# data[].attributes.body
An adult L-plater was taking their time at an intersection when the car behind them began aggressively honking their horn to get them to hurry up. The L-plater panicked and accelerated, crashing into a car being driven by an old lady who was 10kmh over the limit. Both cars suffered significant damage. The L-plater’s driving instructor was using their phone at the time. The driver who honked their horn drove off immediately, however witnesses recorded their license number. Neither the L-plater or the old lady have insurance.

Who should pay for the damages of either cars? The old lady, the adult L-plater, the driving instructor, or the horn-honker?

# data[].attributes.headline
Plaintiff Lucy Brown is suing the accused John Smith for defamation, over a video Mr Smith posted to his social media. The video posted by Mr Smith, shows him giving a 'review' of Lucy Brown's company 'Sneeze Free'. In the video Mr Smith is telling his 10 million followers, that her product did not help his seasonal hayfever, and supposedly aggravated them, giving him an extreme allergic reaction . He told his followers not to buy her products and slammed her company repeatedly. Lucy Brown is suing as she states that Mr Smith's actions have caused severe damage to her company in terms of sales and reputation. She claims she has lost $350,000 in sales. Lucy Brown claims that she believes that his extreme allergies are a result a new cat 'Benjamin' that the accused recently purchased and shared on his social media platform.

# data[].attributes.subject
Plaintiff Lucy Brown is suing the accused John Smith for defamation, over a video Mr Smith posted to his social media. The video posted by Mr Smith, shows him giving a 'review' of Lucy Brown's company 'Sneeze Free'. In the video Mr Smith is telling his 10 million followers, that her product did not help his seasonal hayfever, and supposedly aggravated them, giving him an extreme allergic reaction . He told his followers not to buy her products and slammed her company repeatedly. Lucy Brown is suing as she states that Mr Smith's actions have caused severe damage to her company in terms of sales and reputation. She claims she has lost $350,000 in sales. Lucy Brown claims that she believes that his extreme allergies are a result a new cat 'Benjamin' that the accused recently purchased and shared on his social media platform.

# data[].attributes.body
Sugar has 61 different names. A woman is suing a jelly bean maker for using the term "evaporated cane juice" instead of the word "sugar" in its jelly beans' food label. She alleges fraud, claiming the company is misleading consumers about how much sugar the snack actually contains - even though the total grams of sugar per serving is clearly displayed

# data[].attributes.body
A 69-year-old man wants to legally change his age in order to avoid ageism. He claims he feels discriminated against because his real age is affecting his job prospects as well as his chances of success on Tinder, a popular dating app.

# data[].attributes.body
I went to an independent smoothie bar this time, thinking I would support a local business . I walked in and ordered the Mango Tango flavour. After the worker handed it to me, it felt suspiciously heavy. I swished the straw around and it bumped up against a mound of something...
hairy.
I screamed and threw it down onto the sidewalk. The blasted smoothie went everywhere, the rat as well.
I have not had a smoothie since and i am afraid of eating out. All of my trust in society is gone. I am a shell of a person. I need retribution.

# data[].attributes.body
A group of fans have sued a bus company, Coach Innovations Limited, after a bus from Liverpool to Paris was booked for 4 pm, 29 May 2022. The bus and driver did not contact the group regarding their cancellation and left them stranded until they disbanded after 11 pm. The company has been alleged to be run by rival fans, and the trip was cancelled out of spite. The company dissolved in the next few days and the fans elected to proceed with the lawsuit of $100,000 directed to the named CEO before disbandment.

# data[].attributes.body
a woman made an appointment at the doctors to enquire about fatigue and a significant loss of weight. Upon leaving the doctors, she was diagnosed with perfect health and dismissed, while being charged a significant fee for the appointment. Two months later she grew significantly ill and went to another doctor across town. It was here that she was rushed to get a scan after being told she had symptoms that were consistent with acute heart failure. According to her current GP, these symptoms would have detectable for several months, and it was an outrage to the health system that she was neglected the tests or consideration for immediate treatment. The woman has been offered compensation for the cost of treatment and the time she had missed at her job as a litigator due to the fatigue she has been experiencing for several months. She intends to take it further and sue the doctor who had previously neglected her health and concern.

# data[].attributes.headline
Is the King liable for the personal injury of Humpty Dumpty?

# data[].attributes.subject
Is the King liable for the personal injury of Humpty Dumpty?

# data[].attributes.body
The defendant, the King, was negligent as he was reckless of the consequences of his act of not making the wall suitably safe to sit on, resulting in the serious injury to the Plaintiff, Humpty Dumpty. To support the case, we intend to call the following witnesses: Humpty Dumpty, Dr. Beaten Eggs and Old Man Haggis. Humpty will describe how his pleas for a suitable wall were ignored and how he was forced to sit on the unsuitable wall. He will also describe the inci- dent, the injuries sustained, and the lengthy recovery period. Eggopedic surgeon Dr. Beaten Eggs will describe the cost of the actual medical expenses, as well as the future medical expenses. He shall also give details of the severe injuries. Old Man Haggis will describe the incident on the wall from his point of view, as well as the subsequent treatment and the pain and suffering of the Plaintiff.

# data[].attributes.body
David bought his young daughter Lili a horse that the former owner, George, described as gentle. Within two weeks of delivery, the horse bucks Lili off, injuring her. David discovers an undisclosed history of bucking, calling George a fraud.  George claims a trainer resolved that problem and claims he had no duty to disclose it. He blames Lili for spooking the horse.

# data[].attributes.body
rA 76 year old man, suffering from acute arthritis slipped over whilst collecting a pick up order from family owned restaurant, Susie Luck's in Battery Point, and is suing for damages. Despite no cameras capturing the incident, there are two eye witnesses who claim he fell over due to insufficient mopping on the hardwood floor of the restaurant.
He intends to gain $70,000 in compensation in order to cover medical and psychological expenses.