# data[].attributes.body
Evid. & Commentary Score: ____
There are textual references, but they are limited.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence & Commentary Score: 1
Limited textual references and little to no commentary that only summarizes.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence and commentary score:2
Makes textural references but is very simple.

# data[].attributes.body
+3 for evidence/commentary
there are texual references "sword breaking a featherbed", but the commentary is simple.
+1 for thesis

# data[].attributes.body
Overall Score: 2
Evidence and Commentary Score: 2
Provides textual references to defend thesis, but limited commentary.

# data[].attributes.body
Evid. & commentary score: 3
Makes textual references but is limited and incomplete

# data[].attributes.body
The commentary definitely explains the relationship between the evidence and thesis, somewhat limited

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence/Commentary Score: 1
Provides little commentary.

# data[].attributes.body
Evid. & Commentary Score: 3
Textual evidence is there but is simple

# data[].attributes.body
evidence/commentary: 3
explains relationship between evidence and thesis

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence and commentary-2
In the AAA essay there is good evidence but it is lacking analysis. This person uses a piece of evidence from the excerpt but then there commentary is simple, like they say "He hopes that the reader will realize that the king is only human and makes mistakes just like all mankind" to explain both pieces of evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence- 2
makes textual references to defend thesis, but commentary is simple

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence & Commentary Score: 2
The evidence and commentary seems to misunderstand passage, and is often vague.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence/Commentary Score: 1
Summarizes, provides little commentary.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence and Commentary Score: 3
Makes textural evidence that supports thesis and ties it to the thesis.

# data[].attributes.body
+2 textual evidence doesnt connect back to the thesis
+1 for thesis

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence and Commentary Score: 2
Simple commentary to support textual references.

# data[].attributes.body
+1 for thesis
+2 since there are textual references to defend commentary but commentary is simple.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence/Commentary Score: 3
Commentary explains relationship between evidence and thesis, is a little limited.

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence and Commentary Score: 2
Commentary is vague and doesn't always connect to evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
+4 connects to thesis, great commentary
+1 thesis
+1 sophistication

# data[].attributes.body
evidence- 1
vague reference to text, little to no commentary

# data[].attributes.body
+2 There was textual evidence

# data[].attributes.body
Thesis: 1
Evidence/Commentary: 1
provides vague reference to text

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence & Commentary Score: 5
Expresses a good understanding with great examples from the text that support the thesis. It also exhibits consistent evidence that explains the relationship between the thesis and evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
+1 for thesis
+4 for evidence, consistent and explicit in explaining relationship
+1 for sophistication, complex understanding of the rhetorical situation

# data[].attributes.body
+3 evidence connects to thesis, commentary is good
+1 thesis
+1 sophistication

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence and Commentary Score: 4
Commentary consistently demonstrates the textual reference connection to thesis.

# data[].attributes.body
evidence- 4
defends thesis, consistently explains textual evidence very well

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence and Commentary Score: 4
Textural evidence defends thesis and consistently explains the relationship to thesis.

# data[].attributes.body
thesis: 1
evidence/commentary: 4
Sophistication: 1
demonstrates complex understanding of rhetorical situation

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence and Commentary Score: 3
Good use of evidence to support thesis.

# data[].attributes.body
+1 for thesis
+2 for defending thesis with textual references, but commentary is simple

# data[].attributes.body
+4 was very well done and had textual evidence

# data[].attributes.body
evidence- 2
simple commentary

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence/Commentary Score: 2
Commentary is simple, evidence is provided to defend thesis.

# data[].attributes.body
Thesis: 1
Evidence and commentary:3
All evidence seems to refer back to thesis but analysis and use of sophisticated language is lacking

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence and Commentary Score: 2
simple commentary, disconnect between textual references.

# data[].attributes.body
evidence/commentary 1
provides little commentary

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence and Commentary Score: 3
Was able to provide good evidence however commentary was lacking to fully connect back to thesis.

# data[].attributes.body
+3 Has textual support to back up the claims

# data[].attributes.body
Makes textural references to defend thesis and explains the relationship to the thesis.

# data[].attributes.body
thesis:1
Evidence and commentary:4
Sophistication:1
Amazing essay

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence & Commentary Score: 1
Little to no commentary along with the quotations used that are not well developed.

# data[].attributes.body
Thesis:1
Evidence and commentary:3
good thesis, great evidence but lacks sophistication