# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with juliana becuase she is saying that nuclear energy will save lifes but i couldnt agree to that even if nasa says so becuase a nuclear weapon had destrroyed an entire city.

# data[].attributes.body
Andres I do not agree with you, because according to the article nuclear energy has a great safety record..

# data[].attributes.body
sofia h, i agree with you because you said that nuclear energy does not produce carbon, and that is a fact nuclear energy produces carbon-free electricity.

I also agree with gigi, nuclear energy decreases how much we depend in fossil fuel. when fossil fuel gets burned it hurts the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
Nicolas Acosta-I agree with Nicolas because all of the facts he said are true, like making way less Greenhouse gas and creating carbon free energy. Another big factor in Nicolas`video is that he said that it would reduce the need for oil and oil when burned creates a bad fume called fossil fuel.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Nicolle (pro) because she says nuclear energy do not contamines nature but in the newsela article it says it can poison a whole city like what happened to a place in Japan.

I also disagree with Nicolas Acosta because he says nuclear energy has a perfect safety record and in the newsela for the cons it says there was a place in Japan that was contaminated by the waste of nuclear energy that can't been cleaned up.

# data[].attributes.body
Nicolas Acosta - i disagree because you said nuclear energy has a excellent safety record, but if we talk about nuclear energy we are also talking about nuclear bombs which dont have a good safety record also if we talk about power plants there have been various leaks in last 60 years of nuclear energy so it may have not killed but it made enough damage to make the zones inhabited for quite a while.

# data[].attributes.body
Sofia H: I agree with you Sofia, nuclear energy does produce a carbon free electric power. Nuclear energy does not produce carbon which is really good.

Liliana: I agree with you too. Nuclear energy does decreases the our dependence on fossil feuls.
The burning of fossil feuls does hurt the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
I do not think that the world would run out of space, that is not a actual fact

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with MARIANA T because she says nuclear energy is to expensive to turn on and shut off. However this can be repuesto when we reduce the amount of oil used

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Andres S because he says if you live near a nuclear power plant you are always at a risk of dying however they have been used for 50 years and there has never been an accident caused by radiaton or any other problem

# data[].attributes.body
Stephano De Andreis- I agree with you because it decreases the carbon emissions by using it when using things like oil, coal or natural gasses the carbon emissions are high, and that makes that out atmosphere gets worse by creating more greenhouse gas

# data[].attributes.body
Alejandro Correa - the part i disagree with in your argument is that you say that by using nuclear energy we will significantly decrease the use of carbon but i think this could not happen anytime soon because it is too expensive to build sufficient plants in order to replace the other sources of energy and i feel that solar energy would be a cheaper and better alternative the is more realistic alternative

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with sofia h because she says that it has a good record and we can aslo talk about the nuclear weapons and bombs that have killed lot of people

# data[].attributes.body
i agree with Gigi and pauli because they both stated that nuclear energy helps save lives, it is the best way for creating carbon dioxide without damaging, they also said it reduces CO2 because it is less harmful for the planet and is safer.

# data[].attributes.body
Mariana T. I disagree with you Mariana. It is very rare that nuclear energy can poison a city since it does not release poisonous gasses that can hurt the environment.

Valeria R: I disagree with you Valeria. Not much money will be wasted since the cost of uranium is really low and also running nuclear energy is low too.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Sofia Herrera because she says that nuclear energy is good because there hasn;t been any accidet with power plants in the usa, but in other countries like ukrain, japan and russia many people died because of accident of nuclear energy.
I also disagree with Pauli because she says its the best way to make free carbon dioxide energy plant and its better for the enviroment but it can be good but also really dangerous so i think other ways are better because they arent that dangerous in fact one year after the first nuclear test explosion, two cities were destroyed with nuclear energy!

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Nicolas because he said many true things about the nuclear energy and also he said that it was carbon-free.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with PAULY that it is the best way to create a free carbon dioxide energy plant. It is better for the environment

# data[].attributes.body
I AGREE with Gigi and with diego because they are saying that nuclear energy can change lives and is very good for the planet . And all the facts and reasons that they thinked they were good and they are right .

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with NICOLLE that nuclear energy is the best way to take care of the environment by reducing the carbon dioxide

# data[].attributes.body
Andres - i agree with you because many countries are building nuclear energy with their peaceful nuclear plants so this makes them to be more of a threat with more countries that have nuclear weapons

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Stephano because he says that nuclear energy doesn't contaminate and when nuclear bombs explote they contaminate the planet

# data[].attributes.body
i agree with sofia becuase she is saying that it produces a carbon free electric power since it helps the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
Moises Segebre- I really disagree with you because if the countries that are using the nuclear energy badly they can be sanction the country and they would not use the nuclear energy wrongly, maybe in 60 years there have being plenty of disaster in count there are 7 but if we try to count the amount of disasters while using non nuclear energy we can't there are so many of them.

# data[].attributes.body
nuclear energy is very expensive and risky

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Moises because nuclear bombs and weapons are bad for the people and the cities because it contaminate the planet with the smoke it leaves and it kill people

# data[].attributes.body
the united states its trying to discover new energies , maybe because nuclear energy is not safe enough.

# data[].attributes.body
I dont agree with Mariana tcherassi because a city can not be posisoned by nuclear energy because it doent contain bad gases for the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with jose because he tells us about that the government should not allow to use nuclear plants because that is very dangerous and can cause many injuries and kill people

# data[].attributes.body
i dissagre with jose becasue he is telling the people that is expensive but the world needs it . People need to know how to control the nuclear energy .

# data[].attributes.body
i dissagree with andres because he says that if you live near a nuclear plants people have a high risk of dying. what he says is incorrect, there has not been a problem with nuclear energy in nuclear plants in the last 50 years
I disagree with moises segebre because he says they are used as weapons, not in all cases you can use nuclear energy as you want, the bad people use it as weapons but if you use it well it can really benefit you in electricity.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Mariana T that nuclear energy poisons cities because if there is an accident with nuclear energy it might poison a city killing thousands of people.
I also agree with Andres S because he states that nuclear energy can create nuclear dangerous weapons and that is true that can destroy a lot of land.

# data[].attributes.body
i agree with liliana cuello becuase she is saying that nuclear energy is more safety than oil coal and natural gas

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Alejandro C because he said that nuclear energy is carbon-free and it does not releases greenhouse gases and many other things that are true.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with juli because it is true all , and yes it saves lives , also it is very specific and it has details .

# data[].attributes.body
i agree with mariana t becuase becuase there is a risk for nuclear enregy dangerouse

# data[].attributes.body
i disagree with mariana t because nuclear energy DOES save lives and its the best way. and does not contain any bad gases.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Andres and Jose because they can't only be used for nuclear weapons and even though they are expensive they make a lot of goodness.

# data[].attributes.body
I totally agree to moises becuase in a every nuclear plant they can make weapons and give a bad use for it.

sebastian to andres s
I agree with andres becuase nuclear bombs can be very dangerous as it already destroyed 2 cities i have know about.

# data[].attributes.body
I dont agree with jose because nuclear energy may be used for many diverse things and mostly good purposes

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Moises because they can change the use of the nuclear plant and turn it into a weapon and can be risky.

I also agree with Jose because he says the nuclear plant is very dangerous and there have been accidents before and government should not allow it.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with pauli because we think the same about nuclear energ and its good uses

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with juli because we think the same about the new technology opportunity.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with sofia herrera because I also think that it is good that it produces a carbon free electric power now that it is bad for the enviroment.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with mariana t that it can poisson a city because it odes not produce co2 and that it better

# data[].attributes.body
I dissagree with jose that it has caused many acidents b/c it doesn't ruins as much lifes as other things do.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with you, nuclear energy does save lives, and eventually if people use it, it will save the world..

# data[].attributes.body
I agree it is the best way to create carbon free energy, this is just one of the many reasons why we should use nuclear energy...

# data[].attributes.body
Sebastian Urueña- I disagree with you because some countries with restrictions should be able to own nuclear power plants because it is definitely to a bad thing it is actually a good thing creating a better way of creating energy with less carbon emissions and that means less pollution.