# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Casey because no one was aware at the time.

# data[].attributes.body
The article doesn't change my opinion on Santiago's innocence because the whole time no one actually knew who committed the "crime".

# data[].attributes.body
I thinks Santiago was innocent because in the article everyone was passed out so knowone can tell if Santiago was the true deflowerer of Angela.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Mikaela and Jakob the most because they correspond with my statement the most

# data[].attributes.body
I think this passage doesn't change anything because it's clearly states that everyone around him was drunk asleep so there is nothing to be proven

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Gus because I think it was suspicious

# data[].attributes.headline
I think Santiago is guilty becuase everyone was drunk at that wedding and they were engaged which does look supiscious IKe chuba 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think Santiago is guilty becuase everyone was drunk at that wedding and they were engaged which does look supiscious IKe chuba 

# data[].attributes.headline
I think Santiago is guilty becuase everyone was drunk at that wedding and 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think Santiago is guilty becuase everyone was drunk at that wedding and 

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Remi because the fact that everyone was drunk the night of the doesn't change the fact that something might have happened before t

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Chippy because at the party they were drunk and doozy. No one could remember what had happened, So there was no proof.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Remi because everyone thought it was Santiago and

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Gus because although they were engaged before, they have never been married before. Since they were not married, it shouldn't change anything.

# data[].attributes.body
I still think that Santiago is guilty because they had been engaged and he died saying he did not do it but if he did not do it then why did he know why they stabbed him if nobody told him beforehand

# data[].attributes.body
The information presented in this article does not change my opinion on Santiago's innocence. I think Santiago is still innocent becauseeveryone was drunk, so people were probably confused and most likely focused on the wedding.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Gus because that was the womens fault for not telling her husband that, Cayetano didn't have to

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Santiago is still innocent, because if everyone was drinking that night, who really was alert and paying attention?

# data[].attributes.body
I think that this changes my opinion to Santiago being guilty. It says that everyone was completely drunk on the night of the wedding, but it also says that Cayetano and margarita had been engaged before which raises suspicion.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the information from the article shows that Santiago is innocent. It said everyone was drunk the night of the wedding. You can not know for sure since everyone was focused on the wedding and not Santiago.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it show that he is still innocent because it said that they were all drunk and not very focused at the wedding, they were also probably full of excitement for the new couple. It was most likely a blur.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it still makes Santiago seem innocent because it was the women who didn't tell her new husband that she had been engaged before.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it supports santiago's innocence because it was saying how they were all passed out that night so how could they have know for sure.