# data[].attributes.headline
Subjects presenting by  Felicia and  Shaurya. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Subjects presenting by  Felicia and  Shaurya. 

# data[].attributes.headline
Exploring the laws of nature and their impact on the human societies. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Exploring the laws of nature and their impact on the human societies. 

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
JISK_PYPX  Exhibition planner 2024pptx 4

# data[].attributes.body
We have consulted Google

We read books on physics

# data[].attributes.headline
 how do the laws of nature govern the physical and biological aspects of the world

# data[].attributes.subject
 how do the laws of nature govern the physical and biological aspects of the world

# data[].attributes.body
How do different culture perceive and interpret the laws of nature?

# data[].attributes.body
I found the answer from Google

# data[].attributes.body
We have chosen these central idea because

we have to know what is happening in the world because maybe their is a virus but you dont know so you may die because you didnt know and if you do not know you will think all the natural disasters is miracles

# data[].attributes.body
what methods do nature laws theorists use  to develop and articulate their  ideas
.

# data[].attributes.body
All of my information was provided by Google

# data[].attributes.body
we have consulted google

we read books on physics

# data[].attributes.body
we have consulted google

we read books on physics

# data[].attributes.body
we have consulted google
we have read books of physical

# data[].attributes.body
CURIOSITY we chose curiosity because we are curious to learn more about nature

RESPECT we chose respect because we are learning to respect the laws of nature and Nature itself

# data[].attributes.body
We have consulted Google and we have read books on physics.

# data[].attributes.body
We interviewed high school teacher and middle we asked them and after we did video I interviewed Mrs.joy

# data[].attributes.body
respect
we have choosen respect because we need to respect the nature and protect it

we have choosen curiosity because we need to ask ourself question and how  to solve it

# data[].attributes.body
Curiosity: curiosity why because we are curious about what will happen in whatever we do

Respect: because we should respect whatever we are going to do…

# data[].attributes.body
Curiosity because we are eager to learn and discover more things and laws of the nature.

# data[].attributes.body
CURIOSITY because we are curious to learn more about nature

RESPECT because we are learning to respect the laws of nature and

Nature itself

# data[].attributes.body
knowledgeable and thinker

# data[].attributes.body
respect : because the laws of nature protect us

# data[].attributes.body
respect and curiosity

curiosity because : in the central idea they said exploring the laws of nature

# data[].attributes.body
Curiosity and respect

# data[].attributes.body
Curiosity:

We have a strong desire to learn more about nature.

Respect:

If we do not respect the laws of nature we will break the equilibrium of the laws of nature.

# data[].attributes.body
Curiosity and Respect

I chose curiosity because we didn’t know the laws of nature but after some research we knew what it is.I chose Respect because nature needs to be respected .

# data[].attributes.body
I learned thing about laws of nature and types of trees

the main problem is that we wanted to find the relationship between the laws of nature and the human societies

i love the fild trip we learn more about tree and nature

nothing everything was good

we can action and plant trees

# data[].attributes.body
1:What did you learn in the unit of inquiry ?

We Learned about the laws of nature

2: what was the main problem?

The main problem was that we did not change the laws of nature influence the development and evaluation of human societies.

3:how did you like your central idea

I like my central idea because it has the relationship between the laws of nature.

4:what didn't you like

I tried to post in padlet but it was hard .

5:What are your suggestions

My suggestion to know about exhibition

# data[].attributes.body
x

what I learned about LOI:

I almost know all like law of polarity, law of motion and laws of gravity

# data[].attributes.body
What did I learn by the LOI:

I almost know all the laws like law of polarity law of gravity and so on.The thing we most learn is motion and the three laws of nature.My central Idea is exploring the laws of nature and their impact on the human societies it has many information aout the three laws of nature

# data[].attributes.body
1:What did you learn in the unit of inquiry?

I learned about how natural laws affect and impact on human societies.

2:what was the main problem? The main problem was to research and make power point presentaions

3: How did you like your central idea?

It was amazing an interesting to research on it

4 What didn't you like? When we had to do present different topics in different classes.

5 What are your suggestions My suggestion is that it would be better if we had general exhibition instead of online exhibition.

# data[].attributes.body
The is 12 places it has been created in 1930 or 1933 there is different plant ally of them the creator of garden bothamic is a German boy sometimes white people come here they do 10 or 7time going around they are no more stress there is a connection between human and nature and there is a plant or tree called lemontry and the mango tree I came from learning and there is a toxic tree that is called panda tree if you touch it your going to be sic and die maybe 🤔 and there is a plant that give médecine I kinda forget the name

# data[].attributes.body
What historical and contemporary examples illustrate the impact of natural law on human societies
Ans:in many countries natural rights provides fundamental founding of legal systems

# data[].attributes.body
1.What did you learn in the Unit of inquiry?

Ans: We have learnt a lot of new things about the nature and also went in a field trip where we saw toxic trees, medicinal trees and a lot more.We have researched about thunder and erosion.We made interviews on people and on gravity,motion.

2.What was the main problem?

The main problem was researching about the laws of nature,and also the Internet.

3.﻿﻿﻿How did you like your central idea?

I liked my central because it quite related with our lines of inquiry.

4.﻿﻿﻿What didn't you like?

I did not like when we had to do extra work and we were running out of time!

5.﻿﻿﻿What are your suggestions?

I think we have to have more time and better Internet.

# data[].attributes.body
What is the concept of natural laws and how does it relate to human societies?
Ans:a theory of ethics that says that human beings posses intrinsic values that govern our reasoning and behavior

# data[].attributes.body
1)How do the laws of nature influence the development and evolution of human societies?

Its includes the genes we were born and other hereditary factors that can impacthow our personality is formed.

2. What are the parallels and dist?

Parallels are lines of latitude that circle the earth horizontally. They run east and west.

# data[].attributes.body
What methods do natural law theorists use to develop and articulate their ideas
Ans:begin with the basic belief that everyone has right to leave their life

# data[].attributes.body
Question:how do different philosophical perspectives interpret the role of natural law in shaping societies
Ans:system of right or justice held to be common to all humans and derived from nature rather than from the rules of society or positive law

# data[].attributes.headline
Going further what historical and contemporary examples illustrate the impact of natural law on human society

# data[].attributes.subject
Going further what historical and contemporary examples illustrate the impact of natural law on human society

# data[].attributes.body
In many countries natural rights provide fundamental foundations of legal systems. Natural Laws are evident in the laws of the nation and its policies and are also evident in their interactions with its people.

# data[].attributes.body
Going further what historical and contemporary examples illustrate the impact of natural law on human society

In many countries natural rights provide fundamental foundations of legal systems. Natural Laws are evident in the laws of the nation and its policies and are also evident in their interactions with its people

# data[].attributes.body
1.What historical and contemporary examples illustrate the impact of natural law on human societies?

ANSNatural Law is a philosophical theory. It involves the idea that rights, values, and responsibilities are inherent in human nature.

It doesn’t require political order or legislature and serves as a basis for morality and justice throughout human history.

Natural Law contrasts with both Positive Law and Human Rights.

SOURCE: CFI

# data[].attributes.body
1 : What historical and contemporary examples illustrate the impact of natural law on human societies?

Ans: Natural Law is a philosophical theory that states that human beings have certain universally accepted rights, moral values, and responsibilities that are inherent in human nature.

Natural Law Theory is based on the idea that these laws are a universal moral code and are not based on any culture or customs. It is a fundamental principle that defines the way society acts naturally and governs behavior and reasoning

# data[].attributes.body
Discourses on natural law have spanned aeons[1] of human history and it has remained a recurring decimal in jurisprudential thoughts till date.  In its chequered history, it has taken on different forms, changing in contents, role and scope.  Natural law has survived many turbulent periods during which its relevance came under threats but emerging always, as it were, with renewed vigour and growing influence on the legal systems the world over.

The search for the ultimate philosophical foundation of law having universal application has led to different ideas and theories from the ancient periods to the modern times.  The concern, primarily, has been how to subject positive law to higher and overriding principles of natural law which are universal and immutable in character.  In the process different versions of natural law have emerged.  The conceptions of natural law of the early Greek philosophers are essentially metaphysical in character.  They attempted to establish inextricable nexus between natural law and other elements that constitute the cosmos.  The Romans, on their part, made natural rights into natural law and sought to discover the contents of natural law.  In the middle Ages law was largely expressed in terms of theological principles and beliefs; the seventeen and eighteen centuries put forward rational – theological or rational – ethical natural law and at the end of the eighteen century Kent replaced the rational foundation by once again a metaphysical natural law. In the contemporary times John Finnis and Lon Fuller spearheaded a completely secular approach to natural law.

This paper undertakes an overview of the various ideas from the ancient to the contemporary that have shaped natural law. More importantly, it evaluates the utility and significance of natural law. It also asseses its impact on contemporary legal systems. It finally considers the prospect of its relevance in the future.

# data[].attributes.body
1:How do different philosophical perspective interpret the role of natural law in shaping societies?

Ans:natural law, in philosophy, system of right or justice held to be common to all humans and derived from nature rather than from the rules of society, or positive law.

# data[].attributes.body
1.How Do Different Philosophical Perspectives Interpret the Role of Natural Law in Shaping Societies?

Ans: While some argue that reason and natural law are essential in creating a harmonious society, others believe that they may actually be hindering progress. Despite these differing views, there is a growing consensus that both reason and natural law can play a crucial role in shaping our world for the better.

Source: FasterCapital

# data[].attributes.body
1:How do different philosophical perspective interpret the role of natural law in shaping societies?

Ans:natural law, in philosophy, system of right or justice held to be common to all humans and derived from nature rather than from the rules of society, or positive law.

# data[].attributes.body
Natural Law Theories

First published Mon Feb 5, 2007; substantive revision Wed Jun 3, 2020

This entry considers natural law theories only as theories of law. That is not to say that legal theory can be adequately identified and pursued independently of moral and political theory. Nor is it to deny that there are worthwhile natural law theories much more concerned with foundational issues in ethics and political theory than with law or legal theory. A sample of such wider and more foundational theories is the entry Aquinas’ moral, political, and legal philosophy. In the present entry, “natural law theory” is to be taken as shorthand for natural law theories just insofar as they bear on law and are theories of or about it. This focus has the important incidental effect that many historically important differences between natural law theorists can be omitted, differences which pertain more to the foundations of normativity than to the nature and functions (“the concept”) of positive law.

Legal theorists who present or understand their theories as “positivist”, or as instances of “legal positivism”, take their theories to be opposed to, or at least clearly distinct from, natural law theory. Natural law theorists, on the other hand, did not conceive their theories in opposition to, or even as distinct from, legal positivism (contra Soper 1992 at 2395). The term “positive law” was put into wide philosophical circulation first by Aquinas, and natural law theories of his kind share, or at least make no effort to deny, many or virtually all “positivist” theses—except of course the bare thesis that natural law theories are mistaken, or the thesis that a norm is the content of an act of will. Natural law theory accepts that law can be considered and spoken of both as a sheer social fact of power and practice, and as a set of reasons for action that can be and often are sound as reasons and therefore normative for reasonable people addressed by them. This dual character of positive law is presupposed by the well-known slogan “Unjust laws are not laws.” Properly understood, that slogan indicates why—unless based upon some skeptical denial that there are any sound reasons for action (a denial which can be set aside because defending it is self-refuting)—positivist opposition to natural law theories is pointless, that is redundant: what positivists characteristically see as realities to be affirmed are already affirmed by natural law theory, and what they characteristically see as illusions to be dispelled are no part of natural law theory. But because legal theories conceived of by their authors as positivist are, by and large, dominant in the milieux of those likely to be reading this entry, it seems appropriate to refer to those theories along the way, in the hope of overcoming misunderstandings that (while stimulating certain clarifications and improvements of natural law theorizing) have generated some needless debate.

The point made in the preceding paragraph is made in another way by Orrego (Orrego 2007). When the accounts of adjudication and judicial reasoning proposed by contemporary mainstream legal theories are added to those theories’ accounts of (the concept of) law, it becomes clear that, at the level of propositions (as distinct from names, words and formulations), those theories share (though not always without self-contradiction) the principal theses about law which are proposed by classic natural law theorists such as Aquinas: (i) that law establishes reasons for action, (ii) that its rules can and presumptively (defeasibly) do create moral obligations that did not as such exist prior to the positing of the rules, (iii) that that kind of legal-moral obligation is defeated by a posited rule’s serious immorality (injustice), and (iv) that judicial and other paradigmatically legal deliberation, reasoning and judgment includes, concurrently, both natural (moral) law and (purely) positive law. Orrego’s point seems to be confirmed by, e.g., the entry on legal positivism (Green and Adams 2019). Contemporary “positivist” theories are, it seems, natural law theories, distinguished from the main body of natural law theory (a) by their denial that the theory of law (as distinct from the theory or theories of adjudication, judicial duty, citizens’ allegiance, etc.) necessarily or most appropriately tackles the related matters just listed, and accordingly (b) by the incompleteness of their theories of law, that is, the absence from them (and usually, though not always, from their accounts of those related matters) of systematic critical attention to the foundations of the moral and other normative claims that they make or presuppose.

In short: a natural law theory of (the nature of) law seeks both to give an account of the facticity of law and to answer questions that remain central to understanding law. As listed by Green 2019 (having observed that “No legal philosopher can be only a legal positivist”), these further questions (which “legal positivism does not aspire to answer”) are: What kinds of things could possibly count as the merits of law? What role should law play in adjudication? What claim has law on our obedience? What laws should we have? And should we have law at all? All these questions, though organized and articulated a little differently, are under consideration in the present entry.

# data[].attributes.body
1: what methods do natural law theories use to develop and articulate thier ideas.

Ans: The natural law approach to solving ethical dilemmas begins with the basic belief that everyone has the right to live their life. From there, natural law theorists draw a line between an innocent life and the life of an 'unjust aggressor