# data[].attributes.body
We believe that the public...should help sometimes and not help sometimes because some things you do on your own for say raise a child without a husband or wife and some stuff you do as a community for say raise money for a cancer awareness because your child has.

# data[].attributes.body
The public should not be granted permission to rescue people who are in a risky situation. People have different perspectives of what is a risky situation. Also, if a certain individual gets themselves into a dangerous position, it was their decision. They can get themselves out. On another note, if a person was in danger, private assistance will come. Such as police, firemen, etc. Now, respecting the thought that people in a community should help each other should they need it, but we do not agree. Someone could say they were helping, but go and get into personal business. There are many more unfortunate events that could happen, but it would be impossible to list them all. Please consider our argument. ✌️

# data[].attributes.body
People should be saved. People should be saved because we have public safety people like fire fighters, police, and ambulances. They are here to protect us and the people around you. When you are in danger they should be there to help in a moments notice. It should depend on the severity of the situation. If it is drunk driving the victim should get help, but the drunk person should have to deal with the consequences.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the public shouldn’t be able to rescue anyone in a risky situation. You never know what could happen out in the “real” world. You could trust a stranger, but why take he risk when you are already in jeopardy? The only people you should/will trust are professionals. This is because you can trust people that have brains unlike some classmates. Also when you help someone they can fake and harm you. In addition you can jeopardize yourself from another’s madness. You should stay safe and take advantage of your ability to make good choices(unless you’re Jack.)

# data[].attributes.body
Yes because if that person needs to get to the

# data[].attributes.body
Da public should not be in charge of people's risky behavior. Dey should not be in charge of people's risky behavior because If something is risky they could also get hurt (like getting attacked by a bear), its deir fault dat dey got into dat mess in da first place (I didn't tell you to get stuck in dat tree), and its safer to leave it to da professionals (da police, firemen, stuff like dat).

# data[].attributes.body
No because if you have other people in charge of you, you wouldnt have the freedom that you want. If whatever you are doing isn't a risk, you should be able to do it if you want to. If the government was to say that riding a bike is a risk, you would think that they can't control every little action you do. Riding a bike may be fun and easy for many people in a community.

# data[].attributes.body
The public should not be in charge for someone's risky behavior. For example , a person's irresponsible behavior like texting while driving, it gives a higher chance that someone is going to get hurt because of that person's behavior. Also because what we do affects our own future, and it shouldn't make someone else have the consequences for your actions. Like setting a fire for other people to lose there life , the public should not be responsible for that person's actions.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Write a claim/thesis statement defining your side of the argument.
2. Give at least 3 arguments and reasons.
3. Post your argument and then comment and rate other peoples arguments.