# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise's argument is that all animals should have rights like how us humans have rights. All animals think the same as humans, they also have feelings. For example, there's a video of a dog who's laying down next to his owners grave. Wise uses logos and pathos to grab the readers attention. The logos can be viewed by the facts that are on the article. One of the facts is that Wise states how animals think the same as humans and also have feelings just like us. Steven Wise is an American legal scholar who specializes in animal protection issues, primatology, and animal intelligence. He received his undergraduate in chemistry in Williamsburg, Virginia at the College of William & Mary.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise argues that animals should be protected and treated almost like humans. Like he said objects are like trees and do not have emotion and conscious but animals are like humans because they do have emotions and conscious and should be protected by rights. He uses ethos to persuade people to believe and support animal rights. Its true because he uses experts and people with extreme liability credibility to emphazies that animals have human like qualities that does not make then objects. Steven M Wise is an american criminal defense lawyer who turned over to fight for animal rights. He specialized in animal issues and teaches college Harvard law students about animal rights.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise claims that animals should have "personhood" rights because they are just as sensitive as humans. His legal campaign includes chimpanzees, elephants, whales and dolphins — animals whose unusually high level of intelligence has been recognized by scientific research. Steven Wise you pathos by providing facts to his audience by showing what humans are doing animals. Steven M. Wise is an American legal scholar who specializes in animal protection issues, primatology, and animal intelligence.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise's is trying to argue that all animals should have the same rights as a person does, and are entitled to those rights no matter how presumptuous it may seem. Wise uses logos and pathos to support his argument. He uses pathos because he is trying to appeal to the readers emotions by stating that animals are treated inhumanely and are put in danger because of human needs for experimentation as a way to understand more about that specific animal and that living in captivity is not right, as they deserve to live in the wild where they are free. He uses logos by stating that one hundred sixty animals is killed in the United States alone and because as a matter of liberty, they have what it takes for person-hood. This goes to his credibility as a lawyer with over 30 years experience as a lawyer and animal rights activist, who has been fighting for animals after reading a book called "Animal Liberation" by Peter Singer, of how badly they are treated. He has wrote four books, all about the lives of animals. and the injustices that happens to them. He received his education in chemistry  at the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia. He then went to Boston University where he became an injury lawyer.  He is also the president of the non profit human right s project, where animals could obtain human rights.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise argues that animal rights are just as important as human rights since they share a handful of similarities between each other. He tends to use a lot of pathos as he appeals to the viewers emotion with sympathy and clips of the animals being caged up. He uses hil small clips of chimpanzees completing tests and drills as evidence that animals can do things humans can, and even better at times, which supports his argument that they are like humans as well. Overall, Steven Wise is an American scholar who specializes in animal protection issues and he teaches animal rights law at various school including Harvard Law School.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise alleges that animal rights are just as important as human rights. He has dedicated his career as defending and protesting to protect the rights of animals. He uses ethos by his background as a lawyer, pathos by provoking the readers to double think the next time they think of animal rights because it is important. Wise uses logos by providing the readers to know the rights the animals have and the contribution they also do. Steven Wise is a criminal defense lawyer whom protests the rights of animals. He helped in the pioneer of the study in animals rights law in the 1980s. He teaches in multiple schools about the animal rights laws

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise´s argument that animals should have rights just like any other human being was opened to the public after an event of 4 chimpanzees were held captive. He argues that animals should have ¨personhood rights. Wise became a criminal defense lawyer only to find himself more interested in finding justice for animals. If the outcome is in Wise´s favor, he will change the relationship between humans and animals forever. Within his article, Wise uses all of the rhetorical appeals. He does this by finding was to get the reader to sympathize for the animal, yet provides multiple credible sources, and finds ways to logically reason his way through the argument.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise's argument emphasizes on the animal's ability to think and perform difficult tasks like humans can. He claims that if animals can do similar tasks with the same or higher capability, why should they not have rights? In the video, Mr. Wise claims he saw a monkey memorize the placement of numbers and accurately point them in order. A task that was much too difficult even for himself. Wise uses Logos to give his knowledge about animal rights meaning.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise is an Animal Activist and lawyer that is fighting for the equal rights of animals and describing the intelligence of these creatures. Wise uses Logos and Pathos to re-enforce his claims. He uses Logos to provide statistics about their intelligence and to prove that these creatures have feelings. He also uses studies to prove that monkey's and other species are very intelligent creatures Pathos is used in his claims when he shows animals being treated cruelty and showing how they are depressed being locked in containment.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise argues that animals deserve the same rights that humans have. They are living breathing things that feel joy, experience loss, and have self awareness, just as a human does. He uses ethos with his background in law. He makes the case that when human rights were listed they weren't just based on them being human, but on what made them a person, what make them qualify for these rights. He argues that animals have the same things that would make them qualify for a person. He saw tests conducted on monkeys and saw they were abused and mistreated. He also went to Japan and saw the colonies and the test done on them proving that are capable of learning.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise's argument is indicting that animals should have more rights as they too have feelings and are living things. They are not too different from us humans. Wise mainly uses pathos to make the audience feel empathy for animals who are suffering. He explains how chimpanzees, and other animals, get treated unfairly as scientists do experiments on them and hold them captive for many years or sometimes even a lifetime. Steven Wise is a lawyer who fights for animals rights. He was once a criminal defense lawyer then got inspired to help animals for their rights when he read the "Animal Liberation" book.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise's argument is to show that animals are smart and deserve rights. Wise explains his argument through ethos and logos by giving a good background about himself and his educational accomplishments.  Continuing with his argument, Wise goes to use logos as a way to convince the audience on why his current legal project is so important. He states that chimpanzees, elephants, whales and dolphins have unusual high levels of intelligence that has been identified by scientific research. Steven Wise is a animal rights activist/lawyer that has been fighting for animal rights for over 30 years now. Wise started as a criminal defense lawyer that got inspired by a book written by Peter Singer that's called "Animal Liberation." That book created a spark in him to fight for animal rights. He teaches animal rights law at Harvard Law School, Vermont Law School, John Marshall Law School and more.
https://www.peta.org/about-peta/why-peta/why-animal-rights/

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise argues that animals should have basic legal rights just like humans. He uses ethos as an rhetorical appeal to persuade the audience as he provided evidence of him being the first ever person to lecture about attaining animal personhood rights at Harvard Law School. In my research of Steven Wise, he now teaches about animal rights at Vermont Law, John Marshall Law, Lewis & Clark Law and Tuffin University. His background of finding the passion for animal rights was from reading, "Animal Liberations" from Peter Singer.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise's argument is that animals do have the ability to gain their own rights. He uses mainly logos and ethos to appeal to the audience. The logos can be seen through the facts he puts out in the article, for example he states how there are some animals that have a high level of intelligence. Wise also gives a lot of credibility, the article gives his background of being a lawyer and saying that he has been developing strategies so that animals could also have rights. The main evidence he provides is that he did a test with four chimps that were to prove that they had some sort of intelligence. Steven Wise is a lawyer that was inspired by the book "Animal Liberation". He is also known as the man who started a nonhuman rights project and aims to achieve some rights for animals.
https://www.all-creatures.org/articles/ar-articles.html

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise's argument is that all animals should have rights like how us humans have rights. All animals think the same as humans, they also have feelings. For example, there's a video of a dog who's laying down next to his owners grave. Wise uses logos and pathos to grab the readers attention. The logos can be viewed by the facts that are on the article. One of the facts is that Wise states how animals have

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise's argument is that animals also should have basic rights just like us humans. Animals also has emotions just like humans, so they should be treated like us too. Wise uses ethos in order to give good background information of himself. Since he became the first person to teach the animal rights law at Harvard Law School, he uses ethos to show his expertise. He also uses ethos to show his background as a lawyer. Steven Wise is is an American legal scholar who specializes in animal protection issues. He is the founder and president of the NhRP. He has practiced animal protection law for 30 years.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise's argument is that all animals should have rights, many animals can think like humans so why cant they be treated as such? Wise uses pathos to express that animals should be considered 'persons' in order for them to stop being abused and held captive. If chimpanzees can memorize things better than humans, why cant they be considered human and given certain rights that will protect them.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/animals/rights/rights_1.shtml

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise's argument is that animals should have basic human rights and legal person hood, giving some animals irrevocable right, recognizing their needs to live in the wild and not to be owned and abused. He rhetorical appeal, specifically LOGOS, because the chimps that he is trying to save, there was room for them to be accommodated at the sanctuary but were instead held in captivity. He says that every time a heartbeat passes, 160 animals are slaughtered, this fact along with his 30 years of experience teaching and learning about animal behaviors makes him a trustworthy source. He is an American scholar specializing in animal protection issues and teaches animal rights at Harvard, Vermont law, John Marshall Law school,Lewis & Clark, and tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine.

# data[].attributes.body
In the article "animals are persons too" Steven Wise is making a claim over the amount of rights animals receive from humans. Mr. Wise relates the animals towards children who are taken away from there family for poor care or abusive environments. In the article it states, "legal personhood would give some animals irrevocable protections that recognize their critical needs to live in the wild and to not be owned or abused". In this new method Mr. Wise tried he thought animals would have a similar treatment as a human. Steven Wise born on 1952, is a author and founder of the NhRP and also teaches about animal rights. He many books and talks about ways to help animals from abusement or poor treatment.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise argument states that animals should have the same type of "personhood" rights that humans have. He uses ethos by referring to his background as a lawyer, but he mainly uses pathos in the sesne that he says 160 animals are killed in one heartbeat. Steven M. Wise is An American legal scholar who is for animal protection issues, primatology, and animal intellegence. He is a fouder and president of the NhRP and has practice animal protection law for almost 30 years. Steven Wise was born in 1952 and is currently 66 years old.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
Welcome to Animals & Society Institute | Ann Arbor Michigan

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
This is a collection of articles on Animal Protection and Animal Rights from the Society & Animals Journal in relation to the studies of the human-animal relationship. The Society & Animals Journal is academic journal that publishes studies that describe and analyze our experiences of non-human animals from the perspective of various disciplines within both the social sciences and humanities.

Support Your Local Invasive Species": Animal Protection Rhetoric and Nonnative Species. Mona Seymour. Volume 21, Issue 1. Pages 54 - 73

Animal Rights and Human Social Issues. David A. Nibert. Volume 2, Issue 2. Pages 115 - 124.

Animal Rights as a Post-Citizenship Movement. Brian M. Lowe and Caryn F. Ginsberg. Volume 10, Issue 2. Pages 203 - 215.

Appropriating Liberation. Barry Kew. Volume 11, Issue 1. Pages 29 - 49.

Attitudes and Dispositional Optimism of Animal Rights Demonstrators. Shelley L. Galvin and Harold A. Herzog. Volume 6, Issue 1. Pages 1 - 11.

Attitudes to Animals in the Animal Protection Community Compared to a Normative Community Sample. Tania D. Signal and Nicola Taylor. Volume 14, Issue 3. Pages 265 - 274.

Caring about Blood, Flesh, and Pain:Women's Standing in the Animal Protection Movement. Lyle Munro. Volume 9, Issue 1. Pages 43 - 61.

Changes in Animal Welfare Views in New Zealand: Responding to Global Change. Alison Loveridge. Volume 21, Issue 4. Pages 325 - 340.

Constitutional Inclusion of Animal Rights in Germany and Switzerland: How Did Animal Protection Become an Issue of National Importance? Erin Evans. Volume 18, Issue 3. Pages 231 - 250.

Contesting Moral Capital in Campaigns Against Animal Liberation. Lyle Munro. Volume 7, Issue 1, pages 35 - 53.

Culture, Reform Politics, and Future Directions: A Review of China's Animal Protection Challenge. Peter J. Li and Gareth Davey. Volume 21, Issue 1. Pages 34 - 53.

Ethical Ideology and Moral Persuasion: Personal Moral Philosophy, Gender, and Judgments of Pro- and Anti-Animal Research Propaganda. Darcy Nickell and Harold A. Herzog. Volume 4, Issue 1. Pages 53 - 64.

Every Sparrow That Falls: Understanding Animal Rights Activism as Functional Religion. Wesley V. Jamison; Caspar Wenk and James V. Parker. Volume 8, Issue 3. Pages 305 - 330.

Explaining Support for Animal Rights: A Comparison of Two Recent Approaches to Humans, Nonhuman Animals, and Postmodernity. Adrian Franklin; Bruce Tranter and Robert White. Volume 9, Issue 2. Pages 127 - 144.

Framing Animal Rights in the "Go Veg" Campaigns of U.S. Animal Rights Organizations. Carrie Packwood Freeman. Volume 18, Issue 2. Pages 163 - 182.

Framing Cruelty: The Construction of Duck Shooting as a Social Problem. Lyle Munro. Volume 5, Issue 2. Pages 137 - 154.

Frog and Cyberfrog are Friends: Dissection Simulation and Animal Advocacy. Kenneth R. Fleischmann. Volume 11, Issue 2. Pages 123 - 143.

Gender, Views of Nature, and Support for Animal Rights. Corwin R. Kruse. Volume 7, Issue 3. Pages 179 - 198.

Horse Play in the Canadian West: The Emergence of the Calgary Stampede as Contested Terrain. Brittany Gerber and Kevin Young. Volume 21, Issue 6. Pages 523 - 545.

"I'm Not an Activist!": Animal Rights vs. Animal Welfare in the Purebred Dog Rescue Movement. Jessica Greenebaum. Volume 17, Issue 4. Pages 289 - 304.

In Favor of Tipping the Balance: Animal Rights Activists in Defense of Residential Picketing. Justin R. Goodman and Clinton R. Sanders. Volume 19, Issue 2. Pages 137 - 155.

Interest Groups and Pro-Animal Rights Legislation. Brenda J. Lutz and James M. Lut. Volume 19, Issue 3. Pages 261 - 277.

Law and the Question of the (Nonhuman) Animal. Yoriko Otomo. Volume 19, Issue 4. Pages 383 - 391.

Learning to Be Affected: Subjectivity, Sense, and Sensibility in Animal Rights Activism. Niklas Hansson1 and Kerstin Jacobsson. Volume 22, Issue 3. Pages 262 - 288.

Legitimacy Concerns in Animal Advocacy Organizations during the Michael Vick Dogfighting Scandal. Solange E. Badano, Steven J. Burgermeister, Sidney Henne, Sean T. Murphy and Benjamin M. Cole. Volume 22, Issue 2. Pages 111 - 134.

Non-Human Animal Abuse and Wildlife Trade: Harm in the Fur and Falcon Trades. Tanya Wyatt. Volume 22, Issue 2. Pages 194 - 210.

Origin of Adult Animal Rights Lifestyle in Childhood Responsiveness to Animal Suffering. Nicole R. Pallotta. Volume 16, Issue 2. Pages 149 - 170.

Philosophical Ethology: On the Extents of What It Is to Be a Pig. Jes Harfeld. Volume 19, Issue 1. Pages 83 - 101.

Redesigning the Donation Box: The Effect of Animal Banks on Donations for Animal Welfare. Nicolas Guéguen. Volume 21, Issue 3. Pages 240 - 248.

Resonance of Moral Shocks in Abolitionist Animal Rights Advocacy: Overcoming Contextual Constraints. Corey Lee Wrenn. Volume 21, Issue 4. Pages 379 - 394.

Risk & Reward: The Impact of Animal Rights Activism on Women. Emily Gaarder. Volume 16, Issue 1. Pages 1 - 22.

State Legislators' Roll-Call Votes on Farm Animal Protection Bills: The Agricultural Connection. Steven Tauber. Volume 21, Issue 6. Pages 501 - 522.

Support for Animal Rights as a Function of Belief in Evolution, Religious Fundamentalism, and Religious Denomination. Jamie L. DeLeeuw, Luke W. Galen, Cassandra Aebersold and Victoria Stanton. Volume 15, Issue 4. Pages 353 - 363.

The Actual and Potential Contribution of Economics to Animal Welfare Issues. Joshua M. Frank. Volume 10, Issue 4. Pages 421 - 428.

The Animal Activism of Henry Spira (1927-1998). Lyle Munro. Volume 10, Issue 2. Pages 173 - 19.

The Caring Sleuth: Portrait of an Animal Rights Activist. Kenneth Shapiro. Volume 2, Issue 2. Pages 145 - 165.

The Influence of Animal Advocacy Groups in State Courts of Last Resort. Steven Tauber. Volume 18, Issue 1. Pages 58 - 74.

The Moral Reasoning of Believers in Animal Rights. Gary Block. Volume 11, Issue 2. Pages 167 - 180.

The Philosophy behind the Movement: Animal Studies versus Animal Rights. Elisa Aaltola. Volume 19, Issue 4. Pages 393 - 406.

The Political Landscape Surrounding Anti-Cruelty Legislation in Canada. Antonio Robert Verbora. Volume 23, Issue 1. Pages 45 - 67.

The Politics of Animal Protection: A Research Agenda. Robert Garner. Volume 3, Issue 1. Pages 43 - 60.

The Principles of Animal Advocacy in Islam: Four Integrated Ecognitions. Nadeem Haque and Al-Hafiz Basheer Ahmad Masri. Volume 19, Issue 3. Pages 279 - 290.

The Under-representation of African American Employees in Animal Welfare Organizations in the United States. Sue-Ellen Brown. Volume 13, Issue 2. Pages 153 - 162.

Tracing the Profile of Animal Rights Supporters: A Preliminary Investigation. Colin Jerolmack. Volume 11, Issue 3. Pages 245 - 263.

Us and Them : Scientists' and Animal Rights Campaigners' Views of the Animal Experimentation Debate. Elizabeth S. Paul. Volume 3, Issue 1. Pages 1 - 21.

Verbal Activism: "Anymal". Lisa A. Kemmerer. Volume 14, Issue 1. Pages 9 - 14.

The Political Landscape Surrounding Anti-Cruelty Legislation in Canada, Antonio Robert Verbora, Society & Animals, Vol 23, No 1 (2015)

"I Promise to Protect Dumb Creatures" , Anna Feuerstein, Society & Animals, Vol 23, No. 2

Levin, J., Arluke, A., & Irvine, L. (2017). Are People More Disturbed by Dog or Human Suffering?. Society & Animals, 25(1), 1-16.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Articles on Animal Protection and Animal Rights

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This is a collection of articles on Animal Protection and Animal Rights from the Society & Animals Journal in relation to the studies of the human-animal relationship. The Society & Animals Journal is academic journal that publishes studies that describe and analyze our experiences of non-human animals from the perspective of various disciplines within both the social sciences and humanities.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise argues about animals are creature whom we share the Earth with so they also deserves protection. He uses ethos and pathos by providing his background, knowledge, and studies on animals to give more in-depth details of his argument which further appeal to the reader's emotion about the truth that animal have been abused. Wise's current legal campaign includes chimpanzees, elephants, whales and dolphins which all have high level of intelligence. This shows that certain animals have their abilities and characteristics just like human that are being mistreated. His call to action is that we need to make a better relationship with animal by giving them the rights that can prevent them from the harmful environments. Base on my research, Steven Wise is an American author and a founder of NhRP (Nonhuman Right Protect). He has practiced animal protection rights/law for 30 years. He also teaches at well known schools such as Harvard, Vermont etc.
https://savannahcatassociation.org/animal-welfare/

# data[].attributes.body
Steve Wise argues that animals should be protected and given some of the rights that humans have. He believes animals should be treated with respect and not tortured. Wise uses pathos to appeal to the readers emotion to create sympathy. Wise provides a clip of monkeys being able to memorize and identify numbers on a simulator consistently. Steven Wise is a American legal scholar who teaches animal protection rights at many universities including Harvard and Vermont Law School.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise's argument is that animals should have rights since they are objects and they feel emotions similar to humans. Wise uses pathos to convince people how animals should have right to protect them from
abuse. He provides scientific evidence in the article and video about how animals are similar to us in many ways that is why Wise is fighting for animal rights. Steve Wise teaches animal rights law at Stanford and is a legal scholar who focuses on animals.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven wise's argument is that all animals should have the same right as humans. Animals are almost like human, but are getting mistreated by human. Steven is using pathos as an rhetorical because he want peoples to feel emotional for the animal. He want to show the people whats going on with the world and how animal are getting treated. He proves that animal can feel pain, stress, and affectation like human. Steven wise is a lawyer and animal intelligent. He teaches at Harvard university about animal rights.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise argues that animals do have feelings and emotions like humans and because of that, animals should receive similar protective rights that humans have. Steven Wise uses ethos and pathos in his argument by giving examples of how animals are being inhumanely kept and classifies that using his professional background and intelligence over his years of studying as not being morally okay, especially if these animals understand and feel the same way people do. Wise witnessed first hand the way monkeys at a research institution were being kept. Steven Wise is an American legal scholar who specializes in animal protection issues, primatology, and animal intelligence. He teaches animal rights law at Harvard Law School, Vermont Law School, John Marshall Law School, Lewis & Clark Law School, and Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise is an American Scholar that specializes in animal rights. He currently is a professor of animal rights at Harvard Law school. Steven Wise argues that animals have as much feelings as humans do and that they should not be treated as experiments. In the article Steven Wise uses pathos to get the audiences empathy to convince that animals are just as important as well as ethos by mentioning scientific research to convince the audience opinion that animals also have feelings too. He provides evidence specific animals such as a chimpanzee by showing the reaction of them when they want attention.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise's argument about there are other creatures that are like human that need to be protected. They do have feeling and sense of individualism. Animal deserves to have their own rights like human rights. Wise uses mainly pathos to appeal the emotions to the audience by given the fact that many animal were mistreated in such experiences. Wise also use logos to persuade his audience through logical thought, fact and rationality. He gives out an example of how chimpanzees can memorize the order of the number and that shows how animal have high level of intelligence and can solve abstract problems. As a lawyer, Wise has used ethos to calls out for an action to animals. Wise messages to people that we are sharing the planet with other creatures that are like us. They do feel like we do, they can feel the pain when someone hitting them like us too. All of that is telling that animal should have their own rights and need to be protected like human being. Steven Wise spent over 30 years to working on animal person-hood rights. He specializes in animal intelligence and protection issues. He teaches animal rights law at many Law School such as Harvard Law School and Lewis & Clark Law School.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise argues that animals have the capacity to do exactly what a human can do, using ethos and logos in his case, such as his background as a lawyer, and the scientific studies testing memory of animals. He uses pathos as a way to appeal to the heart, when discussing how cruelly these animals have been treated. He believes that animals should have the chance to do what a human can do.

# data[].attributes.body
Steven Wise argues that animals should have the same rights as us humans do as a example that animals do carry our caracteristics. A rhetorical appeal that he uses is pathos because he's trying to show how these animals have similaritys with us. As he states when a orangutan groomed his teeth and himself when a mirror was placed in front of him, this shows how this animal has caracteristics like us.

# data[].attributes.body
Write a paragraph answering all of the above questions.  Attach at least one related image, link one video on this topic, or include a link to an animal rights article.