# data[].attributes.headline
Question: What kind of connections did Bryan establish between Sources C and D and E? How good were Bryan's connections?

# data[].attributes.subject
Question: What kind of connections did Bryan establish between Sources C and D and E? How good were Bryan's connections?

# data[].attributes.headline
Question: What kind of connections did Bryan establish between Sources C and D and E? How good were Bryan's connections?

# data[].attributes.subject
Question: What kind of connections did Bryan establish between Sources C and D and E? How good were Bryan's connections?

# data[].attributes.headline
Question: What kind of connections did Bryan establish between Sources C and D and E? How good were Bryan's connections?

# data[].attributes.subject
Question: What kind of connections did Bryan establish between Sources C and D and E? How good were Bryan's connections?

# data[].attributes.headline
Question: What kind of connections did Bryan establish between Sources C and D and E? How good were Bryan's connections?

# data[].attributes.subject
Question: What kind of connections did Bryan establish between Sources C and D and E? How good were Bryan's connections?

# data[].attributes.headline
How did Bryan try to evaluate Sources C and D and E in context? How good was Bryan's answer?

# data[].attributes.subject
How did Bryan try to evaluate Sources C and D and E in context? How good was Bryan's answer?

# data[].attributes.headline
Question: What kind of connections did Bryan establish between Sources C and D and E? How good were Bryan's connections?

# data[].attributes.subject
Question: What kind of connections did Bryan establish between Sources C and D and E? How good were Bryan's connections?

# data[].attributes.headline
How did Bryan try to evaluate Sources C and D and E in context? How good was Bryan's answer?

# data[].attributes.subject
How did Bryan try to evaluate Sources C and D and E in context? How good was Bryan's answer?

# data[].attributes.headline
How did Bryan try to evaluate Sources C and D and E in context? How good was Bryan's answer?

# data[].attributes.subject
How did Bryan try to evaluate Sources C and D and E in context? How good was Bryan's answer?

# data[].attributes.headline
How did Bryan try to evaluate Sources C and D and E in context? How good was Bryan's answer?

# data[].attributes.subject
How did Bryan try to evaluate Sources C and D and E in context? How good was Bryan's answer?

# data[].attributes.headline
What kind of conclusion did Bryan establish for his answer? How good was Bryan's conclusion?

# data[].attributes.subject
What kind of conclusion did Bryan establish for his answer? How good was Bryan's conclusion?

# data[].attributes.headline
What kind of conclusion did Bryan establish for his answer? How good was Bryan's conclusion?

# data[].attributes.subject
What kind of conclusion did Bryan establish for his answer? How good was Bryan's conclusion?

# data[].attributes.headline
What kind of conclusion did Bryan establish for his answer? How good was Bryan's conclusion?

# data[].attributes.subject
What kind of conclusion did Bryan establish for his answer? How good was Bryan's conclusion?

# data[].attributes.headline
What kind of conclusion did Bryan establish for his answer? How good was Bryan's conclusion?

# data[].attributes.subject
What kind of conclusion did Bryan establish for his answer? How good was Bryan's conclusion?

# data[].attributes.headline
Question: What kind of connections did Bryan establish between Sources C and D and E? How good were Bryan's connections?

# data[].attributes.subject
Question: What kind of connections did Bryan establish between Sources C and D and E? How good were Bryan's connections?

# data[].attributes.headline
How did Bryan try to evaluate Sources C and D and E in context? How good was Bryan's answer?

# data[].attributes.subject
How did Bryan try to evaluate Sources C and D and E in context? How good was Bryan's answer?

# data[].attributes.headline
How did Bryan try to evaluate Sources C and D and E in context? How good was Bryan's answer?

# data[].attributes.subject
How did Bryan try to evaluate Sources C and D and E in context? How good was Bryan's answer?

# data[].attributes.headline
What kind of conclusion did Bryan establish for his answer? How good was Bryan's conclusion?

# data[].attributes.subject
What kind of conclusion did Bryan establish for his answer? How good was Bryan's conclusion?

# data[].attributes.headline
What kind of conclusion did Bryan establish for his answer? How good was Bryan's conclusion?

# data[].attributes.subject
What kind of conclusion did Bryan establish for his answer? How good was Bryan's conclusion?

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 1's answer (Danielle, Yun Qi, Xinling)

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 1's answer (Danielle, Yun Qi, Xinling)

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 3's answer (Jonas, You Wei, Alisha, Linda)

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 3's answer (Jonas, You Wei, Alisha, Linda)

# data[].attributes.body
ideological differences

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 4's answer (Bryan, Adryel, Scott, Frann)

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 4's answer (Bryan, Adryel, Scott, Frann)

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 5's answer (Emilyna, Tricia, Swathi)

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 5's answer (Emilyna, Tricia, Swathi)

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 6's answer (Neo Yong, Marcel, Emilia)

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 6's answer (Neo Yong, Marcel, Emilia)

# data[].attributes.body
1. Self-defence and security concerns. This is supported by Source C,D, F.

2. Power hegemony. This is supported by A and E.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Resource scarcity (eg. water and oil)

2. Ideological differences (what should an ideal society look like?)

3. Economic gain (eg. to occupy colonies)

4. Self defence and security concerns

5. Nationalism and separatism

6. Power and hegemony

7. Revenge and retribution (eg. China's Hundred Years of Shame)

8. Miscalculation and accidental escalation