# data[].attributes.body
Questions are unclear, unrelated to burnout, or only one question is attempted. Shows minimal understanding of the concept.

# data[].attributes.body
Creates questions that are vaguely related to burnout. Questions may be unclear or show limited understanding of the concept.

# data[].attributes.body
Creates two questions related to burnout with some unclear elements. Questions show basic understanding but may lack specificity.

# data[].attributes.body
Creates two questions that measure burnout with minor clarity issues. Questions show good understanding and are relevant to classroom context.

# data[].attributes.body
Creates two clear, well-worded questions that accurately measure burnout. Questions demonstrate deep understanding of the concept and are highly relevant to classroom context.

# data[].attributes.body
Provides unrealistic or irrelevant strategies, or only one unclear solution. Shows minimal understanding of burnout mitigation.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposes strategies that are vague or may not be suitable for classroom implementation. May only provide one viable solution.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposes two reasonable strategies for burnout mitigation. Solutions may lack detail or have limited consideration of classroom practicality.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposes two effective strategies for mitigating burnout with good consideration of classroom implementation. Solutions are practical but may need minor refinement.

# data[].attributes.body
Proposes two highly effective, specific, and realistic strategies for mitigating burnout in classrooms. Solutions demonstrate excellent understanding of scalability and practicality.

# data[].attributes.body
Uses no vocabulary terms from the presentation or uses terms incorrectly. Shows minimal understanding of terminology.

# data[].attributes.body
Uses only 1 vocabulary term or uses terms incorrectly. Shows limited understanding of terminology.

# data[].attributes.body
Uses 2 vocabulary terms from the presentation with mostly correct context. Shows basic understanding of terminology.

# data[].attributes.body
Uses 3 vocabulary terms from the presentation correctly and in appropriate contexts. Shows good understanding of terminology.

# data[].attributes.body
Correctly and effectively uses 4+ vocabulary terms from the presentation in appropriate contexts. Shows mastery of terminology related to burnout.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows no clear analysis or evaluation. No consideration of efficacy or scalability of proposed solutions.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows limited analytical thinking. Minimal consideration of efficacy and scalability of solutions.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates basic analysis of solutions. Some consideration of efficacy and scalability but may lack depth.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows good analytical thinking and evaluation of solutions. Considers efficacy and scalability with reasonable justification.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates exceptional analysis and evaluation of burnout solutions. Thoroughly considers efficacy and scalability of proposed treatments with insightful reasoning.

# data[].attributes.body
Writing is illegible or incoherent. Ideas are disorganized and difficult to understand.

# data[].attributes.body
Writing has significant legibility or coherence issues. Organization may be unclear or confusing.

# data[].attributes.body
Writing is generally clear and legible with some errors. Organization and coherence are adequate.

# data[].attributes.body
Writing is clear, legible, and coherent with minor errors. Ideas are well-organized and effectively communicated.

# data[].attributes.body
Writing is exceptionally clear, legible, and coherent. Ideas are well-organized and effectively communicated with no errors.