's population

# data[].attributes.body
Best warlord ever he was a savage barbarian and brought Mongolia together. In my opinion the strongest empire of that time was the Mongolian empire which he did create.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Chingis Khan was a unifier who believed in law and religion even though he killed many people

# data[].attributes.body
In the beginning I believed he was a barbarian, but now I believe he was a bit of both. He did kill MILLIONS of people, but he also united with Russia instead of war. He was loyal to his people. But yes he did also kill lots of innocent people.

# data[].attributes.body
Genghis Khan was unifier. He has killed many of people but saved some people as well. He was a very competitive warrior and cared about is culture. He was also a ruler of many cities.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Genghis Khan was a vicious barbarian. The reason I think this is true is because even though he did save scholars and doctors from the villages he destroyed, he still killed many other people in the villages. Libraries, places, and hospitals we're burned in Baghdad, and it was believed that he bought the place to Europe, killing millions more. The acts of good do not overlook the many acts viciousness, so that's why I think he was a vicious barbarian.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Genghis Khan was both a vicious barbarian and a unifier. He did contribute to the world and shape them but in that path, he killed many people.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe he is a unifier. Even though he wasn't the best. He unified entire areas under his rule, and respected culture and religion. He also used justice. If he never used justice in his reasoning, he would have killed everyone and all of the cultures in his empire.

# data[].attributes.body
i think he was both because he helped the country grow and he did it in a bad way

# data[].attributes.body
I think that he was a unifier. He definitely killed lots of people, but that's just life. Life is gruesome. He also saved important people such as scholars, artists, and others that would help them advance scientifically as a nation.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis Khan was a fierce warrior who led the Mongols in many brutal battles, but he also united tribes, created fair laws, and helped trade grow between Asia and Europe. Even though he caused a lot of destruction, he also helped shape the modern world by connecting different cultures.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was both a Barbarian and a unifier. He built an empire and led, yet he killed many. He did contribute to the modern world as well, but he also did many terrible things to innocent people.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel as if he was a vicious barbarian and a unifier because he did both killed and helped with modern life.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was both because he did good things and bad things and both cancel each other out.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Genghis Khan was a mix of both because he did good things for his people that helped his country grow, but he did them in a cruel and violent way.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that he is both because he did contribute to helping the modern world but in the process he killed a lot of inoccents.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was both because he did many good things, he just did most of them with violence.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he is both because while he did do good thing he could have handled thing better and would not support violence as he tried to do good.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was a unifier beacause he tried to do good things even though many of them didn't turn out well

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was a unifier because It was normal at his time to do that.Like today if someone got aressied for shoplifting, but in the future they might think that was cruel.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was both because he tried to unify everyone, but he resorted to violence while doing it.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was both. He killed and hurt so many people, but also paved the way for things in the modern world.

# data[].attributes.body
He was a warlord of course he was going to kill lots of people. Everyone is also forgetting the good he did, he was a living legend!

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was a unifier but he was also a little gruel because he killed so many people and children (unborn, too).

# data[].attributes.body
He was a good leader but he did bad things. He did both.

# data[].attributes.body
Best warlord ever he was a savage barbarian and brought Mongolia together. In my opinion the strongest empire of that time was the Mongolian empire which he did create.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he did pave the way for the modern world but i dont think he should've done all the bad things like killing many people, killing unborn babies, using people as shields, and many others.

# data[].attributes.body
He was both because he made an empire but he like did bad stuff to make the empire.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he had good intentions and wanted to unify the people. Although he should not have killed unborn babies. He was kind to his people and only killed if people refuse to surrender.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that he was vicious barbarian, and a unifies. Because of all the stuff he did. Like being in tribes and making a military campaigns.