# data[].attributes.body
It’s time to update confidential funds circular, says ex-COA official Heidi Mendoza

'Wala pong kulay ang korapsyon, ang layunin natin ay magkaroon ng mas matibay, makatarungan, at makabuluhang polisiya ukol sa paggamit ng pondo ng bayan,' the senatorial candidate says

# data[].attributes.body
This passage is an opinion because it expresses personal judgments and subjective experiences rather than objective, verifiable facts. The reviewer describes the food, service, and pricing based on their own perspective, using phrases like “we loved our Thai-style mains” and “the service was below average”. These statements reflect personal taste and expectations rather than universally provable truths. The complaint about the chips being “too terrible to finish” and “swimming in oil” is also subjective—another person might have a different opinion. Additionally, the reviewer’s frustration with the waiter’s response and the tipping issue are personal feelings rather than objective facts. Since the passage is based on personal perception rather than neutral reporting, it is classified as an opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
This statement is a fact because it reports an event involving a real person (Senator Bato dela Rosa) and a real political situation. It states that Senator Dela Rosa made a remark about punishing Filipinos who helped facilitate former President Rodrigo Duterte’s trip to The Hague, referencing an executive order by former U.S. President Donald Trump. The statement can be verified through official sources, news reports, or direct records of Senate proceedings. Since it does not include personal interpretation, judgment, or opinion, it is classified as a fact.

# data[].attributes.body
This post is a fact-based opinion because it combines verifiable facts with personal interpretation and judgment. It presents factual information, such as Tatay Elmer’s income and the government’s fisheries budget, supported by official sources. However, it also includes opinions, such as concern over poverty and skepticism about government spending, which are based on these facts. Statements like “Let that sink in!” and “We shouldn’t let the government divert our attention from the real issues…” reflect the author's viewpoint rather than just neutral reporting. Since the argument is grounded in real data but includes personal interpretation and a call to action, it qualifies as a fact-based opinion rather than a purely factual statement.