# data[].attributes.body
What events or actions were a direct result of this?
1-  7 states seceded ( South Carolina )
2- pushed nation into war
3-  turned on many issues

# data[].attributes.body
What events or actions were a direct result of this?
1- turning point in U.S. history
2- turning away from the compromise
3- led the war

# data[].attributes.body
What events or actions were a direct result of this?
1- stated that people who were not citizens couldn't get any federal protection
2- Congress couldn't ban slavery from a federal territory
3- also invalidated the Missouri Compromise

# data[].attributes.body
What events or actions were a direct result of this?
1- repealed the Missouri Compromise
2- created two new territories
3- allowed for popular sovereignty

# data[].attributes.body
Why is this event important, and what is its significance? How did it create more division in the United States?
1- would lead to war
2- would create more division between pro and anti-slavery
3- would create more division between the free and slave states

# data[].attributes.body
Why is this event important, what is its significance? How did it create more division in the United States?
1- it was treason
2- murder
3-insurrection

# data[].attributes.body
Why is this event meaningful, and what is its significance? How did it create more division in the United States?
1- Many enslaved people wanted equal rights, but they couldn't
2- If the court gave the enslaved people rights, then having rights wouldn't become a special thing anymore.
3- It would create even more division between the free white people and the enslaved people, there wold be a big gap of rights and money.

# data[].attributes.body
Why is this event important, what is its significance? How did it create more division in the United States?
1- "One of the most consequential pieces of legislation in our national history." ( from here)
2- the policy would contradict the Missouri compromise
3- rise more questions about slavery

# data[].attributes.body
What: a case where Dred Scott wanted equal rights for enslaved people
Who: Dred Scott ( wanted rights for enslaved people ) and John F. A. Sanford ( was against it )
Where: Rock Island, Illinois
Why: Scotts wanted to buy their freedom from Stanford, but Stanford refused, which led to them going to the Supreme Court.

# data[].attributes.body
What: created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska
Who: Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois ( presented the bill )
Ohio senator Salmon Chase and Charles Sumner’s ( against it)
Where: Missippi River, Kansas, Nebraska, Montana, and the Dakotas
Why: "repealed the Missouri Compromise, created two new territories, and allowed for popular sovereignty."

# data[].attributes.body
What events or actions were a direct result of this?
1- The Fugitive Slave Act amended
2- Allowed the addition of some free states and slave states
3- California entered the union as a free state

# data[].attributes.body
Why is this event important, and what is its significance? How did it create more division in the United States?
1- If we had more states in our union, it meant that we had more power
2- It created more division by having more states that are free and slave
3- It would also lead to the Civil War

# data[].attributes.body
What: established a boundary between Texas and called for abolition in the slave trade, also added some free and slave states

Who: Henry Clay, he wanted to make a compromise to avoid any chance of civil war Stephen A. Douglas, when it came to discussing the issue of slavery he advocated for state rights
Where: Wahington D.C., Utah, California, and Texas in what place(s) did this happen
Why: To seek a compromise over North and South because of the tensions between them

# data[].attributes.body
What: When President Abraham Lincoln was elected president
Who: Stephen A. Douglas ( democratic ) and Abraham Lincoln ( republic )
Where: Whole U.S.
Why: Abraham Lincoln was against slavery

# data[].attributes.body
What: Brown and his men captured innocent citizens and stole federal weaponry
Who: John Brown, his army
Where: Harpers Ferry
Why:  "It was an attempt to disrupt the security of investing in people as property." ( got it from here)