# data[].attributes.body
1. We worked well together through trial and error. We seemed to dive right into the task.
2. Everyone brought a positive attitude, we worked well together once we had an idea and started things moving.
3. Not everyone's voices were heard at the beginning we just jumped into the task.
4. We learned each others strengths and will know how to better utilize them in future tasks.

# data[].attributes.body
1. We worked well together because we listened to each others' suggestions. We tried each suggestion and we were able to find the ones that worked and move on in the task.
2.We were very determined and open minded.
3.We were frustrated with the materials.
4. We are able to share our opinions openly without fear. We also work together as a cohesive unit.

# data[].attributes.body
1. We collaborate/ teamwork and shared our ideas
2. We had fun working together, tried our best and we support each other.
3. Our frustration is when the base is not steady coz we didn't plan it well.
4. We plan and apply strategies on how to build it. We learned that our base has to be strong before we can move forward.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Function: All leaders, but had a good mix of people taking action, and people supporting.
2. Strengths: Engagement, collaboration, everyone jumped in/had a voice/all hands on deck;
3. Frustrations: RULE CHANGE midway through the game; Broke some pasta :-(  Marshmallow too big; ;

4. Application: Patience, listening to each other; processing differences account for different engagement.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Amazingly! The team used lots of humor and our two new educators (Ms. Ryan and Mr. Miller) and Ms. Spriggs were the first to manipulate the supplies when other educators may have been afraid of breaking the spaghetti. Eventually, all team members were hands-on.

2. "All voices were heard," (Ms. D., 2018). Collaboration was outstanding. We had a great time and hope to engage our own students in these types of icebreakers. Mr. Terry Miller perseveres above all, as he refused to let go of that spaghetti strand until it became awkward.

3. Knowledge of building structures.

4. We must listen to each other, build upon each other's ideas, support each other, and take risks when appropriate. We focused on the task while still having fun. We acted on ideas rather than come up with a bunch and not have time to complete any of them. We reflected upon completing the activity about how we would change parts of our plan if provided the opportunity in the future.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  Very effectively, we all contributed and shared our ideas. Everyone was open to each others ideas.
2. Shared responsibility, communication, willing to help each other
3. Not being able to achieve our goal at first but it did not stop us!
4. Be open minded and available to do what is necessary for the team to make it stronger. Communication and problem solving will be helpful in collaborative planning and coaching and analyzing data. We respect our differences and allow them to contribute to a successful outcome!

# data[].attributes.body
How did your team function?
1.Some people took the initiative, everybody cooperated and took the supporting roles.
2. What were your team's strengths? Everyone took a role where needed.   We listened to each other and took suggestions.
3. Our frustration was when the marshmallow was not supported, but we persevered and tried various methods to keep it standing.
4. As a strong member of an inclusive collaborative team each of us needs to be open to suggestions, be willing to let go of our pride in order to meet with success, understand each others' strengths and weaknesses. We continued working together towards a common goal in spite of the challenges.

# data[].attributes.body
Please respond to the following questions for your team.
1.  How did your team function? (Think: organization, leadership)
We came up with a plan and stuck with it, we were flexible in the middle to change our plan.  We worked together and no one got frustrated with each other
2. What were your team's strengths?
Worked well together and cooperation, collaboration, all voices were heard and everyone chipped in to help with actual building and ideas.
3. What were your team's frustrations?
Tedious task, noodles kept breaking and limited resources. With more time and resources we could make it last.
4. How can you apply what you learned from this challenge to your role as a strong member of a collaborative team?
We all did our part and all voices were heard. We talked through our plan before we began. We all feel we did the best we could with our resources at the end. We had a good time together and had fun!

# data[].attributes.body
1. We had a collaborative approach. Each member had an idea and had the opportunity to express it and be heard. We then took those ideas and put them together to create our structure. We had people take charge when the idea didn't work and we recalculated and adapted to the situation.
2. We were very collaborative, flexible, listened to one another, we kept our emotions at bay and remained focused, and we thought about the outcomes.
3. The marshmallow were too big, we did not have enough time to plan and go through trial and errors, we needed a preplanning period before we began building, and our structure fell.
4. Making sure that all voices are heard during our collaborative meetings, trying out ideas even if we aren't sure if they will work, proper planning, being supportive, looking at the bigger picture, being flexible and adapting, and using our resources that we have on hand.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Functioned well and naturally found different roles, equal number of "do-ers", "supporters" and "leaders"
2. We built on the ideas of others and tried to incorporate everyones ideas. We respected each others ideas and included different ideas in the building
3. Time constraint was stressful!
4. Pairs great with accountable talk- we need to respect others and model teamwork! Respect each others ideas and build on them. We worked well together and were able to shift roles.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Collaboratively. All members of the group shared ideas and worked together to get the structure completed.
2. Mutual respect, all ideas were welcomed and troubleshooted. We were analytical in our approach.
3. Time limits and building materials. (name brand pasta please!)
4. To carry with us the principles of mutual respect, risk taking, all voices heard, analyzing from different points of view and PATIENCE!!

# data[].attributes.body
1.  We were collaborative.
2. We were positive, encouraging and we had fun together.
3. We didn't have a plan before we started building. Our structure's foundation was not strong enough.
4. Encourage each other when things are going well and when they are not. Find ways to have fun together. Need to have a strong foundation to support the team.

# data[].attributes.body
1. How did your team function? (Think: organization, structure...)
2. What were your team's strengths?
3. What were your team's frustrations?
4. How can you apply what you learned from this challenge to your role as a member of a cooperative team at PTES?