# data[].attributes.body
(Paragraph) - AAMO

# data[].attributes.body
(Paragraph) - supported/challenged ___________________________________reliable and useful/ unreliable and not useful

# data[].attributes.body
(Paragraph) - Useful/Not Useful in telling us ______________________.

# data[].attributes.body
How useful is Source B in telling us about whether Hitler’s rule benefitted Germany? Explain your answer. [6m]

# data[].attributes.body
This source is useful in telling us that Hitler's rule did not benefit Germany. Source B shows Hitler standing on top of many people that represents the groups being suppressed by his policies and actions, such as "Religious Freedom suppressed", "Freedom of press suppressed." This suggests that Hitler stepped over many people in his rule. To achieve his own goals and aspirations for Germany when he was ruling, Hitler removed the freedom of many people, not allowing them to practice their religion, not allowing people to do as they wanted and causing them to feel trapped and upset. In addition, people were not allowed to speak and write what they wanted about Hitler's policies, meaning they lost the freedom to express themselves and led to a decline in their quality of life. As the people felt oppressed, they were suffering under Hitler's rule and thus, the people did not benefit from Hitler's rule.

# data[].attributes.body
This source is useful in telling me that hitlers role didn’t benefit Germany. In source B ,it shows hitler and the rest of the leaders standing over the peasants. There is boards hanging on the peasants neck showing the suppression on social impact. This shows that hitler trampled over the peasants opinion and forcing them to be in certain order. Thus hitler did not benefit the people.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is useful in telling us that Hitler’s rule benefited Germany at the expense of the Germans as he suppressed much of their freedom. Source B states that “In these three years I have restored honour and freedom to the German people!” While also showing all the privileges that Hitler had taken away from the German and him standing on top of them. This implies that Hitler had sacrificed many of rights of Germans in order to “restore honour and freedom” so as to benefit German people.

# data[].attributes.body
The source is useful in telling us that Hitler's rule did not benefited Germany. In the picture it shows Hitler and a couple of generals standing on top of peasants that hung signs on their neck showing the things that Hitler suppressed. Yet in his speech ,"In these years I have restored honour and freedom to the German people!" , States how he thinks that he has given freedom to everything and everyone .But hides away things that he restricts away from the public,in order to look like a leader who gives everyone freedom.

# data[].attributes.body
From the source,It is reliable in telling that hitler rule did not benefit the German people.the photograph show hitler was standing above the German people and the people under hitler seem unable to speak out. Each of the people have their goal toward something but it was silence.Imply that hitler rule did not benefit

# data[].attributes.body
This source is useful in telling us that germans did not benefit from hitler as he suppressed many social policies. Source B shows Hitler standing on top talking to the people of germany with other important people, while below him are social policies such as religious freedom and academic freedom that are silenced. This implies that to gain power, Hitler suppressed many from having their rights to express themselves so he can have better control over the people of Germany.

# data[].attributes.body
I think source B is useful in telling us that Hitler's rule did not benefit Germany. Source A shows Hitler and many of the key leaders in the Nazi party standing on a stage while Hitler gives a speech. Below the stage are six people tied and bound. They represent various institutional freedoms, such as religious freedom an women's independence, that Hitler has suppressed during his reign. This implies that the people have suffered for Hitler's rule as they have lost basic rights due to his regime, and therefore have not benefitted from his rule.

# data[].attributes.body
this source is useful in showing that hitlers rule did not benefit germany. the source shows hitler standing on top of many of people rights and freedom showing that he suppressed them not allowing them to have their own freedom. however, the source states “in these three years i have restored honour and freedom to the german people” this   contradicts the source that shows that peoples freedom were taken away. therefore, this source is useful in telling us that hitlers rule did not benefit germany.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is useful in telling that Hitlers rule did not benefit Germany . In source B it shows the organisation that have been suppressed like religious freedom, academic freedom, freedom of the press. this shows that many people were not able to have the freedom of speech, to express themselves , however below the picture stated "in these three years i have restored honour and freedom to the German people" this tell that Hitler claim to have given freedom to the Germans which is contradicting as the pictures shows the freedom of people being suppressed . Therefore source b is useful is telling that Hitlers rule did not benefit Germany

# data[].attributes.body
Souce B depicts Hitler giving a speech on a platform above organisations and rights like Religious Freedom,Academic Freedom, Labour Unions,Fraternal Organisations, Opposition parties,Womens Independence, Freedom of Press and Judicial Integrity being suppressed and buried under the platform. This tells me that Hitler only gained power by burying and hiding these organisations that may go against him. This means that the rights and freedom of people were supressed and people did not have a platform to speak out their ideas, thus people did not benefit from Hitler's rule as their freedom of speech and opinion would not be supported by organisations that would advocate for them , and this ultimately causes unhappines amongst those who were silenced. Thus source B is useful in telling us that Hitler's rule did not benefit Germany.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is useful in telling us that Hitler's rule did not benefit the people of Germany . In source A, Hitler is seen to be leading the Nazi party and him being at the front shows him being the leader. He is also seen to be standing on top of other people which implies that he had taken advantage of the impacts.

# data[].attributes.body
This source is useful in telling us that Germans did not benefit under Hitler’s rule. Source B shows leaders standing above people that represent social’s freedom

# data[].attributes.body
The source is useful in telling us that Hitler’s rule did not benefitted the Germans. Source A shows Hitler standing on top of 6 humans that are tied up and their mouths are tapped up which means they cannot talk. They represent different in freedom such as Religion freedom, academic freedom and freedom of press. This means those people that represented different freedom was not allowed to speak up for who they are representing.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is useful in telling us that Hitler's rule did not benefit Germany. Source B shows Hitler and other powerhouses standing behind Hitler while Hitler was giving his speech, below the stage were six people whose freedom has been suppressed. This implies that Germans were restricted and were not allowed to speak up. Hitler's rule had made many Germans suffered and lost their freedom, therefore, source B is useful in telling us that Hitler's rule did not benefit Germany.

# data[].attributes.body
source B is useful in showing us hitlers rule was not beneficial as the photo depicts hitler and other prominent nazi leaders standing on top of oppressed groups of people inferring that his solution to groups and peoples that he disliked was to silence them in harsh ways as the photo shows them being tied up and bound. this shows that hitlers rule brought a lot of pain and misery to the german people and that the people suffered under his command

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is useful in showing us that Hitler’s rule did not benefit Germany . Source B shows Hitler and his team of leaders such as Joseph Gobbels , standing on a stage speaking to the Germans . Under the stage was 6 people who were suppressed . The people were called Religious Freedom , Academic Freedom , Lbour Unions , Fraternal Organisations , Opposition parties , Women’s Independence  , freedom of the press and judicial integrity.This implies that under Hitler’s rule to restore Germany’s former glory and pride , he had taken away the following factors from the people of Germany . These factors had taken away what the people want and caused a lot of unhappiness . Hence , this source shows us the Hitler’s rule did not benefit the people of Germany .

# data[].attributes.body
It is useful in telling us how hitler rule benefited Germany,  this is because in the picture is shows  Hitler standing on a podium on top of people which is the germans who seem to be suffering. Implementing that whatever hitler said was all tell and no show as even though hitler was saying that he promise to benefit the people is hosted tha the people are still suffering from, as the the rule suppressed things like religious freedom women's independence and other important things as well.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B Is useful in telling us that Hitler's rule did not benefit Germany .From source A, Hitler is shown to be standing above  6 people symbolising religious freedom, academic freedom,Labour unions,fraternal organizations,opposition parties,women independence ,freedom of the press,judicial integrity being suppressed.This implies that the people did not have freedom of certain things and women's independence was also negated  .Hence this had a negative impact on the people of Therefore Hitler's rule did not benefit Germany.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is useful for telling us that Germany did not benefit from Hitler’s rule. The picture shows that Hitler is standing above 6 people representing, Religious Freedom, Academic Freedom, Labor Unions, Womens Independent, Freedom of the Press and Judicial Integrity. This tells me that Hitler had negatively affected Germany

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is useful in telling us that Hitler’s rule did not benefit the people of Germany. Source B shows religious freedom, academic freedom, labour unions, fraternal organisations, opposition parties, women’s independence, freedom of the press and judicial integrity all suppressed. This implies that Hitler removed anything and everything that would get in his way of commanding Germany

# data[].attributes.body
source b is useful in telling us that Hilter’s rule did not benefit Germany. source b shows a lot of things being “suppressed” like “religious and academic freedom”. this shows Hilter removed the rights of the people of Germany and negatively impacted the society. Hence Hitler’s rule did not benefit Germany.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is useful in telling me that Germany did not benefit under Hitlers rule. Source B shows Hitler and the leaders of the Nazi party on top of 6 different groups who were negatively impacted and where mistreated and ostracised by Germans. This tells me that certain groups were disadvanted by Hitlers rule as they were oppressed and lost their freedom

# data[].attributes.body
I think it is useful

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is useful in telling us whether did Hitler's rule benefitted the people in Germany. As source B shows a comic of Hitler and his party together while he was having his speech , and underneath them was people tied with their mouth taped up with board signs hanging from their necks. Showing various aspects of things that have been suppressed under his rule. Which shows what the German people have not benefitted from Hitler's rule.  Hence it is useful and reliable about whether the German people have benefitted under Hitler's rule.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is useful in telling us that Hitler's rule benefited Germany.Source B shows him standing on podium on top of people who we can assume are representing the German people.Showing that they are suffering and struggling under his rule.This implies that the German people has not benefited under Hitlers rule.

# data[].attributes.body
This source is useful in telling us that Hitler’s rule did not benefit the people of Germany. Source B show's Hitler and other powers at that time standing above of different  freedom and rights that were also highly desired. This implies that not everyone benefited from his rule as other desirable rights were repressed deeming them as inferior which tells me how narrow-minded Hitler was as his rule did not benefit everyone and did only what he wanted to do

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is useful in telling us that Hitler’s rule did not benefit the Germans. Source B shows Hitler and the other Seven leaders standing on top and Hitler is having his speech. Below there is people and a board hanging on their necks writing about things that are suppressed. This shows that people are not benefitting under Hitler’s rule and their life were not very successful like what Hitler had promised with many things being suppressed.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is useful in telling us that Hitler's rule did not benefit the people. Source B shows different groups of people being oppressed and silenced while Hitler and the other leaders are 'standing' on top of them. This tells us that Hitler's rule caused pain to the people as they were not allowed to have freedom and they were also not cared by him

# data[].attributes.body
this source is useful in telling us that Hitler's rule did not benefit Germany. Source B is a cartoon that portrays Hitler standing on a platform, underneath it being 6 different freedoms that have been taken away from the people. This implies that not every German has benefitted from Hitler's rule rather it has brought even more negative impacts on them. Hitler has caused the people to lose their rights to freedoms.

# data[].attributes.body
The source is also not very useful when cross-referencing to source c which stated,"within the shortest space or time, to bring about recovery, to bring millions back into work and restore German pride and honour" .This emphasises on how Hitler actually benefitted Germany because he helped to provide the people with jobs from being bankrupt within a short amount of time.This implies that Hitler did benefit Germany which then contradicts to source B , therefore source B is not so useful and not reliable.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is also useful and reliable in terms of Hitler’s rule benefitting the Germans when I cross-reference to Source C. Source C shows that Hitler’s rule had greatly benefitted the Germans in terms of the economy as shown by “How tremendous indeed are the achievements of the new Reich in the economy alone!” This emphasises the impact that Hitler had on the economy as it had greatly improved as compared to before under his rule.  This implies that Hitler’s rule did actually benefit Germany as he restored the economy and more.

# data[].attributes.body
source B is not very useful in showing us that Hitler’s rule benefitted Germany. The source showed the people of Germany being tied up and bounded, each representing a certain organisation or freedom which has been suppressed by Hitler like religious freedom. Hitler and the high powers are also seen to be standing on top this people. From this I can infer that Hitler did not care for the people struggles or how they feel and only about his own goal.

# data[].attributes.body
However the source has limitations as it does not show us whether Hitlers rule benefitted Germany. The source is not very useful when cross referring to source C

# data[].attributes.body
However, the source also only focuses on how Hitler's rule suppressed and controlled certain aspects if society, and neglects to mention what Hitler did to help the people of Germany. It is not very useful when I cross-reference it with my contextual knowledge. For example, he managed to achieve recovery for Germany's struggling economy, and also promoted German nationalism, which raised the morale of the German people. As such, Source B is not so useful.

# data[].attributes.body
However, the source has limitations because it only focuses on Hitler gaining power by mistreating and controlling others, and does not show us the benefits the people were able to enjoy because of Hitler. Hence source B is not so reliable

# data[].attributes.body
Brayden

# data[].attributes.body
the source is not very useful when i cross reference it with my contextual knowledge as the source focuses on hitlers rule against certain groups he disliked. however, for germans as a whole they did benefit. Hitler was able to solve and fix the hyper inflation in the weimar government

# data[].attributes.body
However,  source C is not very useful when I cross reference to Source B which challenges Source C . Source C states that ' with an economy which should have long declared itself as bankrupt, within the shortest space of time, to bring about recovery, to bring millions back to work and restore German pride and honour.' Implying that Hitler has made improvements for the German people at that time by restoring honour and freedom for them. He created jobs for the people and helped boost the economy greatly, pulling Germany out of a very dangerous situation. Therefore contradicting Source B, saying that Hitler's rule did benefit the Germans.

# data[].attributes.body
Source C is not very useful as it contridics what Source B was telling me in the cartoon. As Source C was telling how Germany have benefitted economically and its reputation under his rule. As Source C stated "with an economiy which should have long since declared itself bankrupt, and within the shortest space of time, to bring about recovery, to bring millions back into work and restore German pride and honour." which shows that Germany only benefitted from Hitler's rule under economy and industry aspects to boost their reputation and not really as a whole. Even though Hitler was the one who retored Germany's freedom and honour. As source C was contridicting what Source B was impliying which is how under Hitler's rule that he had ignored all the aspects that Germany really needed. Hence Source C is not useful as it only shows how Germany benefitted in economy aspects and reputation but not as a whole.

# data[].attributes.body
the source is not very useful when i cross reference it with my contextual knowledge as the source focuses on hitlers rule against certain groups he disliked. however, for germans as a whole they did benefit. Hitler was able to solve and fix the hyper inflation of the german currency through the use of Reich Labour Service employing the public to build up Germanies infrastructure while earning.Hence, source B is not reliable in showing us the full impact of Hitler's rule but instead only the negative treatment to certain parties instead of Germans as a whole.

# data[].attributes.body
However, Source C is not very useful

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is not as useful as during my cross referencing, it is challenged by source C. Source C contradicts Source B by stating that Germans benefitted under Hitler's rule, "tremendous indeed are the achievements of the new Reich in the economy alone... bring millions back into work" This suggests that Hitler's rule allowed people to be able to get back on their feet financially because of the jobs provided. This means that the people gained economically and could afford to support themselves and their families, naturally leading to a rise in standard of living. Thus, since source C contradicts Source B, Source B has become unreliable and therefore, less useful.

# data[].attributes.body
when cross referenced to source C, the source becomes less useful. from the source, it states that 'How tremendous indeed are the achievements... to bring about recovery, to bring millions back into work and restore German pride and honour.' This implies that Hitlers' rule has caused the economy to be restored. Hence, Hitlers' rule has benefitted Germany. Which then, contradicts source B hence source b is unreliable therefore, not useful.

# data[].attributes.body
this source is ultimately not useful as it is not reliable. Source b only shows the negative impacts of Hitlers rule. it was trying to manipulate the Germans into thinking that Hitler has done more bad than good for their nation. This is so that Hitler was casted in the negative light and there would be lesser support for him.

# data[].attributes.body
The source is also not very useful when I cross-reference to source C. Source C states that "within the shortest space of time, to bring about recovery, to bring millions back into work and restore German pride and honour." This implies that Hitler's rule had provided more jobs for Germans and restored their economic status in a short period of time, benefitting the Germans. As source C contradicts source B, source B is therefore unreliable and not so useful.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is ultimately not useful because it is not reliable. It is trying to warn the Germans that Hitler was ruthless, so that Germans would condemn the actions of Hitler and no longer support him as the president and chancellor.

# data[].attributes.body
When I cross reference to source C, it is seen that it supports what what source B illustrates. Source C shows that Hitler’s rule had benefitted the Germans economically  as seen in  , “How tremendous indeed are the achievements of the new Reich in the economy alone!” . This shows that Hitler had really helped to turn the dire state around by himself as the picture also shows how peace and independence has been restored.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is not useful as it only shows the surface of how he rules Germany and does not show what he has done in order for such "peace" to restore.This source is probably used to inform the other nations that Hitler was not a ruler who gives freedom of right etc to the people of Germany, he limits the things that he does not want which also displays him in  a negative light as a ruler.

# data[].attributes.body
The source is ultimately useful as it is reliable in showing us the surface level of the benefits that Hitler’s rule had brought to Germany, it also helps to show the means that Hitler had used to benefit Germany. Source B is a cartoon from America which was trying to convince Americans of Hitler’s evil deeds that he committed to benefit Germany so as to lower people’s trust of him.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is ultimately useful as source B is published by an American magazine, meaning the source is more objective. Source B was published to educate the people around the world about Hitler's rule to create awareness of what was happening in Germany so that the people around the world, especially the world leaders, could help to pressure Germany to stop Hitler from continuing his rule. As such, since Source B is written from an objective point of view, source B is ultimately useful in telling me whether Germany benefitted under Hitler's rule.

# data[].attributes.body
The source is not very useful when I cross-reference to Source C.  Source C states that, " within the shortest period of time, to bring about recovery, to bring millions back into work and restore German pride and honour." This tells us that Hitler's rule benefitted Germany as he helped provide more jobs for the people and boosted the economy of Germany. As my cross-reference contradicts the source, Source B is unreliable and therefore not so useful

# data[].attributes.body
Source B becomes less useful when i cross reference to source C. Source C states that "How tremendous indeed are the achievements of the new Reich in the economy alone!" and " bring millions back into work and restore German pride and honour. " which both suggest that Hitler's rule brought benefits to Germany in terms of providing jobs, strengthening the economy and also fulfilling his campaign goals. As source c contradicts source b, source b is therefore unreliable and less useful.

# data[].attributes.body
This source is ultimately not useful because it does not reflect all of Hitler's contributions to Germany. Despite suppressing the rights of groups of people, Hitler still did help to boost German economy and improve the lives of Germans which is not mentioned by Source B.  As the source was written in 1936 by an American cartoonist ,source B's purpose is to manipulate the people of America into thinking that Hitler is unfair and should step down as Germany's leader so as to give back the freedom of right and speech to those who are discriminated and ousted in Germany. Therefore, Source B is reliable and therefore not useful in telling us whether Hitler's rule benefitted Germany.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B is ultimately useful and reliable. Source B is a cartoon written on a magazine and was written by an American cartoonist who had no direct involvement with the topic. It was written to convince people around the world that Hitler was not a good ruler and treated people unfairly so that they would stop supporting him