# data[].attributes.body
Partner: Julia Perez

She made use of a lot of statistics and facts, which provided reliability and support. She also incorporated a moral aspect – it just wasn't as strong as her logical reasoning. Lastly, the emotional appeal could be seen, but I think it could have been reinforced a little more.

# data[].attributes.body
Partner: Angela Divina

Logical appeal was obvious all throughout her essay since it was supported by statistics and various facts. Moral and Emotional appeal was evident in her introduction and conclusion but in my opinion, there was more moral appeal as compared to emotional appeal.

# data[].attributes.body
Partner: Isabela Ebio

Most of her appeals were logical appeals, which really helped me to learn more about the statistics and facts about same-sex lso

# data[].attributes.body
Partner: Romina Letaba

Throughout her essay, she mostly stated statistics to be used as a basis for her logical appeals, and usually followed them up with emotional appeals. Towards the conclusion, she raised a lot of questions designed to appeal to one’s morals.

# data[].attributes.body
Partner: Andie Domingo

Andie used statistics and data to support her ideas, but some were simply stated and not related to any logical appeals. Moral appeal and emotional appeal were used a few times, so she could add more to improve her speech

# data[].attributes.body
Partner - Astrud Ulili

Astrud mentioned many laws, facts, and statistics. Every now and then, morals and ethics were brought up. However, not much emotion appeal was present.

# data[].attributes.body
Partner: Isabela Ebio

Most of her appeals were logival appeals, which really helped me to learn more about the statistics and facts about same-sex marriage. She also included various emotional  appreals, making me feel empathy towards lesbain couples about how they are not able to marry the person they love. There were only a few moral appeals which helped me side more with same-sex marriage.

# data[].attributes.body
Partner : Mika Atanante

Mika provided specific instances for her topic but broad data and did not elaborate on it enough which is why it lacked a bit in logical appeal. She provided more than enough experiences of people and articles, that gives us a better idea of the situations/opinions of people who are relevant to the problem, which appeal to the reader emotionally. She also provided a few points that had moral appeal and elaborated on it fairly ok.

# data[].attributes.body
Partner: Sydney Espino

# data[].attributes.body
Partner: Jade Vega

Logical appeal was clearly evident throughout her essay since she used statistics. Emotional appeal was also there especially in the beginning where she provided an overview of Danica's, a drug war victim, story which would sadden any reader and make the readers want to do something about the issue . For the moral appeal, if the government would read it , it would be high since it's something about guilt but as a reader, I did not really feel guilty but more of concerned and sad.

# data[].attributes.body
Partner - Yumiko Shoshi

Yumi was able to put two moral appeals in the conclusion, but not in the rest of the essay. She also had one emotional appeal which appeared in the introduction. Although she was able to present a lot of evidence and statistics, they were not used in logical appeals to reach out to and connect with the audience.

# data[].attributes.body
Partner- Ella Utitco
Ella based a lot of her main points on facts, data and laws. She compared the state of the country to other nations. Occasionally, she would comment about topics related to morals and ethics, what is right and what is not. However, not much emotion was inflicted on the audience throughout the essay.