# data[].attributes.headline
Discussion Groups on iCollege - collaborative projects

# data[].attributes.subject
Discussion Groups on iCollege - collaborative projects

# data[].attributes.body
Could have students be required to communicate on a discussion board by certain dates.

In the past, I have also had students send in like Midterm reflections/review of peers effort at certain points. Then contacting the student who is not participating if peer reviews are similar.

I have also inserted a "firing clause" in some past collab work, where if a student is not collaborating, and the group has evidence I (as their "manager") will fire them and they have to complete the project solo... sounds harsh, but is a great incentive.

# data[].attributes.body
I got this idea from a biology professor -- have students use AI and a more traditional approach to find scientific info and create a summary; have the assignment focus on analysis of strengths and limitations of each

# data[].attributes.body
Have group rubrics associated with the grade for the activity. AAC&U have VALUE rubrics that can be used for teamwork.

# data[].attributes.body
Giving feedback/timely grading

Where to fit assignments in the course

AI concerns?

# data[].attributes.body
Time available in semester

Students coming to course with vastly different skills/knowledge

# data[].attributes.body
no tool available at GSU currently for eportfolio

# data[].attributes.body
Clear and High Expectations

Timing of assignments and activities associated with the research they are conducting

Timely and constructive feedback

AI concerns?

# data[].attributes.body
Students wanting to treat scaffolding and feedback as optional. Need to revamp grading policies to accomplish goals.

# data[].attributes.body
Finding ways to integrate activities for feedback across groups in an asynchronous format

# data[].attributes.body
Time constraints

Ways to get students in the community/realize real-world problems/experiences

# data[].attributes.body
What I really want to do is offer more revise and resubmit opportunities, but practically I can only do this in courses with fewer students or group work

# data[].attributes.body
How might this be impacted by the current administration?

How to approach in ways that students feel connected in different ways

# data[].attributes.body
Consult with WAC program for feedback

AI webinars on CETLOE website and blog posts

For grading - use iCollege rubric and voice recording or peer review for low stakes assignments

# data[].attributes.body
Something that is discussed in the scaffolding-related workshops is backwards design, where you plan your projects backwards to help plan out the assignment or course

# data[].attributes.body
GSU has a blog/website platform (sites.gsu.edu) that can be used as a portfolio site

# data[].attributes.body
I make scaffolding assignments collectively about the same number of points as the final assignment and grade for responsiveness to feedback -- but scaffolding assignments I focus more on did they cover the concept vs. right/wrong

# data[].attributes.body
Discuss with students the levels of learning and mastery they are progressing through. Let them know where they will be at the end vs where they started if they maximize engagement

# data[].attributes.body
For frequent revise and resubmits, I use a very basic rubric and only look for certain issues recurring. You could also use peer review or even a trained AI agent for this.

# data[].attributes.headline
Complete Revise and Resubmit in Online Format

# data[].attributes.subject
Complete Revise and Resubmit in Online Format

# data[].attributes.body
Could assign partners for feedback - then have a grade attached to the feedback they provide a peer.

Doing this online can provide more time for students to review each others' work.

# data[].attributes.body
For real-world experiences, maybe use the Wicked problem model and then have students do research on that in their specific community