# data[].attributes.body
The bottom of this picture reads, “without animal research, we couldn’t have put an end to polio, smallpox, rubella, or diphtheria. Now, some would like to put an end to animal research. Obviously, they don’t have cancer, heart disease, or AIDS."
This visual briefly explains that without animal research, humans would still be suffering from these diseases and many more. Obviously, animal research has proved to be necessary in the past, and will continue to be necessary in the future, at least until scientists come up with alternative methods.
WorksCited:
Foundation for Biomedical Research "If we stop animal research, who will stop the real killers" Foundation for Biomedical Research, Washington, D.C.. USA.gov, http://resource.nlm.nih.gov/101438470. Accessed Dec. 5, 2018.

# data[].attributes.body
I do not agree that research needs to be stopped as a whole because of the downfalls of some researchers.
Instead of fighting to stop animal researchers, PETA needs to support scientists who are trying to come up with alternative methods. “Fortunately, advances in science have led to a new vision for toxicity testing based on human cell systems that will be more predictive, have higher throughput, cost less money, be more comparable to real-life exposures in humans, while using many fewer animals” (Zurlo). With this new approach, animals will no longer be needed because the testing will be based on extrapolated human cells instead, which will be a scientific breakthrough to be celebrated.
Works Cited:
"Combination of Transgenic Mouse Models and Existing In VitroMethods." Trends in Pharmacological Studies,
https://www.cell.com/trends/pharmacological-sciences/fulltext/S0165-6147(16)30076-1#secsect0015. Accessed Dec. 6, 2018.
Zurlo, Joanne. “No Animals Harmed: Toward a Paradigm Shift in Toxicity Testing”. Hastings Center Report, no. 6, p. 23-26, 2012, Ebsco Host, http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.frccwc.idm.oclc.org/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=772b62b4-8926-4ad0-861c-8369158556a4%40sessionmgr102. Accessed 11 Oct. 2018.

# data[].attributes.body
This visual represents a new way to test cosmetics that does not involve animals. This picture specifically depicts how scientists are trying to create a human like skin made from mature human cells, instead of testing on animals.
However both of these processes just explained will require a lot time and money to make them a reality.
This is where PETA comes in. PETA needs to support scientists that are trying to come up with alternative testing methods.
Works Cited:
"Instead of using animals for cosmetic/makeup testing, EpiDerm™ and EpiSkin™ could be used as replacements." https://nomoreexperimentingonanimals.weebly.com/alternatives.html. Accessed Dec. 6, 2018.

# data[].attributes.body
This is where I agree with PETA. I agree that animals that are used for testing need to be treated better. The Animal Welfare Act needs to be more closely adhered to by scientists and researchers.
Works Cited: https://www.picmonkey.com/p/B9S32hDCn5q

# data[].attributes.body
This visual clearly represents the strong need for animals in medical research, as the life or death of humans is dependent on them. Animals have helped develop life saving drugs that have been needed to help save the lives of many people. Taking this away would result in the death of millions of people.
Works Cited:
"The Bottom Line is that Animal Research Helps Save Human Lives". ListLand, https://www.listland.com/top-10-reasons-why-animal-testing-is-necessary/the-bottom-line-is-that-animal-testing-helps-save-human-lives/. Accessed Dec. 5, 2018.