# data[].attributes.body
In this video, Sadhguru discusses the concept of arranged marriages versus love marriages, emphasizing that the cultural context significantly influences our perceptions of deviance. He challenges the Western critique of arranged marriages by pointing out the low divorce rates in India compared to Western countries. This underscores how deviance is not an inherent quality of an action but is determined by cultural norms and societal values.

The video highlights that what is considered deviant behavior in one culture may be perfectly acceptable in another.

# data[].attributes.body
Environmental activism, while aiming to protect the planet, can sometimes be seen as deviant, especially when it involves civil disobedience or other disruptive actions against established norms. This article highlights how some activists have escalated their tactics to include sabotage and vandalism, raising concerns about safety and legality. These actions challenge societal norms and laws, illustrating the tension between environmental goals and the methods used to achieve them. The debate continues on how to balance effective advocacy with respect for public safety and order.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Anyone who's been paying attention to the increasingly fraught battles over oil and gas projects has seen a decided shift in the strategies employed by industry opponents.

While peaceful protest by earnest citizens remains the primary vehicle of dissent, and is rightly protected by our constitution, there is a growing edge to the tactics employed by professional activists, which have become more and more extreme, threatening our country's economic well being as well as the health and safety of the public.

Troublingly, permissiveness of violent and extreme action to counter fossil fuel projects is becoming more mainstream, with Canadian environmental activist David Suzuki stating this weekend that "the next stage after this [is] there are going to be pipelines blown up if our leaders don't pay attention to what's going on."

His statement follows London's the Guardian on Thursday publishing a column by activist and author Andreas Malm, called "The moral case for destroying fossil fuel infrastructure."

Malm, who wrote the controversial book How to Blow Up a Pipeline, argues that sabotaging equipment used in the construction of even legally permitted projects is a moral imperative.

"We could destroy the machines that destroy this planet. If someone has planted a time bomb in your home, you are entitled to dismantle it," he wrote.

"This is the moral case which, I would argue, justifies destroying fossil fuel property. That is completely separate from harming human bodies, for which there is no moral case."

Hours after Malm's column was published, Mounties in B.C. began a " rescue mission " after 500 workers, including members of the Wet'suwet'en community, were trapped following the erection of three blockades on the Morice River public forest service road by activists, blocking all exits and access to two lodges while cutting off access to food, water and vital medical care.

Activists allegedly used stolen heavy equipment to fell trees and, in at least one case, tear up a portion of the road. When RCMP moved in to reopen the roadway, one was blocked with a crushed van and another vehicle that was set on fire.

Following the raid, RCMP arrested 14 people for breaching a Supreme Court of BC injunction that prevents obstruction of the road.

In a statement, Chief Superintendent John Brewer said police made the decision to intercede because workers trapped in the camp were "nearing the end of their essential supplies."

"We have serious concerns that a number of individuals from out of province and out of country have been engaging in illegal activities in the area, such as falling trees, stealing or vandalizing heavy machinery and equipment and causing major destruction to the forestry road, all in an effort to prevent industry and police from moving through," he said.

While Malm acknowledges there's no "moral cause" for harming people, the escalation of activist tactics is absolutely putting innocent people in jeopardy.

A few recent examples:

Three weeks before the latest flare up by CGL opponents, activists allegedly damaged and stole heavy equipment, in some cases by force, according to TC Energy. They then went on to block the only access to a work camp with 500 people. According to a news release from the Likhts'amisyu, one of five bands within the Wet'suwet'en Nation, hereditary Chief Dini ze' Dsta'hyl was arrested and then released after "decommissioning" 10 pieces of heavy construction equipment "in observance of Wet'suwet'en trespass laws."

Shortly after that arrest, anarchist group Montreal Counter-Information, posted an anonymous video taking credit for smashing the windows at five RBC branches in the Quebec city while using a fire-extinguisher filled with paint to vandalize the facade of another in solidarity with activists opposed to CGL. They also implied the potential targeting of RBC employees. "If RBC wants to f- around, RBC is going to find out. The institutions, companies, and individuals responsible for ecocidal industry have names and addresses. RBC branches, ATMs, CEOs and board members are no exception," the video said, posting a list of RBC executive members. RBC is one of the primary lenders for CGL.

In October, the FBI joined an ongoing police investigation in Michigan after the Line 5 pipeline project, which connects western Canadian petroleum to refineries in eastern Canada and the U.S., was tampered with by protesters, forcing it to briefly shut down. An unidentified, masked individual crawled under a security fence and used a pipe wrench to close a safety valve, authorities said, prompting Enbridge to temporarily close the critical pipeline due to the "reckless and dangerous" interference.

In September, a worker on the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion in Burnaby was knocked unconscious by a falling tree branch while protesters were doing a "tree-sit" aimed at stopping the federally backed project from removing obstacles on the route. A few months earlier, an activist dubbed "Dr. Anonymous" embedded galvanized spikes in several trees to make them difficult to remove. Similar tactics have historically been used by logging protesters and have resulted in injuries to workers.

Over the summer, nearly 180 Line 3 protesters in Minnesota were arrested after "an extensive amount of damage" to equipment being used by Enbridge on the now completed project. Some 300 protesters assembled at a pumping station and allegedly began trying to scale the fence with ladders. The company said 43 employees on site were unable to escape the property after they were locked in by protesters. The local sheriff's department said in addition to the damaged equipment, protesters left behind garbage, feces and a large boat that they had chained themselves to.

In August, one of two women accused of using shunts on railway tracks near Bellingham, Washington that could have caused a train derailment pleaded guilty to terrorism charges. A month later, her accomplice was convicted as well, and both now face up to 20 years in prison. Authorities believe the actions were done in opposition to the CGL pipeline. The FBI is investigating at least 41 incidents of railway sabotage in Washington state dating back to January 2020, including one last December that saw a train derail in Custer, spilling 130,000 litres of crude oil and prompting the evacuation of 120 nearby people.

Protesters opposed to oil and gas projects certainly aren't new. What is new are the increasingly violent and destructive tactics being employed by a few that are putting innocent people in harm's way.

In all the cases documented above, the projects have gone through all the necessary legal and regulatory processes, which in Canada have grown more rigorous in recent years and include unprecedented consultation and collaboration with affected Indigenous communities.

In the case of CGL, while activists have styled themselves as defending the rights of impacted Indigenous communities, they tend to ignore the fact that all 20 elected First Nations along the 670-kilometre pipeline route from Dawson Creek, B.C. to the LNG Canada terminal on the coast at Kitimat (including five Wet'suwet'en bands) support the project and have signed agreements that engage them in development.

As well, more than one-third of work so far has been conducted by Indigenous people, with $825 million in contracts awarded so far to Indigenous and local businesses, according to Coastal GasLink.

Even more puzzling from the standpoint of activists who claim to be taking action to help battle climate change, is that fact the same natural gas that will eventually flow through CGL to the still under construction LNG Canada terminal in Kitimat, BC, can make a real difference in helping to reduce global emissions.

With much of Asia still heavily reliant on coal, switching to cleaner burning natural gas can have a significant impact on lowering greenhouse gas emissions. According to a June 2020 study published in the Journal for Cleaner Production, replacing coal power with natural gas from Canada in China could reduce emissions by up to 62 per cent.

Canada is a proud democracy and any healthy democracy needs debate and healthy conversations about our future and the best way to approach it.

Violence when used to further an anti-oil and gas agenda is morally wrong, and has the potential to seriously harm citizens.

And the potential implications are frightening.
The unaltered reproduction of this content is free of charge with attribution to Canadian Energy Centre Ltd.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Escalation of anti-oil and gas activist tactics has frightening implications - Canadian Energy Centre

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
David Suzuki warns pipelines will be 'blown up' as opponents become more extreme

# data[].attributes.body
"Breaking Bad" offers a compelling exploration of deviant behavior through its protagonist, Walter White. The show portrays how a high school chemistry teacher turns to cooking and selling methamphetamine after a terminal cancer diagnosis. This drastic shift highlights the thin line between societal norms and deviance, as Walter's actions challenge legal, ethical, and moral boundaries. The series effectively illustrates how desperation and circumstance can push individuals towards criminal behavior, and how media representation can shape our understanding of deviance and its consequences.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.alternative_text
Breaking Bad Season 2: Episode 9: Cooking Meth HD CLIP

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Cooking Meth | Breaking Bad (Season 2, Episode 9)

# data[].attributes.body
Digital piracy is a form of technological deviance that challenges traditional notions of property and legality in the digital age. This article from OriginStamp delves into the ethical dilemmas and societal impacts of online piracy, discussing how it undermines revenue for content creators, discourages investment in new projects, and can lead to broader issues like malware distribution and a culture of entitlement among consumers. The ongoing battle between legal streaming services and piracy highlights the complex relationship between accessibility, affordability, and the rights of creators​.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
This post may contain affiliate links. If you use these links to buy something we may earn a commission. Thanks!
In the rapidly evolving world of digital entertainment, the streaming industry has gained immense popularity, providing a convenient and on-demand way to consume a variety of content. However, the surge in popularity of streaming platforms has also brought to light the darker side of digital entertainment: piracy.

Piracy, the unauthorized distribution and reproduction of copyrighted material, continues to be a major concern for artists, content creators, and the industry as a whole. As the ease of accessing and sharing digital content increases, so does the temptation to engage in illicit activities, infringing on intellectual property rights.

Yet, amidst this ongoing battle between legal streaming services and illegal piracy websites, a critical question emerges: what are the ethical implications of streaming and piracy in the digital entertainment landscape? This blog post aims to delve deeper into this complex issue, exploring the different perspectives, consequences, and ongoing debates surrounding ethical considerations in digital entertainment.

The Rise of Streaming Services

In recent years, streaming services have become synonymous with the way we consume digital entertainment. The convenience and accessibility they offer have revolutionized the industry, providing users with instant access to a vast library of movies, TV shows, music, and more.

One of the main factors driving the rise of streaming services is the increasing availability of high-speed internet. With faster and more reliable internet connections, users can now stream content seamlessly, without the need to wait for downloads or physical media. This has drastically changed the way we watch and listen to media, allowing us to indulge in our favorite shows or music on demand.

Moreover, streaming services have disrupted the traditional model of content distribution. Gone are the days when viewers had to adhere to television schedules or rely on physical copies of movies or music. Today, with a variety of streaming platforms at our disposal, we have the freedom to choose what we want to watch and when we want to watch it. This flexibility has given rise to a more personalized and user-centric entertainment experience.

The rise of streaming services has not only benefited consumers but has also opened up new avenues for content creators. Artists, musicians, and filmmakers now have the opportunity to reach a global audience through these platforms, allowing them to showcase their work and gain recognition that might have been more challenging in traditional distribution channels. Streaming services have become a major source of revenue for these creators, often compensating them through licensing deals or revenue-sharing models.

The ease of use and competitive pricing offered by streaming services have made them an appealing alternative to traditional means of entertainment consumption. As a result, more and more individuals are turning to legal streaming options, contributing to the growth of the industry. However, this rise in popularity has also brought with it a surge in piracy, as some individuals opt for illicit methods to access copyrighted content without paying for it.

While streaming services have undeniably transformed the digital entertainment landscape, the ethical implications of this shift cannot be overlooked. It is crucial to explore the complex relationship between legal streaming services and piracy to gain a deeper understanding of the ethical considerations at play in the digital entertainment industry.

Impact of Digital Piracy on the Entertainment Industry

Digital piracy has emerged as a major concern for the entertainment industry, posing various challenges to content creators, distributors, and consumers alike. The unauthorized sharing and distribution of copyrighted material can have significant consequences, not only affecting the revenue generated but also impacting the overall landscape of digital entertainment.

One of the primary impacts of digital piracy is the financial loss experienced by content creators and distributors. When individuals choose to pirate content instead of paying for it through legal means, it undermines the revenue streams that fuel the creation of new and innovative entertainment. This loss of revenue can have a detrimental effect on the industry, leading to budget cuts for future projects and inhibiting the ability to produce high-quality content.

Furthermore, the presence of piracy can also discourage investments in the entertainment industry. Content creators, investors, and distributors may hesitate to allocate resources to projects if they believe that piracy will diminish their returns. This concern for profitability can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of content available to consumers. It becomes a vicious cycle where the fear of piracy hampers investment, resulting in a lack of fresh and engaging entertainment options.

In addition to its financial impact, digital piracy can also harm the reputation and integrity of the entertainment industry. When copyrighted material is shared illegally, it diminishes the value of creative work and undermines the efforts of those involved in its creation. Piracy can lead to decreased trust and respect for content creators, making it difficult for them to establish a sustainable livelihood and continue producing captivating content.

Moreover, piracy can contribute to a culture of instant gratification and entitlement among consumers. When people have easy access to illegal copies of movies, TV shows, music, or games without paying for them, it devalues the efforts put into creating that content. This devaluation can lead to a diminished appreciation for the hard work and talent behind the entertainment industry, fostering a mindset that places little importance on compensating creators for their efforts.

Additionally, digital piracy can also have wider societal implications. Illegally obtained software, movies, or music often contain malware or viruses that can harm users' devices and compromise their personal information. Furthermore, the funds lost due to piracy can affect the economic viability of the industry, potentially leading to job losses and a decline in overall cultural production.

The impact of digital piracy on the entertainment industry is a multifaceted issue that requires careful consideration. While streaming services have provided a more convenient and accessible means of consuming digital entertainment, addressing the ethical challenges posed by piracy remains crucial. By exploring the consequences of piracy, stakeholders can work towards developing effective strategies to protect intellectual property and cultivate a sustainable entertainment ecosystem for the benefit of all.

The Ethical Dilemma of Streaming vs. Piracy

As digital entertainment continues to evolve, the ethical implications of streaming services and piracy have become a prominent concern. The availability and convenience of streaming platforms have revolutionized how we consume music, movies, and TV shows. However, the prevalence and ease of accessing pirated content have raised ethical questions regarding the impact on content creators and the broader entertainment industry.

Streaming services offer a legal and often affordable means of accessing a vast library of content. They provide a convenient solution for consumers, enabling them to enjoy their favorite shows and movies without the hassle of physical media or illegal downloads. Streaming platforms also offer a source of income for content creators, as they are able to license and monetize their work through these services.

On the other hand, piracy remains a significant concern, as it allows individuals to access copyrighted material without permission or compensation to the creators. This raises ethical dilemmas surrounding the fair use and distribution of creative works. While some argue that piracy provides access to content that may otherwise be unaffordable or regionally restricted, others contend that it undermines the efforts of creators and threatens the sustainability of the entertainment industry.

The ethical dilemma arises from the tension between the desire for convenient and affordable access to content and the need to protect intellectual property rights. Streaming services offer a legal alternative that supports content creators and generates revenue through subscriptions or ad-based models. By choosing to engage with legal streaming platforms, consumers contribute to a sustainable ecosystem that rewards creators for their hard work and encourages innovation and artistic expression.

However, piracy presents a significant challenge to this ecosystem. It allows individuals to access content without compensating the creators, potentially resulting in financial loss and discouraging future investment in original content. This raises concerns about the long-term viability of the entertainment industry and the ability of creators to earn a living from their work.

The ethical dilemma of streaming vs. piracy requires careful consideration from all stakeholders involved. It necessitates a balance between providing convenient access to digital entertainment and upholding the rights of content creators. As consumers, we have the responsibility to support legal streaming services, respect intellectual property rights, and affirm the value of creative work.

In the next section, we will explore potential solutions and strategies for addressing the ethical challenges posed by streaming and piracy in digital entertainment. By recognizing the importance of ethics in our digital consumption habits, we can contribute to the preservation and growth of a sustainable and diverse entertainment industry.

Final Thoughts

As digital entertainment continues to evolve, so do the ethical considerations surrounding its consumption. Individuals must be mindful of their choices and the impact they have on the creative industry. By educating themselves on the consequences of piracy and supporting legal alternatives, consumers can play a vital role in fostering a fair and sustainable environment for content creators.

Ensuring the availability and accessibility of legal platforms is crucial in promoting ethical consumption. By offering a wide range of content and removing regional barriers, the industry can reduce the incentive for piracy. Collaboration between content creators, distributors, streaming platforms, and regulatory bodies is essential in developing effective strategies and technologies to combat piracy.

Enforcing copyright laws is another key aspect of navigating the ethical landscape of digital entertainment. Strengthening legal frameworks and imposing stricter penalties for piracy can act as a deterrent and protect the rights of content creators. By actively prosecuting copyright infringements, the legal system can send a clear message about the importance of respecting intellectual property rights.

Promoting ethical consumption also involves appreciating the value of art and the efforts behind creative works. Supporting artists through attending concerts, buying merchandise, and engaging with official channels reinforces the idea that their work deserves recognition and compensation. Building strong relationships between content creators and fans can further encourage ethical consumption practices.

In conclusion, navigating the ethical landscape of digital entertainment requires a collective effort. By raising awareness, providing accessible legal platforms, collaborating with industry stakeholders, enforcing copyright laws, and fostering a culture that values art, we can create a fair and sustainable environment for content creation and enjoyment.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Ethics in Digital Entertainment: Streaming and Piracy

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Delve into the ethical implications surrounding streaming and piracy in the realm of digital entertainment, offering insights on the complexities of this controversial issue.

# data[].attributes.body
The use of performance-enhancing drugs in sports is considered deviant and unethical, highlighting the pressure athletes face and the lengths they go to achieve success. This article discusses major doping scandals that have rocked the sports world and their implications.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Throughout history, athletes have been willing to ingest just about anything to improve their performance on the field. Some ancient Greeks turned to figs, while others used mushrooms, and ancient Egyptians believed that ground mule hooves could boost their athletic prowess. In 1807, an endurance walker in Britain took laudanum to stay awake around the clock in a competition.

A runner in the 1904 Olympic marathon imbibed a mixture of strychnine, raw eggs, and brandy and won his race (though he barely survived and quickly quit the sport). And in the 1930s an English football club bragged about dosing its players with monkey gland extract.

In recent times, however, performance-enhancing substances consist of steroids, human growth hormone and blood-boosting erythropoietin, and taking them courts both danger and censure. Doping in the 20th and 21st centuries has produced tainted victories and infamous scandals like these:

1967: Cyclist Tom Simpson dies after Tour de France

British cyclist Tom Simpson passed away during the Tour de France on July 13, 1967, as he pedaled up Mont Ventoux on an extremely hot day. Simpson's cause of death was listed as a heart attack due to dehydration. However, there were tubes of amphetamines in his jersey and an autopsy found traces of amphetamines.

An official report related that the drugs Simpson took made it possible for him to push himself into an overworked and dehydrated state. His death led to an International Cycling Union ban on the use of performance-enhancing drugs in cycling.

1970s and '80s: German government forces its athletes to use steroids

In the 1970s and '80s, the East German government decided to dose its athletes with performance-enhancing drugs, most notably steroids, in the belief that sports wins would demonstrate the superiority of communism. Athletes noticed their bodies changing, yet had little choice but to go along in an authoritarian system. Some swimmers even said to each other, "You eat the pills, or you die."

At the 1976 Olympics in Montreal, the East German women's swim team won 11 gold medals out of a possible 13, contributing to an overall haul of 40 gold medals. Competitors and observers suspected the East Germans were taking steroids, but state resources were used to continue and cover up the doping program. All in all, at least 9,000 athletes were given performance-enhancing drugs. Following German reunification in 1990, some perpetrators of the doping scheme were tried and found guilty. However, this didn't erase the price paid by athletes, many of whom had been left with lifelong health problems, including heart disease, infertility and cancer.

1988: Track star Ben Johnson tests positive for steroids

When Canadian track star Ben Johnson won gold in the 100m at the Olympic Games in Seoul, South Korea on September 24, 1988, he not only established a new world record but also defeated his American rival, Carl Lewis. Then Johnson tested positive for the steroid stanozolol. In the face of this evidence, he returned his gold medal, which then went to Lewis.

Johnson had fame and million-dollar promotional deals before his fortunes reversed soon after his win. Yet his downfall helped open the world's eyes to the fact that doping, previously seen as a Communist bloc issue, was happening throughout athletics.

1994: Diego Maradona's ephedrine use eliminates the soccer player from the World Cup

Argentinian soccer player Diego Maradona, who'd led his team to victory in 1986's World Cup, tested positive for five different variants of ephedrine at the 1994 World Cup. Though he'd been suspended for 15 months in 1991-92 due to cocaine use, Maradona had seemed to be making a comeback: he'd lost 26 pounds to get ready for the tournament and had demonstrated his continued abilities with a goal and an assist in the first round.

Instead of continuing to represent his home country, Maradona made news for being tossed out of the competition. His career lasted a few more years, but he never played for Argentina again.

1998: The Festina cycling team is caught doping during the Tour de France

During a border search in Lille, a French town near Belgium, the Festina cycling team's masseur was found to be transporting amphetamines, erythropoietin and steroids, all performance-enhancing substances. Police searches, raids and arrests were set in motion by this discovery, even as the Festina team began to compete in 1998's Tour de France.

After days of police interrogation, the team's manager and doctor admitted to the Festina team's doping program. The team ended up being expelled from the race. The scandal became one of the factors in the creation of the World Anti-Doping Agency in 1999.

2003: The BALCO scandal begins

In October 2003, the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency announced that the designer steroid tetrahydrogestrinone (THG), which had been undetectable to tests, was used by a number of athletes. It was a tipster-later revealed to be the former coach of track star Marion Jones-who had informed investigators earlier in the year about the existence of THG, and that the source was the Bay Area Laboratory Co-operative, called BALCO, and its founder, Victor Conte.

In 2007, Jones admitted to using steroids. She surrendered the five medals-three gold and two bronze-she'd been awarded at the 2000 Olympics in Sydney, Australia. In 2008, she was sentenced to six months in prison for lying to federal investigators about her steroid use. San Francisco Giants player Barry Bonds, who broke baseball's all-time home run record in 2007, was another BALCO client. He testified he never knowingly took steroids, but this denial was countered by reporting that Bonds had used multiple performance-enhancing drugs.

2012: Cyclist Lance Armstrong is stripped of his Tour de France titles

American cyclist Lance Armstrong won seven Tour de France titles in a row from 1999 to 2005. His wins made him famous, and the fact that he accomplished this as a cancer survivor earned him even more plaudits.

Along the way, questions were asked about his possible use of performance-enhancing drugs, but no charges stuck. Then in 2010, Floyd Landis, a former teammate who'd been involved in his own doping scandal, accused Armstrong of doping.

In 2012, the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency charged Armstrong with the use of performance-enhancing drugs. Armstrong ultimately didn't contest the charges, which resulted in the loss of his Tour de France titles and a ban from the sport of cycling. The agency released a report in October calling Armstrong part of "the most sophisticated, professionalized and successful doping program that sport has ever seen." In January 2013, Armstrong confessed to Oprah Winfrey that he'd been doping for all of his Tour de France wins.

2013: The Biogenesis scandal reveals doping in the MLB

In January 2013, news broke that Biogenesis, a Florida-based rejuvenation clinic, had been supplying several Major League Baseball players with human growth hormone and other performance-enhancing drugs. The story, set in motion by a clinic employee with an axe to grind, revealed that doping was still a problem for baseball.

MLB investigated and proceeded to suspend more than a dozen players. Most were out for 50 games, while right fielder Ryan Braun received a 65-game suspension and Yankees star Alex Rodriguez was suspended for 211 games (this was reduced to 162 games on appeal). Though Rodriguez initially protested his innocence, he admitted his doping to federal investigators, in exchange for immunity from prosecution. The scandal resulted in MLB promising to institute tougher penalties and more frequent testing.

In 2016, the former head of an anti-doping laboratory in Moscow blew the whistle on a state-run initiative to provide Russian athletes with performance-enhancing drugs, and to hide that use, at the 2014 Olympic Games in Sochi, Russia. He described a cover-up that involved the intelligence service accessing "tamper-proof" bottles in order to replace urine from doping Russian athletes with safe-to-test samples. The World Anti-Doping Agency commissioned an investigation that found evidence of this elaborate scheme.

In December 2019, after receiving manipulated test results from the Moscow lab, the World Anti-Doping Agency imposed a four-year ban on Russia for the Olympic Games and world championship sporting events. This was reduced to a two-year ban by the Court of Arbitration for Sport in 2020. Russian athletes were able to compete at the 2021 and 2022 Olympic Games, but not under the Russian flag or with their country's anthem.

Fact Check

We strive for accuracy and fairness. But if you see something that doesn't look right, click here to contact us! HISTORY reviews and updates its content regularly to ensure it is complete and accurate.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
9 Doping Scandals That Changed Sports | HISTORY

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Athletes have always been driven to win, but the advent of performance-enhancing drugs has resulted in stripped titles, ban from sports and more.