# data[].attributes.body
1. Public housing. The material used is stronger and safer compared to slims. It is also more hygienic.
2. Slum upgrading
3. Public housing because it is more sustainable and clean. Slums might have different kinds of diseases and it may easily topple down.
4. Make Public housing closer to opportunities

# data[].attributes.body
1.Slum upgrading . This is because slum upgrading has provision of basic necessities and upgrading of building material which is more economically sustainable and is also more humane as not many slum dwellers want to move to public housing as takes away their sense of belonging and decreases their job opportunities which is extremely unsustainable. On the other hand, public housing is less sustainable and may still be too expensive to live in for the extremely poor slum dweller and needs the provision of many income document proves which may be unaccessable to slum dwellers.

2.Slum upgrading. This is because it can provide basic facilities and amenities to slums at a low cost because many of the slum dwellers may not be able to afford living their if it is to pricy. Besides, it is more humane and is able to make the slum dwellers live in happier living conditions and still feel a sense of belonging unlike public housing.

3. Public housing. Public housing would be much more comfortable and i would have a better life as well

4. We can loosen regulations on the resale of public housing and can provide CPF too while also provide more grants and lower monthly instalments.

# data[].attributes.body
I think by upgrading the slums, it is a more sustainable solution. The community of favelas are a very close knit community, and they might be reluctant to leave the settlement since they have an emotional attachment to it. It addresses the toot of the issue; if some of the favelas are situated in accident-prone areas, slum upgrading might not help but in most cases it would.       They can have basic access to electricity and water, in which they can still find job opportunities without having to move too far away to earn a living.
If I were a slum dweller in São Paulo, I would rather live in slums because there are more interactions with the community and upgrading it would be equivalent to going for public housing, sometimes even better since no rent has to be paid. But in public housing, we might be evicted if we are unable to fork out the money.
The government should locate public housing closer to the central area so everyone gets a chance to earn money. They should also have subsidies like CPF so that they would not have to rack up payment.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Slum upgrading. I would not have to move far away from job opportunities and family and friends.

2. Slum upgrading. There just needs to be easier access to basic facilities.

3. Upgraded slum. I would be with my friends and family and I would be nearer job opportunities and public facilities.

4. The government can make the upgrading of slums less costly

# data[].attributes.body
1.  Public Housing. It is much safer and more stable as it has basic foundations in the buildings compared to certain upgrades which may be built in risky areas that are prone to floods and landslides.

2. Slum upgrading may be better solution to the root problem. The root problem is mainly the lack of basic necessities like water and electricity. If you just provide slums with these necessities, the problem is already solved. There are already many opportunities for slum-dwellers since most slums are built in city areas to land compared to public housing which are located outside the city area which has less opportunities.

3. I would rather stay in my slum but have it upgraded. This is because the main problem of slums is that there is lack of necessities. If these necessities are provided in the slum upgrade, the problem will be solved. Moreover, I would be emotionally attached to the slum area as it holds memories with my close family and friends and I would not want to leave this close community.

4. Housing solutions can be further improved in many aspects.
Firstly, public housing can be built in city area so that residents have more opportunities for work and education since most public housing are built in rural areas.
Lastly, slums can be provided with stable building foundations such that when incidents of floods, landslides etcetc happen, slums will not be easily destroyed.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Slum upgrading would be more sustainable as less materials are required as compared to building a completely new building.
2. Slum upgrading. The mission is to make safer housing for the slum residents while maintaining a sense of belonging in the community.
Public housing. The issue is that there aren’t enough safe and durable housing. If a slum is destroyed and they’re repaired, it does not solve the problem. It simply fixes it temporarily which is not sustainable in the long run.
3. Stay in the slum and have it upgraded:  I prefer a sense of belonging in my community and it’s also cheaper to stay in upgraded slums.
Public housing: It is much safer to stay in a building than to live in a slum built with informal building materials. Depending on the location of the slum, the environment may also be unsafe to live in.
4. By building public housing and making sure that the community lives close to one another

# data[].attributes.body
1.) Public housing is more sustainable as it uses better construction materials, and thus will not collapse as easily.
2.) Slum upgrading. Allowing the people to stay in their slums and not forcefully evicting them allows them to have proximity to their jobs and maintain the relationships they have built in their built in their community.
3.) We would rather stay in the slum because the community there is familiar and we have friends within this community. Even if we're all living in a slum these are the people we grew up with so we would prefer to stay in the upgraded slums.
4.) Only evict and move the slum dwellers who want to have public housing. Make public housing more affordable in the long term.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Public housing. Public housing has a safer location and stuff and the buildings are made of better materials and they have cleaner and better facilities.
2. Slum upgrading. Slum upgrading is more affordable for venue the poorest of families
3. upgraded because at least then I will still have some social connections
4. Location of public housing shld be nearer to job or education opportunities

# data[].attributes.body
1. Public housing. The conditions in the slums are not very good and it is not very clean. The people might catch diseases and may not have the means to treat the sick people. The amenities in the public housing are also better and their life will be better and safer.
2. Slum upgrading. Even if they build a lot of public housings, there will still be a lot of people who are too poor to move there, so slum upgrading will benefit the people who aren’t well off more
3. Stay in the slum. There are many memories made in the slums and the community. Even though the facilities may not be the best, I would still want to stay in the slum
4. The public housing needs to be nearer to the city, so more people are willing to move out of slums and they can have access to better facilities while still being near to the city centre.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Slum upgrading. It is closer to opportunities and the people living in slums know each other so they will feel a sense of community. Slums are also less expensive than public housing.
2. Public housing. Because the slums have drug gangs and it is not safe for residents.
3. I would stay in my slum as public housing is too far away from opportunities and I want to live in the same area as my friends
4. Reduce pricing of the houses and make it closer to opportunities

# data[].attributes.body
1. Upgrading slums instead of demolishing them is the more sustainable option in the long run. This is because when one demolish the slums, materials are wasted.
2. Upgrading the slums that are in suitable locations for human lives.
3. I would rather stay in my slum but have it upgraded. Even though staying in public housing would ensure a better living condition, I would have to leave all my neighbors, friends and memories I got from the slums behind.
4. Maintain the cleanliness of the area so that slum dwellers would not get sick easily. Build some facilities for the slum dwellers so that they won’t be so bored :((

# data[].attributes.body
1. Public housing. Slums might fall apart over time
2. Slum upgrading. Nearer to opportunities.
3. Public housing. Provision of daily needs, have amenities, built by government, have legal right to tenure, less urban crimes
4.  Reduce pricing so more people can afford and include more amenities.

# data[].attributes.body
1. public housing better in terms of sustainability because there is not risk of the houses getting smooshed by nature.

2. slum upgrading because the residents chose where they live and if you evicted them, they might start rioting and overthrow the government.

3. we prefer having it upgraded because moving away means no more friends :(, need to find new friends. very awkward, yk. other people who are not from slum housing might judge you. if you stay, you know your way around the slums and still have friends.

4. yes. they can temporarily be put in a building for a few weeks/months, before demolishing their slums and rebuild it with hdbs. that’s like slum upgrading n public housing combined :D

# data[].attributes.body
1. Slum upgrading because the materials needed is lesser, cheaper and quicker to build.
2. Slum upgrading because the root of the issue is poverty and slums are nearer to job opportunities for the to get out of the poverty cycle.
3. Slums because my family/relatives and friends all live there.
4. Make public housing nearer to job opportunities and make slum upgrading free.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Which solution is more sustainable in the long term?

2. Which solution better addresses the root of the issue?

3. If you were a slum dweller in Sao Paulo, would you rather live in public housing or stay in your slum but have it upgraded? Why?

4. How do you think the housing solutions can be further improved?