# data[].attributes.body
According to thecut.com, "It's sobering to discover that whatever you believe intelllectually, you're biased about race..."  THe test shows how reactions and reaction times are different. The reactions were dependent on race and many people were biased toward a certain race. Going back to my previous point, we believe we are acting one way or thinking one way, but in reality we are just thinking what we want to think about.

# data[].attributes.body
On page 84 of the book Blink,  "It turns out that more than 80% of all those who have ever taken the test end-up having pro-white associations... what it means is that our attitudes towards things like race or gender operate on 2 levels." The quote is saying that our conscious attitudes are what we want to believe, but in reality, the test results show our racial attitude when we are unconscious which means our instant reaction that we do not realize.

# data[].attributes.body
According to the book Blink, "If the surgeon's voice was judged to sound dominant, the surgeon tended to be in the sued group. If the voice sounded less dominant and more concerned the surgeon tended to be in the non-sued group" (Gladwell 43). Humans make snap judgements based on the most irrelevant things. I don't think it is right to make judgements based on voice because that surgeon could be extremely talented, but I think the reason humans do it even though they know it is not right is because being comforted by the doctors who could have save someone's life is more important at certain times in someone's life.

# data[].attributes.body
I was not in class during the discussion... this is my prep

# data[].attributes.body
THIS ALSO DID NOT NOT UPLOAD-I disagree with the statement Deirdre informed us with about how everyone is racist. She claimed that when the group of participants saw the blacks, they performed worst on the test, compared to when they saw the whites. As stated in Blink, when the people saw positive images of the blacks they also performed well on the test. One can argue that it is based on what racial stereotypes you define people with.

# data[].attributes.body
Sorry, this did not get uploaded the first time.

# data[].attributes.body
On page 73 Gladwell says "his manner as he bestowed a tip suggested a generous good-nature, a wish to give pleasure, based on physical well-being and sincere kindliness of heart. In that instant Daugherty sized up Harding, an idea came to him that would alter American History: Wouldn't that man make a great president? Although snap judgement are important, they are also not beneficial. Based on the quite we can see that considering Warren was not the best president.

# data[].attributes.body
on page 25 of blink, in the text it says that " you don't just get the sense that they're an unhappy couple when they come in" this shows that he actually has to study a couple and their actions before he can tell.

# data[].attributes.body
To answer Ella's question, the way someone looks can definitely differentiate the thoughts of other people. History can bring us a perfect example of this. In the presidential debate of Nixon V Reagan, it was documented as the first ever presidential debate to be televised. During the televised debate, Reagan made sure to wear a suit that perfectly complemented the background of the recording. Nixon was also seen sweating and seemed a little nervous while talking, whereas Reagan looked very confident. People who watched debate on television thought that Reagan won, however people that listened on the radio thought that Nixon had won. This proves that visual appearance does have an affect on what people think about others.

# data[].attributes.body
on psycology.com, it says that "our actions respond randomly" which basically means that your body already makes a response to something, without you knowing

# data[].attributes.body
In the article “Scences Right Now”, it talks about how “People are always judging you when they see you due to their self response that gets triggered in their brain.” This shows how people are always judging appearances and will always have something to criticize about you.

# data[].attributes.body
Business Edge says " When Malcolm Gladwell let his hair grow out a couple of years ago, people began making snap judgements about him. Those who knew Gladwell as an author and a staff writer with the New Yorker magazine suddenly slotted him into a new category- a quickier, edgier part of the avant-garde." This just shows that snap judgements are made unconsciously and made quickly based off 1 encounter. I find it Interesting that his coworkers that knew hi before suddenly changed there mind about him based off his hair.

# data[].attributes.body
Tying into the whole topic of the unconscious mind, in the text on page 51, Bernard Berenson was able to identify fake artwork from "a curious ringing in his ears... a momentary depression." Even though he was correct about the artwork being false from his intuition, is intuition/unconscious impulse really a reliable factor to base judgement on?

# data[].attributes.body
Answering Ella's question, yes I do think appearance does play a role on how someone reacts to someone else. In the video we watched before reading Blink, the people talked to each other and learn their personalities but when they turned around they learned each others appearance.

# data[].attributes.body
In the text, "many of our actions

# data[].attributes.body
What I said in case you didn't hear: I also agree that people aren't racist. In page 58 of the book, Blink, the experiment results show that, "...what we think of as free will is largely an illusion: much of the time, we are simply operating on automatic pilot, and the way we think and act- and how well we think and act on the spur of the moment - are a lot more susceptible to outside influences than we realize." (Gladwell 58). Our society and outside influences may change or affect our unconsciousness which leads our thoughts. This would mean that we aren't racist by nature, but our outside experiences influence our thoughts a lot.

# data[].attributes.body
Priming effects the brain by a single stimulus. The signal the brain picks up previously is scientifically shown that it has an influence on the reaction response.

Questions: What if someone was bullied by a person of color, will it make them think bad of all colored people?

az

# data[].attributes.body
In the Warren Harding error people made a bad snap judgement and thought Warren Harding would make a great president because he looked formal and presidential

# data[].attributes.body
Building off of something I said earlier, sometime, visuals do actually account for a lot of our first impressions (unconscious mind) because as a public speaking teacher, I know that body language accounts for 55% of all communication, which shows that visuals sometimes do matter quite a bit, and like Izzy said, our left brain can account for most of our unconsciousness. On blink, When they performed the experiment on the couple, they analyzed things called micro traits: little traits that transfer a message. SO for example, rolling your eyes means you don't really care about what the other person is saying and tha you either disagree or think it's stupid.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't believe all people to be "racist". Most people may have a thought here or there, but unless its meant with malicious intent, it isn't wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
Do you think that machines can actually predict human decisions? On one hand, Gladwell tested married couples based on their behavior and emotion to tell if they will get divorced. On the other hand, Van Riper was a famous American war hero by doing an act that was never even thought of by machines. How do you think this relates to free-will and thin-slicing?

# data[].attributes.body
On page 52 of the text, Gladwell talks about being primed for actions. Being primed means having something affect your behavior. For example, Blink talks about a test in which participants read words such as worried, old, gray, Florida, bingo, and wrinkle. This led the participants to unconsciously think abut the stage of being old. This caused the participants to walk more slowly down the hallway when they left. This leads to my questions. Is thin slicing really reliable even though so many factors can change the outcome?

# data[].attributes.body
I would like to bring up the topic of priming, which is used to prompt the brain to make unconscious connections. In the text, Gladwell stated that "priming...is not brainwashing." However, priming is an attempt to influence that brain to behave a certain way- so could it possibly be considered brainwashing?

# data[].attributes.body
The definition of"racist", thanks to safari, is a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or who believes that a particular race is superior to another. Therefore, I disagree with Emily because, though subconsciously, we are giving caucasians a higher importance out of all the races. It is hard to grasp this because avoiding racism is a common effort by people to make our world a better place, but to finally end such prejudice would take a LONG time if possible at all. Another topic to relate to this is, even if we end the feeling of bad with say african americans, could it be the appearance of these people (e.g. color of skin) that continues this bias or would it be ended once and for all? And to answer Aidan: Yes, subconsciously caucasians are thought to be better than others. Another interesting point is that eventually, America will have caucasians as a mere minority.

# data[].attributes.body
To go off of what Emily said our society as a whole have many different stereotypes about women and minorities. We have been taught to agree with the majority of the people so we are not consciously racist. In our minds we clearly know what is right to say and what is wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
Adding onto the topic of conscious and unconscious values: in the text on page 85, Gladwell states that "our unconscious attitudes may be utterly incompatible with our stated conscious values." We may be completely unaware of our own values, perhaps because we haven't had enough exposure to different experiences to decide what those values may be.

# data[].attributes.body
To answer to what Emily said about free will, I do not really thing that free will is something that we all have. The reason say this is because "As a society , we place enormous faith in tests because we think that they are reliable indicator of the test takers ability and knowledge" (Gladwell 56). This connects to free will because when people are forced to circle their race or something like that on a test. Studies his it gets people to think differently about themselves and causes them to even score less, so they do not have the opportunity to be the best they can.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Hayden. I agree that there are some things that we hold back when people are deciding their first impressions on us. EX: Like how some people end up marrying homicide killers without knowing.

# data[].attributes.body
An employer would judge a person based on their appearance for a person who looks professional. The judgement could be considered negative or positive depending on who the person actually is. Do you think snap judgement and thin slicing have a positive or negative impact on society?

# data[].attributes.body
In the text, it talks about how Vic Branden could predict tennis double faults by the split second of priming. This is an absolutely incredible ability that seems unreal. The book Blink shows how this is possible. In the text it says, "Priming affects the brain by a signal of stimulus. . The signal the brain picks up previously is scientifically shown that it has an influence on the reaction response."

# data[].attributes.body
Our conscious and unconscious minds are very different and work in their own way. Once a person gets used to doing a certain thing over and over again, it will be your unconscious mind. For example, you use your unconscious mind to pick up a pencil because it is a learned habit that people use every day for years and years.

# data[].attributes.body
To add on to what Izzy said about not knowing why we do something, on pg. 52 of Blink Malcolm Gladwell states that "We need to respect the fact that it is possible to know without knowing why we know and accept that-sometimes- we're better off that way". so therefore that shows some things we do is just in our conscious and we can not explain why we do that.

# data[].attributes.body
Something Izzy said about how our unconscious comes from the left side of the brain (which governs our visuals). I agree with this but also disagree: I agree on the fact that our conscious is massively based off of our visuals, but another huge pat is also what that person says. What do you guys think, do you agree, disagree and why?

# data[].attributes.body
Response to Hayden:
Your unconscious mind makes more decisions, because everything you do every day is a decisions, but most of the decisions you make aren't thought out. Most of your decisions you don't even realize you've made. Your unconscious mind makes a lot more decisions than your conscious mind.

# data[].attributes.body
In Blink, there was some research about the speed dating and how the speed daters would come back and rate the other daters during different time periods and how they were attracted to different things than what they thought. This begs the question are humans defined by what they think they want or what they do?

# data[].attributes.body
To go off of what Andy said with the test in Blink where it put men and women in categories this is an example as stereotyping people when thin slicing.

# data[].attributes.body
In psychologytoday.com they say " mainly, our actions are reactions to random stimuli." This means that our actions are based off of our instincts.

# data[].attributes.body
Going back to what Andy said, I don't think men with careers and women with families are split judgments. These stereotypes were created in the 1900's and later by men who were very selfish and wanted to be dominant. These thoughts were passed down by generation until it became apart of society. Even though people are trying to stop these thoughts from happening, it is already apart of everyone's mind.

# data[].attributes.body
Vic Braden experienced the moment of snap judgement during his tennis life. However there was something that make him doesn’t known how he was able to read a serve of other opponent. I think snap judgements in sport can show the subconscious of each player’s mind when they try to respond to the event. According to the book it stated that, “...Vic Braden should be really good at reading a serve in the blink of an eye” “he simply cannot figure out how he know” page 45.
Question: How is this possible and does this have a relationship betweenness instinct behaviors and thin slicing?

# data[].attributes.body
Replying to something Elizabeth asked, yes, I do believe that sometimes strengthening your unconscious can cause more discrimination.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Deirdre's point of snap judgments being prominent in terms of minorities being judged; a preconceived idea about an individual will prompt a perhaps unintended bias. Contributing to this manifestation of bias, Site 6 states that "people... generally prefer others who are similar to themselves in looks," which explains minority discrimination.

# data[].attributes.body
What I found I interesting in chapter 3 was the Warren Harding Error. On page 76 it states, “The Warren Harding Error is the dark side of rapid cognition. It is at the root of a good deal of prejudice and discrimination”. Chapter 3 explains that due to “implicit decisions” we sometimes use past experiences and make connections to things that are incorrect. This often leads to prejudice and subconscious discrimination.

# data[].attributes.body
Also, bringing it back to chapter 1 in Blink, what about how the people who saw someone's room and how they knew more about a person from seeing their things, than a friend?

# data[].attributes.body
In a Time Magazine article, it says "the artificial grasp on how we approach individuals in just one meeting, is the basis on how we view someone later, despite further interactions with the person, that first impression is always there." I think even if there is a bad impression it can always eventually be changed.

# data[].attributes.body
Responding to Andrew Wang: Our unconscious is the motherboard of first impressions. Our first impressions are normally completely subconscious and done through "algorithms" we have been introduced to as we have grown (stereotypes). You can't be better at first impressions because everyone has their own opinions, but there are people who are more accurate but have trained to this point. Like the scientist in Blink chapter 1 who analyzed a couple and concluded if they would get divorced, even at a coffee shop, once people get the practice and work with this aspect of our brains it becomes stronger for them. There are many different factors to first impress people accurately and the common homo sapien could not grasp this without study or a lot of practice.

# data[].attributes.body
Something I wanted to question that I didn't have the chance to express in the discussion is how does our unconscious relate when it comes to first impressions. Are some people so good at making first impressions that it has become a part of their unconscious? What do you guys have to say?

# data[].attributes.body
Adding on to chapter four of Blink, during the war, it is extremely important to think over you decisions. In chapter four the author states, "Instead of going after war-fighting capability, we have to go after war-making capability" (105). This quote demonstrates that thinking about your actions will lead to better decisions being made.

# data[].attributes.body
In Blink, Gladwell suggests that it is possible to fight unconscious discrimination and it is possible to strengthen and train the adaptive unconscious. Do you think this could be possible for stereotyping?

# data[].attributes.body
In response to what Deirdre asked, I believe our unconsciousness is similar in improv and basketball because in both we are making very quick decisions on what we will do next. Thinking and acting quickly are very important in both improv acting and playing basketball.

# data[].attributes.body
Going back to what Andrew said about basketball, I do believe that is takes a split second to respond and it may be muscle memory, but most of the movements that happens are planned out with the plays made by the coaches. There are specific people that are more frequently passed too, because of their skill and how they react to the defense. So I agree with Andrew, but at the same time I disagree.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree what Dube said where she disagreed with Andrew. I believe that people do follow their unconscious to play a sport. In the book it says, " This is the second critical fact about the thoughts and decisions that bubble up from our unconscious. Snap judgement are, first of all, enormously quick: they rely on the thinnest slices of experience. But they are also unconscious."(Gladwell 50).

# data[].attributes.body
How do you think our unconsciousness works similarly in improv and basketball?

# data[].attributes.body
I would like to agree with sajan. When he says that when you play sports some of it is unconscious and I believe that is true. What people do not realize about sports is that it is more mental than physical. In my opinion you cant go into a game thinking that you are going to lose or you cant take a shot in basketball while thinking your going to miss the shot.

# data[].attributes.body
To answer what Hayden said, snap judgement can be associated with stereotypes. I say this because in pager 83-84 of "Blink", it focuses on how "Evil? African American or Bad... Wonderful? European American or Good." When I read this quote and the latter on statements that came after that. This got me to see how race can in fact be a primary factory of how people are judged and so can gender and age. Stereotypes of how a certain group is like can lead to a quick snap judgement.

# data[].attributes.body
Question: Could the pressuring of Juliet's parents for her to get married (to Paris) act as a primer for Juliet to fall in love with Romeo? She acted differently from her past act of refusing marriage, so could this be a sign of words changing her actions?

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Andrew on the topic of how our adaptive unconscious is used a lot in sports. Our choices made while in the middle of the action are made in the blink of an eye, and we may not even notice we are doing it. In the article, The Adaptive Unconscious: Commentary on Malcolm Gladwell's "Blink" states “Due to a general lack of awareness and understanding of the unconscious processes guiding our behavior, it is often difficult or even impossible for us to articulate how or why we behave.” This is true about our adaptive unconscious in sports, and the way we make snap choices without even knowing or realizing we are doing this.

# data[].attributes.body
Back to what Andrew said with the sports being unconscious i agree because with doing something for years and having years of practice it becomes unconscious. there was a test years ago that dealt with Jordan that it had him shooting free throws and they measured his brainwaves i believe and it showed that it wasn't thinking about shooting the free throw it was him thinking about his taxes or what he is having for dinner that night what i'm trying to say is sports and other stuff relative to that it is unconscious.

# data[].attributes.body
Along with what Andrew said about improv, Malcolm Gladwell said,"Improv actors are governed by rules. Rather than being random, their peers critiqued one another to better their performances." Eventually they have grown in experience and got better at creating a scene on the spot.

# data[].attributes.body
Words will effect first impressions greatly. Like if you say things in a mean tone it gives off a bad impression. You might not mean to do it but you have to be careful about what you say and how you say it or you will get thin sliced and not liked by some people. Your words can also hurt someone extremely like if you say a "trigger" word it will set some people off in a bad mood. Its addressed greatly throughout the book that our first impressions are big to people. If you do nt have a good first impression you might not get a second chance to change your "personality" in the other persons mind.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with what Andrew says because in the book it says that
Riper, "...didn't just put his team up onstage and hope and pray that funny dialogue popped into their heads. He created the conditions for successful spontaneity."(Gladwell 117) His team had won because he let his teams react too the conditions which would make them win.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Andrew because we do have a choice in what we like or are drawn too. Yes, we can be taught to like something but we can change that through experiences.

# data[].attributes.body
To answer Ella's question, I definitely think that someone's looks can affect how we judge them, even if we already know their personalities.

# data[].attributes.body
The dark side of thin slicing is also very present. For example, on pages 77-81 of the text, it explains how thin slicing leads to prejudice. An example of this is the IAT test. When faced with a group of words, most people grouped terms such as entrepreneur with make and laundry with females. This could be because people often group females with family, mother, and housewife and see men as the "breadwinners" of the family. My question is...does the good of thin slicing out weight the bad?

# data[].attributes.body
Adding on to what Sophia said, we as people believe from what we are taught and told. Some people think of this concept as not really having free will, that it is all an allusion, considering we are taught what the people are us want us to know. If you think of life like this, it seems as though we really don't have much free choice. In the text, on page 58, Gladwell says, “They suggest that what we think of as free will is largely an illusion: much of the time, we are simply operating on automatic pilot, and the way we think and act - and how well  we think and act on the spur of the moment - are a lot more susceptible to outside influencers than we realize.” This quote from the book suggests how we are as if we are on automatic pilot, we aren't really thinking and choosing what we want to do or say, we are just acting automatically, like machines. What do you guys think of this concept?

# data[].attributes.body
Responding to Dube: We can't control our subconscious very well as shown by the man who took the IAT everyday in Blink, but what I found interesting is that you can actually train your rapid cognition. Elizabeth Kadetsky of Experience Life said," Check your prejudices, avoid overconfidence, avoid information overload, and notice anomalies to make the most of your thin-slicing and rapid cognition abilities."

# data[].attributes.body
Would you rather be aware of your unconscious thoughts or keep them behind the locked door? It could be useful to know how your brain works and to be able to come to decisions faster, but at the same time it can also leave people very confused. In chapter 2 it states, "This is the price we pay for the many benefits of the locked door. When we ask people to explain their thinking... we need to be careful in how we interpret their answer" (58).

# data[].attributes.body
Adding onto Katie, who said people make "quick judgement" in certain situations, and what Cayden said about having more knowledge would influence decisions, Paul van Riper was able to make snap decisions in a simulated war because of his experience in war. He acted "strict" (page 101 of the book blink) and "fair". "He was a student of war." He knew what to do. "Somebody who doesn't sit behind a desk but leads the troops from the front." He got this experience in the 1980s, often taking part in "training exercises, and, according to military", ... "systemic decisions". (page 106 in the book "Blink"

# data[].attributes.body
Adding to Dubes statement about how we view other people do you think we base people on looks even if we know their personalities?

# data[].attributes.body
Answering Kaydens question i think that more information would definitely help with "evaluating Someone" because you can judge someone a lot more easily

# data[].attributes.body
On page 87, "The lack of women or minorities among the top executive ranks at least has a plausible explanation." People will often thin slice with uncommon situations that they are not used to. So If someone grew up in a town where not a lot of women were succeeding then they would not trust them to own their business. That is a very common way that we stereotype and can often stereotype in a bad way. Women have the same capabilities as men but stereotyping brings them less success in some situations.

# data[].attributes.body
In Chapter 3 in talks about how one of he worst presidents in history, Warren Harding, was voted because many people based there decisions on what he looked like rather than what his political views. They looked at his appearance and voted him because he was incredibly handsome. In the text, it says "There are facts about people's appearance, their size, sex, or color, that can trigger a very similar set of powerful associations."

# data[].attributes.body
Adding onto the conversation, on page 50 Gladwell states, "snap judgments are first of all, enormously: they rely on the thinnest slices of experience. But they are also unconscious." By saying that these judgments are also unconscious i believe that Gladwell is trying to say that even if someone give you a good impression in the first thirty seconds it is for you to decide whether you think the person is actually good or bad based on what you see and hear.

# data[].attributes.body
Second part of notes

# data[].attributes.body
How do you view someone based on a first impression?

# data[].attributes.body
Chapter 2 of Blink says that most people that feel they love someone while speed dating can't explain why exactly they love them. On page 52 of Blink, the author states that "we need to respect the fact that it is possible to know and accept that - sometimes - we're better off that way." Do you guys think that it is real love if they either don't know or can't explain why they love someone?

# data[].attributes.body
In agreement with Andrew, first impressions really impact how you view a person. In the text on page 97, Gladwell says, "“Our first impressions are generated by our experiences and our environment, which means that we can change our first impressions - we can alter the way we thin slice - by changing the experiences that comprise those impressions.” These first impressions made by others around us are based on what we know and from our experiences, yes we can alter them, but first impressions leave a mark on us and are usually what we tend to rely on and believe about that person.

# data[].attributes.body
To go off of what Andrew said in page 68 in Chapter 4 too much information can be harmful because we take all of that information into account when our brain is trying to make snap decisions.

# data[].attributes.body
Relating to what Daria said, I think that thin-slicing isn't always the most reliable way to make a judgement. For example a lot of times people will say that the first time they saw you they thought something, but were proven wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
To answer Cayden's question, I believe that although snap judgments can be helpful is situations such as tennis, gambling, etc. it is not always reliable. For example, in the text on page 72, Daugherty believed that Harding would be a good president because of his distinguished and "roman" looks. However, this was proven to be wrong. Even though Harding had the looks and the voice, the lacked the knowledge and responsibility needed to be president. Harding is described as "not a particularly intelligent man" that enjoyed drinking, poker, and chasing after women. However, from first glance, he may have seemed to be the opposite because of his looks.

# data[].attributes.body
Sort of adding onto what Andrew Wang said, on page 49 of the book "Blink", Vic Braden (tennis professional) was able to identify "double faults" (failing both serves) before they happened "twenty out of twenty right" for "guys who almost never double fault" and this proves in a sense that quick judgement may be correct.

Also,

# data[].attributes.body
First impressions are not everything because on page 63 of blink it talks about "I loved the accent. And I dropped my pen to see what he would do and he picked it up right away."

# data[].attributes.body
In Part 2 of Chapter 2, the author starts talking about speed dating. How did these people use thin-slicing when speed dating?

# data[].attributes.body
In chapter 3 Gladwell talked about thin slicing and how the presidential election shows the bad side of thin slicing as he said on page 36 "this is the dark side of rapid cognition."

# data[].attributes.body
To answer Daria's question, I would have to say that a person can judge a person wrong by using thin slicing. Only talking to someone for 30 seconds to a minute cannot allow you to make an accurate decision on someone because you do not see what is beneath the surface.

# data[].attributes.body
Too add on to what Cayden said in the article Bad Intuition: Too-thin Slicing by Roger Dooley he states "A hotelier who is exceptionally skilled at spotting tiny fashion details, like a hermes tie, to identify wealthy guest deserving of special attention". This was not always true though because the wealthy were actually the people who came more frequently and the  types of people who deserved more attention.

When Andrew was talking about the war games and intuition, Malcolm Gladwell in Blink started to talk about basketball and how it was full of spontaneous decisions and he explains this on page 114 by stating "Everyone first engages in hours of highly repetitive and structured practice", leading to the fact that spontaneous decisions are not random.

# data[].attributes.body
Going back to what Sajan said on with instincts and unconsciousness, according to Blink when people interact with people of different races, they might be less friendly and relaxed, even when they are not racist. Could this be true? Is everyone secretly racist?

# data[].attributes.body
Relating to what Deirdre said, in the text it says and Gladwell states on page 76, "Part of what  it means to take thin-slicing and first impressions seriously is accepting the fact that sometimes we can know more about someone or something in the blink of an eye than we can after months of study. But we also have to acknowledge and understand those circumstances when rapid cognition leads us astray.” This relates to the Warren Harding problem. It was a wrong decision about a person based on limited evidence about him as a person.

# data[].attributes.body
i agree that there is a certain level of of snap judgement and its accuracy when guessing basic surface characteristics, but one can not always tell a person by a snap judgement and the deeper parts of ones personality can only be uncovered through knowing the person. Do you think that it is more important to have a good first impression or that someone might have a deeper side to them hidden from a snap judgement