# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
This chart represents the amount of carbon dioxide going into the earth from the creation and shipping of fast fashion.

# data[].attributes.body
Chart#1

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Beneath the Seams: The Human Toll of Fast Fashion - Earth Day

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Fast fashion exploits millions of workers, especially women, with poor wages and unsafe conditions. Stronger regulations and consumer action can drive accountability.

# data[].attributes.body
The environmental impacts on fast fashion is very harsh against the earth. This is because The amount of natural resources they use and how much pollution they put into the earth for shipping. You see, in order to make these cheap clothing there is an order of the way they are made. The fast fashion industry is the second largest consumer for water, in order to make one cotton shirt you need 70 gallons of water. By using this much water, a lot of it goes to waste. And it gets worse. To produce one regular pair of jeans, they use 2,000 gallons of water. With all the resources they are using, the amount of waste that goes into the earth annually is 92 million tonnes. This builds up waste lands, and it can put more plastic into the ocean. The fast fashion industry is bad for both the environment and humans.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Fast fashion refers to the business model within the fashion industry that relies on cheap and speedy production of low-quality clothing to meet the latest and newest trends. Unsurprisingly, this industry has detrimental effects on the environment. This ever-growing throwaway culture generates an estimated Image by: Tnarik Innael/Flickr 92 million tonnes of textile waste globally every year and is expected to soar up to 134 million tonnes a year by 2030. What's more, the fast-paced manufacturing process of the industry contributes to nearly 10% of global carbon emissions and nearly 20% of global wastewater. While the average shopper has likely purchased from textile and environmental polluters before, here are seven of the biggest fast fashion companies to avoid moving forward. You might also like: 5 Fast-Fashion Brands Called Out for Greenwashing Image by: Pixabay
-
You might also like: The 9 Biggest Fast Fashion Statistics
1. Zara

One could make the argument that Zara was the first fast fashion company in the world. First coined by the a garment from the design stage to being sold in stores in only New York Times in the early 1990s, Spanish apparel giant Zara famously touted its ability to turn 15 days. Nearly three decades later, the retail house now puts out 12,000 new designs and manufactures more than 450 million clothing items every day. It's without a doubt one of the fastest clothing turnover in the fashion industry. Though the clothing company has announced plans to use only cotton and polyester materials that are both sustainable and recyclable, as well as reducing and offsetting all emissions by 2040 , it is nowhere near enough to combat its current fast fashion business model and high carbon footprint in its supply chains, which the company has made no mention to slow down.

2. H&M

The second-largest fashion retailer in the world, H&M, has contributed monumental amounts of textile waste over the years and continues to churn out millions of clothing items and design every year. With more than 5,000 stores worldwide, H&M is one of the many fast fashion companies known for copying high end fashion, rapid clothing turnover, and unsustainable practices, including previously using harmful chemicals such as PFCs, phthalates, and APs/APEOs in its products. The retailer has also been accused of inhumane working conditions and failure to pay 850,000 garment workers a living wage . Though the brand has promised to provide better wages, a 2018 research discovered that workers in India and Turkey earned about a third of the estimated livable wage .

The fast fashion company has since made attempts to adopt more sustainable practices, from implementing a clothing collection and recycling programme within its stores, to the launch of its Conscious collection in 2011 where items are made with at least "50% sustainable materials". H&M also publicly set the goal of using only recycled and sustainably-sourced materials by 2030. However, many criticised its sustainability claims to be vague and greenwashing, highlighting the lack of transparency in regards to reducing its environmental impact and carbon emissions throughout the supply chain.

3. Forever 21

Items made at this American clothing company are almost exclusively made with synthetic fabrics, which are not biodegradable nor be recycled after its use. According to an investigation done by the Los Angeles Times in 2017, one Forever 21 worker can produces up to 700 shirts a day, which amounts to insurmountable volumes of textile waste and pollution every year. Forever 21 was also found to vastly underpay its factory workers. The US Labour Department discovered workers were paid as little as USD$4 an hour , far below the state's minimum wage, and was sued for multiple violations in Los Angeles and abroad. What's more, the company failed to sign the Bangladesh accord, which guarantees garment workers' safety and rights. Despite Forever 21's attempts to be more environmentally supportive, including its American Forest capsule collection which donates $1 to "help conserve and restore healthy forests" , and claims to use 100% recyclable plastic and paper carriers bags, the fast fashion retailer has made no plans to address its textile pollution problem and environmental impacts.
You might also like: Fast Fashion and Its Environmental Impact
4. Uniqlo

One of the best known fast fashion companies that originally hailed from Japan, Uniqlo owns over 3,000 stores across the globe and offers clothing items at low costs. The Japanese brand uses significant amounts of cheap synthetic materials, including rayon, polyester, nylon, and elastane, which cannot be recycled or break down when they're disposed of, contributing to the global plastic and microfibres pollution. Uniqlo also doesn't present any certification for their textiles. Much like other fast fashion companies, Uniqlo has had multiple labour rights violations and complaints. In 2015, the company withheld $5.5 million of severance pay from its workers after abruptly closing down two of its facilities in Indonesia. The following year, an investigation in China found repeated unpaid overtime for workers and dangerous working environments. Though the brand has since signed the Bangladesh Accord.

In an effort to improve its sustainability, Uniqlo introduced a recycling and donation programme , which encourages consumers to bring unwanted clothing (its own brand) to its stores, some of which will be redistributed to refugees, disaster victims and others in need. Down garments in particular, can be converted into new products. Though the brand is implementing initiatives to reduce water and energy use, as well as a carbon emission reduction target, reports say that the company has yet to disclose any progress in meeting this target.

5. Shein

Undoubtedly one of the most popular fast fashion companies among Generation Z shoppers, and famously using social media platforms like TikTok to market its products, Shein has become one of the biggest contributors to textile and environmental pollution in recent years. The brand adds at least 500 products on their website everyday, according to a 2020 press release , and sells more than 36 million pounds of goods globally a year. It is no stranger to copyright infringement issues for stealing designs directly from high-end clothing companies. To combat growing bad press, Shein launched its " Our Products/Our Planet" campaign , which claims to produce 50-100 items for every product, and will only implement large-scale production when the product is in high demand, though stops short of detailing what the threshold is, or committing the switch towards sustainable fabrics and materials. The Chinese online retailer also recently falsely stated on its website that conditions in the factories it uses were certified by international labor standards bodies, which has prompted a number of labour watchdogs to question how it produces its clothing at such low prices.

6. Mango

Mango is another Spanish fashion company with stores located in more than 110 countries. In 2013, a Bangladesh garment factory with 29 brands, including Mango, manufacturing inside collapsed, resulting in the death of more than 1,000 workers with another 2,400 injured. Only nine companies offered compensation to the victims and Mango was not among them. The Bangladesh Accord was also created in the wake of the tragedy.

However the brand has been making progress on the sustainability front. Across the company's entire line of 18,000 products, 44% of which uses sustainable materials and has moved to eliminate the hazardous chemicals PFCs from its items. Despite disclosing its carbon footprint and greenhouse gas emissions across its supply chain, Mango has made no move to set a target to lower them.

7. ASOS

Short for "As Seen On Screen," ASOS is a British online-only retail that offers more than 850 brands including their own on its platform. Similar to Shein, the digital fashion retailer adds as many as 7,000 new products and styles every week to keep up with ongoing trends, which makes it all the more popular with younger shoppers. The fast fashion business model relies on the rapid production of low-quality clothing, and ASOS is a prime example of that where many criticised the clothing the company produces does not fit the way they're advertised.

While ASOS made a public commitment to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from its own operations and supply chain by 2020, reports say there has been evidence to suggest progress has been made, nor have there been any water reduction initiatives in most of its supply chain.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
7 Fast Fashion Companies Responsible for Environmental Pollution in 2022 | Earth.Org

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Fast fashion has detrimental effects on the environment. From Zara to Shein, here are seven of the biggest fast fashion companies to avoid moving forward.

# data[].attributes.body
As Americans go to press or use their mouse to click order, they never realize the human impacts that they are impacting. Millions of people working long hours, physically draining themselves and never getting a break. This is called fast fashion. Exploited labor, this affected humans because factories like sweatshops today can kill or injure most of their workers. In 2013 one of the fast fashion factories called Rana Plaza factory in Bangladesh  collapsed and killed almost all of their workers. It collapsed Because they were over-populating the factory so they could have more workers. more workers means more clothing in designers' eyes.

workers are constantly sewing and working. That can affect their physical health. They don't have any time to go to the doctors and get checkups.This is because the working conditions are so bad that a worker can easily cut their hand or get hand cramps. Most working days tend to last 14-16 hours depending on the day. But when there is a big fashion trend or during peak season the latest they work is 2-3 am depending on the place. So being able to fit in a doctor's checkup in the little time they have can be very hard. This can also affect their mental health since they are constantly working. Also a worker is faced with wage theft, long hours and gender based harassment. Especially the gender based harassment can really affect them when the harassment can go as long as multiple months, or their whole career.

Their pay is very little, they barely make anything considering the amount of work they do. They get paid 2-4$ a day, stated a reporter from an article from the clean clothes campaign.

# data[].attributes.body
We can Solve this problem by putting a limit (or put a tariff on the country it's mostly getting imported from.) on the amount of fast fashion going into the United states. We could do this because the clothing items are getting imported from other countries. We can't do a lot about fast fashion in different countries, but we can definitely change something in the United states. People could also spend less or stop spending money at fast fashion stores. By doing these things it could help climate change for the better. 10% of climate change is because of fast fashion.

# data[].attributes.body
Me personally will change my behavior on spending in fast fashion, i never used it until recently so it will be easy for me to change. But most people have been using these fast fashion clothes for a while so it will be difficult for them to change. But i will definitely be changing my ways.

# data[].attributes.body
This website is what i used for to write about the working conditions. The working conditions are extremely dangerous for humans to be working in everyday. This is because most of the items they use to make these clothing are usually not the nicest. So they tend to be not the safest things for people to be using. People can accidentally cut themselves... but they cant bandage the wounds up. Or they could be in risk of losing their job.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
This is someone who works in a sweatshop. As you can see they don't have a lot of space to work and its very cramped.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
This photo is a sweatshop (factory) that collapsed. This indjured many people leaving them with serious indjurys.