# data[].attributes.headline
Goodbye Chocolate City (DC Policy Center)

# data[].attributes.subject
Goodbye Chocolate City (DC Policy Center)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
D.C. is no longer "Chocolate City."

In fact, the District of Columbia now joins New Mexico, California and Texas as states without any one racial group forming a majority of the population. (Of course, unlike those three, our "state" doesn't have a vote in Congress.)

Our case is unique in that, in recent decades, our majority group was black (The other three states had majority white groups). The demographic high water mark for "Chocolate City" was 71.1 percent "Negro" in the 1970 census. Whites were 27.7 percent and "persons of Spanish language" (of any race) were 2.1 percent.

As of 2015-almost a half century later-D.C. residents identified themselves as 48.0 percent Black, 35.6 percent " Anglo," 10.2 percent Hispanic (of any race), 3.6 percent Asian, and 2.6 percent mixed race and other.

In 1970, blacks and whites largely lived in separate neighborhoods. Using a demographer's common measure, D.C. black/white " segregation index " was 72 (highly segregated). By 1980, the segregation index had risen to 77 though the increase may have been largely a statistical artifact; for the first time, the 1980 census allowed Hispanics to be separated out from white and black categories. Separating out white Hispanics to create the Anglo category (i.e. non-Hispanic whites) raised the segregation index somewhat since Hispanics proportionally tended to share neighborhoods with Blacks (that is, non-Hispanic blacks) more than did Anglos.

Despite the growing diversity of some neighborhoods, in 2015, D.C. remains highly segregated. Its Black/Anglo segregation index was 70. From 77 to 70 in 35 years-that is not much progress.

Let's look at what was happening in different parts of D.C.:

West of Rock Creek Park (Georgetown, American University Park, Cleveland Park, Chevy Chase DC, et al.): This was the traditional bastion of Whiteness in DC. In 1980, this area was 88 percent Anglo (having come down from 95 percent white in 1970). By 2015, West of the Park was still three-quarters Anglo (74.5 percent) with the balance split evenly between African Americans and other blacks (6.6 percent), Hispanics (9.2 percent), Asians (6.2 percent), and mixed race and others (3.5 percent).

East of the Anacostia River (excluding Bolling Field): The most racially isolated part of DC in 1980 (95.4 percent black), this vast area-one-fifth of DC's population-is unchanged racially over 35 years. In 2015, East of the Anacostia River's racial breakdown was 95.1 percent Blacks; 1.3 percent Anglo; 2.1 percent Hispanic; 0,3 percent Asian; and 1.2 percent mixed race and other.

Pierre L'Enfant's City of Washington (bounded by Florida Avenue and the Potomac and Anacostia rivers): The old City of Washington, with its neighborhoods primarily filled with 19th century townhouses, has been the great magnet for gentrification over the past 35 years. In 1980, the area was 59.7 percent Black and 34.01 percent Anglo; by 2015, the ratios had roughly reversed with 56.9 percent Anglo and 24.6 percent Black.While there were well-established Anglo enclaves in the old City of Washington in 1980 (for example, Capitol Hill, Foggy Bottom, the redeveloped Southwest), the most dramatic transformation occurred in the Shaw area centered on U Street, the heart of 20th century Black Washington. While the Shaw neighborhood's population almost doubled, its Anglo population ballooned ten-fold, increasing Anglos from 11.4 percent to 61.7 percent of what had been the old City of Washington's poorest neighborhood in the 1960s and 1970s.

Census tracts have changed between 1970 and 2015. For this reason the maps look slightly different. You can see the change in tracts by downloading this file.

Central Northwest (bordered by Rock Creek Park, North Capitol Street, and Florida Avenue, NW): This area saw the second greatest racial change, shifting from 79.3 percent Black and 14.5 percent Anglo in 1980 to 42.4 percent Black and 30.6 percent Anglo in 2015. Interestingly, over 40 percent of the increase in Anglos within Central Northwest occurred in just those neighborhoods abutting the old City of Washington, such as Adams Morgan, Columbia Heights, and Le Droit Park;

Central Northeast (bordered by North Capitol Street, Anacostia River, and Florida Avenue, NE: In Central Northeast, the modest change in racial composition was driven almost entirely by an almost seven-fold increase in Hispanic residents. Over the 35 years the percentage of Anglo residents was stable (14.3 percent to 14.7 percent); the proportion of Black residents declined modestly (83.3 percent to 72.7 percent); but the Black decline was replaced almost completely by Hispanic residents (1.2 percent to 9.1 percent).

Why does this statistical analysis classify D.C. as still "highly segregated" when many parts of the District show increasing racial diversity? It is the extreme degree of racial isolation of Blacks in east of the Anacostia River (basically, Wards 7 and 8) that accounts for it. Of the mono-racial census tracts (90 percent or more of a single race) 42 of D.C.'s 43 mono-racial tracts lie in East of the Anacostia River.

Suppose the eastern boundary of D.C. were the Anacostia River. The Black/all others segregation index would be 55-a level of medium segregation. In short, the old City of Washington, Central Northwest and Central Northeast, and even West of the Park are increasingly racially diverse. Is this integration stable or just a snapshot in time as neighborhoods re-segregate (from Black to Anglo) as appears to be the case with Shaw and Capitol Hill? Creating stable racial diversity is a challenge that DC faces.

The other pressing challenge is east of the Anacostia River. With federal Hope VI grants and other public/private financing, the DC Housing Authority has been replacing former public housing projects such as East Capitol Dwellings and Capitol View Plaza in Ward 7 and Sheridan Terrace and Barry Farms in Ward 8 with mixed-use, mixed-income developments featuring both affordable rentals and home ownership. This has introduced a modicum of greater economic diversity but not, to date, racial diversity. Eliminating such "poverty factories" has helped stimulate the first private, market-rate home building in east of the Anacostia River.

This article has focused on the District of Columbia as the "central city." However, the real city is the entire Washington metropolitan area. The status of racial diversity in the entire region and how we compare with other regions will be the topic of the next article.

Notes

[majority of population] In 2015 Hawaii had a 56 percent resident Asian population.

[Anglo] Of course, I doubt that many DC residents would have identified themselves as "Anglo" to the census takers but "Anglo" is an all-purpose term in New Mexico that labels anyone who is not Hispanic, black, Asian or Native American. Thus, in New Mexico a Puccini, a Pulaski, and a Goldstein would all be called "Anglos." In this and succeeding articles I'll use the term "Anglo" instead of the more cumbersome "non-Hispanic whites." In addition, "Black" (capitalized) indicates non-Hispanic blacks while "black" (lower case) refers to blacks without having separated out Hispanics who identify themselves racially as black.

[common measure] My segregation index is a commonly-used "dissimilarity index." A dissimilarity index measures evenness (or unevenness) of the racial makeup across neighborhoods (census tracts), school attendance zones, etc. While 71.1 percent of the District's population was black in 1971, this share varied from neighborhood to neighborhood. But how much? A black/white dissimilarity index of 72 means that 72 percent of blacks would have to move to other neighborhoods in just the right proportions for every neighborhood to be 71 percent black. Or conversely, 72 percent of whites would have to make the right moves for every neighborhood to be 27.7 percent white. Demographers often classify indices of 80 or more as hyper-segregation; 60-79.9 as high segregation; 40-59.9 as medium segregation; 20-39.9 as low segregation; and less than 20 as no systemic segregation.
Feature photo by Ted Eytan (source). David Rusk is a Senior Fellow at the D.C. Policy Center. Rusk is a former federal Labor Department official, New Mexico legislator, and mayor of Albuquerque, the USA's 32nd largest city. He is also the author of Cities without Suburbs. Now a consultant on urban policy, Rusk has worked in over 130 US communities in 35 states. Abroad, Rusk has lectured on urban problems in Canada, England, Germany, South Africa, and The Netherlands.
D.C. Policy Center Fellows are independent writers, and we gladly encourage the expression of a variety of perspectives. The views of our Fellows, published here or elsewhere, do not reflect the views of the D.C. Policy Center.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Goodbye to Chocolate City - D.C. Policy Center

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
D.C. is no longer "Chocolate City." In fact, the District of Columbia now joins New Mexico, California and Texas as states without any one racial group forming a majority of the population. (Of course, unlike those three, our "state" doesn't have a vote in Congress.)

# data[].attributes.body
May 29, 12:00-1:15pm

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What You Need To Know About The D.C. School Lottery

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In D.C., parents use a lottery to try and get their kids into the public school of their choice. The system has been hailed for being user-friendly, but evidence is mixed as to whether it helps bring equity to the school system.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
D.C.’s changing public school enrollment: Trends by race and grade band - D.C. Policy Center

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
D.C.’s changing public school enrollment: Trends by race and grade band - D.C. Policy Center

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Developing Community Agreements — National Equity Project

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Community agreements are a powerful strategy for coalescing a group into a team. Develop effective agreements with these tips from the National Equity Project.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Rising Graduation Rates and Falling SAT Scores for D.C. Students - D.C. Policy Center

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Rising Graduation Rates and Falling SAT Scores for D.C. Students - D.C. Policy Center

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
IMPACT: The DCPS Evaluation and Feedback System for School-Based Personnel

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
IMPACT: The DCPS Evaluation and Feedback System for School-Based Personnel In 2009, DCPS reinvented its teacher evaluation process into a research-based approach to evaluation based on a rigorous, multiple measure system that sets expectations for all school-based employees and provides opportunities for clear and actionable feedback. IMPACT has evolved over the past ten years—and has again evolved as a result of the IMPACT Review.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
Lost in the City: An Exploration of Edward P. Jones's Short Fiction

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Kenton Rambsy and Peace Ossom-Williamson

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Lost in the City: An Exploration of Edward P. Jones’s Short Fiction: DC Demographic Shift 1970 - 2015

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
According to David Rusk, DC is no longer “Chocolate City” (Slang term for Washington, DC because of its large African American population). In 1970, DC had a majority black population at 71.1% with white people making up 27.7% of the District’s population and person’s of Spanish descent making up 2.1%. By 2015, the population of DC was made up people 48% black, 35.6% white, 10.2% hispanic, 3.6% Asian, and 2.6% mixed race and other races.

# data[].attributes.body
OSSE provides city-wide dual enrollment opportunities, free of charge, to public high school students (at participating LEAs).

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
View each IHE’s minimum grade point average (GPA) requirements

# data[].attributes.headline
DC Dept. of Employment Services (DOES) Pre-Apprenticeship Program

# data[].attributes.subject
DC Dept. of Employment Services (DOES) Pre-Apprenticeship Program

# data[].attributes.body
DOES offers pre-apprenticeship, which is their 16+ learn and earn program designed to prepare people to transition into a Registered Apprenticeship Program (RAP).

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Unlock your potential with innovative programs and hands-on apprenticeships in Washington D.C. Explore career opportunities and training to seize the economic prospects in the nation’s capital. Let’s fuel your future together!

# data[].attributes.headline
DC Policy Center: Role of School Boundaries in the District of Columbia

# data[].attributes.subject
DC Policy Center: Role of School Boundaries in the District of Columbia

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The role of school boundaries in the District of Columbia: Facts and findings on boundary participation, student representation, and facility utilization - D.C. Policy Center

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The role of school boundaries in the District of Columbia: Facts and findings on boundary participation, student representation, and facility utilization - D.C. Policy Center

# data[].attributes.headline
NYT: At Black Colleges, a Stubborn Gender Enrollment Gap Keeps Growing

# data[].attributes.subject
NYT: At Black Colleges, a Stubborn Gender Enrollment Gap Keeps Growing

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
At Black Colleges, a Stubborn Gender Enrollment Gap Keeps Growing

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Only 19 percent of students at Howard University are Black men, whose enrollment levels at four-year colleges have plummeted across the board.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Our Navigator Toolkit consists of evidence-based resources and activities that highlight learning mindset supportive practices. Introducing the Navigator Toolkit Using the Navigator Toolkit Expand...

# data[].attributes.headline
The Values Connection Activity-Navigate Project

# data[].attributes.subject
The Values Connection Activity-Navigate Project

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Values Connection is an activity based on Motivate Lab’s relevance affirmation intervention research, in which students explore their personal values and connect these values to their education and future goals. The purpose of this activity is to help students find greater value and meaning in the pursuit of their goals, whether it be through their current learning or coursework, future career or college plans, or other postsecondary pathways.