# data[].attributes.body
1. King Arthur was king of the Briton's in the 5th or 6th centenary
2. He was the head of the knights of the round table
3. Arthur had a wife named Guinevere
4. He went on a search for the holy grail
5. Arthur was featured in many books and plays
6. Historians are still searching for the truth on whether he is real of a legend

# data[].attributes.body
1. Was King Arthur real or just some story character?
2. How many knights did he have, and what are their names?
3. What made him want to lead Briton?
4. What evidence have historians uncovered to support this mystery?
5. What happened to King Arthur; how did he die?

# data[].attributes.body
The theory that has the most evidence and makes the most sense is that King Arthur was merely a legend and a hero of peoples tales.

# data[].attributes.body
King Arthur is only featured in books and plays. Their have been no real or tangible evidence that he actuality lived.

# data[].attributes.body
Countless writers, painters, photographers, filmmakers and other artists have produced their own versions of King Arthur's legend for posterity. They spread his legend and what life he supposedly lived without any true and realistic evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
If King Arthur did exist, then why is there no real, tangible evidence of his existence? He is only portrayed as the king of the Briton's in fictional stories and plays.

# data[].attributes.body
Others may say if someone, like Arthur, hadn't lead the army that saved the Briton's form the barbarians, who did? However, someone else could have easily saved them from the brink of destruction. There have been several cases were characters were created around historical events.

# data[].attributes.body
Real or legend he was a hero!