# data[].attributes.body
Est-ce que nous mesurons les bonnes choses ?

# data[].attributes.body
Y a-t-il des soucis majeurs ?

# data[].attributes.headline
¿Qué hacemos ya que pueda contribuir a esto?

# data[].attributes.subject
¿Qué hacemos ya que pueda contribuir a esto?

# data[].attributes.body
Que faisons-nous maintenant pour y contribuer ?

# data[].attributes.headline
¿Falta algún aspecto de nuestro trabajo?

# data[].attributes.subject
¿Falta algún aspecto de nuestro trabajo?

# data[].attributes.body
Y a-t-il un aspect manquant de notre travail ?

# data[].attributes.headline
¿Quiénes son los equipos o personas adecuadas para responder a las preguntas relacionadas con su resultado?

# data[].attributes.subject
¿Quiénes son los equipos o personas adecuadas para responder a las preguntas relacionadas con su resultado?

# data[].attributes.body
Quelles sont les bonnes équipes ou personnes pour répondre aux questions liées à votre résultat ?

# data[].attributes.body
should we include political realities/landscape - things improve, then regress, new governments change direction, etc

# data[].attributes.body
something about the wider network/landscape (CSO & political?) being active on IP rights as well? Something that situates us as one part of a greater whole (sometimes supporting us, other times working at odds with us)?

# data[].attributes.body
having comms part of the full process of briefings etc - who are we targeting, dissemination so seems appropriate to track uptake of ideas in briefngs

# data[].attributes.body
Are we missing indirect impacts [where FPP is not necessarily cited] but has fed into and had an influence

# data[].attributes.headline
Measuring movement of networks and target policy makers

# data[].attributes.subject
Measuring movement of networks and target policy makers

# data[].attributes.body
For UK work, Ligia is already noting down what PQs are asked etc. Also insight into how something is being received by different target audiences.

# data[].attributes.body
More impact related - section contained within it to add comments/positive response (we've used this report/we've sent this to other people in the team) - used in Fern and helped to see impacts. Niya

# data[].attributes.body
how well we're communicating on policy processeses/ regressions/opportunities to inut with indigenous and other partners as well as indigenous and CSO movement?

# data[].attributes.body
where partners are impacted as well as where we're engaged in relative policy processes

# data[].attributes.body
monitoring where we're advocating for States to do this (i.e. UK) - is this covered adequately - or something more to unpack?

more clarity or guidance might be needed

what finance, what mechanisms?

country teams and climate and markets team, potentially Retraid team

i.e. working with partner to access direct financing could be included

# data[].attributes.headline
part of the thinking needs to be how to ensure we all understand/are clear on the objectives of monitoring, etc

# data[].attributes.subject
part of the thinking needs to be how to ensure we all understand/are clear on the objectives of monitoring, etc

# data[].attributes.body
it prob is clear but starts to get confusing as you think more about it!

# data[].attributes.headline
measuring increase in partner self-determined advocacy (and things needed behind the scenes to enable this?)

# data[].attributes.subject
measuring increase in partner self-determined advocacy (and things needed behind the scenes to enable this?)

# data[].attributes.headline
can we use this framework to learn and re-direct ourselves: what do the indicators and response options need to include to help this?

# data[].attributes.subject
can we use this framework to learn and re-direct ourselves: what do the indicators and response options need to include to help this?

# data[].attributes.body
is there anywhere in the MEAL framework that helps capture where we think there might be greater impact if we had more resources (i.e. money/working with other teams)?

there's a question of how granular monitoring is useful at

# data[].attributes.body
only related to fending off the bad guys - the resilient communities in their territories will prob be in another outcome?

# data[].attributes.headline
Policy processes long and gains are often v. small (unnoticeable for most in many cases!)

# data[].attributes.subject
Policy processes long and gains are often v. small (unnoticeable for most in many cases!)

# data[].attributes.body
What actually is a success in these long processes? it's easy to measure (in some cases) any actions we've managed to get someone to do, but also much of it behind the scenes and also 'narrative' success - hard to assess our contribution to that (if we can at all)