# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.text
If you’re still on the fence about how harmful vaccines are, please watch these documentaries 💉☠️

Vaxxed 1- https://t.co/Pp6k7paQrG

Vaxxed 2- https://t.co/fnWYumYHBh

Vaxxed 3- https://t.co/M3bhdJadDB https://t.co/6KSnfyq7GD

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.entities.urls[].description
‘An investigation into how the CDC, the government agency charged with protecting the health of American citizens, destroyed data on a 2004 study that showed...

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.entities.urls[].description
Vaxxed II: In 2016, a media firestorm erupted when Tribeca Film Festival abruptly censored its documentary selection, VAXXED: From Coverup to Catastrophe, am...

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.entities.urls[].description
Children’s Health Defense embarked on a nine-month journey across America, gathering powerful testimonies from the people. Our interviews ranged from mothers...

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.original_text
If you’re still on the fence about how harmful vaccines are, please watch these documentaries 💉☠️

Vaxxed 1- https://t.co/Pp6k7paQrG

Vaxxed 2- https://t.co/fnWYumYHBh

Vaxxed 3- https://t.co/M3bhdJadDB https://t.co/6KSnfyq7GD

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
If you’re still on the fence about how harmful vaccines are, please watch these documentaries 💉☠️

Vaxxed 1- https://t.co/Pp6k7paQrG

Vaxxed 2- https://t.co/fnWYumYHBh

Vaxxed 3- https://t.co/M3bhdJadDB pic.twitter.com/6KSnfyq7GD
— “Sudden And Unexpected” (@toobaffled) March 23, 2026

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props_source.data.text
If you’re still on the fence about how harmful vaccines are, please watch these documentaries 💉☠️

Vaxxed 1- https://t.co/Pp6k7paQrG

Vaxxed 2- https://t.co/fnWYumYHBh

Vaxxed 3- https://t.co/M3bhdJadDB https://t.co/6KSnfyq7GD

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props_source.data.entities.urls[].description
‘An investigation into how the CDC, the government agency charged with protecting the health of American citizens, destroyed data on a 2004 study that showed...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props_source.data.entities.urls[].description
Vaxxed II: In 2016, a media firestorm erupted when Tribeca Film Festival abruptly censored its documentary selection, VAXXED: From Coverup to Catastrophe, am...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props_source.data.entities.urls[].description
Children’s Health Defense embarked on a nine-month journey across America, gathering powerful testimonies from the people. Our interviews ranged from mothers...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.original_text
If you’re still on the fence about how harmful vaccines are, please watch these documentaries 💉☠️

Vaxxed 1- https://t.co/Pp6k7paQrG

Vaxxed 2- https://t.co/fnWYumYHBh

Vaxxed 3- https://t.co/M3bhdJadDB https://t.co/6KSnfyq7GD

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.text
If you’re still on the fence about how harmful vaccines are, please watch these documentaries 💉☠️

Vaxxed 1- https://t.co/Pp6k7paQrG

Vaxxed 2- https://t.co/fnWYumYHBh

Vaxxed 3- https://t.co/M3bhdJadDB https://t.co/6KSnfyq7GD

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.entities.urls[].description
‘An investigation into how the CDC, the government agency charged with protecting the health of American citizens, destroyed data on a 2004 study that showed...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.entities.urls[].description
Vaxxed II: In 2016, a media firestorm erupted when Tribeca Film Festival abruptly censored its documentary selection, VAXXED: From Coverup to Catastrophe, am...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.entities.urls[].description
Children’s Health Defense embarked on a nine-month journey across America, gathering powerful testimonies from the people. Our interviews ranged from mothers...

# data[].attributes.headline
Cullen McDonald has won his case! It’s all-over social media, but why should we care?

# data[].attributes.subject
Cullen McDonald has won his case! It’s all-over social media, but why should we care?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
Cullen McDonald has won his case! It’s all-over social media, but why should we care?

We should, and here’s why ~

Cullen became a test case for Canada. While similar cases were being dismissed across the country, Mr. McDonald’s case was pushed forward by prosecutors in hopes of… pic.twitter.com/Z7LazxGZFk
— PoliceOnGuardForThee (@PoliceOnGuard) October 16, 2024

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.rebelnews.com/alberta_based_class_action_lawsuit_seeks_justice_for_those_harmed_by_covid_19_vaccines

# data[].attributes.body
https://abc7news.com/post/bart-workers-fired-due-covid-vaccine-mandate-get-1-million-each-federal-jury-decides/15464182/

# data[].attributes.body
https://archive.org/details/TheGreaterGood

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Greater Good : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
"THE GREATER GOOD may be the most important vaccine film ever made. Finally, we hear the stories of families adversely affected by vaccines told in a...

# data[].attributes.body
https://vaccinerights.substack.com/p/religious-exemptions

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Religious Exemptions: Clearing Some of the Confusion

I used to do 3-hour consultations introducing the law on vaccines and religion and providing detailed information about how to write a legally sound statement of religious beliefs opposed to vaccines. After two decades of working with religious exemptions in about three dozen different exemption contexts and sub-contexts, some things stand out as either common points of confusion or information people need to know to make effective religious exemption decisions.

Exemptions apply to vaccines required for daycare, school and college; for military and civilian employees; for immigrants; for children of parents in child custody disputes; and for international travelers. And there are many sub-categories within these broader categories. In most states, daycare and school religious exemptions don't require parents to explain their religious beliefs opposed to vaccines. But in two states and other contexts, religious exemption applicants are required to explain their religious beliefs to get the exemption. Instructions about how to write a legally sound statement of religious beliefs opposed to vaccines is beyond the scope of an article, but the information below may nevertheless be helpful to people in those situations in particular, and to anyone else concerned with religious exemptions in the U.S. more generally.

"What are the legal requirements for a vaccine religious exemption?" This is not a short-answer question. But the starting place is that the beliefs must be "religious in nature" (as the law defines that) and "sincerely held." These are objective standards, which means we don't get to decide whether our own beliefs fit these terms; the law decides that. How? The boundaries are set out in legal precedent, sometimes called case law, which comes from past court cases where courts have applied the law to a variety of different situations. Each of these legal precedent court cases serves as a point of reference we can compare to our own situation to see how the law should be applied. Legal precedent must be researched ongoing, as it's constantly being updated and, in some cases, is revised or even replaced. My e-book provides a good starting point to the precedent on vaccine religious exemptions ( vaccinerights.com).

Religious freedom is a First Amendment federal Constitutional right, and a right in all state constitutions as well. The law protects religious beliefs and practices. And this is a powerful right. But there aren't any absolute rights in our legal system other than the right to think whatever you want to think (though we may rest assured that they're working on ways to take that right away, too <sigh>).

When public health and religious freedom conflict, public health will always win, though it's sometimes more a question of balancing conflicting needs than determing which one wins absolutely. But the problem with public health trumping religious freedom isn't with the law, it's that health policy and law are driven by a corrupt medical/pharmaceutical system. If forcing someone to be vaccinated over their religious objections really would save lives, many of us would be all for it. But it rarely if ever actually does or would. Vaccines are more harmful than the diseases, emergencies are declared where none actually exists, authorities pretend vaccines are effective when they offer little or no real benefit.

As a general rule, religious objections and exemptions can be overridden during a declared emergency, should a health authority deem that necessary. But as we've seen recently (and are likely to see again very soon), emergencies can be declared whether they're real or not. Either way, once an emergency is declared, our rights diminish while health authorities' powers expand. You may insist that there really isn't an emergency, and you may be absolutely right, but what changes rights and powers is the declaration of an emergency, not our awareness of the reality. Worse, some people supporting the pro-vaccine agenda step over the law-some knowingly, some unknowingly-to achieve their "public health" goals. Sadly, having a right doesn't necessarily mean you get to exercise it. But knowing your rights is a necessary starting point to maximize your chance of success.

We get to decide what we believe, but the law decides what beliefs qualify for a legal right. A belief that's "religious" to us personally may or may not be "religious" for legal exemption purposes. So, if you're seeking an exemption where you're required to explain your religious beliefs, you'd be wise to find out how the law works first. You can't "un-ring the bell," as the saying goes, can't come back later and say, "oops, pretend I didn't say that, here's what I meant to say..." It's important to get this one right the first time. So, learn about your rights before going forward with your exemption request.

In religious beliefs statements, it's just as important what not to say as it is what to say. Your stated beliefs must meet the legal requirements, but you should also avoid saying things that don't meet the requirements, as they can backfire on you. For example, vaccine harm is a documented reality, but it isn't a protected religious belief. The law sees science and religion as mutually exclusive realms. When people refer to vaccine harm in a religious belief statement, they risk giving the impression that harm is the real or primary objection, and that the religious beliefs are either disingenuous or a secondary concern. This can cost you the exemption. So, it's best to leave out anything that doesn't help you get the exemption.

Some people are frustrated that the law gets to decide whether their beliefs are "religious." But it only does this with respect to legal rights, and for that purpose, the law has to do this. If we got to decide, any belief could instantly become a qualifying religious belief, which wouldn't make sense, of course. Every person would be "a law unto himself," as an 1800's U.S. Supreme Court case put it. The good news is that the law defines "religious" (for legal purposes only) broadly. The bad news is that there are pitfalls that can cost you the exemption if you're not aware of them. In my decades of exemption experience, I've observed that most people's common-sense approach to writing a statement of religious beliefs is just not fully consistent with the legal requirements. So, some pre-exemption education is in order for those seeking to maximize their chance of success.

It doesn't matter whether an exemption applicant belongs to an organized religion, nor which one if they do. It only matters if the person's stated religious beliefs meet the legal requirements. There are probably still one or two states with outdated religious exemption laws that require church membership for daycare and school exemptions, but those laws are arguably not enforceable, as the church requirement is unconstitutional. (I've been able to help people overcome these barriers in the past.)

Technically, having received vaccines in the past doesn't automatically disqualify you from getting a religious exemption today. If you meet the legal requirements today, you qualify for the exemption today. But past vaccines can present a problem, especially if you're gotten a vaccine recently, because it's a conflict. "How can you say you're opposed to vaccines on religious grounds when you just got a flu shot last fall?" This raises a question about the sincerity requirement. But if there is a reasonable explanation for the apparent conflict, then the sincerity requirement is met. A complete explanation is beyond the scope of an article, but the successful "reasonable explanations" I've seen over the years fall into 4 distinct categories. The legal precedent gives us a way out of this one. But in sum, what matters is that you have a reasonable explanation for the apparent discrepancy.

Some religious exemptions are in state law (e.g., daycare, school, and college, except for military schools), while others are in federal laws (e.g., military; immigration; employee religious accommodation under Title VII of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964). The specific procedure for getting an exemption will vary from context to context, situation to situation, jurisdiction to jurisdiction. But as to what beliefs qualify for a religious exemption, that falls primarily under federal Constitutional law, so it's the same everywhere in the country in any context, regardless of whether the starting place is a state or federal law.

Sometimes, there isn't a religious exemption law that applies to a situation at all. This doesn't necessarily mean there's no right to refuse vaccines on religious grounds, only that you have to approach the matter in a different way. For example, few states have exemption laws for employees, but when employers have 15 or more employees, employees can refuse vaccines required for their employment on religious grounds under Title VII of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, a "discrimination in the workplace" law. Another situation concerns college students doing internships or clinical rotations in local hospitals required for their college degree or certification. State exemption laws arguably don't apply to these situations, but Title VII has language that does apply (I've assisted many college students successfully in the past in this situation). There's even a legal argument for the proposition that parents have a right to refuse vaccines on religious exemptions for their children's daycare and school enrollment even in states that don't have a religious exemption law. As a practical matter, asserting this right would very likely require a lawsuit to test it, and would just as likely involve one or more levels of appeals before the issue was finally resolved. But a clear legal argument exists to support this.

The law protects religious beliefs and practices. The starting place is the First Amendment "free exercise" of religion in the U.S. Constitution. But the Constitution itself doesn't tell us anything about our rights, it only provides the starting point, a list of categories such as religious freedom, free speech, freedom of the press, due process, etc. So, before we can say whether or how such rights apply to any given specific situation, we must research the legal precedent to see how the courts have interpreted and applied these rights to various situations, and from there "argue" that we have that right in our specific situation because it's similar or analogous to the legal precedent.

If you belong to an organized religion, it doesn't matter whether you have support from your religious leader, nor whether anyone else in the organization agrees with you. You could be literally the only Catholic, Jew, Muslim, etc. opposed to vaccines on religious grounds, but that doesn't matter, legally. What matters is whether your beliefs, your interpretation of your religion if you belong to one, meets the legal requirements.

If doesn't matter whether you are, generally, a religious person. Again, it only matters whether your beliefs opposed to vaccines meet the legal requirements, whether they are protected by law.

For legal purposes, the word "religious" is quite broad. Some over the years have said, "Alan, I'm not religious, but I consider myself to be deeply spiritual; does that count?" Yes! The scope of "religious" for legal purposes includes matters of conscience. It's possible to be an atheist with a matter of conscience that is a legally protected religious belief. But this doesn't mean that any belief qualifies. There are categories of beliefs that specifically do not qualify: scientific (including medical), philosophical and political. How the law defines and applies these categories is a legal precedent research question, but many people's common-sense approach to writing religious belief statements results in a statement with a combination of qualifying and non-qualifying beliefs, the latter falling into one or more of these non-qualifying categories. The most successful statements include only beliefs that are religious as the law defines that term for exemption purposes.

Can you have religious beliefs opposed to only some vaccines? Yes, if you have a qualifying belief that only applies to some vaccines. The only real-life exampleI know is with people with a moral or religious objection to abortion. Some vaccines are cultured or tested on aborted fetal cells. So, this belief alone wouldn't exempt a person from all vaccines. If one wants to avoid all vaccines, this belief could be part of their statement of religious beliefs, but they'd need to have at least one additional religious belief that's opposed to all vaccines.

The above is only a starting point, but I hope you've found it helpful. For more information about how the U.S. legal systems work, a summary of some of the important state and federal court cases (legal precedent) on vaccine religious exemptions, and an introduction to the various vaccine exemption contexts and sub-contexts, consider purchasing The Authoritative Guide to Vaccine Legal Exemptions ( https://www.vaccinerights.com/e-book.html), an e-book by the nation's leading vaccine legal exemption expert (if I may say so myself). If you have to explain your religious beliefs opposed to vaccines to get an exemption (something the e-book doesn't cover) and would like help from someone with in-depth experience in the field, email me for information about my religious exemption manual. It provides detailed information not available anywhere else about how to write a legally sound statement of religious beliefs opposed to vaccines, how to handle religious exemption interviews, and a detailed overview of how the law works with religion and vaccines. I also have separate employee and immigration exemption manuals for people dealing with exemptions in these more complicated situations.

In service,

Alan Phillips, J.D.
Vaccine Rights Legal Expert
Please consider a one-time or small monthly donation to help keep these articles coming!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Religious Exemptions: Clearing Some of the Confusion I used to do 3-hour consultations introducing the law on vaccines and religion and providing detailed information about how to write a legally sound statement of religious beliefs opposed to vaccines.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT FILED
Two years ago, the Province of B.C. violated the employment and constitutional rights, #medicalprivacy and #bodilyautonomy, of 38,000 B.C. public servants with its coercive and unjustifiable proof of COVID-19 vaccination mandate, leading to untold…
— BCPS Employees for Freedom (@bcpsef) November 29, 2023

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
🚨#BREAKINGNEWS🚨

It’s been almost two years since I lost my beautiful boy, and now it’s time for the answers Sean deserves.

I am happy to announce that Umar Sheikh @uasind @SheikhLawCA, and Angela Wood, have agreed to take on our case. In addition, Dr. Peter McCullough MD…
— Answers4Sean 🇨🇦 (@Answers4Sean) July 26, 2023

# data[].attributes.body
https://unitedtogether.ca/

# data[].attributes.body
https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/vaxxed-from-cover-up-to-catastrophe/

# data[].attributes.body
https://deeprootsathome.com/list-of-attorneys-worldwide-now-available-for-lawsuits/

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.epidemicoffraud.com/

# data[].attributes.body
https://unsafeandineffective.com/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Latest Twitter Threads by @JohnBeaudoinSr on Thread Reader App

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Thread Reader helps you read and share the best of Twitter Threads

# data[].attributes.body
https://rumble.com/v3v0q2m-shot-dead-the-movie.html

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/charges-dropped-against-alberta-doctor-who-gave-covid-vaccine-exemptions-5569682

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA) has dropped charges against an Edmonton-area doctor who gave out COVID-19 vaccine exemptions to patients.

Dr. Michal Princ was charged with professional misconduct and was scheduled for a disciplinary hearing on March 8, which has now been cancelled.

The charges against him were formally dropped on Jan. 10, the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) said in a Jan. 18 news release.

Dr. Princ was accused of failing to follow vaccine exemption requirements set out by the CPSA, Alberta Health Services (AHS), and the province's Chief Medical Officer of Health in April 2023, the release said.

The JCCF funded Dr. Princ's legal case.

The charges were dropped following a court decision, Ingram v. Alberta, where the court found the health orders were invalid because they were issued by politicians rather than the Chief Medical Officer of Health.

"Court of King's Bench Justice Barbara Romaine found this to be contrary to the Public Health Act and ruled that health orders must come from the Chief Medical Officer of Health in order to be valid," JCCF said.

One of Dr. Princ's attorneys, Andre Memauri, said they were pleased with the news.

"Our client was ethically motivated by the sacrosanct and longstanding principle of 'do no harm.' We are pleased the CPSA has withdrawn charges, although we wish the charges had been withdrawn to protect professional independence, not based on the Ingram ruling," he said in the release. "The relationship of trust between each physician and his or her patients must be brought back to the forefront of medical practice."

Change to Public Health Act

Since the Ingram decision, Alberta's legislative assembly has made changes to the Public Health Act that require public health orders to be issued by the cabinet, not by the Chief Medical Officer of Health.

JCCF said that while the CPSA, AHS, and Chief Medical Officer of Health released requirements that are called "guidance," they were "strict and inflexible."

The JCCF said there were virtually no grounds for exemption from the COVID-19 vaccine based on requirements issued by CPSA, AHS, and the provincial medical officer.

"The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta violated the ethical principle of informed and voluntary consent for medical treatment, by threatening medical doctors with the loss of their license if they exercised their independent clinical judgment about the safety and efficacy of new vaccines for which no long-term safety data existed," JCCF President John Carpay said in the release.

"In the 'Rapid Brief' document of Alberta Health Services, informed consent is only mentioned once, when recommending vaccination to women 'who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant,' or to people with a history of allergies," said Glenn Blackett, another attorney for Dr. Princ.

"Perhaps even more troubling is the CPSA's COVID-19 Vaccine: Questions and answers for the public and healthcare practitioners, which encourages doctors advising vaccine-hesitant patients to employ 'motivational interviewing' techniques," he said. "When I read that, a shiver ran up my spine."

Legal Battles With Regulatory Colleges

It's not the first challenge that Canadian medical professionals have faced by regulatory bodies with regard to COVID-19 vaccines.

In October 2023, the College of Registered Nurses of Saskatchewan (CRNS) held a disciplinary hearing for nurse Leah McInnes.

Ms. McInnes was facing discipline for social media posts about vaccine mandates, vaccine passports, and related issues like freedom of choice and medical privacy.

She was accused of violating the association's code of conduct with her online comments.

The CRNS accused the nurse of the "misuse" of her influence as a health care provider.

In 2022, the CRNS also advised nurse Shelly Wilson that she could face discipline over her social media posts regarding COVID-19 vaccines, masks, and treatment options that "did not accord with public health or mainstream media narratives," according to the JCCF.

The CRNS asked Ms. Wilson to sign an agreement that would admit professional misconduct. They ended up dropping the case.

Three doctors in Ontario were suspended during their battle with the Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons over public comments each made that were critical of the COVID-19 restrictions and vaccines.

One of the doctors ended up permanently losing his license for issuing exemptions for COVID-19 vaccines, masking requirements, and testing.
Matthew Horwood contributed to this report.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Alberta Physicians College Drops Charges Against Doctor Who Gave COVID Vaccine Exemptions

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA) has dropped charges against an Edmonton-area doctor who gave out COVID-19 vaccine exemptions to patients. Dr. Michal Princ was charged with professional misconduct and was scheduled for a disciplinary hearing on March 8, which has now been cancelled.

# data[].attributes.body
https://strongandfreecanada.org/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Voice of the Covid Counter Narrative | StrongAndFreeCanada.org

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Strong And Free Canada is working to save lives and recover our rights and freedoms from the globalists and the traitors in our government

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
"No More Mr Nice Guy" - Names and Faces - Gloves Are Off!

14th November 2021

Dr. David Martin declares he has had enough and delivers an explosive expose revealing whom he considers to be the real names and faces behind the Covid Criminal Conspiracy at the Red Pill Expo. We believe this presentation was from the recent Red Pill Expo Conference at Lafyette on November 6th and 7th 2021 (TBC).

When we have more info on, or manage to obtain clearer slides from the presentation, we will post it/them here. In the meantime we have some screenshots below which are about as clear as we can make them:
Update: as promised, here is a pdf document with all the details: https://filedn.com/l0gou38PXoMb2NFeG3z4Yqf/PDF%20DOCS/Dr_David_Martin_Presentation_Slides_Privateers%2C_Pirates%2C_Orchestra(3).pdf

Are the names and faces in the top screenshot above representative of all the people at the top of the pyramid structure? We suspect not, and that there is most likely another layer above. We have to admit though, that some of these names are an eye-opener to us.

Support Truth Media

f you like the service we provide, please consider a donation. Every penny, dollar or pound helps us keep this vital service going!

Thank you!

#Dr-David-Martin #Covid-Orchestra #Criminal-Conspiracy #Red=Pill-Expo #J-Edward-Griffin #Lafayette

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Covid Orchestra - Names and Faces - Dr David Martin Delivers Red Pill Revelation at RedPill Expo

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
14th November 2021 Dr. David Martin declares he has had enough and delivers an explosive expose revealing whom he considers to be the real names and faces behind the Covid Criminal Conspiracy at the Red Pill Expo. We believe this presentation was from the recent Red Pill Expo Conference at Lafyette on November 6th and 7th 2021 (TBC).

# data[].attributes.body
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/10/16/fifty-doctors-back-dr-aseem-malhotra-as-the-good-law-project-takes-the-gmc-to-court-for-refusing-to-strike-him-off-over-covid-vaccine-concerns/

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/compensation-scheme-for-covid-vaccine-injuries-is-unconstitutional-new-lawsuit-5508113

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Biden administration tried to censor this Stanford doctor, but he won in court

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
White House, surgeon general, CDC and FBI "likely violated the First Amendment" by exerting a pressure campaign on social media companies to censor Covid-19 skeptics - including Stanford epidemiologist Dr. Jay Bhattacharya - a federal court found.

# data[].attributes.body
The last section,  the Red Pill Master's Pack is still in development, the link will appear below when it is live.

# data[].attributes.body
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/nyc-school-teacher-victory-covid-vaccine-mandate/

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.courthousenews.com/ivermectin-proponents-ask-fifth-circuit-to-revive-lawsuit-against-fda/

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/covid-victims-families-sue-ecohealth-alliance-funding-releasing-virus

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.oraclefilms.com/safeandeffective

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/policy/national-case-summaries

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
National Case Summaries | America's Frontline Doctors

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Fearless Group of Nurses and Medical Workers File Lawsuit Against Texas Hospital Over Mandatory Covid-19 Injection Policy

# data[].attributes.body
https://twitter.com/iambrookjackson/status/1686877782507225089

# data[].attributes.body
https://news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/australian-gp-sues-pfizer-and-moderna

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.westernstandard.news/alberta/covid-19-vaccine-injured-mom-sues-govt-cbc-for-10-5m-over-misinformation-negligence/article_1c03dff8-19db-11ee-ae95-3fac5daae216.html

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
A 47-year-old mother who suffered a vaccine injury is suing the federal government and the CBC for following "misinformation" advice to get vaccinated.

Empowered Canadians and The Institute for Freedom and Justice are supporting and raising funds for a new lawsuit filed by Plaintiff Carrie Sakamoto, a mother of three, who suffered significant physical and psychological harm, including permanent Bell's Palsy, because she thought she was doing "the right thing" by following the advice and information from the government and the CBC about the COVID-19 vaccines.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
covid-19 vaccine misinformation and hesitancy

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
COVID-19 vaccine-injured mom sues gov't, CBC for $10.5M over misinformation, negligence

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
"I think Canadians will be shocked to learn about the rushed changes the government made to the safety standard for vaccines at the start of COVID."

# data[].attributes.body
https://twitter.com/theblackfemini3/status/1680099800983957506

# data[].attributes.body
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/george-watts-jr-pfizer-covid-vaccine-injury/

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/covid-vaccine-injured-sue-biden-administration-over-censorship

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
A woman who suffered severe nerve damage after receiving a COVID-19 vaccination and four others with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 vaccine injuries launched a lawsuit against President Joe Biden and his administration on May 22.
Top government officials violated the plaintiffs' rights to free speech and peaceful assembly when they pressured Big Tech companies to crack down on people sharing their experience after receiving the COVID-19 vaccines, Brianne Dressen, the woman, and the other plaintiffs say.

"Through threats, pressure, inducement, and coercion, Defendants now work in concert with social media companies to censor content the government deems 'disinformation,' 'misinformation,' and 'malinformation'-a feat that the government could never lawfully accomplish alone," the 124-page suit, filed in U.S. court in southern Texas, states.

In addition to Biden, defendants include Rob Flaherty, a top adviser to Biden; White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre; the Department of Homeland Security; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and Surgeon General Vivek Murthy.

Defendants did not immediately respond to requests for comment, or could not be reached.

Dressen hailed the lawsuit as a major development for those reporting to be suffering from vaccine injuries.

" People injured by the COVID vaccines in the United States have not been able to file suit anywhere, under any circumstance," she told The Epoch Times. "So this is a landmark case for Americans injured by the COVID vaccine."

COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers are largely immune from litigation in the United States due to the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act declaration entered by the Trump administration in early 2020. Most other vaccine manufacturers are also shielded from liability under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.

Censorship

The five people who experienced serious problems following vaccination are joined by Ernest Ramirez, whose son died after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. They've repeatedly been censored by platforms like Twitter and Instagram as they tried to share their stories.

Ramirez, for instance, saw a GoFundMe that sought to raise funds for him to travel to Washington to share his son's story taken down. GoFundMe claimed the account was removed for violating conduct the company prohibits. GoFundMe did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Another plaintiff, Nikki Holland, meanwhile, posted videos on TikTok regarding her experiences after being vaccinated, including the injuries she suffered. TikTok said the videos violated guidelines such as one against posting "violent and graphic content."

" When I really started to share and open up about things, I started to notice that a lot of stuff was being taken down and censored," Holland told The Epoch Times. "That adds a whole new world of questioning to motive and what's really going on because ... why would you censor something you might need to look into to protect millions of others?"

TikTok did not immediately return a query.

The other plaintiffs are Shaun Barcavage, a former nurse who has been on disability leave since suffering medical problems after receiving Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine; Kristi Dobbs, a dental hygienist who suffered "debilitating medical injuries" after a shot of Pfizer's vaccine; and Suzanna Newell, who is also on disability leave due to problems following vaccination.

The right to peacefully assemble was also violated when Facebook and other big tech platforms disbanded groups where those with suspected or confirmed adverse reactions following vaccination gathered, according to the suit.

One Facebook group called "A Wee Sprinkle of Hope" was shut down after a group member posted an infographic of symptoms people have experienced following COVID-19 vaccination and Dressen shared a link to a press conference at which she had shared about her symptoms.

Facebook's message to Dressen was that the group violated the company's "Community Standards on misinformation that could cause physical harm." Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for an explanation from the group.

The removal of the groups robbed those suffering injuries after a COVID-19 vaccine of key gathering places for the exchange of information as they sought to figure out how to treat their often-debilitating conditions. Dressen said she is aware of multiple suicides as a result, because the censorship sparked feelings of helplessness amid the suffering.

The deplatforming was "devastating, especially when you're being censored and no one's listening to you," Holland said.

Evidence

Evidence unearthed in an ongoing case against the government, as well as internal Twitter documents, underpin the new case.

Discovery in Missouri v. Biden litigation, lodged by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana against the Biden administration, has revealed that officials pressured WhatsApp, Facebook, and other technology companies to censor users talking about problems following COVID-19 vaccination, including posts that accurately outlined the lack of evidence for COVID-19 vaccines among certain populations.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
COVID Vaccine-Injured Sue Biden Administration Over Censorship

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A woman who suffered severe nerve damage after receiving a COVID-19 vaccination and four others with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 vaccine injuries launched a lawsuit against President Joe Biden and his administration on May 22.

# data[].attributes.body
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/canadian-airline-lawsuit-covid-vaccine-mandates/

# data[].attributes.body
https://twitter.com/_taylorhudak/status/1661036527206400001

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.text
BREAKING: Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi found not guilty in the Plön local court in Germany

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.original_text
BREAKING: Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi found not guilty in the Plön local court in Germany https://t.co/tOanEOOtBw

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
BREAKING: Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi found not guilty in the Plön local court in Germany pic.twitter.com/tOanEOOtBw
— Taylor Hudak (@_taylorhudak) May 23, 2023

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props_source.data.text
BREAKING: Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi found not guilty in the Plön local court in Germany https://t.co/tOanEOOtBw

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.original_text
BREAKING: Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi found not guilty in the Plön local court in Germany https://t.co/tOanEOOtBw

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.text
BREAKING: Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi found not guilty in the Plön local court in Germany

# data[].attributes.body
https://twitter.com/_taylorhudak/status/1660922858665566209

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.text
I am in the courtroom covering the case of Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi in Germany.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.original_text
I am in the courtroom covering the case of Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi in Germany. https://t.co/JJMlJmt6nq

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.embed_code
I am in the courtroom covering the case of Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi in Germany. pic.twitter.com/JJMlJmt6nq
— Taylor Hudak (@_taylorhudak) May 23, 2023

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props_source.data.text
I am in the courtroom covering the case of Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi in Germany. https://t.co/JJMlJmt6nq

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.original_text
I am in the courtroom covering the case of Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi in Germany. https://t.co/JJMlJmt6nq

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.metadata.attachment_props.text
I am in the courtroom covering the case of Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi in Germany.

# data[].attributes.body
https://healthfreedomdefense.org/busd-ordered-to-pay-400k-conduct-training-for-employees-for-harming-students-during-covid/

# data[].attributes.body
https://karenkingston.substack.com/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Kingston Report is an evidence-based analysis of COVID-19 causes, guidelines, treatments, 'vaccines', and market forecast presenting government documents not found on any other platform.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Kingston Report is an evidence-based analysis of COVID-19 causes, guidelines, treatments, 'vaccines', and market forecast presenting government documents not found on any other platform. Click to read The Kingston Report, by Karen Kingston, a Substack publication with tens of thousands of readers.

# data[].attributes.body
https://icandecide.org/press-release/breaking-icans-attorneys-score-another-major-win-against-fda-with-pfizer-and-moderna-covid-19-vaccine-documents/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
ICAN's attorneys in yet another action against FDA just scored another massive win for transparency, with a federal judge ordering FDA to release documents it relied on to license Pfizer's COVID vaccine for 12- to 15-year-olds and Moderna's COVID vaccine! Despite FDA's insistence it needed 23.5 years, the federal judge, opening his decision with the quote, "Democracy dies behind closed doors," ordered them to produce the files in just 2 years!
As you may recall, ICAN's attorneys, led by Aaron Siri, obtained a court order in January 2022 forcing FDA to produce all of its data on Pfizer's COVID vaccine for those 16 years and older at a rate of 55,000 pages per month, as opposed to the 75 years FDA sought.

ICAN's attorneys then sued the FDA again, also on behalf of PHMPT and this time including the parents of Maddie de Garay, a young girl grievously injured in Pfizer's clinical trial for 12- to 15-year-olds, for FDA's documents related to Pfizer's COVID vaccine for 12- to 15-year-olds and Moderna's COVID vaccine.

They explained to the Court the importance of timely production. Once again, FDA claimed it would be "impractical" to release the estimated 4.8 million pages at more than between 1,000 to 16,000 pages per month, or in other words at least 23.5 years! ICAN's attorneys countered, demanding FDA produce all the documents before mid-2025.

In another monumental win for transparency, the federal judge ordered the FDA to produce all of the requested documents by June 2025, amounting to an average rate of about 180,000 pages per month-in other words, in just 2 years!

In his reasoning, the judge made the astute observation that "while the Court recognizes the limited resources that the FDA has dedicated to FOIA requests, the number of resources an agency dedicates to such requests does not dictate the bounds of an individual's FOIA rights."

The Court further agreed that "Plaintiffs have shown an urgent need to inform the public about the health and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines based on the massive push to vaccinate, persistent effort to eradicate COVID-19, and continued government and private efforts to enforce these vaccines" and aptly recognized that "this information is not only necessary for the good of our American medical system, but also for the health of our society at large."

ICAN could not agree more!

All the Pfizer documents produced to date can be found here. We will continue to update that page as more documents are produced, and you can see below for more of ICAN's updates on the Pfizer documents:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Breaking: ICAN's Attorneys Score Another Major Win Against FDA with Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Documents - ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
ICAN's attorneys in yet another action against FDA just scored another massive win for transparency, with a federal judge ordering FDA to release documents it relied on to license Pfizer's COVID vaccine for 12- to 15-year-olds and Moderna's COVID vaccine!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
National Citizen's Inquiry - Canada's Response To Covid-19

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
1. The scope and magnitude of the COVID-19 response were / remain unprecedented.

2. The impacts were national and the responses of the governments affected the vast majority of Canadians.

3. Canadians have many legitimate questions concerning how the response was managed and what scientific and policy advice governments' relied upon - questions to which the governmental response thus far has been non-existent or unsatisfactory.

4. Calls for the governments themselves to commission an inquiry have gone unheeded.

5. The governments cannot be expected to objectively and impartially conduct the required investigation of themselves - hence the need for a National Citizens Inquiry.

6. It is necessary to solicit, receive, and evaluate first hand personal testimony from those impacted by governments' response to COVID-19. It is important that this testimony be given sincerely, and free of coercion or censorship.

7. It is necessary to solicit, receive, and evaluate testimony from scientific, medical, legal and other appropriate experts which may differ from the narrative communicated by governments and mainstream media.

8. It is necessary to ascertain where governmental responses to COVID-19 were effective, ineffective or counterproductive, and where alternative methods could have yielded better or more appropriate results.

9. It is necessary to establish accountability for the impacts of measures taken and to ascertain the social and economic costs of those measures.

10. It is necessary to ensure that our governments manage any future declared public emergencies, and their exercise of related emergency orders or powers, in a transparent, responsive, democratic, and effective manner.

1. Independence - The Inquiry must be truly independent. Inquiry Commissioners shall be selected on the basis of experience, competence, and credibility and not for any pre-conceived positions they might hold on the issues to be dealt with by the Inquiry.

2. Citizen Supported - The authority of the Inquiry must rest on a mandate received from significant numbers of Canadian citizens across the country who have made repeated calls for an independent and objective review of governments' pandemic measures. This mandate is to be further reinforced by such citizens adding their names to the Petition of Support for a National Citizens- Inquiry provided on the Inquiry's website - www.citizensinquirycanada.ca .

3. Open and Transparent - The Inquiry's investigation and related activities must be open and transparent, free of biases or preconceived conclusions.

4. Truthfulness - All persons participating in the Inquiry may only submit oral or written testimony under oath, dutifully sworn before a Commissioner of Oaths.

5. Evidence Based - The deliberations and conclusions of the Inquiry must be evidence based, with any and all testimony received (including that containing extreme claims and conspiratorial charges) being subject to cross examination. The submitted evidence for all arguments, claims, and/or positions shall be made publicly available through the Inquiry's website.

6. Respect - The Inquiry shall insist that all participants exhibit mutual respect for the contrary opinions and positions of others - so as to facilitate reconciliation, rather than further polarize Canadians.

1. To inquire into and undertake dialogue with Canadians. To listen to Canadians concerning the impacts of government health and policy measures impacting their personal lives, including their physical and mental health, families and communities (particularly children and seniors), jobs and livelihoods, businesses, and their fundamental freedoms and civil liberties as guaranteed by the Constitution.

2. To invite Canadians to pose to the Inquiry any unanswered or unclear questions concerning COVID-19 and governments' responses thereto, and for the Inquiry to make all reasonable efforts to secure answers to those questions.

3. To receive and evaluate testimony from medical, legal, scientific, and other relevant experts concerning the governments' pandemic measures and strategy, what information was known or knowable by governments, and what alternative approaches could have been taken.

4. To receive and evaluate testimony from legacy and independent media to understand what information was known or knowable and why information was conveyed to the public as it was.

5. To invite input from healthcare officers and other governmental officials as to the rationale behind the health care protection measures adopted - including mandates, lockdowns, and similar orders and actions - and the strategies employed to secure public compliance.

6. To invite and secure testimony as to the appropriateness, efficacy, legality and constitutionality of governments' responses to COVID-19.

7. To investigate public sector expenditures, grants, and any other subsidies or financial support programs and their distribution related to the governmental responses to COVID-19.

8. To consider the issue of civic and criminal liability for any damages or harms caused by governments' response to COVID-19.

9. To make publicly available to Canadians all findings, submissions, and testimonies certified by and formally presented through the Inquiry.

10. To identify any mistakes, negative impacts, or mismanagement that the Inquiry may determine have occurred and, if it does so, to recommend appropriate measures for more appropriate and effective government responses in the future.

Selection of Commissioners
It is critical that selected Commissioners are, and are seen to be, credible in all regards. In particular, that they are, and are seen to be, as objective, competent, and trustworthy to Canadians on whose behalf the Inquiry is being conducted.

Suggestions received will then be evaluated and those most qualified to serve shall be invited to do so. Commissioners will be asked to sign a Declaration of Understanding and Neutrality indicating that they accept the Inquiry's Terms of Reference and commitment that their conclusions and recommendations have not be pre-determined but will be based solely on testimony provided to the Inquiry.

The names and biographies of the selected Commissioners will then be posted on the Inquiry's website.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
NCI Homepage - National Citizen's Inquiry - Canada's Response To Covid-19

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The scope and magnitude of the COVID-19 response were / remain unprecedented. The impacts were national and the responses of the governments affected the vast majority of Canadians. Canadians have many legitimate questions concerning how the response was managed and what scientific and policy advice governments' relied upon - questions to which the governmental response thus far has been non-existent or unsatisfactory.

# data[].attributes.body
https://informedconsentdefense.org/

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12015497/Australian-government-hit-class-action-lawsuit-Covid-vaccines.html

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Australian government hit with class action lawsuit over Covid vaccine

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A landmark Covid-19 vaccine injury class action lawsuit has been filed against the Australian government.

# data[].attributes.body
https://icandecide.org/press-release/icans-monumental-mississippi-win/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
ICAN’s Monumental Mississippi Win - ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
ICAN’s biggest legal victory yet provides Mississippi residents a religious exemption option for their children to attend school

# data[].attributes.body
https://cacuk.uk/green-light-for-vax-injury-test-case/

# data[].attributes.body
https://drbowden.substack.com/p/fda-attempts-to-recharacterize-its

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
FDA attempts to recharacterize its actions to avoid judicial scrutiny. Our brief to the 5th circuit.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
FDA undertook a singularly effective campaign against ivermectin but now seeks to disclaim its intended and predictable effects.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.globalresearch.ca/court-appeal-ontario-decision-j-n-v-c-g-brings-provinces-appellate-judiciary-into-disrepute/5814125

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Parental Authority for Covid Vaccination of Young Children: Ontario Law Case

The Court of Appeal for Ontario's Decision in J.N. v. C.G. Brings the Province's Appellate Judiciary Into Disrepute

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author's name.

To receive Global Research's Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

***

In the recent family law case J.N. v. C.G., the divorced parents sought a court decision regarding which parent should have deciding authority for COVID-19 vaccination of their two youngest children, aged 10 and 12.

Justice A. Pazaratz gave the self-represented mother (J.N.) sole decision-making authority with respect to the vaccinations,[1] and awarded her costs in the motion;[2] on the basis that her concerns were the result of conscientious enquiry, were not unfounded or arbitrary, that the children had not been manipulated and held a consistent desire not to be vaccinated, and that psychological harm could be caused if they were forced to be vaccinated by their father (C.G.).[3]

Basically, Justice Pazaratz found that the mother was the more rational, closest and concerned adult to make the decision of vaccination for the two youngest children (which every adult is free to make for themselves), which also respects the children's constant and independently expressed wishes; on the considered basis that this is the best outcome for the welfare of the children.

Justice Pazaratz found the father to be mean-spirited, unreasonable, offensive and misguided in his representations before the court, preferring to attack the mother's credibility rather than address the issue. For example:

[79] With respect to the positions advanced by each parent.

1. I respect the father's decision to be guided by government and health protocols.

2. I think the father did himself a disservice by focussing so much of his case on dismissive personal attacks on the mother. Those attacks are not only misguided and mean-spirited. They raise doubts about his insight with respect to the vaccine issue - and they also raise doubts about his appreciation of the nature and quality of the important relationship between the mother (as primary resident parent) and the children.

3. I equally respect the mother's decision to make exhaustive efforts to inform herself about the vaccination issue.

[...]

[ emphasis added]

In his reasoned 27-page analysis, Justice Pazaratz expressly refused to take judicial notice (i.e., simply accept without tested proof) that the vaccines are safe and effective - on the mere basis that the government approved the vaccines, recommends the vaccines, and states that the vaccines are safe and effective. As such, there was no evidence before him that the vaccines are safe and effective.

Justice Pazaratz received the affidavit submissions of both parents solely as evidence of what the parents were considering in making their parenting decisions, not as evidence, one way or the other, regarding whether the vaccines are safe and effective:

[15] In this case the evidence provided more questions than answers.

1. The father filed two affidavits.

2. The mother filed one.

3. They both relied extensively on unsworn "exhibits", which were basically internet downloads.

4. In addition, the father relied on numerous downloads from the mother's social media accounts.

5. They both consented to my receiving these materials, to demonstrate the sources of information which each of them is relying on in formulating their respective parenting position.

[ emphasis added]

Justice Pazaratz expressly did not consider that his mandate included resolving the scientific and policy question of COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy:

[71] In a complex, important, and emotional case like this, it is important to remember the court's mandate:

1. I am not being asked to make a scientific determination. I am being asked to make a parenting determination.

2. I am not being asked to decide whether vaccines are good or bad.

3. I am not being asked to decide if either parent is good or bad.

4. My task is to determine which parent is to have decision-making authority over L.E.G. and M.D.G. with respect to the very specific and narrow issue of COVID vaccinations. Each parent has clearly identified how they would exercise such decision-making authority.

[ emphasis added]

The Court of Appeal for Ontario nullified the ruling of Justice Pazaratz, and substituted its own ruling giving sole decision-making authority with respect to the COVID-19 vaccinations to the father.[4]

The appellate court's 23-page decision is dismissive, even overtly sarcastic at one point (paragraph 30), and, most importantly, denies the mother's natural justice rights, in a matter of forced bodily injections no less, by misrepresenting the family court decision and disregarding the established law of evidence regarding judicial notice, while imposing its own order that the father have sole decision-making authority "with respect to the children's vaccination against COVID-19".

Leaving aside the central issue (circumvented by the appellate court) of whether the scientific question of the vaccine safety and efficacy needed to be answered for the family court judge to make his decision about parenting (the family court judge says not), let me explain the egregious appellate-court error about judicial notice this way:

1. no court or reasonable person can have any doubt that the question of whether the COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective, and the degrees to which they are safe and effective for children, is a matter that requires expert evidence, whereas

2. a different formation of the same appellate court in 2021 determined the obvious - that matters that are the proper subject of expert evidence are, by definition, not compatible with judicial notice.[5]

The said different formation's position is entirely aligned with the authoritative 2001 Supreme Court of Canada directive on the question:[6]

48 In this case, the appellant relies heavily on proof by judicial notice. Judicial notice dispenses with the need for proof of facts that are clearly uncontroversial or beyond reasonable dispute. Facts judicially noticed are not proved by evidence under oath. Nor are they tested by cross-examination. Therefore, the threshold for judicial notice is strict: a court may properly take judicial notice of facts that are either: (1) so notorious or generally accepted as not to be the subject of debate among reasonable persons; or (2) capable of immediate and accurate demonstration by resort to readily accessible sources of indisputable accuracy: R. v. Potts (1982), 1982 CanLII 1751 (ON CA), 66 C.C.C. (2d) 219 (Ont. C.A.); J. Sopinka, S. N. Lederman and A. W. Bryant, The Law of Evidence in Canada (2nd ed. 1999), at p. 1055.

49 The scientific and statistical nature of much of the information relied upon by the appellant further complicates this case. Expert evidence is by definition neither notorious nor capable of immediate and accurate demonstration. This is why it must be proved through an expert whose qualifications are accepted by the court and who is available for cross-examination. As Doherty J.A. stated in R. v. Alli (1996), 1996 CanLII 4010 (ON CA), 110 C.C.C. (3d) 283 (Ont. C.A.), at p. 285: "[a]ppellate analysis of untested social science data should not be regarded as the accepted means by which the scope of challenges for cause based on generic prejudice will be settled".

[ emphasis added]

Impervious to the establish law of evidence regarding judicial notice, the Court of Appeal in this case decided:

[45] Stated otherwise, judicial notice should be taken of regulatory approval, and regulatory approval is a strong indicator of safety and effectiveness. That being the case, where one party seeks to have a child treated by a Health Canada-approved medication, the onus is on the objecting party to show why the child should not receive that medication. The motion judge erred by reversing that onus.

[46] The respondent, as the parent seeking not to have the children vaccinated, had the onus to establish that, despite Health Canada's opinion as to the vaccine's safety and effectiveness, they should not be. That onus was not satisfied.

In the context, this means: "If the government states on its websites that a medical intervention is safe and effective, then trial-court judges in Ontario should take this government statement to be a proven fact, and administer the case accordingly."

Basically, on my study of the decision, if I may paraphrase, the appellate court's reasoning for circumventing the established law of judicial notice (and principles of natural justice) in this case about forcibly injecting children is: "well, it's the government, and there's a declared pandemic".

The appellate court's decision is contrary to law, and is both absolute and absurd.

Many unanswered follow up questions immediately arise, such as:

How could a mother know or reasonably expect that a court will take untested evidence of government positions expressed on the internet as proven facts, and that she has an onus to disprove those facts?

How could a mother know that the complex parenting conflict will, in the court, be reduced to a purely scientific question and that the government's slogan-style answer to that question is taken to be a proven fact?

Beyond the qualitative (and meaningless) "safe" and "effective" qualifiers, what degrees and types of risks versus predicted benefits are sufficient to override the parent and child decisions against injection?

What amount and type of "overall benefit" or "best interest" is sufficient to override the child's Charter rights and the caretaking parent's authentic concerns?

What about the myriad of follow up boosters?

What about the palpable possibility that government agencies are partly or largely captured by influential entities having motives other than pure concern for public health?

What about the money and politics, which are in play?

How does the court preserve its constitutional role if it thus makes a blanket decision to defer to whatever position the government decides to have?

In addition, the appellate court makes several incorrect statements; for example, as follows.

(at paragraphs 19 and 31, respectively): "The information relied upon by the respondent [mother] was nothing but something someone wrote and published on the Internet, without any independent indicia of reliability or expertise" [...] "The motion judge erred in failing to conduct any meaningful review of the appellant's authorities, or the laws of evidence, in favour of the respondent's [mother's] questionable and unreliable internet printouts with no independent indicia of reliability or expertise."

Actually, the mother's affidavit contains a fact sheet from Pfizer, giving a long and detailed description of side effects, and the appellate court does not dispute the authenticity of the fact sheet.

Actually, the mother's affidavit contains an article dated 26 August 2021 from the scientific journal Science, entitled "Having SARS-CoV-2 once confers much greater immunity than a vaccine-but vaccination remains vital - Israelis who had an infection were more protected against the Delta coronavirus variant than those who had an already highly effective COVID-19 vaccine".[7] By independent estimates, Science is consistently ranked as the world's third leading scientific journal.[8] The 26 August 2021 article's sources are public and fully verifiable.

Actually, the mother's affidavit contains a 2012 article published in PLoS ONE, entitled "Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS virus".[9] PLoS ONE is a highly ranked peer-reviewed scientific journal. This article in PLoS ONE has been cited in the scientific literature more than 650 times, which is a very high number, including by many recent leading scientific-journal articles about COVID-19 vaccines.[10] All of this is readily verifiable using Google Scholar (which is a "CanLII" for globally published scientific articles).

(at paragraph 15): "The motion judge's description of Dr. Malone, Dr. Lawrie and the other authors cited by the respondent - as leaders in their fields - seems to be based on nothing more than their ability to either create a website or be quoted in one. There is no apparent or verifiable expertise."

Actually, Dr. Robert W. Malone's record as a scientist is a matter of public knowledge, which is immediately verifiable in both the scientific literature and the U.S. Patent records. His Google Scholar profile is not difficult to find.[11] His 5 most cited scientific articles and US patents, all immediately verifiable, make it clear that he is eminently qualified, far beyond virtually every government public health officer, to make expert criticisms of the mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines:[12]

Everything the family court judge wrote about Dr. Malone is correct and verifiable although imprecise in one instance:

[60] For example, the article submitted by the mother "Are People Getting Full Facts on COVID Vaccine Risks?" quotes Dr. Robert W. Malone, the inventor of the mRNA vaccine. Whether he is right or wrong about the current use of COVID vaccines is a matter for discussion and determination. But with his credentials, he can hardly be dismissed as a crackpot or fringe author. The mother referred to the following excerpt from the article:

The original inventor of the mRNA vaccine (and DNA vaccine) core platform technology currently used to create the vaccines is Dr Robert W Malone. Dr Malone has been expressing serious concerns [...]

[ emphasis added]

Should the judge be fatally faulted for loosely assimilating co-inventing and demonstrating the underlying technology that is the crux of the new mRNA vaccines to "inventing the vaccine"? Do the industry modifications in manufacturing the actual vaccine constitute "inventing the vaccine"? Who, if anyone, "invented the lipid-particle mRNA COVID-19 vaccine"?

(at paragraph 30): "Further, the materials from the Canadian Paediatric Society - attached to the appellant's affidavit, and which state that the vaccine is safe and effective for children (and that its benefits outweigh its rare side effects) - clearly meet the criteria set out in the case law cited by the motion judge. That is to say, pursuant to ITV and Sutton, this is a well-known organization (whose objectivity and sources can be readily and easily assessed), and the information contained in its documents is capable of verification. Moreover, as the Canadian Paediatric Society is not a government agency, the motion judge should have been comforted knowing that its opinion is not formulated by a government official, or reliant only on government procured information."

Actually, if the appellate court had spent any time applying its recommendation that "whose objectivity and sources can be readily and easily assessed", it would have found a few relevant items on the website of the Canadian Paediatric Society:

Under "Sponsorship", the organization has:[13]

The Canadian Paediatric Society's activities and programs are funded through a wide variety of sources, including membership dues, revenue from continuing medical education events and annual conferences, publications, unrestricted grants from individuals, foundations and corporations, as well as government grants. Over the years, the CPS has developed mutually beneficial relationships with private sector companies. The resources offered by the private sector enhance our ability to fulfill our mission. For instance, sponsorships can help us expand our distribution network, allowing our resources on child and youth health to reach a wider audience than would otherwise be possible. The CPS welcomes corporations as supporters of our programs and activities and seeks corporate sponsors that operate in the best interests of children and youth.

[ emphasis added]

Under "Competing Interests", the organization has several declared conflicts of interest among its board members, executives, and members, such as, for example:[14]

Why would the appellate court want judges to presume reliability and accuracy of statements from such internet sources, rather than have the judges apply the strict threshold for judicial notice prescribed by the Supreme Court?

Several provincial appellate courts have denied their jurisdictions to fairly determine scientific questions related to government COVID-19 measures, by taking government experts to be correct on the apparent basis that the government must be right,[15] but this appellate court has gone further. This appellate court holds the view (expressly not shared by the family-court judge) that the scientific question is determinative in this case and that the government position expressed in generic terms on the internet should be accepted as proven fact without any government expert being required or cross-examined.

This appellate court in-effect wants to "simplify" all similar cases in this way: the government position should be taken as absolute, and the parent's only option is to prove that their particular child would be at too high a risk compared to an unquantified benefit - "the parent seeking not to have the children vaccinated, had the onus to establish that, despite Health Canada's opinion [taken as proven fact] as to the vaccine's safety and effectiveness, they should not be" (at para. 46).

How did this happen?

Is the father's legal team of three lawyers to be followed because the mother is self-represented?

Is it so unpalatable that a family-court judge in-effect took judicial notice that there was a live scientific debate about the risks and benefits of the COVID-19 vaccines?[16]

In fact, there can be little doubt that there is a live and unresolved scientific debate about the vaccines.

Death is not listed in the Pfizer list of side effects that was before Justice Pazaratz, however, it is well established that the COVID-19 vaccines can cause death, as seen from:[17]

an increasing number of detailed autopsy studies (Choi et al., 2021; Schneider et al., 2021; Sessa et al., 2021; Gill et al., 2022; Mörz, 2022; Schwab et al., 2022; Suzuki et al., 2022; Tan et al., 2022; Yoshimura et al., 2022; Onishi et al., 2023),

adverse effect monitoring (e.g., Hickey and Rancourt, 2022),

a recent survey study (Skidmore, 2023),

studies of vaccine-induced pathologies (e.g., Goldman et al., 2021; Kuvandik et al., 2021; Turni and Lefringhausen, 2022; Edmonds et al., 2023; Wong et al., 2023), and

more than 1,250 peer-reviewed publications about COVID-19 vaccine adverse effects (React 19, 2022).

There is also the known vaccine injury compensation programmes of states worldwide, which include death resulting from the COVID-19 vaccines (Mungwira et al. 2020; Wood et al., 2020; Crum et al., 2021; Kamin-Friedman and Davidovitch, 2021). Japan, Canada and the UK have granted compensation for COVID‑19 vaccine induced deaths (The Japan Times, 26 July 2022; Corbett, 6 September 2022; Wise, 2022).

To this we should add the incisive criticisms against the pharmaceutical-industry-funded vaccine clinical trials themselves (the supposed scientific basis for "safe and effective"), such as are published in the leading British Medical Journal, in which the raw data was hidden from independent researchers, and the trial designs were fatally flawed:

Why is it so difficult for an appellate court to admit the possibility that, when billion-dollar secret contracts are in play, and when the government structurally applies a self-reporting framework with manufacturers, government public health positions are not entirely and objectively based on actual and verifiable science, and that, therefore, the government should not be taken at its (website) word in establishing facts arising from complex and technical manipulations controlled by an industry that does not have a stellar reputation for safety?

In the present case, the family-court judge acted wisely, applying the principles of family law, whereas the appellate court was flippant, to the extent that a court can be flippant, and brings the province's appellate judiciary into disrepute.

Finally, it is comforting to note that the appellate court's decision in J.N. v. C.G. has already engendered bold and significant pushback from a judge of the family court in Ontario, in a similar case of parents having opposite positions regarding COVID-19 vaccination of their children, in which government pronouncements about "safe and effective" are at issue.[18] Although couched in terms of distinguished circumstances, the said pushback is as close to a "rebellion" as one can observe in a common law court system.

In an extensive analysis of the said appellate court's decision, Justice R.T. Bennett explains point-by-point why the appellate ruling should not apply to the case before their court,[19] and concludes their analysis with:

666. The Charter of Rights ensures that accused persons have the right to a fair trial. This court finds that innocent children should and do have that same right.

There is hope, even during a declared and highly mediatized and politicized pandemic.
Notes
*

[3] See Pazaratz J.'s decision, https://canlii.ca/t/jmk30, paras. 37, 75-78.

[7] Meredith Wadman, "Having SARS-CoV-2 once confers much greater immunity than a vaccine-but vaccination remains vital - Israelis who had an infection were more protected against the Delta coronavirus variant than those who had an already highly effective COVID-19 vaccine", Science, 26 August 2021, doi: 10.1126/science.abm1207, https://www.science.org/content/article/having-sars-cov-2-once-confers-much-greater-immunity-vaccine-vaccination-remains-vital, archived at: https://archive.ph/PnnWV.

[8] For example, Google Scholar has: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_venues, accessed on 28 March 2023, archived history at: https://archive.ph/https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_venues.

[10] For example: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_ylo=2023&hl=en&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&cites=10595293153265702610&scipsc, accessed on 28 March 2023.

[11] https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=Jf1bApYAAAAJ, accessed on 28 March 2023.

[13] https://cps.ca/en/about-apropos/sponsorship, accessed on 28 March 2023.

[14] https://cps.ca/en/about-apropos/competing-interests, accessed on 28 March 2023.

[15] Rancourt, Denis G. (2022) "Canadian court decisions on the constitutionality of Covid measures are invalid due to jurisdictional errors of law", Ontario Civil Liberties Association, OCLA Report 2022-2 | 23 September 2022. https://ocla.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/2022-09-23-OCLA-Report-2022-2.pdf

[16] See Pazaratz J.'s decision, https://canlii.ca/t/jmk30, paras. 63, 68-70, 79(d), 79(g), 79(j), 80-83, esp. para. 81.

[17] Citation details and links of the references use in the bullet points are given here: D.G. Rancourt, M. Baudin, J. Hickey & J. Mercier. "Age-stratified COVID-19 vaccine-dose fatality rate for Israel and Australia", Correlation Research in the Public Interest, Correlation Brief Report, 9 February 2023 (40 pages), https://correlation-canada.org/report-age-stratified-covid-19-vaccine-dose-fatality-rate-for-israel-and-australia/

Featured image is from Children's Health Defense

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Parental Authority for Covid Vaccination of Young Children: Ontario Law Case - Global Research

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author's name. To receive Global Research's Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here. Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/lawsuit-astrazeneca-covid-19-vaccine-1.6787374

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
A Manitoba family is suing AstraZeneca Canada, alleging their son had a stroke following his COVID-19 vaccination that has left him unable to work or care for himself.

Jackson Troy Reimer, now 23, was "in excellent health" before getting vaccinated while working at the Whistler Blackcomb ski resort in British Columbia in 2021, according to a statement of claim filed in Manitoba's Court of King's Bench on March 16.

But six days after getting his shot, he started feeling dizzy, losing his vision and having severe headaches. A CT scan at Vancouver General Hospital found Reimer had a hemorrhagic stroke, the lawsuit says.

He later needed two platelet infusions, then underwent a craniotomy to stop bleeding in his brain and had to be intubated after becoming unresponsive - all outcomes Reimer and his parents, Marina Dawn Toews Reimer and Perry John Reimer, believe were caused by the vaccine.

"The plaintiffs claim that the stroke, the craniotomy and all symptoms arising from them were caused as a result of Jackson having been administered the AstraZeneca vaccine or Covishield," the court filing says.

No statements of defence have been filed. None of the allegations in the lawsuit have been proven in court.

Blood clot concerns

The family is also suing Vail Resorts, which runs the ski facility where Jackson Reimer worked.

The lawsuit alleges the company emailed employees on March 15, 2021, and recommended those living in staff housing get the AstraZeneca shot at their first opportunity.

The same day as that email, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the shot was safe and Canadians should have no concern about getting it, after roughly a dozen European countries suspended its use over concerns about blood clots.

Two weeks later, Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommended pausing use of the vaccine in people under age 55 because of safety concerns.

That change came following reports out of Europe of very rare instances of blood clots in some immunized patients, notably among younger women.

The lawsuit also names as defendants the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, the attorney general of Canada and the Ontario-based Verity Pharmaceuticals, a manufacturer authorization holder for the Covishield vaccine, which is the Indian-made version of the AstraZeneca shot.

Anne Génier, a spokesperson for Health Canada, said in a Wednesday email the agency has just been made aware of the claim and is reviewing it.

Vancouver Coastal Health Authority spokesperson Jeremy Deutsch said in an email the authority has no comment on the matter, as it is before the courts.

The suit alleges the defendants deprived Reimer of his right to informed consent and negligently misrepresented the vaccine by failing to inform him of all the possible risks associated with the shot and by continuing to provide it, in spite of some adverse reactions.

Canada confirmed its first case of a rare but potentially fatal blood clot in connection with the AstraZeneca vaccine on April 13, 2021.

The national vaccine committee said a month earlier the condition occurred at a rate of about one in 100,000 people vaccinated, with a mortality rate of about 40 per cent, but that more research was needed and risk was reduced if treated early enough.

The lawsuit also claims Health Canada's promotional slogan "the first vaccine is the best vaccine" was false.

"For Jackson, the AstraZeneca vaccine and/or Covishield was not the best vaccine. Other vaccines were both safer and more effective," it says.

Lasting effects of stroke

Since March 2021, Reimer has been unable to hold gainful employment, advance his university education or carry out many activities of daily living, the court filing says.

He's now legally blind and has other symptoms related to mental focus and concentration, memory loss, mental impairment and obsessive compulsive disorder tendencies, according to the claim.

Reimer also has physical symptoms including brain seizures, excessive weight gain, and impaired bowel function and control, the lawsuit says.

His symptoms, which are expected to continue indefinitely, are so severe that Reimer is unable to live alone and requires ongoing assistance with daily activities, the claim alleges. It also says his parents have been unable to work their regular hours due to their son's care demands.

The family is seeking damages for Reimer's injuries, loss of income and costs of care.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Manitoba family suing AstraZeneca after son's stroke following COVID-19 vaccination | CBC News

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A Manitoba family is suing AstraZeneca Canada, alleging their son had a stroke following his COVID-19 vaccination that has left him unable to work or care for himself. Jackson Troy Reimer, now 23, was "in excellent health" before getting vaccinated while working at the Whistler Blackcomb ski resort in British Columbia in 2021, according to a statement of claim filed in Manitoba's Court of King's Bench on March 16.

# data[].attributes.body
https://inews.co.uk/news/health/covid-vaccine-families-rare-reaction-astrazeneca-jab-legal-fight-2228146

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Around 30 million doses of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine have been administered in the UK (Photo: Dinendra Haria/Sopa Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

Dozens of patients and families whose lives have been damaged by extremely rare reactions to the Oxford/AstraZeneca covid vaccine have launched legal action against the pharmaceutical company.

While the vaccine is widely credited with protecting many millions of people from the virus, 81 patients died and 364 suffered severe reactions, some of them resulting in serious injuries as a result of blood clots caused by the jab.

Legal action is now being taken against AstraZeneca by the families of 19 people who died after being vaccinated and 54 patients who suffered severe reactions but survived.

Strokes, paralysis and repeated blood clots are among the symptoms of those who suffered very rare but severe reactions to the vaccine. Many have gone from being fit and healthy to being left struggling to walk and talk, with little hope of getting better.

The latest NHS advice is that Covid-19 vaccination is safe and effective and that it gives people the best protection against Covid-19. NHS advice states: "Anyone who gets Covid-19 can become seriously ill or have long-term effects. The Covid-19 vaccines are the best way to protect yourself and others."

In autumn this year, people at higher risk of severe Covid could be offered a booster vaccine dose in preparation for winter 2023-24. For a smaller group of people, such as the elderly and immunosuppressed, an extra booster vaccine dose is already being offered this spring.

The 54 members of the class action group who survived the reaction have been diagnosed as having vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), a rare condition that has been identified after Covid-19 vaccination.

Lawyers representing the group, who are pursuing personal injury compensation in addition to a Vaccine Damage Payments Scheme claim, argue that the AstraZeneca vaccine was "not as safe as the public were entitled to expect" and that the case is not about finding fault "but about the reasonable expectation of safety". They claim people were provided with a false picture of safety and efficacy and expect the number joining the lawsuit to increase.

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia affects approximately 1 in 50,000 AstraZeneca vaccine recipients under 50 years old, and one in 100,000 for those aged 50 and older in England, according to the NHS, which says the effect of the blood clots can be devastating.

AstraZeneca vaccinations were first administered on 4 January, 2021 as part of a rapid rollout of jabs by the NHS. Just a few weeks earlier, Margaret Keenan, 90, had become the first person in the world to receive the Pfizer jab following its clinical approval. By September 2022, almost 25 million first doses of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine and 27.2 million of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine had been administered in the UK. Around 50 million AstraZeneca doses have been given in total.

As part of the drive to get vaccines developed and on the market quickly, the UK Government had early in the pandemic granted the pharmaceutical giants a legal indemnity protecting them from being sued by patients in the event of any complications. This means that if AstraZeneca has to pay compensation it will be covered by the taxpayer.

The Vaccine Damage Payments Scheme (VDPS) has received 4,017 applications for compensation of which 1,013 have, as of 6 March, been resolved. Of those, 622 related to the AstraZeneca vaccine, 348 for the Pfizer vaccine and 43 for the Moderna vaccine, according to a Freedom of Information request published by the NHS Business Authority this week. All of the claims relate to disability.

Health minister, Maria Caulfield, told Parliament last month that 48 VDPS claims had been successful. All of them are understood to relate to the AstraZeneca vaccine. "Medical reasons" were cited for the majority of cases being rejected. The number of administration staff working for the scheme has increased from four to 80 in recent months as the Government aims to speed up the process.

The scheme provides a one-off tax free payment, currently £120,000, to successful applicants where a vaccine has caused severe disablement. It does not prejudice the right of the disabled person to pursue a claim for damages through the courts. To qualify for a payment, an applicant needs to establish that they meet two main criteria: on the balance of probabilities, the vaccine caused disability, and that the resulting disablement is severe, classified as 60 per cent or more.

UK's first Covid-19 vaccine

The Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine was the first to be approved for use in the UK with the Government ordering 100 million doses for use in its vaccination programme.

The vast majority of people had the vaccine without suffering complications, but within months reports emerged that a small number of people developed blood clots in combination with low platelet levels, called thrombocytopenia, after receiving a dose.

In April 2021, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) confirmed a possible link between the AstraZeneca vaccine and these rare blood clots, but emphasised that the benefits of the vaccine continued to outweigh the risks for the vast majority of people. The cases of blood clots that the MHRA reviewed were accompanied by abnormally low levels of platelets in the blood.

The following month, the UK's Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation recommended under-40s were offered an alternative to the AstraZeneca vaccine due to the extra risk of serious side effects in younger people. Countries around the world had already suspended its use by this stage.

In 2022, the JCVI did not recommend using the AstraZeneca vaccine for the UK's booster campaigns and the Government confirmed it would not order any more doses.

It is no longer used in the UK. It has been used in several other countries around the world, but it is uncertain if any stocks are still being used.

The lawyers are calling upon the Government to "appropriately support" the vaccine injured and bereaved. Pre-action protocol letters have been sent to the Cambridge-based Anglo-Swedish company, which has yet to formally respond to the claims. Lawyers representing the AstraZeneca claimants expect more people to join the lawsuit given that more than 400 people have been recorded as suffering from blood clots.

Peter Todd, consultant solicitor with Scott-Moncrieff & Associates Ltd, is representing 33 of the claimants and told : " According to the MHRA, in the UK up to 23 November, 2022, there had been 445 reports of major blood clots (thrombosis) with concurrent low platelets (thrombocytopenia) reported after AstraZeneca Covid vaccine, including, tragically, 81 deaths.

"These include strokes, heart attacks, amputations and other major life-changing injuries. This is an unusually large number of very serious injuries to have been caused by a vaccine. We expect to be able to establish in court that these clots were likely caused by the vaccine."

Mr Todd, who acted for 86 people with narcolepsy as a result of the 2009 pandemic swine flu vaccine, added: "We have started an action against AstraZeneca UK Ltd seeking damages for injury and consequential loss for a group so far comprised of 77 such claimants, under the Consumer Protection Act 1987, contending that the vaccine was not as safe as the public were entitled to expect.

"This is not about fault but about the reasonable expectation of safety. People were told that the vaccine was safe and they relied on such statements at face value. However they have suffered life-changing injury. The Government agreed to indemnify Astra Zeneca against these claims and we call upon the Government to appropriately support the vaccine injured and bereaved as well."

Officials said they could not comment on ongoing legal proceedings.

A Government spokesperson said: "All vaccines being used in the UK have undergone robust clinical trials and have met the MHRA's strict standards of safety, effectiveness and quality. The vaccine damage payments scheme provides additional support to help ease the burden on individuals who have, in extremely rare circumstances, been severely disabled due to receiving a government-recommended vaccine for a listed disease."

AstraZeneca said it was unable to comment on "ongoing legal matters" regarding its Covid vaccine, also known as Vaxzevria.

A spokesman said: "Patient safety is our highest priority and regulatory authorities have clear and stringent standards to ensure the safe use of all medicines, including vaccines. Our sympathy goes out to anyone who has reported health problems.

"AstraZeneca and regulatory authorities, carefully record and assess all reports of potential adverse events associated with use of Vaxzevria. From the body of evidence in clinical trials and real-world data, Vaxzevria has continuously been shown to have an acceptable safety profile and regulators around the world consistently state that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of extremely rare potential side effects.

"The MHRA granted conditional marketing approval for Vaxzevria for the UK based on the safety profile and efficacy of the vaccine. Over 3 billion doses of the vaccine have been supplied to more than 180 countries and, according to independent estimates, Vaxzevria helped to save more than six million lives worldwide in the first year of availability alone."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Dozens of families damaged by rare reaction to AstraZeneca jab launch legal fight

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Dozens of patients and families whose lives have been damaged by extremely rare reactions to the Oxford/AstraZeneca covid vaccine have launched legal action against the pharmaceutical company. While the vaccine is widely credited with protecting many millions of people from the virus, 81 patients died and 364 suffered severe reactions, some of them resulting in serious injuries as a result of blood clots caused by the jab.

# data[].attributes.body
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender_category/legal/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Children's Health Defense ® is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Our mission is to end childhood health epidemics by working aggressively to eliminate harmful exposures, hold those responsible accountable, and to establish safeguards to prevent future harm.

# data[].attributes.body
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mother-sues-doctor-kids-covid-vaccines-without-consent/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Children's Health Defense is funding a lawsuit by a D.C. mother alleging a doctor vaccinated two of her children for COVID-19 without her consent after falsely telling the teens the shots were required for school.
Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender's Top News of the Day. It's free.
The mother of two children who were given COVID-19 vaccines without the mother's consent is suing the doctor who administered the vaccines.

An attorney representing NaTonya McNeil last week filed a lawsuit in Superior Court for the District of Columbia against Janine A. Rethy, M.D., M.P.H.

According to the complaint, on Sept. 2, 2022, McNeil took her two older children, ages 15 and 17, to the KIDS Mobile Medical Clinic/Ronald McDonald Care Mobile clinic, operated by Georgetown Hospital, to complete their required annual physical exam for the 2022-2023 school year.

The lawsuit alleges Rethy, director of the mobile clinic, held the children in the examination room longer than necessary for a regular check-up and vaccinated them against COVID-19 over their objections and without consulting their mother

In order to attempt to obtain the children's consent - which they are not legally able to provide without a parent or guardian - the doctor falsely informed the children the COVID-19 vaccine was mandatory for school attendance and told them they could not lawfully decline it if they wanted to attend school.

The suit, filed by D.C. attorney Matthew Hardin, seeks damages for false imprisonment, battery and fraud.

Children's Health Defense (CHD) is financing the lawsuit because, according to CHD President and General Counsel Mary Holland, "CHD couldn't just sit still and allow this wrong to go unpunished and not bring this to the public's attention."

In an exclusive conversation with The Defender, McNeil explained why she is suing the the doctor:

"I just feel like people shouldn't be able to do whatever they want to do to other people and especially not to children. As a mother, I feel like, 'You all just took all my rights away from me to do what you wanted to do to my kids.'

"I do want justice to be done in this case. I feel like something needs to be done. This can't just continue to happen."
'I feel violated'
According to the complaint, Rethy's stated goal is to vaccinate all children against COVID-19. The complaint quotes her statement to the press:

"Our goal is to increase vaccination rates in children here in D.C. ... For more than 30 years our role has been to be in the community to help address the problem of health disparities, bringing families care where they are.

"For this particular effort, we are glad to be partnering with DC Health to provide both regular childhood vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines to all children."

In addition to her role as director of the mobile clinic, Rethy is chief of MedStar Georgetown University Hospital's Division of Community Pediatrics and assistant professor of pediatrics at Georgetown University School of Medicine.

McNeil said that when she took her older children to the clinic, she stayed outside the examination room to care for her infant. As soon as the children entered the doctor's office, she called her daughter's cellphone to let Rethy know she was just outside the door if the doctor needed to consult her for anything.

According to McNeil, the doctor did not ask or inform her about any vaccinations, and did not ask her to sign anything. At the end of the physical, Rethy came out to talk to her.

McNeil said the doctor explained her son's asthma treatment plan, but that's all they discussed.

As they were heading home, McNeil said she was shocked when her daughter complained that her arm hurt "pretty bad." When McNeil asked her why it hurt, her daughter said she was given the COVID-19 shot, even though she told the doctor she didn't want it.

When McNeil asked her why she allowed the doctor to administer the shot, her daughter said:

"When she had the needle in her hand and she was coming towards me, I backed up and I asked her what is that needle, and she said it was the COVID shot and I ... told her I didn't want it and she said, 'Well it is mandatory, you have to get it in order to go to school.'"

Rethy allegedly administered the shot to her daughter, and then to her son. McNeil said:

"He's 14 and he said they didn't even ask him if he wanted it or not, but when they gave it to him, he said he thought he had to get it because his sister got it."

According to the complaint, both children received the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, authorized for emergency use, and the meningococcal vaccine. Her son was also injected with TDaP.

Both children were upset and angry they had been coerced into vaccination, the complaint says.
No school mandate, despite what clinic and doctor alleged
When she got home, McNeil said she called the doctor's office, and asked them why they vaccinated her children without her consent.

"I would have never consented to you all vaccinating my children," she said. "I'm not vaccinated and I'm not getting vaccinated and my kids were never supposed to be vaccinated for COVID period, under no circumstances."

She said the person on the phone said they were supposed to get them for school.

After hanging up, McNeil said she was "so irritated I even started crying" because she couldn't believe "they put this poison" into her children's bodies.

In July 2022, D.C. public schools imposed a vaccine mandate for schoolchildren ages 12 and up for the 2022-2023 school year. But on Aug. 26, just weeks after imposing the mandate, officials walked it back, postponing it until 2023.

That means when McNeil's children saw the doctor, there was no school vaccine mandate in place, despite what the Rethy allegedly told the children.
The age of consent
The District of Columbia in March 2021 enacted the D.C. Minor Consent for Vaccination Amendment Act of 2020 (D.C. Minor Consent Act), allowing children 11 and older to consent to the administration of any vaccine - including COVID-19 shots - recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) - without parental knowledge or consent if the medical provider believed "the minor is capable of meeting the informed consent standard."

The law also required healthcare personnel to provide accurate immunization records to the Department of Health and to the student's school, but not to parents with religious exemptions.

CHD and Parental Rights Foundation filed a lawsuit seeking a court order to declare the D.C. Act unconstitutional.

A judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on March 18, 2022, granted a preliminary injunction prohibiting the D.C. mayor, Department of Health and public schools from enforcing the law.

That means at the time McNeil's children visited the clinic, they could not legally provide consent to be vaccinated without their mother's consent.

McNeil said:

"To do that to my little children, my innocent children. They took her rights. When she backed away from you [the doctor] and said she didn't want it, that should have been the end of it.

"Or you [the doctor] should have called me on the phone to find out what I feel about the situation. But you [the doctor] basically told my child a lie so you [she] could do what you [she] wanted to do to my kid."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Exclusive: Mother Sues D.C. Doctor Who Gave Kids COVID Vaccines Without Consent

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Children's Health Defense is funding a lawsuit by a D.C. mother alleging a doctor vaccinated two of her children for COVID-19 without her consent after falsely telling the teens the shots were required for school. Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender's Top News of the Day.

# data[].attributes.body
https://biosafetynow.org/our-mission/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
For two decades, scientists have been conducting research enhancing potential pandemic pathogens-research that creates new, more dangerous, potential pandemic pathogens and that, as such, can cause new pandemics-and have been doing so with little or no national or international oversight.

Our Mission is to demand effective national- and international-level oversight that will reduce the risks research with dangerous pathogens poses to the public. We are convinced that public health and safety require that all high-risk research with dangerous pathogens be subject to mandatory, independent oversight. We also are convinced that this can be done without negatively impacting science, national security, or public health. We also are convinced that the public has a central role to play in advocating for, implementing, and participating in, oversight of research on dangerous pathogens.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
For two decades, scientists have been conducting research enhancing potential pandemic pathogens-research that creates new, more dangerous, potential pandemic pathogens and that, as such, can cause new pandemics-and have been doing so with little or no national or international oversight.

# data[].attributes.body
https://thehighwire.com/editorial/terrified-of-discovery-massive-implications-in-pfizer-whistleblower-case/

# data[].attributes.body
https://freedomplatform.tv/
London Real started as a podcast in 2011 as an antidote to the numbing effects of mainstream media, by offering an alternative perspective on the hottest topics of the day via in-depth interviews with a diverse range of inspiring guests.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Digital Freedom Platform is a place where content can be livestreamed and shared uncensored, unedited and unfiltered #londonrealarmy

# data[].attributes.body
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/judge-evidence-pfizer-whistleblower-lawsuit/

# data[].attributes.body
https://exopolitics.blogs.com/international_criminal_co/2023/02/natural-and-common-law-tribunal-for-public-health-and-justice-wwwpeaceinspaceorg-to-a-2009-2023-lockstep-ongoing-c.html

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
International Natural and Common Law Tribunal for Public Health and Justice

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
NATURAL AND COMMON LAW TRIBUNAL FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND JUSTICE TO: A 2009-2023 Lockstep Ongoing Criminal Co-conspiracy,
As set out in this Tribunal's November 15, 2020 Indictment at
https://exopolitics.blogs.com/files/indictment---tribunal.public.health.justice-final-ver-1-11.15.pdf AND TO ANY AND ALL CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS AND DEFENDANT GENOCIDERS NAMED AND UNNAMED HEREIN, including and not limited to:
To Criminal Co-Conspirators And Defendant Genociders Named And Unnamed Herein: TO: Defendants
World Health Organization [WHO] and

Officers, Directors, Employees, and

Agents, Individually and Collectively

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director General,

Michael Ryan, WHO
TO: Defendants WHO's Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB)
Avenue Appia 20
1211 Geneva
Switzerland

Telephone: +41 22 791 21 11
https://www.who.int/
And
TO: Defendants
194 Member Nations of

Defendants World Health Organization [WHO]
https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/countries
And

TO: Defendant United States of America

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20500
https://www.whitehouse.gov
and

TO: Defendant President Joseph Robinette Biden

TO:

Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Serviced

TO:

Defendant Dr. Anthony Fauci

NIH

DEFENDANTS CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS

TO: DEFENDANTS CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS

WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM
https://www.weforum.org/about/leadership-and-governance
Klaus Schwab, Executive Chairman

Børge Brende President

Managing Board

Excecutive Committee

Board of Trustees

91-93 route de la Capite,
CH-1223 Cologny/Geneva
Switzerland

TO: DEFENDANTS CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS
His Royal Highness KING CHARLES III

TO: DEFENDANTS CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS

Governor General

Mary Simon

Rideau Hall
1 Sussex Drive
Ottawa ON K1A 0A1
613-993-8200
1-800-465-6890 (toll-free in Canada and the U.S.)
TTY: 1-800-465-7735
[email protected]

TO DEFENDANTS CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS

Justin Trudeau

DBA Prime Minister

80 Wellington Street

Ottawa ON K1A 0A2

613-957-5420

TO DEFENDANTS CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS

Chrystia Freeland

DBA Deputy Prime Minister

344 Bloor Street West
Suite 510
Toronto, Ontario
M5S 3A7

Telephone: 416-928-1451
Fax: 416-928-2377

TO DEFENDANTS CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS

Dr. Theresa Tam

Canada Chief Health Officer

TO DEFENDANTS CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS

Dr. Supriya Sharma,

Chief medical adviser for Health Canada

TO DEFENDANTS CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS

OECD - Headquarters Chateau de la Muette ,Paris

2 Rue Andre Pascal, 75016 Paris

Secretary General - Mathias Cormann

[email protected] -media relations

[email protected] -public affairs

[email protected] - washington office
AND TO ANY AND ALL CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS, GENOCIDERS, AND DEFENDANTS NAMED AND UNNAMED IN THE TRIBUNAL CEASE AND DESIST ORDER AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS SET OUT AND LINKED BELOW, AND SERVED
Sunday 26th February 2023, afternoon at opening 1330 hrs (Swiss Lucerne Time CET) UPON:

World Health Organization (WHO)
WHO Headquarters
Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
Secretary General
Avenue Appia 20
1211 Geneva 27
Switzerland
T: 022 791 21 11
EMERGENCY INJUNCTION AND TRIBUNAL ORDER TO IMMEDIATELY TO COMMIT WAR CRIMES, GENOCIDE & THROUGH UNLAWFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FOLLOWING: (1) WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response ("WHO CA+") https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb4/A_INB4_3-en.pdf (2) International Health Regulations (2005) https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241580496 (3) Any and All Other Documents, Standards, or Agreements Allegedly related to Public Health by Defendants WHO, including and not limited to: (a) Codex Alimentarius https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/en/ AND TO: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS NAMED & UNNAMED HEREIN: EMERGENCY WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO REMOVE, ARREST & INCARCERATE CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS & DEFENDANTS NAMED & UNNAMED HEREIN Download !!!!TRIBUNAL CEASE & DESIST ORDER AGAINST - WHO - WHO CA+ CONVENTION + WHO INR REGULATIONS + CODEX ALIMENTARIS + USA +JOE BIDEN + + CANADA-TRUDEAU-WEF + 194 WHO MEMBER NATIONS - WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT https://exopolitics.blogs.com/files/tribunal-cease-desist-order-against---who---who-ca-convention-who-inr-regulations-codex-alimentaris-usa-joe-biden-canada-trudeau-wef-194-who-member-nations---writ-of-mandamus-to-law-enforcement.pdf SO ORDERED NATURAL AND COMMON LAW TRIBUNAL FOR PUBLIC HEALTH & JUSTICE http://www.peaceinspace.org FEBRUARY 24, 2023 ANNO DOMINI

CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY CEASE & DESIST A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
TO: Defendants World Health Organization [WHO] & Criminal Co-conspirators, Genociders & Defendants named & unnamed: Tribunal Cease & Desist Order & Writ of Mandamus to Constitutional Law Enforcement to Arrest and Incarcerate Defendants

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
NATURAL AND COMMON LAW TRIBUNAL FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND JUSTICE www.Peaceinspace.org TO: A 2009-2023 Lockstep Ongoing Criminal Co-conspiracy, As set out in this Tribunal's November 15, 2020 Indictment at https://exopolitics.blogs.com/files/indictment---tribunal.public.health.justice-final-ver-1-11.15.pdf AND TO ANY AND ALL CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS AND DEFENDANT GENOCIDERS NAMED AND UNNAMED HEREIN, including and not limited to: To...

# data[].attributes.body
https://rumble.com/v2b2816-tribunal-verdict-natural-and-common-law-tribunal-for-public-health-and-just.html

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
TRIBUNAL VERDICT - Natural & Common Law Tribunal for Public Health and Justice - 26.2.2023 -

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Washington Sate, USA, 26. February 2023 The formal Recording of the Tribunal Session reading out the Verdict constituting lawful in Personam Service of Process of the Enclosed Emergency Inunction and

# data[].attributes.body
Epoch Times Covid Coverage alone worth the subscription, .https://www.theepochtimes.com/ccp-virus

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Get Coronavirus Daily Updates. Be safe. Get informed and know the facts. Coronavirus outbreak special coverage.

# data[].attributes.headline
The New Abnormal: The Rise of the Biomedical Security State, Aaron Kheriaty

# data[].attributes.subject
The New Abnormal: The Rise of the Biomedical Security State, Aaron Kheriaty

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1684513855/

# data[].attributes.headline
Drs. Paul Marik, Mary Bowden, and Robert Apter V FDA

# data[].attributes.subject
Drs. Paul Marik, Mary Bowden, and Robert Apter V FDA

# data[].attributes.body
Doctors Sue FDA For Prohibiting Ivermectin To Treat Covid-19
https://pierrekory.substack.com/p/the-case-against-the-fda-for-their

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.technocracy.news/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
"Believers" in man-made global warming show their love and devotion for "mother earth" and are bent on saving it at all costs. Their prophecies of doom have repeatedly failed. They have long abandoned legitimate science to embrace pseudo-science, forcing the data to fit their preconceived conclusions. It's time they stopped getting a free pass to change society.

Musk is a consummate Technocrat, warning against too much government. Technocracy is pointedly antithetical to government because it is illogical, unscientific and unnecessary. Technocrats want to control the world directly, without public discourse of protest. Thus, this is a subtle nudge to world leaders: "Back off".

The war on food in the Netherlands is spawned by the UN's 2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy. Controlling food, controls populations. Taking away fertilizer controls food. Dutch farmers recognize this and are fighting back; we need to support this important part of the resistance in every way possible. Famines kill.

Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy, is a resource-based economic system designed to control all resources on earth by a few pseudo-scientists with overinflated egos. If humanity rejects this in the end, it will be remembered as the greatest self-destructive delusion of all time.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
"Believers" in man-made global warming show their love and devotion for "mother earth" and are bent on saving it at all costs. Their prophecies of doom have repeatedly failed. They have long abandoned legitimate science to embrace pseudo-science, forcing the data to fit their preconceived conclusions.

# data[].attributes.body
Case outlined on Website
https://www.iambrookjackson.com/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
I Am Brook Jackson | Whistleblower Pfizer’s Clinical Trials

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Whistleblower exposes fraud and misconduct with Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine trial. I Am Brook Jackson

# data[].attributes.headline
Criminal Prototype Vaccine Harm Legal Case Filed by Switzerland Citizen Pascal Najadi v Swiss President Alain Berset for “Abuse of Office”

# data[].attributes.subject
Criminal Prototype Vaccine Harm Legal Case Filed by Switzerland Citizen Pascal Najadi v Swiss President Alain Berset for “Abuse of Office”

# data[].attributes.body
https://therebelpatient.substack.com/p/breaking-news-criminal-prototype

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Listen to Elizabeth Lee Vliet, MD, President and CEO of Truth for Health as she does a legal segment interview of Pascal Najadi who filed a criminal case now being brought forth against the President of Switzerland.

https://rumble.com/v28wxg6-whistleblower-report-2.9.2023-swiss-ag-case-against-swiss-president.html

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
BREAKING NEWS: Criminal Prototype Vaccine Harm Legal Case Filed by Switzerland Citizen Pascal Najadi v Swiss President Alain Berset for "Abuse of Office"

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Listen to Elizabeth Lee Vliet, MD, President and CEO of Truth for Health as she does a legal segment interview of Pascal Najadi who filed a criminal case now being brought forth against the President of Switzerland. https://rumble.com/v28wxg6-whistleblower-report-2.9.2023-swiss-ag-case-against-swiss-president.html

# data[].attributes.headline
3 US Law Enforcement Agencies Activated Against Fauci, Daszak, Baric, & Justin Trudeau

# data[].attributes.subject
3 US Law Enforcement Agencies Activated Against Fauci, Daszak, Baric, & Justin Trudeau

# data[].attributes.body
https://rumble.com/v2a2tcc-3-us-law-enforcement-agencies-activated-against-fauci-daszak-baric-and-just.html

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
3 US Law Enforcement Agencies Activated Against Fauci, Daszak, Baric, & Justin Trudeau

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Ann Vandersteel reports that Dr David Martin has been working with 3 US Law enforcement agencies at this time to bring INDICTMENTS against Ralph Baric, Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak and that WEF sock-pu

# data[].attributes.headline
Nurse Injected Saline Instead of toxic mRNA

# data[].attributes.subject
Nurse Injected Saline Instead of toxic mRNA

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11490847/Anti-vaxxer-nurse-injected-8-600-patients-saline-instead-Covid-vaccine-walks-free.html

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Anti-vaxxer nurse who injected up to 8,600 elderly patients with saltwater instead of Covid vaccine walks FREE from court in Germany

The nurse in Germany jabbed up to 8,600 elderly people with ~saline solution

The nurse administered the fake vaccines and left people without protection

The defendant shared anti-vaxxer posts on social media during the pandemic

An anti-vaxxer nurse who injected up to 8,600 elderly people with saline solution instead of a Covid-19 vaccine has walked free from court.

Red Cross nurse Antje T, 39, jabbed thousands of elderly patients at a vaccine centre in Germany with what she told them was the BioNTech Pfizer vaccine but was just a saltwater solution.

The nurse, who administered the fake vaccines at the Schortens jab centre in Friesland, northwest Germany, was given just six months on probation.

She was found guilty of six counts of intentional assault by Oldenburg District Court, Lower Saxony state, on November 30.

Antje T jabbed up to 8,600 patients who were mainly hospital employees, educators and doctors above the age of 70 between March 5 and April 2021, leaving them with no protection against the deadly virus.

Police told the court that she was able to introduce the saline solution undetected, because she was in charge of vaccine and syringe preparation during her shift at the vaccination centre.

But after more than a month she was reported by another employee who saw her use the saline solution instead of the vaccine on six patients on April 21, 2021.

The 39-year-old had additionally posted several social media posts where she openly emphasized her skeptical views regarding COVID-19 vaccines.

When questioned by police, she admitted to using saline solution but had said she only did it because she had accidentally broken a vial containing six shots and was ashamed to tell her colleagues.

She had also claimed that it was a one-time incident, but was immediately sacked after antibody tests that were carried out on the affected people confirmed authorities' suspicions.

In addition, Antje T's licence to work as a nurse has been revoked, media reported.

Following the incident, state authorities urged the fraud victims to register for revaccination and emphasised that it is completely safe.

Antje T in turn was initially charged with 15 counts of intentional assault at the beginning of the trial in November 2022, but nine of them were dropped due to no evidence.

Court spokesperson Torben Toelle said that the prosecutor found evidence that six syringes were changed for saline, leading to the charges, but that they expect this was done to many more.

During the trial on November 30, the shamed nurse apologised in court.

Concerning the defendant's anti-vaxxer posts on social media, Toelle added: 'The accused had shared various conspiracy theories on the Internet and on social media.

'However, the chamber could not determine with the necessary certainty that this set of ideas was the motive for her actions and that she then acted to sabotage a vaccination campaign.'

The verdict can reportedly be appealed within a week.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Anti-vaxxer nurse injected some 8,600 patients with fake Covid vaccine

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The nurse in Germany jabbed up to 8,600 elderly people with ~saline solution The nurse administered the fake vaccines and left people without protection The defendant shared anti-vaxxer posts on social media during the pandemic An anti-vaxxer nurse who injected up to 8,600 elderly people with saline solution instead of a Covid-19 vaccine has walked free from court.

# data[].attributes.body
https://padlet.com/nunisasyu/1-red-pill-starter-pack-tey4sw7a1g0ooz4f

# data[].attributes.body
https://padlet.com/nunisasyu/2-red-pill-intermediate-pack-aewt8es9srpcnid8

# data[].attributes.headline
German Pfizer Vaccine Study Fraud Trial Info

# data[].attributes.subject
German Pfizer Vaccine Study Fraud Trial Info

# data[].attributes.body
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/german-press-discusses-pfizer-vaccine

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
I am pleasantly surprised to see the mainstream German publication Die Welt openly asserting that clinical trials of the "Pfizer COVID vaccine" were rife with fraud. ( paywall-free German language link, PDF with English translation) What a change!

The article explains that Pfizer unblinded and removed numerous patients who suffered adverse events from the Covid vaccine trial. It also gives examples of Pfizer subjects whose deaths were covered up. One of the victims described by Die Welt is Pfizer subject C4591001 1162 11621327, whose story I unearthed in July of 2022.

WELT has documents according to which patient no. 11621327 was found dead in his apartment three days after the 2nd dose, apparently a stroke. Patient #11521497 died 20 days after vaccination, diagnosis of cardiac arrest. "According to the current state of science, these two cases would be assigned to the vaccination," says the Berlin pharmaceutical specialist Susanne Wagner, "especially since the US health authority CDC is currently investigating strokes in vaccinated people and it is known

As you remember, Pfizer's investigators falsely ruled these deaths unrelated.

Die Welt also describes Argentine lawyer Augusto Roux, who remained alive, but whose sufferings were written off as "anxiety."

Three weeks later, test candidate Roux received the second dose. He remained under observation for 40 minutes, then left the hospital feeling good. In the taxi home he felt uncomfortable, and later he had shortness of breath, burning chest pain, nausea and fever. His urine turned black like cola and he passed out. Three days later, Roux was in the Alemán Hospital, several PCR tests for Covid were negative. Senior physician Gisela di Stilio noted in the discharge report, which is available to WELT: "Adverse reaction to the coronavirus vaccine (high probability)". The computer tomograph had provided images of fluid in Roux's heart. A pericardial effusion.

Over the next few months, Roux lost 14 kilos, he had liver problems, and his heart sometimes beat irregularly. ... The diagnosis for the symptoms after the second vaccination is very likely to be "pericarditis", inflammation of the heart. All of this fits exactly with a clinical picture that the Paul Ehrlich Institute also has in its list of "rare side effects" for mRNA vaccines.

Note how Die Welt sarcastically puts "rare side events" in quotes.

... He found amazing things there. His story, one might think, should appear in Pfizer's pivotal study papers, but it doesn't. The pharmaceutical company's papers say Roux informed the research team that he was hospitalized with pneumonia on both sides, following the initial report, which was classified as an "adverse event of toxicity level 1". That could have nothing to do with the vaccine, the file goes on to say, it is probably a Covid infection. Not a word that Roux had tested negative for Corona in several PCR tests.

The paper finds more cases of Pfizer fraud:

Almost at the same time as the Roux case, there must have been an incident in the Buenos Aires test center. In one fell swoop, the test management said goodbye to 53 subjects on August 31, 2020. The test candidates were "unblinded", which means they were informed about their vaccination status, a process that the Pfizer study protocol expressly only provides for "in emergencies". But there is nothing about it in the approval study. In protocol documents that are available to WELT, and which are actually not intended for the public, those responsible get caught up in contradictions. "

While Die Welt does an excellent job at exposing Pfizer's trial fraud, which the FDA wanted to hide for 75 years, most of what it discussed is not new to us. What is new is that mainstream newspapers are now discussing it.

Die Welt mentions that Pfizer's contracts included a liability waiver even for Pfizer's negligence and for "fraud or bad faith on the part of Pfizer itself."

I expect this "fraud waiver" be litigated furiously in many countries of the world. In the United States, liability for certain misdeeds, such as fraud, cannot be waived in advance because it would "violate public policy" and encourage fraud. Thus, I expect Ed Dowd's "fraud vitiates all contracts" doctrine to prevail legally in many localities.

A question that many of us are asking is, "will there be trials." A friend of this substack, Eugyppius, concludes with regret that " there will be no Corona reckoning in Germany."

I am not an expert on German politics, but I would like to make a statement: in more than one country, though possibly not in Germany, there WILL be Corona reckoning. A mini-reckoning is already happening in Florida, which gives us a hint of future things.

The governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis, is a shrewd political operator who expects to benefit from defending the public from Covid vaccines.

I am optimistic that some reckoning and some punishments will happen. Consider this:

Almost everyone was affected by Corona vaccinations. People were either vaccinated or discriminated against, with the extent of discrimination varying from country to country.

Covid vaccination harmed a significant fraction of vaccine recipients. The harms are numerous. A Thailand study found 29% of young males having subclinical heart damage, for example. I discussed, numerous times, immune system damage affecting vaccinated people who suffer Covid reinfections and endless other illnesses.

While many vaccinated individuals do not realize that Covid vaccines affected them, they can be easily convinced that they are vaccine victims when presented with evidence.

Many vaccinated people had multiple COVID infections. If nudged, they will see the apparent disconnect between promises and the ugly reality.

Lawsuits against Big Pharma, and possibly against Google and Facebook, will, naturally, make many people consider whether they are also victims when financial compensation becomes a possibility.

People understandably fear death, and the excess mortality we are experiencing worldwide should unsettle any person whose risk of death is heightened in a mysterious, unknowable way.

Many political operators will realize they can build a career by being anti-Covid-vaccine and demanding retributions. While this has the potential of turning ugly, it is an important factor.

There is a possibility of mass hysteria created around "will the Covid vaccine kill me," which the above-mentioned political operators can turn to their advantage.

The most important determinant of how much "Corona reckoning" we will see is the future fate of humanity and the disturbing trends of excess mortality and infertility.

I want these trends to reverse and mortality and fertility to return to normal. That fortunate turn of events would necessitate only a moderately serious reckoning.

In the highly undesirable case of the general public's health trends taking a turn for the worse, the more extreme measures against people who lied to us to force the public to take the deadly experimental vaccines would be perfectly acceptable.

National laws may need to be revisited to allow legal punishment of wrongdoers who participated in a novel global biomedical crime that harmed billions of humans. In plenty of precedents, crimes against humanity committed under the color of national laws were successfully prosecuted.

So... do you think at least one country will see any "Corona reckoning"?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
German Press Discusses Pfizer Vaccine Trial Fraud. Will "Covid Reckoning" Follow?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
I am pleasantly surprised to see the mainstream German publication Die Welt openly asserting that clinical trials of the "Pfizer COVID vaccine" were rife with fraud. ( paywall-free German language link, PDF with English translation) What a change! The article explains that Pfizer unblinded and removed numerous patients who suffered adverse events from the Covid vaccine trial.

# data[].attributes.headline
Lawsuit to Stop Retaliation by Medical Specialty Boards Filed by AAPS Educational Foundation

# data[].attributes.subject
Lawsuit to Stop Retaliation by Medical Specialty Boards Filed by AAPS Educational Foundation

# data[].attributes.body
https://aapsonline.org/lawsuit-to-stop-retaliation-by-medical-specialty-boards-filed-by-aaps/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
AAPS | Association of American Physicians and Surgeons

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Update, November 14, 2022: AAPS files opposition to motion to dismiss: https://aapsonline.org/judicial/aapsedfnd-v-abim-abog-abfm-dhs-opposition-motion-dismiss-11-14-2022.pdf

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Educational Foundation (AAPS) filed a lawsuit today in the federal Southern District of Texas, against three medical special boards for their threatened retaliation against physicians who speak out on matters of public concern. AAPS stands up for First Amendment rights of physicians who, like all American citizens, should be able to speak publicly without risk of retaliation.

"Our freedoms depend on the ability of physicians and all Americans to speak out on important issues of our day," said Andrew Schlafly, who filed this lawsuit. "Entities holding monopolies over board certification should not be retaliating against good physicians."

This new lawsuit asserts that "Defendants wrongly misuse their authority in a politically partisan manner to chill speech critical of positions taken by Dr. Anthony Fauci, lockdowns, mask mandates, Covid vaccines and even abortion." This Complaint seeks injunctive and declaratory relief against several specialty Board Defendants that hold monopolies over board certification, and against the federal government for its newly created Disinformation Governance Board.

"Although only official state medical boards have the proper authority to regulate the practice of medicine, certifications by the Board Defendants constitute a de facto essential credential for practicing in most hospitals or participating in most networks," this lawsuit asserts. "By threatening to revoke board certification of physicians, the Board Defendants improperly chill speech by physicians without the political accountability of official state medical boards," this Complaint adds.

The Board Defendants are the American Board of Internal Medicine, the American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology, and the American Board of Family Medicine. Each of these entities, which hold monopolies over board certification in their specialties, have declared their plans to discipline physicians who speak out.

"Criticizing Dr. Anthony Fauci should not be a basis for retaliating against a physician for speaking his mind," Andrew Schlafly states. The lawsuit points out that many Republican senators properly rebuked Dr. Fauci for his statements that "I represent science" and that those who criticize him "are really criticizing science." The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Educational Foundation is a national organization that co-sponsors conferences and funds scholarships for attendance by medical students and residents.

Read Full Complaint: https://aapsonline.org/judicial/aapsedfnd-v-abim-abog-abfm-dhs-7-12-2022.pdf

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Association of American Physicians & Surgeons

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Lawsuit to Stop Retaliation by Medical Specialty Boards Filed by AAPS Educational Foundation - AAPS | Association of American Physicians and Surgeons

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Update, November 14, 2022: AAPS files opposition to motion to dismiss: https://aapsonline.org/judicial/aapsedfnd-v-abim-abog-abfm-dhs-opposition-motion-dismiss-11-14-2022.pdf The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Educational Foundation (AAPS) filed a lawsuit today in the federal Southern District of Texas, against three medical special boards for their threatened retaliation against physicians who speak out on matters of public concern.

# data[].attributes.headline
The Inescapable Immune Escape Pandemic, Geert Vanden Bossche

# data[].attributes.subject
The Inescapable Immune Escape Pandemic, Geert Vanden Bossche

# data[].attributes.body
Geert : “Some of you have been wondering why I’ve become so quiet lately. I’ve been working on my book: “The inescapable immune escape pandemic”.
The aim of the book is to unambiguously demonstrate that nothing was more predictable than the detrimental consequences of mass C-19 vaccination during a natural pandemic. I absolutely wanted to document the scientific evidence that makes this statement beyond compelling.”

https://voiceforscienceandsolidarity.substack.com/p/the-inescapable-immune-escape-pandemic

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Geert : "Some of you have been wondering why I've become so quiet lately.
I've been working on my book: "The inescapable immune escape pandemic".
The aim of the book is to unambiguously demonstrate that nothing was more predictable than the detrimental consequences of mass C-19 vaccination during a natural pandemic. I absolutely wanted to document the scientific evidence that makes this statement beyond compelling."

This book provides a thought-provoking analysis of the complex interactions between the virus and the host immune system that underlie the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic. The author delves into the impact of mass vaccination on individual and global health, and explains how powerful organizations, institutions, and industries lacking an understanding of this complex environment have turned a natural viral pandemic into one of disastrous immune escape. The author's predictions are compelling and indicate that Nature will correct this mistake, but at a substantial cost to human lives in highly vaccinated countries. The book also highlights the ignorance and arrogance of key opinion leaders and decision-makers in the field as the main reason for this colossal blunder. It is a must-read for anyone interested in understanding the intricacies of the pandemic and the impact of mass vaccination on society. The author's unique approach and reliance on basic scientific principles make this a valuable addition to the literature on the subject.

✅ The book is already available in Europe as a soft cover

👉🏻 for paperback version :

Bol.com at https://tinyurl.com/2p8jyfj (immediately available)
or:
Libris.nl at https://tinyurl.com/mr3t55uf (immediately available)
or:
your local Amazon.com shop (pre-order - available mid next week)

✅ And worldwide as an e-book

👉🏻 for Kindle version :

Amazon : https://a.co/d/3A5HVoL

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Geert : "Some of you have been wondering why I've become so quiet lately. I've been working on my book: "The inescapable immune escape pandemic". The aim of the book is to unambiguously demonstrate that nothing was more predictable than the detrimental consequences of mass C-19 vaccination during a natural pandemic.

# data[].attributes.body
" A platform to share information that has led us to our conclusion, one in which we can continue to share more, including opinion pieces, clinical papers, government documents, information leaflets, flyers and more. We also document the work we have done under the 'Resist and Act' section of this website. We will continue to research and share facts as we believe the ‘Time for The Truth’ has come."

Join us in our fight for the truth.

https://covileaks.co.uk/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
CoviLeaks; based in the UK and Founded by Fiona Hine in June 2020, was born in response to mainstream media propaganda and government misinformation surrounding the COVID-19 'pandemic'.

We believe that the lockdown has had catastrophic consequences leading to excess deaths, poverty and severe economic damage.

We believe the lockdown and Coronavirus Legislation was wholly disproportionate and an offence on our human rights and civil liberties; we continue to fight for justice for those who have suffered, and we continue to stand against further attacks on our Freedom.

We strongly believe the 'vaccine' has not been proven safe or effective, is harming millions and for some, it has been fatal.

We have simple aims: To fight for our freedoms through action in our community, to seek the truth and to provide the truth through publishing what the mainstream media won't.

You can help us continue our work...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
CoviLeaks; based in the UK and Founded by Fiona Hine in June 2020, was born in response to mainstream media propaganda and government misinformation surrounding the COVID-19 'pandemic'. We believe that the lockdown has had catastrophic consequences leading to excess deaths, poverty and severe economic damage.

# data[].attributes.body
https://thetruthaboutvaccines.com/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Join over 500,000 People as We Continue to Learn The Truth About Vaccines.

# data[].attributes.body
The book consolidates a great deal of information (accompanied by detailed analysis) that is scattered in hundreds of medical articles, books, and websites. All discussion is presented in clear and easy-to-understand language, so no medical education is required. It presents several original concepts in addition to laying a robust scientific foundation for the more established ones.
https://www.amazon.com/Turtles-All-Way-Down-Vaccine/dp/9655981045/

# data[].attributes.body
https://unlimitedhangout.com/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
British and American state intelligence agencies are "weaponizing truth" to quash vaccine hesitancy as both nations prepare for mass inoculations, in a recently announced "cyber war" to be commanded by AI-powered arbiters of truth against...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
British and American state intelligence agencies are "weaponizing truth" to quash vaccine hesitancy as both nations prepare for mass inoculations, in a recently announced "cyber war" to be commanded by AI-powered arbiters of truth against...

# data[].attributes.body
https://dailyclout.io/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
We are a company that builds digital tools, and produces media to help anyone, from any walk of life, use and affect democracy more powerfully.​

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.amazon.com/DailyClout-Documents-Analysis-Volunteers-Reports-ebook/dp/B0BSK6LV5D

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
War Room / DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Volunteers' Reports eBook: Find Out What Pfizer, FDA Tried to Conceal

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Pfizer Reports book contains 50 reports written by the highly-credentialed War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project volunteers between March and December 2022. The reports are based on information in the primary source Pfizer documents released under court order by the U.S. Food ...

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.amazon.com/Real-Anthony-Fauci-Democracy-Childrens/dp/1510766804

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.amazon.com/Cause-Epidemic-Sudden-Childrens-Defense/dp/1510776397/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
"Cause Unknown": The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 & 2022 (Children's Health Defense)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Cause Unknown : The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 & 2022 (Children's Health Defense) [Dowd, Ed, de Becker, Gavin, Kennedy Jr., Robert F.] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Cause Unknown : The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 & 2022 (Children's Health Defense)

# data[].attributes.headline
BEAUDOIN v BAKER (Governor of Massachusetts)

# data[].attributes.subject
BEAUDOIN v BAKER (Governor of Massachusetts)

# data[].attributes.body
Substack outlining legal case based on irrefutable data.
https://coquindechien.substack.com/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Commentary on the Idiocracy. Click to read Coquin de Chien's Newsletter, a Substack publication with thousands of readers.

# data[].attributes.body
https://totalityofevidence.com/dr-mike-yeadon/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
Totality of Evidence - COVID-19 pandemic timeline and resource links

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Dr. Michael Yeadon PhD was formerly the Vice President & Chief Scientific Officer of Allergy & Respiratory at Pfizer Global R&D. He holds joint Honours in Biochemistry and Toxicology and a PhD in Pharmacology. He is an Independent Consultant and Co-founder & CEO of Ziarco Pharma Ltd.

Dr Mike Yeadon on GETTR

Videos in reverse chronological order

2023

January 25, 2023 - Info Wars: Dr. Michael Yeadon: We've Been Lied To About Every Part of The COVID Pandemic! - WATCH

2022

November 21, 2022 - World Council for Health | General Assembly Meet #66: Dr Mike Yeadon: Why the Depopulation Agenda is Real and What We Can Do About It - WATCH, FULL, EXCERPT, No one is coming to save us - EXCERPT2

"I certainly, when I was in [the pharmaceutical] industry, I was pro-vaccine. I would say I now abstain at best. And I'm ashamed that I was pro-vaccine because I didn't do my homework."Dr Mike Yeadon

September 18, 2022 - Radical Ep #22 with Maajid Nawaz: On Building Back Better, First By Destroying - an interview with Dr Mike Yeadon - WATCH

September 1, 2022 - Global Research: Dr. Michael Yeadon on the Covid Crisis: The Most Important Single Message I've Ever Written - READ, BACKUP

If you experimentally adopt the position that OUR GOVERNMENT IS ACTIVELY WORKING TO HARM US, TO DISMANTLE MODERN SOCIETY & ENSLAVE ALL PEOPLE IN A DIGITALLY CONTROLLED TOTALITARIAN WORLD, it all fits. Nothing is surplus.

August 1, 2022 - Hearts of Oak: Dr Mike Yeadon - Fraud, Fear and How Herd Mentality Has Brought Us to the Edge - WATCH, CREDIT

Sir Patrick Vallance, Sir Menelas Pangalos (A/Z), James Merson & Dr Mathai Mammen (J&J) are accused of crimes against humanity by Dr Yeadon because the R&D of the vaccines are on their watch. Most soon announced their resignation - coincidence?! - EXCERPT

July 15, 2022 - CHD 'Doctors & Scientists' Episode 37: 'It Could Not Have Worked, and They Knew It' - Fundamental Flaw of COVID Vaccine Strategy With Dr. Mike Yeadon & Brian Hooker - WATCH, EXCERPT

June 12, 2022 - Maajid Nawaz interviews whistleblower Dr Mike Yeadon, author of The Covid Lies and former global Head of Respiratory Diseases for Pfizer - WATCH, GETTR

June 11, 2022 - Doctors for Covid Ethics: THE FOURTH SYMPOSIUM: Freedom is the Cure - Crime is not health with Mike Yeadon - WATCH

June 9, 2022 - Dr. Mike Yeadon speaks with Dr. Paul Elias Alexander - WATCH, SUBSTACK

June 5, 2022 - Dr Yeadon's message on GETTR (Worth placing here)

" My dear friend & all round dark horse, Mr Neil Oliver, like me, was until 2020 what I now call "a normie". Well aware that there was the odd bit of corruption in political circles, I had thought in the main that administrations wanted their go at playing with the train set. Neil no longer believes that. Nor do I. Here's perhaps his most direct warning to date. "
Mike Yeadon speaking about Neil Oliver and THIS MESSAGE

June 3, 2022 - Facts Matter: Former Pfizer VP: 'Massive Fraud Playing Out on a Global Scale,' Reckless to Vaccinate the Whole Population WATCH

No Benign Explanation: Three Clear Bits of Evidence That This Has Nothing to Do With Health - EXCERPT

Suboptimal Vaccine Design at Every Level - Collusion and Malfeasance: What's the Chance That All Four Companies Would Pick the Spike Protein? - EXCERPT

Under the Boot of the State For Good: We Must Resist the Imposition of the Digital Control Grid - EXCERPT

..." a new vaccine is always, let me say it again, always, Mr. Gates, the wrong answer. It will always take you longer to do a responsible job of creating and testing a novel vaccine than the length of the pandemic. And if you take less time, it means you do not have an appropriate amount of safety data and therefore it's reckless to go and vaccinate the whole population "
Mike Yeadon

May 19, 2022 - 'Doctors And Scientists' With Brian Hooker Episode 29: COVID Hysteria and the Great Reset Agenda: Dr. Mike Yeadon Reflects on Where We Go From Here - WATCH, BACKUP, EXCERPT

May 4, 2022 - KLA TV: Michael Yeadon: Corona vaccines batch scandal - "The Hot Lots" - WATCH

April 28, 2022 - The Delingpod: A James Delingpole Podcast: With Dr Mike Yeadon - WATCH

April 23, 2022 - Friday Roundtable: Episode 4: COVID LIES With Former Pfizer Vice President + Chief Scientific Officer Michael Yeadon - WATCH, EXCERPT, EXCERPT2

April 10, 2022 - UPDATED: The Covid Lies: A comprehensive review, Dr. Yeadon argues that all the main narratives about SARS-CoV-2 and imposed "measures" are lies - READ

February 18, 2022 - Doctors for COVID Ethics Symposium 3: Session III COVID-19 and Global Coup D'etat with Catherine Austin Fitts & Dr. Mike Yeadon - WATCH, FULL, Three Key Troubling Takeaways From This COVID Dilemma - EXCERPT, EXCERPT2

The most frightening thing is the passivity of the people

February 1, 2022 - Australia's Maria Zeee: Ex-Pfizer Chief Scientific Officer Exposes Deadly Vax Lots for Nuremberg 2.0 - WATCH

January 23, 2022 - Lioness of Juday Ministry Substack: Dr. Michael Yeadon: THIS MUST STOP! Pfizer Documents Show FDA Knew of Death Risk - The document description was posted by Dr. Michael Yeadon on his Telegram channel. Dr.Michael Yeadon is a Former VP of Pfizer Pharmaceuticals - READ

January 8, 2022 - Corona Investigative Committee Session 86 with Dr Mike Yeadon talks on vaccine batches - "The Hot Lots" - WATCH, BATCH, BACKUP

January 8, 2022 - GB News with Neil Oliver: 19 minute interview with Mike Yeadon, "As a professional scientist it's been absolutely obvious to me - by May 2020 - it's nothing like you've been told." - WATCH, BACKUP, Subtitles

2021

August 20, 2021 - Corona Investigative Committee Session 66 with Dr Mike Yeadon - WATCH, FULL

June 2021 - War Room with Steve Bannon: Children 50 Times More Likely to Die from Spike Protein! - WATCH

June 10, 2021 - The Highwire Episode 219: Former Pfizer VP: "The thing to be terrified of is your government" - WATCH, FULL

May 8, 2021 - Defender Podcast with RFK jr speaks with Dr Yeadon - LINK, PODCAST

April 26, 2021 - Planet Lockdown interview with Dr Mike Yeadon - A FINAL WARNING TO HUMANITY - WATCH, SOURCE, GETTR

April 11, 2021 - The Last American Vagabond: Michael Yeadon Interview - Former Pfizer VP Speaks Out On Dangers Of mRNA Vaccines & COVID Illusion - LINKS, WATCH

March 31, 2021 - The Delingpod: A James Delingpole Podcast: with Dr Mike Yeadon - WATCH, LISTEN

March 25, 2021 - Exclusive: Former Pfizer VP to AFLDS: 'Entirely possible this will be used for massive-scale depopulation' - READ

March 20, 2021 - Corona Investigative Committee Session 44 with Dr Mike Yeadon - WATCH

2020

November 30, 2020 - Former Pfizer chief science officer Mike Yeadon: The pandemic is over, PCR tests yield false positives - WATCH, BACKUP

" Perceived prevalence of pandemic is based on false positives from PCR tests."
Mike Yeadon

"The most likely duration of immunity to a respiratory virus like SARS CoV-2 is multiple years. Why do I say that? We actually have the data for a virus that swept through parts of the world seventeen years ago called SARS, and remember SARS CoV-2 is 80% similar to SARS, so I think that's the best comparison that anyone can provide."

" The evidence is clear: These very clever cellular immunologists studied all the people they could get hold of who had survived SARS 17 years ago. They took a blood sample, and they tested whether they responded or not to the original SARS and they all did; they all had perfectly normal, robust T cell memory. They were actually also protected against SARS CoV-2, because they're so similar; it's cross immunity."

"So, I would say the best data that exists is that immunity should be robust for at least 17 years. I think it's entirely possible that it is lifelong. The style of the responses of these people's T cells were the same as if you've been vaccinated and then you come back years later to see if that immunity has been retained. So I think the evidence is really strong that the duration of immunity will be multiple years, and possibly lifelong. "

In other words, previous exposure to SARS - that is, a variant similar to SARS CoV-2 - bestowed SARS CoV-2 immunity. - REF

November 12, 2020 - The Highwire - follow up on last week's episode - WATCH

November 5, 2020 - The Highwire reports on Dr Mike Yeadon's 26 October 2020 Tweet - WATCH

October 31, 2020 - Daily Mail: Three facts No 10's experts got wrong: DR MIKE YEADON says claims that the majority of the population is susceptible to Covid, that only 7% are infected so far and virus death rate is 1% are all false - by Dr Mike Yeadon - READ

The Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) has made three incorrect assumptions. They assume:

1. That the vast majority of the population is vulnerable to infection;

2. That only 7% of the population has been infected so far;

3. That the virus causing COVID-19 has a mortality rate of about 1%

"Many individuals who've been infected by other coronaviruses have immunity to closely related ones such as the Covid-19 virus."

"SAGE reached its conclusion by assessing the prevalence of Covid-19 antibodies in national blood surveys. Yet we know that not every infected individual produces antibodies.

Indeed, the immune systems of most healthy people bypass the complex and energy-intensive process of making antibodies because the virus can be overcome by other means. The human immune system has several lines of defence...

These include innate immunity which is comprised of the body's physical barriers to infection and protective secretions (the skin and its oils, the cough reflex, tears etc); its inflammatory response (to localise and minimise infection and injury), and the production of non-specific cells (phagocytes) that target an invading virus/bacterium."

In addition, the immune system produces antibodies that protect against a specific virus or bacterium (and confer immunity) and T-cells (a type of white blood cell) that are also specific..."

October 29, 2020 - Anna Brees of Brees Media speaks with Dr Mike Yeadon - WATCH

October 26, 2020 - from The Highwire: TOP DOC CONFIRMS: COVID IS OVER - featuring Dr Mike Yeadon @MichaelYeadon3 statement Twitter - WATCH , Twitter - ARCHIVE

" The number of deaths occurring at the moment is normal for this time of year."
Michael Yeadon

September 17, 2020 - TalkRadio with Julia Hartley-Brewer: Dr Mike Yeadon: 'Government are using a Covid-19 test with undeclared false positive rates.' - WATCH, YouTube, BACKUP, Global Research - ARTICLE

"Ferguson's model has no validity in the view of most scientists"

"Yes, its a novel virus but its very closely related to at least four other viruses that circulate freely in the population, which are all corona viruses and contribute to the common cold, so bluntly it was naive of them (government etc) to assume everyone was susceptible.."Dr Mike Yeadon

September 8, 2020 - The Daily Sceptic: How Likely is a Second wave? by Mike Yeadon et al - ARTICLE

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Dr. Michael Yeadon PhD was formerly the Vice President & Chief Scientific Officer of Allergy & Respiratory at Pfizer Global R&D. He holds joint Honours in Biochemistry and Toxicology and a PhD in Pharmacology. He is an Independent Consultant and Co-founder & CEO of Ziarco Pharma Ltd.

# data[].attributes.body
https://rumble.com/vlzihf-the-story-of-ivermectin-and-covid-19.html

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.therealanthonyfaucimovie.com/trailer/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
THEY PRAY YOU NEVER WATCH THIS

Within the first 5 minutes, you know why Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s blockbuster bestselling book The Real Anthony Fauci is now a full-length feature documentary exposing Big Pharma, Big Tech and Big Government.

NOW, FOR A LIMITED TIME ONLY, YOU CAN SEE IT EXCLUSIVELY FOR FREE AND ONLY ON THIS PAGE

During more than a year of painstaking and meticulous research and interviews, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. unearthed shocking truths about collusion, deceit and manipulation affecting the freedom, health and safety of our families

And, despite censorship, boycotts from bookstores and libraries, and hit pieces against the author, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s book, The Real Anthony Fauci is a New York Times bestseller with over 1,000,000 copies sold.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Within the first 5 minutes, you know why Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s blockbuster bestselling book The Real Anthony Fauci is now a full-length feature documentary exposing Big Pharma, Big Tech and Big Government. During more than a year of painstaking and meticulous research and interviews, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.campfire.wiki/doku.php?id=start

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
You made it! Take a seat around the campfire. There is much to discuss.

To find pages or info within the wiki, use the search bar in the top right-hand corner, or visit the Sitemap.

We've also begun assembling a list of useful resources, including other wikis, here.

Campfire Wiki is a project to document the details and events of the COVID-19 pandemic. Beyond simply capturing news headlines, the wiki is intended to sift through the layers of propaganda and partisanship laced throughout to extract the facts and record them for posterity. The goal of the wiki is to aggregate good information in one place where it won't be censored, thus adding scale, cooperation, and reducing duplication of efforts.

Here is a list of featured updates to the Campfire Wiki, last updated on January 29, 2023:

The following is a list of the most newly-created pages:

We want to keep track of information on complex topics that is difficult if not impossible for the layperson to discover on their own. We have busy lives and the search for any truth demands full attention and our heady news environment provides an extra layer of challenge. Physicians, nurses, scientists, independent journalists, and more have been censored by the legacy media and Silicon Valley algorithms. The information they have does not reach the eyes and ears of the public and therefore hinders our ability to make informed choices. Those of us who have chosen to participate in this project reflect a similar broad range of skills and insights which we bring to this campfire to produce something together that we could not do alone.

The name of this wiki comes from the metaphor used by Biologists Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying in their Darkhorse Podcast of the campfire not just as a tool for warmth and cooking, but also as "a forge for ideas."

We have begun this project with the most topical and pressing issue in mind first: the COVID-19 pandemic and the responses to it. From the very beginning much of what we were led to believe was incorrect. There is indeed a crowd madness around this subject. From the science on masks, early treatment, and vaccine safety much of the information has been hidden, thrown into the memory hole, and discarded as misinformation. Our knowledge base only grows by pitting ideas against one another publicly to see who has the evidence and argument to support their conclusions.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
You made it! Take a seat around the campfire. There is much to discuss. To find pages or info within the wiki, use the search bar in the top right-hand corner, or visit the Sitemap. We've also begun assembling a list of useful resources, including other wikis, here.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.diedsuddenly.info/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
After tens of millions of people engaged with Died Suddenly, there were numerous questions, criticisms, and deeper rabbit holes to explore to fully explain the depth of what has happened as a result of the Covid-19 vaccination program.

Directors Matthew Skow and Nicholas Stumphauzer are in pre production now on a sequel to address all the criticisms, answer further questions, perform scientific experiments to demonstrate the claims made, and bring all this evidence to Capitol Hill where it belongs.

This is the People of the World vs. The New World Order.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
After tens of millions of people engaged with Died Suddenly, there were numerous questions, criticisms, and deeper rabbit holes to explore to fully explain the depth of what has happened as a result of the Covid-19 vaccination program.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B2KRLPY2

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
We bear witness to loneliness, free-floating anxiety, and fear giving way to censorship, loss of privacy, and surrendered freedoms. It is all spurred by a singular, focused crisis narrative that forbids dissident views and relies on destructive groupthink.

Totalitarianism is not a coincidence and does not form in a vacuum. It arises from a collective psychosis that has followed a predictable script throughout history, its formation gaining strength and speed with each generation-from the Jacobins to the Nazis and Stalinists-as technology advances. Governments, mass media, and other mechanized forces use fear, loneliness, and isolation to demoralize populations and exert control, persuading large groups of people to act against their own interests, always with destructive results.

In The Psychology of Totalitarianism , world-renowned Professor of Clinical Psychology Mattias Desmet deconstructs the societal conditions that allow this collective psychosis to take hold. By looking at our current situation and identifying the phenomenon of "mass formation"-a type of collective hypnosis-he clearly illustrates how close we are to surrendering to totalitarian regimes.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Amazon.com: The Psychology of Totalitarianism (Audible Audio Edition): Mattias Desmet, Dan Crue, Chelsea Green: Books

# data[].attributes.body
John Leake and Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD. MPH.

https://www.amazon.com/COURAGE-FACE-COVID-19-Hospitalization-Bio-Pharmaceutical/dp/B09ZLVWMD9

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
John Leake (Author), Peter A. McCullough MD (Author)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
THE COURAGE TO FACE COVID-19: Preventing Hospitalization and Death While Battling the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
THE COURAGE TO FACE COVID-19: Preventing Hospitalization and Death While Battling the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex [Leake, John, McCullough MD, Peter A.] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. THE COURAGE TO FACE COVID-19: Preventing Hospitalization and Death While Battling the Bio-Pharm…

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
Armstrong Economics | research the past to predict the future

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Interested in additional videos from Armstrong Economics? Click here to visit our YouTube channel and click the "subscribe" button for the latest content updates.

# data[].attributes.headline
Robert Malone: Lies My Government Told Me

# data[].attributes.subject
Robert Malone: Lies My Government Told Me

# data[].attributes.body
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/malone-lies-my-government-told-me-cola/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Dr. Robert Malone's new book, "Lies My Government Told Me: And the Better Future Coming," analyzes the tyranny we currently face, and how to get out from under it.
Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender's Top News of the Day. It's free. Story at a glance:

Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology (the original platform, not the current mRNA COVID-19 shots), has published a new book, "Lies My Government Told Me: And the Better Future Coming," in which he analyzes the tyranny we currently face, and how to get out from under it.

The first part of the book reviews the reality of censorship of medical and scientific truth during the COVID-19 pandemic and the emergence of global totalitarianism.

The second part tries to answer the question, "Who or what is behind it all?" Malone believes it's a combination of bad actors with nefarious intent and opportunism.

The last part of the book is focused on how to create a better future. A major part of the answer lies in creating decentralized, local intentional communities, and to create the potential for networking between them on a national and international level, while remaining independent and self-governed.

A good way to avoid groupthink that results in policy fiascos is to establish completely separate problem-solving groups that do not interact with each other. Only after each group has independently come up with their own ideas do they come together to share, analyze and find common ground.

In the video below, I interview Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology (the original platform, not to be confused with the current mRNA COVID-19 shots) and author of " Lies My Government Told Me: And the Better Future Coming."

In my view, Malone has been one of the most prominent leaders in helping us understand the scientific truth of what's actually happening with COVID-19 and the COVID-19 shots.

Malone and his wife Jill actually published one of the first books on COVID-19 prevention and treatment. They self-published it as an ebook on Amazon in early February 2020. Amazon deleted it the following month.

After repeated inquiries as to why the book was removed, Amazon finally cited "violation of community standards." "It was the first time we'd ever heard that phrase," Malone says.

Since then, of course, it's become the key excuse used by tech platforms of all kinds to justify the censorship of plain truth. The removal of that book was just a small foretaste of what was to come.
The gaping disconnect between reality and the narrative
Over the past three years, ever since he appeared on the DarkHorse podcast with Steve Kirsch in June 2021, he's been publicly defamed, canceled, deplatformed and had his scientific accomplishments scrubbed from Wikipedia.

As explained by Malone, he was deplatformed from Twitter after posting an entirely fact-based professionally-produced video from the Canadian COVID Care Alliance that documented how Pfizer had committed fraud in its COVID-19 jab trials.

Everything in that video was true, and still is.

"The production quality was excellent and I just retweeted it," Malone says.

"LinkedIn at the same time also whacked me. The other day I was noodling around and for some reason clicked on a link to somebody's LinkedIn ... and it brought me to this page that said something to the effect that I should reactivate my account.

"I thought, well, what do I have to lose? So, I filed for that and did their necessary little paperwork and they came back and said, due to my continuing violations after having been kicked off of LinkedIn, I'm permanently banned.

"And I'm scratching my head going, 'What were the continuing violations when I was kicked off of your platform?' It's kind of circular, but I mean, none of this has to make sense. It's whatever they say it is. That's the big lesson. Reality is whatever they say it is."
The price of being a truth-teller
Malone, like so many others, myself included, has paid a high price for choosing to speak the truth rather than stay silent.

He's sacrificed a great deal since that fateful DarkHorse podcast, which got more than a million views in a short amount of time before it was taken down by YouTube. He's lost business ventures, decades-long professional relationships and much more.

"For decades, Jill and I have run a consulting business, and we've done so successfully, in part by staying quiet and behind the scenes. That's what our clients typically like. In order to really speak truth about what was happening here, we had to come out from under cover and go public.

"As you know, you're a poster child for this, as soon as you start speaking the truth about these forbidden topics like vaccine safety, we were immediately attacked, which caused us to make the decision to go to alternative media, and now to publish and finally put this book out.

"It has been a rough road, but we've made so many new friends from all over the world that I think that's really compensation in and of itself. Right now, we're sustaining ourselves through Substack, and it's an interesting situation. We've never required that anybody pay to subscribe, and so it's really kind of amazing.

"We've tried to do the right thing and have not focused on commercialization. Some of my colleagues have found themselves forced to do various things to try to keep afloat, and we've just tried to do the right thing and speak truth to power.

"These benefits, such as the subscribers on Substack, have just come and supported us, and we've have had donations from other individuals, donations that came through the Malone Institute ... that have allowed us to keep going.

"So, I really try not to complain or whine. One of my core messages is, yep, none of this is fair. None of this is right. None of this is ethical, and you have to get over it. You have to just recognize that this is the nature of the situation we're in, and it's not really personal.

"It's about a system that has come to the point where the government and corporate media just treat all of us as grist for the mill in order to reinforce whatever the narrative is that they want to push. So, it helps to not take it personally, although it can be a little painful from time to time."
'The Lies My Government Told Me'
As explained by Malone, the basic structure of "The Lies My Government Told Me" is like that of a physician's approach to a new patient.

"When the patient first comes to you, you want to understand their main problem, their chief complaint, and take a history and do a physical. Then you go through a process of determining a diagnosis. What's really wrong with them? What's causing them to have that complaint? Then you come up with a treatment plan.

"That was the basic idea of the structure of the book. The first third of it is personal anecdotes from people - myself, Meryl Nass, Paul Marik, Pierre Kory and many others who have experienced directly the censorship, the deplatforming, loss of license, all these things, so that people can have a sense of what it's really been like at the forefront; what people have been experiencing ...

"The second part is an excursion, trying to get to sense-making, which really started with Bret Weinstein's Dark Horse podcast, when he posed the question to me and to Steve Kirsch, 'What's really behind this? Is there a grand conspiracy, a single conspiracy, or is this an emergent phenomenon?'

"I think in the end, having spent months and months running down all these little warrens, these rabbit holes of the World Economic Forum (WEF), the central banks, Tony Fauci, the DOD and all of that stuff, I've come to the conclusion that it is really multifactorial, and that it is a situation where, I'm sure, there were some nefarious bad actors behind this.

"But in addition, there was a lot of opportunism and people taking advantage of a system in a situation in ways that they had kind of planned before, that when something like this came up they would take advantage of it.

"Folks like Ed Dowd ... [have made it] quite clear that there were major financial liquidity problems going into this, and that that opportunity was exploited to inject massive amounts of capital and restructure the economy in ways that we're still just beginning to appreciate as we're encountering inflation and the stagflation cycle we're in. So, the middle part is about making sense [of the situation]."
Creating a better future through decentralization
The last part of the book is focused on the subhead of the book's title, which is about creating a better, more humane, future.

As noted by Malone, after everything we've been through during these past three years, it can be difficult to envision a future that doesn't involve a totalitarian One World Government, replete with forced eugenics protocols, as envisioned by WEF founder Klaus Schwab and his transhumanist philosophy guru Yuval Noah Harari.

But there is a way. The answer is basically the converse of the problem. Since the problem, the driver toward totalitarianism is centralization and top-down governance, the answer lies in the creation of self-sustainable decentralized systems and self-governance.

"How do you envision a better future when you come to grips with the dark mutterings of Harari and Schwab, talking about transhumanism and the Fourth Industrial revolution, the fusion of man and machine, the excess surplus labor, the need for guaranteed basic income, the logic behind 'You will own nothing and be happy.'

"[This] actually has a business model behind it - when you come to terms with the willingness of our government to suspend the Bill of Rights in fundamental ways, and the willingness of our government to disregard the norms of bioethics that have been established for generations. ...

"How do you imagine a better future when you're confronted by what is clearly a thrust towards totalitarian control? ... How do you envision a future where there's such a massive force driving towards a centralized-command economy totalitarianism, based on the concepts of Marxist utilitarianism?

"The answer is best captured in one of the final chapters from a group in Italy ... IppocrateOrg. They, like the World Council for Health under Tess Lawrie have been very committed to a vision of decentralization and intentional communities. They give some great examples of what they've done, which I think are a fantastic opportunity for the world to learn through their experience.

"The physicians in Italy were censored at least as bad as the docs here in the states. Hundreds have lost their license, ability to practice, for the sin of providing early treatment and saving lives.

"They've come together and formed this organization, and they're now starting their own medical school, Hippocrate, and they've done very novel things, like assembled local community groups in cities and towns throughout Italy that are engaging in training. This includes setting up training programs for physicians to despecialize.

"So, doctors that had been hospitalists, that had been focused in very narrow specialties, are learning and have set up mentorship with primary care physicians to learn the tools of the trade to allow them to go back to old-school medicine, to treating patients, which is where so much of the joy comes from.

"All of the things that they've been subjected to, just like many of the docs here in the United States, have led them to conclude that corporate medicine is just not the place they want to be ...

"I hope that what we can do is find our souls and move towards a future where we respect the importance of human dignity and commit ourselves to acting in integrity, with transparency. These are the things that we've lost.

"I think what the book really brings to the fore is that all throughout the system of governance ... we've lost integrity. People are willing to lie and misrepresent and hide behind their conflicts of interest and not disclose them. Somehow, we have to get back to a space where that's not acceptable."
How to win on an uneven playing field
Like Malone, I believe we can win by creating new decentralized systems to replace, on our own terms, the systems that are now falling apart.

A surefire way to lose our freedoms and everything else is to do nothing and simply wait for the eugenics-centered cabal to replace them for us. Because they will.

They're decades ahead of us in terms of planning and they already have new top-down centralized systems ready to go. Programmable central bank digital currencies, digital identity and an international vaccine passport are just a few examples that will be implemented very soon.

The playing field is by no means even. But we can still overcome their plans, for the simple reason that "average people" outnumber the globalist cabal by millions to one.

They need our cooperation, or their new enslavement system won't work. We saw this with vaccine mandates.

No one, at least not in the U.S., was ever held down and injected at gunpoint. They used every conceivable and inconceivable method of coercion, yes, but they couldn't use physical force.

One reason for that is because there's too many of us. They need us to enter their system by choice, even if it's a coerced choice.

So, our greatest weapon is simply refusal, to say no, even if it costs us in the short-term, and to instead enter into and support emerging parallel alternative systems.

One example of this is the emergence of alternative free-speech social media platforms and online payment systems to replace Google, Facebook, Twitter, PayPal, GoFundMe or EventBrite.

No one actually "has to" use any of those platforms anymore, because there are alternatives that won't mine and sell your personal data, censor your viewpoints, fine you for wrongthink or dictate who you can and cannot send money to.

So, make the switch sooner rather than later. Support the alternatives that are cropping up rather than feeding a beast intent on swallowing you whole.
Our immediate challenges
Granted, some of our immediate challenges will indeed be significant and will require our active participation. Coming right up is the planned implementation of an international vaccine passport.

The World Health Organization is also seeking to attain the sole authority to dictate the global response to declared pandemics.

Can a decentralized model be successful in the face of the global cabal continuing their efforts to eliminate our freedoms?

Malone responds:

"I'm being hit with multiple requests for press commentary about this new position that the G20 has taken in favor of personal ID health certificates to restrict global travel. I fear that things have progressed to such a point that we may not be able to overcome the momentum that confronts us.

"The modification of the international health regulations is proposed to be backed by the World Trade Organization as the enforcement arm for the World Health Organization, so that they'll be able to impose sanctions on noncompliant countries.

"Had we had a major red wave [in the midterm] elections, I would've been more optimistic. But I fear that this will get pushed through under this administration this summer ... I'm of the opinion that to a significant extent, they will have their way with us. So, what do you do in the face of that? What do you do in the face of this profound evil? ...

"I've just come back from a three-day meeting in Mexico City with a group of very intelligent folks that are very active in business and investment, and many of them are establishing their own local intentional communities. My sense is that there is a reasonable chance that we will see these local consortium collections of intentional communities pop up all over the world.

"The opportunity is to create some way for them to come together and form their own network, their own matrix. My concern is that right now we're so dependent on an internet that is subject to arbitrary and capricious modification from the ICANN [the Internet governance] committee or others. There are some fundamental problems we have to solve, but I think there are ways that we can approach this.

"The solution cannot be imposed or created by any one person or even a small group of people, because then we'll end up falling into exactly the same trap. I think that it has to emerge organically, from many different groups from all over the world, interacting with each other.

"But I think what we can do is envision a process to enable it. I think that process starts by defining what the need is. What it is that we as a community of independent thinkers and networks need?

"I think we can envision a process where key people come together, representing their communities, and define what it is that we want to see in a decentralized world, and what the problems are in getting there. Once we define what those are, then we can start working on coming up with solutions to that problem set."
How to avoid groupthink traps
Malone suggests we learn the lessons presented in Irving Janis' book "Victims of Groupthink," in which he points out that the most effective way to avoid the kinds of policy fiascos the U.S. government finds itself in on a regular basis is to create completely separate problem-solving groups that do not interact with each other.

Each group is given a common set of problems (which is why our problems need to be defined), and each group then comes up with their own solutions. Only then are the groups brought together to share their ideas.

"That way you have independent solutions coming from a diverse array of different people from different cultures and nation states," he says. "Then, [we] come together and see if we can find common ground among those. I think that's a process that could work. But I'm very wary of anybody who thinks they have the answer right now.

"I think I might be able to help facilitate [such] a process, so, what I'm trying to focus on is, how could we get there? Not saying, 'Oh, I know the answer, we need to do this or do that.'

"There are a lot of classic traps that the medical freedom movement is starting to find itself in, and one of those is the trap of cults of personality. It's easy to get caught up in the fame and adulation, but I think we really have to fight that and come together in a way that does not set up any one person to be the leader, but rather enables all of us to be leaders."
More information
To learn more, be sure to pick up a copy of " Lies My Government Told Me: And the Better Future Coming."

Malone also has a great Substack, where he publishes one to two articles a day, and an incredibly active GETTR account.

You can also find him on Gab and TRUTH Social.
Originally published by Mercola. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children's Health Defense.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
'Lies My Government Told Me': Malone's New Book on Tyranny and How to Escape It

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Dr. Robert Malone's new book, "Lies My Government Told Me: And the Better Future Coming," analyzes the tyranny we currently face, and how to get out from under it. Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender's Top News of the Day. It's free.

# data[].attributes.body
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/covid-litigation-conference-next

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
In March, VSRF is partnering with the Mendenhall Law Group to host the Covid Litigation Conference 2023 (CLC 2023) from March 25-26 in Atlanta, Georgia. Over the next 10 years, Covid lawsuits are expected to see huge growth, an unfortunate development that reflects the need to bring justice in the courts for hundreds of thousands of people negatively impacted by harmful Covid-19 policies.

The demand is overwhelming and CLC 2023 is the first conference launched to help educate attorneys on best practices in litigating these types of cases. We will feature informative panels on cutting-edge, Covid-related legal issues and will provide an excellent opportunity for lawyers interested in this burgeoning field to network and support each other moving forward. CLE has also been requested.

Our speaker list continues to expand and includes Mary Holland (Chief Counsel of Children's Health Defense), Tricia Lindsay (Tricia Lindsay Law), Robert Barnes (Barnes Law, LLP), Warner Mendenhall (Mendenhall Law Group), Jeff Childers (Childers Law), and Bobbie Ann Flower Cox (Cox Lawyers, PLLC.)

Pierre Kory, MD, Co-Founder & Chief Medical Officer of the FLCCC and Ryan Cole, MD, a Mayo-trained Board-Certified Anatomic/Clinical Pathologist, will also be speaking as medical experts. Panelists will be joined by plaintiffs in current Covid lawsuits to lead nine panels covering the following areas of litigation:

While the conference is presented with lawyers as the primary audience, the public is welcome to also purchase tickets to attend.

Please join us and come have a beer and some Q&A with me at the VSRF Pub Night on Friday, March 24 in Midtown, Atlanta.

For more information and to get special Early Bird Registration pricing, please visit www.VacSafety.org/Events.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
COVID litigation conference next month in Atlanta

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In March, VSRF is partnering with the Mendenhall Law Group to host the Covid Litigation Conference 2023 (CLC 2023) from March 25-26 in Atlanta, Georgia. Over the next 10 years, Covid lawsuits are expected to see huge growth, an unfortunate development that reflects the need to bring justice in the courts for hundreds of thousands of people negatively impacted by harmful Covid-19 policies.

# data[].attributes.body
https://vigilantfox.substack.com/p/dr-mccullough-lawsuits-are-coming

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Dr. McCullough is an internist, epidemiologist, and one of the most published cardiologists ever in America - serving as the Chief Scientific Officer of The Wellness Company. Since the outset of COVID-19, Dr. McCullough has contributed to dozens of peer-reviewed publications on the illness and has commented extensively on the botched response and the subsequent injections.

Dr. McCullough elaborates on illegal advertising. "We have multiple laws that apply that all biopharmaceutical products have to be presented with both the risks and the benefits - Americans know that. The companies and the governments together have defrauded Americans in terms of the truth of the vaccine," he conveyed.

The information that Pfizer and the FDA wanted to keep hidden for 75 years has been thoroughly documented and compiled into an ebook - and made available on Amazon.

We are shattering expectations, but we need your continued support to push truth up the algorithm, which is not just good for the book and the project but also for the conversation, forcing the criminals to be confronted. We already have the blueprint for prosecution; we just need enough people informed to demand accountability:
Pick Up Your Copy on Amazon

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Dr. McCullough: Lawsuits Are Coming for Those Who Defrauded the Public

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Dr. McCullough is an internist, epidemiologist, and one of the most published cardiologists ever in America - serving as the Chief Scientific Officer of The Wellness Company. Since the outset of COVID-19, Dr. McCullough has contributed to dozens of peer-reviewed publications on the illness and has commented extensively on the botched response and the subsequent injections.

# data[].attributes.body
https://ourvoicesmatter.com/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Our Voices Matter | Providing information to help you make informed choices

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Posted by ovmadminhash | | Episodes, Featured, Vaccine Injuries, Videos | |

# data[].attributes.body
https://phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjects/Humanity%20projects.asp

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
We live in a world where regulatory institutions are captured by financial and political interests, either unwilling or unable to get to the truth of the issues they set out to investigate and regulate on behalf of the individuals in society. Without unbiased and comprehensive research, there is a risk of misguided policy decisions at best, and at worst, negligence and malpractice. Never has this been more apparent than during the Covid-19 pandemic.

In this context, we need independent agents to act as gatekeepers of the public interest. We intend to be such agents, and to provide high-quality research to other individuals and institutions who seek similar outcomes.

We believe in

Empowering individuals with the tools for decision-making, when the regulatory institutions set up to protect them can no longer be trusted with the important decisions that affect their lives.

Asking the tough questions. Undertaking research with an open mind and unhindered by political and economic pressure.

Speaking the truth, even though many times this will mean saying, "We don't know".

We work by

Applying the principles of scientific rigour. This means that we: Ask questions, collect and analyse data, use this feedback to ask new questions, and refine our answers accordingly as we approach a greater understanding of the truth. We also identify and openly acknowledge possible biases in our work so that these can be challenged and addressed by others working in the same field of enquiry.

Identify conflicts of interest (emotional and financial) and try to mitigate for these. Sometimes this will mean acknowledging that we are not the best people to do a particular piece of research.

Analysis of excess mortality. Follow the link for viewing the different sections of the project which include: the methodology papers and the analysis of excess deaths for European countries, UK and the US.

Excess Mortality Project

Analysis of trends in disabilities. Follow the links to visualise our analysis of US disabilities using data from the BLS.

US - Disabilities Project

The V Damage project investigates the total damage inflicted by the global vaccine programme. It encompasses two aspects: the human impact (deaths, disabilities and injuries) and economic impact.

Demographics projects. These projects are related to demographic trends and/or their economic impact. The scope of the project includes research into fertility, deaths and migration.
Other projects
We are actively seeking knowledge, data sources and collaborators to work with us on our current and other projects. Examples of projects under consideration are:

Data gathering and investigation on vaccinations over the past century.

Investigation into the human health effects of potable water fluoridation.

Investigation into the limits of human lifespan.

And others.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
We live in a world where regulatory institutions are captured by financial and political interests, either unwilling or unable to get to the truth of the issues they set out to investigate and regulate on behalf of the individuals in society.

# data[].attributes.body
Eashwarran Kohilathas is a medical doctor and an advocate for total freedom. This, his second book, is a collection of the knowledge and experience he has gained in medicine over the past 15 years to help uncover the disastrous effects of COVID-19 policy, and various ways to heal after COVID shot administration. It is his gift to humanity.
https://www.amazon.com/Calling-Out-Shots-Questioning-jab-related/dp/B0BRDGRFB9/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Calling Out The Shots: Questioning the science behind COVID-19 genetic agents; shedding light on jab-related injuries; helping you understand the ... what you might be able to do about it all.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Calling Out The Shots: Questioning the science behind COVID-19 genetic agents; shedding light on jab-related injuries; helping you understand the ... what you might be able to do about it all. [Kohilathas, Dr. Eashwarran] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.davidmartin.world/

# data[].attributes.body
https://plandemicseries.com/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The first installment of , a 26 minute documentary featuring veteran virologist Judy Mikovits, has been seen by over one billion people worldwide. The premiere of Plandemic: Indoctornation, featuring white collar crime investigator, Dr. David Martin, set a world record with 2 million viewers attending the global livestream.

The two part series was smeared by critics as "dangerous conspiracy theory." US media took unprecedented measures to make the masses look away. When Dr. Mikovits made the bold claim that COVID-19 was manipulated in a lab, she was smeared as "crazy". When Dr. Martin exposed the patents and paper trail proving that that Dr. Fauci was covertly funding dangerous gain of function research at the Wuhan Lab, critics laughed. One year later, they were no longer laughing.

Through various independent investigations and accredited studies, every major claim made within the Plandemic series has been validated as accurate. The tide is turning. Truth is emerging. Plandemic is now being acknowledged for being among the first to warn the world of the agenda to reduce the liberties of citizens through medical tyranny.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The first installment of , a 26 minute documentary featuring veteran virologist Judy Mikovits, has been seen by over one billion people worldwide. The premiere of Plandemic: Indoctornation, featuring white collar crime investigator, Dr. David Martin, set a world record with 2 million viewers attending the global livestream.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1630695939

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Liberty or Lockdown [Tucker, Jeffrey, Gilder, George] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Liberty or Lockdown

# data[].attributes.body
https://pharmafiles.substack.com/p/week-5-news-from-japan

# data[].attributes.body
https://padlet.com/nunisasyu/4-red-pill-master-s-level-pack-49y79pdycac5kk7h

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.truthforhealth.org/2022/09/remdesivir-wrongful-death-landmark-lawsuit-filed-against-three-hospitals-in-fresno-calif/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Attorneys Dan Watkins and Michael Hamilton announced in a national Press Conference September 7 the filing of their first-in-the-nation landmark lawsuit against three hospitals on behalf of families who had lost their loved ones with the "bounties" paid to hospitals for using the toxic combination of food and fluid restriction, remdesivir, mechanical ventilation, high dose morphine-midazolam respiration-suppressing cocktail to spiral patients down the dark road to death.

After more than 2 ½ years of daily COVID deaths in America's hospitals, we finally have the first two attorneys in the US to take legal action boldly and courageously against three hospitals in Fresno, California for wrongful death, medical battery, elder abuse and other violations of patients' rights to hold these hospital administrators, doctors and nurse accountable for such horrific patient abuses.

Truth for Health Foundation has pledged financial support for this lawsuit as one of our human rights defense efforts to serve the public good by helping protect public safety, defend patient rights, and defend life. Both Attorney Watkins and Attorney Hamilton have been engaged by Truth for Health Foundation to assist on several legal initiatives to help defend human and civil rights secured by law. Donations to support our legal defense efforts may be made here:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
REMDESIVIR WRONGFUL DEATH LANDMARK LAWSUIT FILED AGAINST THREE HOSPITALS IN FRESNO CALIF.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Attorneys Dan Watkins and Michael Hamilton announced in a national Press Conference September 7 the filing of their first-in-the-nation landmark lawsuit against three hospitals on behalf of families who had lost their loved ones with the "bounties" paid to hospitals for using the toxic combination of food and fluid restriction, remdesivir, mechanical ventilation, high dose ...

# data[].attributes.headline
Dr.s  Apter, Bowden & Marik v. DHHS & FDA

# data[].attributes.subject
Dr.s  Apter, Bowden & Marik v. DHHS & FDA

# data[].attributes.body
https://drbowden.substack.com/p/suing-the-fda-our-appeal-to-the-5th

# data[].attributes.body
https://indianbarassociation.in/worlds-first-vaccine-murder-case-against-bill-gates-adar-poonawalla-filed-in-indias-high-court/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Petitioner has sought prosecution of AstraZeneca's (Covishield) manufacturer Bill Gates, his partner Adar Poonawalla and other Government officials and leaders involved in the murder of a 23 year old man, who lost his life because of vaccination. The deceased took the Covishield vaccine by believing in the false narrative that the vaccine is completely safe and also owing to the compliance requirement set by the Railways that only double vaccinated people would be allowed to travel.

The Government of India's AEFI (Adverse Event Following Immunisation) Committee has recently admitted that the death of Dr.SnehalLunawat,was due to side effects of the Covishield vaccine. The said report has exposed the falsity of the claim made by vaccine syndicatethat vaccines are totally safe.

Petitioner has claimed Rs. 1000 crores ($ 134 million USD) compensation and has asked for interim compensation of Rs. 100 crores ($ 13.4 million USD).

Petitioner has also sought Lie Detector, Narco Analysis Test of accused Bill Gates and others.

In a case before the American Court regarding the side effects of MR vaccines, the Court accepted the settlement of compensation of 101 Million US Dollars (around Rs. 752 Crores) to the victim.

In another case in America, the CIA, FDA's office of criminal investigation, recovered around 10.2 Billion US Dollar (around Rs.76,00 crores) from Pharma Company GlaxoSmithKline for various offences including suppression of side effects of the medicines and putting the life of Americans in danger.
The company's unlawful promotion of certain prescription drugs, its failure to report certain safety data, and its civil liability for alleged false price reporting practices. The United States further alleges that GSK sponsored dinner programs, lunch programs, spa programs and similar activities to promote the use of Paxil in children and adolescents. GSK paid a speaker to talk to an audience of doctors and paid for the meal or spa treatment for the doctors who attended. Between 2001 and 2007, GSK failed to include certain safety data about Avandia, a diabetes drug. The missing information included data regarding certain post-marketing studies, as well as data regarding two studies undertaken in response to European regulators' concerns about the cardiovascular safety of Avandia. Since 2007, the FDA has added two black box warnings to the Avandia label to alert physicians about the potential increased risk of (1) congestive heart failure, and (2) myocardial infarction (heart attack). It also includes allegations that GSK paid kickbacks to health care professionals to induce them to promote and prescribe these drugs as well as the drugs Imitrex, Lotronex, Flovent and Valtrex. The United States alleges that this conduct caused false claims to be submitted to federal health care programs.
Constitution Bench of Supreme Court of India in Anita Kushwaha's case (2016) 8 SCC 509,made it clear that the rights of Indians are no lesser than the people across the world.

In India lakhs of compensation claims are expected to be filed soon.

The judgment in Montgomery's case [2015] UKSC 11, Airdale NHS Trust Vs. Bland (1993) 1 All ER 821, Common Cause Vs. Union of India (2018) 5 SCC 1 and Registrar General Vs. State of Meghalaya 2021 SCC OnLineMegh 130 and also the Universal Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights, 2005, makes it clear that before giving vaccine or any treatment to a person, he should be informed about the side effects of the medicine and also about the alternate remedies available.

If any person is vaccinated by suppressing the facts or by telling a lie that the said vaccines are completely safe, amount to the consent being obtained under deception. In India, vaccination under deception or by force/coercion or by putting certain stiflingconditions, is a civil and criminal wrong. [Registrar General Vs. State of Meghalaya 2021 SCC OnLineMegh 130]

Based on the abovesaid legal position the petitioner asked for registration of an F.I.R. under Section 52, 115, 302, 409, 120(B), 420, 34, 109 etc. of IPC and section 51(b), 55 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 against concerned officials who were marketing the vaccines as completely safe.

Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla, the partners in manufacturing the Covishield (AstraZeneca) vaccine are made accused for their involvement in conspiracy.

In India, the person allowing the false marketing of his product is also held to be guilty due to his act of commission and omission. In this regard the petitioner says that the provisions of Section 120(B), 34, 109 etc. of IPC get attracted to make Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla guilty of mass murders i.e. Section 302, 115, etc. of IPC.

The prayers in the petition read thus;
C.B.I. be directed to treat this petition as F.I.R. and prosecute the offender as done by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of B.I. be further directed to immediately start custodial interrogation of the accused and take use of scientific tests like Lie Detector Test, Brain Mapping Test and Narco Analysis Test to unearth the complete conspiracy and to save the life of Indian Citizen; Direction to Respondent No. 1 i.e. State of Maharashtra to pay an interim compensation of Rs. 100 crores to the Petitioner forthwith and then to recover it from the guilty officials responsible for death of the Petitioners citizen by their deliberate and unlawful act of commission and omission." Noida Entrepreneurs Association Vs. Noida (2011) 6 SCC 508 and followed by this Hon'ble Court in the matter between Param Bir Singh v. State of Maharashtra, 2021 SCC OnLineBom 516.
As per the expert opinion, considering the proofs of sterling nature, Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla will get death penalty.

The Petitioner also relied upon the criminal antecedents of Bill Gates in killing 8 female children by unauthorized trial of HPV vaccines in India and judgment of Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Kalpana Mehta's Case , which is a strong proof against Bill Gates and his vaccine syndicate.

Petitioner has also referred to the proofs of sinister plan of Bill Gates in polio programme which spoiled the lives of 4.5 lakh children in India as they suffered new type of paralysis. This is also an additional proof of Bill Gates' pervert and criminal mindset.

As per experts, there is no chance of Bill Gates getting bail in the case and all the movable and immovable properties of the accused will be confiscated soon.

Various social organizations and common people have decided to exercise citizen's right to arrest the accused as provided under section 43 of Cr.P.C. As per the said section, any citizen can arrest Bill Gates, Adar Poonawalla and other accused and handover them to the police.

Recently in Australia around 10,000 compensation claims are filed against the vaccine injury.

Link: https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/more-than-10-000-australians-have-filed-coronavirus-vaccine-injury-claims-20211115-p598yy.html

In India, lakhs of cases will be filed soon, as informed by Adv. Ishwarlal Agarwal, the Indian Bar Association's National Co-ordination Committee Head.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
World's First Vaccine Murder case against Bill Gates, Adar Poonawalla filed in India's High Court - Indian Bar Association

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Petitioner has sought prosecution of AstraZeneca's (Covishield) manufacturer Bill Gates, his partner Adar Poonawalla and other Government officials and leaders involved in the murder of a 23 year old man, who lost his life because of vaccination.