# data[].attributes.body
I think this is a really critical intersection that is specifically addressing the needs of working class communities of color in an area that is in many ways the starting place and foundation for all experiences (the home).

# data[].attributes.body
I'm super excited by transformative potential, and it's not a 3-5 year campaign. There are so many complexities! I could see pairing this with a shorter term push (like $ for resilience centers or influencing fed $) while we lay the groundwork

# data[].attributes.body
Amee - 5
I am really excited about this!!

# data[].attributes.body
4 - exciting, daunting, housing less of LAANE's expertise

# data[].attributes.body
Very excited about movement building opportunities, and think there is a way to bridge the fast moving building decarb $ to bring in housing/tenant justice groups. Also intimidating, and unclear what our role/path is

# data[].attributes.body
It's a very crowded space. Finding our own lane in that would be difficult.

# data[].attributes.body
On root cause solution: maybe that's right, but it almost feels low from how I'm interpreting it. On other elements (readiness to lead, etc) I agree with Tracey's concerns. But this seems very high up there, so resonating with the higher ranking there.

Strategic positioning: In terms of united front power - because this is such a need for working class communities, this does come at intersection of survival needs. (Perhaps even more so than CRCs??) This addresses such a fundamental level of need + addresses environmental issues.

# data[].attributes.body
I didn't see anything in the proposal about _who_ the unorganized are, whom we could win support for. 4 might be a bit high on that front.

Building with segments of Labor: so touchy! Just a year earlier re: Wahab bill, this would've been a shit storm with labor forces. I'm a little bit more iffy on this ranked at 5.

Also curious about wedges to split opposition: I don't recall if there was an analysis of this. What jumps to mind: Biggest oppo on housing has been developwers working with Trades against affordable housing. This could provide a wedge, if indeed we could pull Trades away from the developers. But a challenge; they worked so closely together.

# data[].attributes.body
Feel really excited about it - but feel daunted by the proportions of this kind of campaign. Feel onboard with smaller campaign first to build power towards this longer-term

# data[].attributes.body
Feels bold and there's urgency. Could be collective win with cross-movement partnership. Wonder what CEJA is doing on this, what are the ways to work with MVP to move through statewide coalitions

# data[].attributes.body
How do we incorporate the most impacted into our messaging and narrative as a campaign?

Low-income housing is desperately needed, how do we balance that with the slower but more sustainable solution of social housing?

# data[].attributes.body
Share many reservations (with Tracey, ALexis). It's a very ambitious campaign to take on. Not unwinnable: much of it could come to messaging, the dominant narrative, who's speakign most loudly. NIMBY/YIMBY narrative also turns people off, so how do we navigate bringing in more voices of people who are low-income, who are BIPOC?

Mixed-income housing isn't necessarily as appealing to middle forces. Who's advocating for this is really important to shift narrative & bring in partners.

# data[].attributes.body
Very exciting, but timeline knocks down a notch. GND should be building power, with wins in the short-term (e.g. 3-5 year)

# data[].attributes.body
Feels accurate!

# data[].attributes.body
Will all of our allies show up for this? Do we have support even from mainstream environmental partners to get folks housed?

What are the other ways we can gain power against opps?

# data[].attributes.body
- The more we align on this, the more we may provoke alignment amongst the opposition (developers, realtors, even oil)
- What would be the scope/priority? Dan sketches out stepping stones - but given the scale of the problem, would have to carve a strategic path for what to take on
- What would GND's role be with regard to MVP's role? Could be adding the green components?
- Huge potential tent - which can mean a huge potential set of disagreements (e.g. different labor standards approaches even within labor)
- Removing toxics from housing is extremely exciting (being able to frame as healthy homes) - may complicate in terms of how to account for this in scale of funding needed?

# data[].attributes.body
Saw that GND taking lead in acquisitions would be a challenge

# data[].attributes.body
Concerned about big price tag -- MVP is struggling with that as well. Where is the money going to come from?

Price tag will increase the longer it takes to implement

# data[].attributes.body
This would absolutely have to be a ballot measure for $$.

One of my core concerns is the assumption (which is beautiful!) about how we'll be able to bring our groups together with housing justice groups.  We heard $16B/year, and that's not including the extra costs for stuff we want (i.e. basic habitability is WAY cheaper than full decarb); our demands add a ton of $$. Will our partners in social housing be willing to build less in order to have our demands met? That will be the tradeoff: fewer units.

# data[].attributes.body
Decommodifying housing is critical, deeply transformative. Really holistic proposal that gets at systems change -- also makes it hard because it's so big.

Excited about how transformative it could be to put all these movements together + push people to prioritize each others' agendas.

# data[].attributes.body
Would be challenge to translate campaign to community members -- e.g. explaining retrofits, decarb, etc. Harder pitch to make, but doable. Renters generally not thinking about upgrades to building to make greener, focused on necessities (e.g. fixed pipes). Rather than focusing on decarb, focus on broader upgrades.

also concerned about timeline -- impact / benefits would be later than we want

# data[].attributes.body
Opportunity to uplift communities out of poverty. Showing the intersection between climate crisis and housing crisis.

# data[].attributes.body
Agree with Alexis' point on decommodifying housing. A beautiful opportunity to life communities out of poverty; people struggle to upgrade homes, equipment. Good opportunity to uplift a lot of people and highlight climate crisis as an issue impacting people.

# data[].attributes.body
- Very exciting as this issue is very immediate for basic needs
- Housing justice allies would welcome our joining
- SB 567 was gutted so would be good to build here
- This feels like a good time to be working on this given momentum, similar to CRCs with base and ability to activate people (and bring together different groups)
- Movement building/systems change -a "big idea" to de-commodify housing
- Potential movement building for a ballot initiative

# data[].attributes.body
Hear from our members every day evictions, rising rent, displacement. So hard to ignore when focusing on climate, trying to connect b/w housing and climate. Building decarb is great stepping stone towards bolder vision

# data[].attributes.body
Likes the decomodifying housing. Tangible examples/stepping stones to look to: co-ops

# data[].attributes.body
Glad to see it go all the way to social housing (councilmembers often stop short). Glad to hear framing about taking housing off of speculative market

# data[].attributes.body
Challenging capitalism, taking away incentive for profit around housing. Could be wide-reaching for BIPOC frontline community members. Excited about cross-movement solidarity, opportunity to build large base