# data[].attributes.body
Score: 1
The definition provided was very lengthy and covered a few different types of behaviors. It was not an operational definition.

# data[].attributes.body
2- Named behaviors and gave examples

# data[].attributes.body
Score: 2
She mentioned multiple instances of direct observation and a teacher interview.

# data[].attributes.body
Score: 2

She listed a few possible MOs (behavior occurs more in the afternoon when the student had more stories from the day to share, etc.)

# data[].attributes.body
Score: 0

We felt the provided hypothesis was written more as a goal as it explains the goal for the student but does not address the functionality or topography of the behavior.

# data[].attributes.body
Score: 1

There was one antecedent mentioned (Diagnostic teacher)

# data[].attributes.body
Score: 2

There were several different consequences discussed throughout the plan (peer attention, adult attention, etc.)

# data[].attributes.body
Score 1: no operational definition

# data[].attributes.body
Score: 2
She was very thorough in her explanation of how she collected baseline data as well as provided information related to the data.

# data[].attributes.body
2- Assuming data collected came from direct observation of FA

# data[].attributes.body
2 - Multiple sources are mentioned

# data[].attributes.body
Score 1: only one other person was interviewed

# data[].attributes.body
2
Direct obs -- report writer
FAST -- ABA therapist
Interview -- ABA

# data[].attributes.body
N/A

# data[].attributes.body
2 -- gave clear examples, operationally defined

# data[].attributes.body
Score 1: no contingency pattern identified

# data[].attributes.body
Score 1: omitted analysis of outcomes, and target behavior of which the data was collected

# data[].attributes.body
2- Multiple antecedent events are mentioned

# data[].attributes.body
1 --
Baseline data is not summarized well, only provided in a graph. Analysis is missing

# data[].attributes.body
Score 1: identifies but lacks details

# data[].attributes.body
2-Very detailed

# data[].attributes.body
Score 0: no identified consequences following problem behavior

# data[].attributes.body
2- All 3 components are present

# data[].attributes.body
2

# data[].attributes.body
Score 1: missing function has antecedent and problem behavior

# data[].attributes.body
2 -- Lots of examples provided

# data[].attributes.body
0 -- consequences are absent from report

# data[].attributes.body
Score: 0

No function identified

# data[].attributes.body
2- Function is linked to data

# data[].attributes.body
Score: 0

The FBA and Behavior plan lacked an adequate hypothesis.

# data[].attributes.body
2 -- clear hypothesis statement with all three elements present

# data[].attributes.body
Score 0: no function identified

# data[].attributes.body
Score 0: no hypothesis referenced in BIP

# data[].attributes.body
1 -- not linked to FBA.
Tangible was identified as function in the hypothesis but escape is discussed earlier (indirect assessment) but not included in the hypothesis statement.

# data[].attributes.body
Score 1: identified when however not sufficient detail

# data[].attributes.body
Score: 2

Several different antecedent strategies as well as when they may be helpful were provided.

# data[].attributes.body
1 - Not sure if all parts are addressed

# data[].attributes.body
Score: 1

There were a few replacement behaviors listed, but as we do not have a strong hypothesis related to the function of the behavior it is difficult to say if the replacement behaviors were functionally equivalent.

# data[].attributes.body
Score: 1

A reinforcer was listed (stickers), but it was acknowledged that the student is not sufficiently motivated by the use of stickers.

# data[].attributes.body
2 --
described in consequences for appropriate and inappropriate behavior in problem situation

# data[].attributes.body
Score: 0

The only section that mentioned a safety or crisis plan stated that the child would never have a crisis or the need for a safety plan.

# data[].attributes.body
Score 0: no replacement behavior and function of problem behavior

# data[].attributes.body
Score 0: no socially acceptable functional replacement behavior identified

# data[].attributes.body
Score: 0

We cannot say there is a strategy listed to address the maintaining consequences of the behavior as we do not know the accurate function of the behavior.

# data[].attributes.body
2- Giving options to demands

# data[].attributes.body
2 -- included setting event and antecedent event strategies

# data[].attributes.body
2- Yes, teaching FCT

# data[].attributes.body
Score: 0

The data collection procedures that were mentioned were extremely vague. There was not a replacement behavior mentioned at all related to data on the replacement behavior.

# data[].attributes.body
2 -- FCT

# data[].attributes.body
2- Token economy

# data[].attributes.body
Score 2- Detailed strategies are listed

# data[].attributes.body
2 -- access to preferred items

# data[].attributes.body
Score 0: maintaining consequences not identified, and not functionally related

# data[].attributes.body
Score: 0

There was no mention of a fidelity checklist.

# data[].attributes.body
0- Not addressed

# data[].attributes.body
2 -- withhold reinforcement and prompted to use replacement behavior

# data[].attributes.body
Score 2- Detailed plans

# data[].attributes.body
Score 2- All data collected is described

# data[].attributes.body
Score 1: plan identified and procedure not clear

# data[].attributes.body
2 -- safety plan included

# data[].attributes.body
2 -- frequency of independent use, frequency of challenging behaviors, example data sheet, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
Score 0: none

# data[].attributes.body
Score 1: partial plan and lacks details

# data[].attributes.body
2 - trainings provided and fidelity checks will be completed when ABA therapists are running sessions