# data[].attributes.body
Money can be involved in many kinds of ways, such as when people or businesses advertise pseudoscientific concepts such alternative medicine, psychic skills, or untested health goods in order to generate money. They may sell books, treatments, or items based on misleading or exaggerated claims.

connecting Monet to pseudoscience is quite easy, as listed above some individuals will use peoples beliefs to profit by selling reading material ( books, magazines, articals) as well as items like preventive measures, "spiritual" artifacts or wards, untested an checked health goods or procedures.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Astrology, Intelligent Design, Occult Studies and Phrenology are examples of quasi-sciences. That is not to denigrate these beliefs, but they are not sciences, whatever the proponents claim, and they do not belong in the science classroom.

Sometimes, the boundaries are a little blurred. For example, researchers into extra-sensory perception and the power of the mind do perform scientific tests. Whilst few positive results have been found, it could still be classed as a genuine field that tries to stick to the scientific method.

Whether positive results are gained or not is largely irrelevant, only that the method is followed. This is an example of a pseudoscience gradually becoming an established science.

Another example is alternative medicine, which used to be classed as pseudoscience by the medical profession. Now, many fields such as herbalism, acupuncture, and chiropractics follow the protocols of scientific research. They are often classed as genuine fields, or indeed proto-science. Working the other way, phrenology, where many proponents believed that a person's personality could be assessed by measuring the shape of the skull, is now debunked. It has sunk into the realms of pseudoscience.

Whilst some 'pure' scientists refer to many of the social sciences and market research as not proper science, they do at least attempt to follow the scientific method. A fairer term, in such cases, is quasi-science.

Signs That Research is Pseudoscience

Check the credentials of any researchers, as it is easy to be swayed by qualifications, and pseudo scientists are very good at switching fields.

For example, a professor of quantum physics typically knows less about biology than first year biology undergraduate, so why are they qualified to comment upon evolution?

Pseudosciences are often selective with facts, selecting results that suit their needs. Peer reviewing and replication are essential to science, so any experiment that does not allow this process cannot be taken seriously.

Parapsychology is a very good example. If researchers into ESP and telekinesis follow the scientific method, and accept results for what they are, then their work can be classed as science. Unfortunately, many pseudo researchers in this field distort findings and try to fit the results to their theory, rather than using them to try to refine hypotheses. The Atkins diet is another example of verification error, resulting in potentially dangerous practices.

Pseudoscience often uses the media as a first stop, rather than submitting their work for peer review. No genuine researcher would dream of publishing their results until they had passed all of the rigors of the scientific method.

Pseudoscience often claims that it is right and that everybody else is wrong, instead of trying to fit in with established scientific protocols. Many pseudo-sciences now claim to be complimentary to science, rather than alternative, and this view is fair in many cases.

Acupuncture, Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Reflexology are good examples. Physicians and consultants often refer patients, believing that there may be some benefit if these therapies are used alongside regular medicine. The fact that these methods are also prepared to subject their methods to scientific debate often earns them the name of proto-science.

Pseudoscience is often about making money, through selling books, claiming that the research is something that science cannot explain. The reason why science cannot explain everything is that often it does not care. Most researchers are not going to waste time and resources studying a field that is full of cranks.

For example, the pyramid scam selling e-books claiming that water used in your car engine saves gas is physically impossible. Scientists often finds other explanations than those of the pseudoscience. Hypnotherapists charging many dollars an hour are not interested in healing anybody, but in making the client return week after week.

Pseudoscience often tries to create problems and mysteries that are not there, usually linked to making money. The Bermuda Triangle spawned a range of books and films, but Occam's razor showed that a plane or ship is statistically no more likely to go missing there than anywhere else. This was not before an extensive array of books and films about the subject.

It is All About the Money

To summarize, the boundaries between science and pseudoscience are often blurred. Some practices straddle the divide, like complimentary medicine, and others can begin as a pseudoscience and develop into a science. If they follow the scientific method, and allow scrutiny, then they may develop into a full-blown field

The common denominator for the rest is money. Every pseudoscience has money or an unethical motivation at the root, and dresses crankery up as science to persuade the public. This is the reason that the scientific method was developed, to drive the charlatans out.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Pseudoscience is a belief that masquerades as a real science, despite failing to follow the scientific method.

# data[].attributes.body
Appealing to people's emotions describes how pseudoscience ideas or approaches are frequently expressed in ways that generate powerful emotions in people.

it is quite easy to connect appealing to peoples emotions to pseudoscience as well, coming from a pseudo scientists perspective by tailoring what you say, the way you say it, and the "evidence" or examples you should can usually bring the ideal emotion you were looking for out in a person or group of people's when you get a taste of the kind of crowd you are speaking to for your benefit or your corporations benefit which is not necessarily in the greatest interest or benefit of the person(s) your are with.

# data[].attributes.headline
deliberately creates mystery - watchlist

# data[].attributes.subject
deliberately creates mystery - watchlist

# data[].attributes.body
The process of presenting certain ideas, occurrences, or behavior in a way that obscures understanding and develops a sense of mystery .

by creating mystery among people it encourages them to attempt and look into the topic or matter more in depth and it keeps people more intrigued into the idea of pseudoscience and what it offers or can prove, solve and define rather than usual practices .

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Ignorance makes masses fall easily for pseudoscientists, and education can fix it, writes Pranay Aggarwal

# data[].attributes.headline
results cannot be reproduced or verified - watchlist

# data[].attributes.subject
results cannot be reproduced or verified - watchlist

# data[].attributes.body
Claims, procedures, or experiments that cannot be correctly, repeatedly, or properly tested or replicated are believed to be not possible to be reproduced or verified. Repeatable experiments and results are critical to true science.

with some practices they are truly just fake and not real but are marketed and pushed as such for profit, believers, to gain more "belivability " but these inaccurate process, whatever they may be, depending on what they are and the circumstances can be endangering to the other people involved or you yourself.

# data[].attributes.body
the issue of not progressing describes how pseudoscientific theories or procedures don't change, adapt, or progress over time like those used by recognized fields of science.

now I don't know to much how to connect this but with not progressing it can lead to people not being as involved or intrigued as they were at the beginning as well as it can cause doubt and non believers because of the fact it makes it seem like the practice is unreliable and outdated or inaccurate.

# data[].attributes.body
This method is used to try to convince people that a specific idea or legend or treatment is right simply because it has been around for a long time.

using the leverage of time when it comes to legends, treatments or ideas in pseudoscience can be manipulative. In order to convince people your ideas or methods are correct, trustworthy and effective enlisting the fact that it may have been around for hundreds of even thousands of years just to reinforce your beliefs is manipulative to your own benefit and not the other person's.

# data[].attributes.body
mystical energy is usually a warning sign in pseudoscience because it usually means vague, untestable, and unreliable claims that aren't verified by science. Applying non-physical energies that are impossible to measure, analyze, or prove through the scientific method is typical when using mystical energy.

employing mystical energy as one of your strong back ups or evidence in your claims in a flawed and unreliable practices many people will not believe you and take it as a joke or its just that facts that majority of claims with '' mystical energy'' supports cannot be proven.

# data[].attributes.body
In pseudoscience, appealing to authority is the practice of depending on the opinion or support of a person generally someone who is viewed as having credibility, experience, or a position of power without providing solid evidence or logic to back up a claim.

relying on someone in a higher or respected position who have people that look up to them or follow their every move and word to make sure your point or practice is believed and trusted among the people is a unfair representation to the pseudoscience community.

# data[].attributes.body
The tendency for some claims or practices to be defended mainly on the grounds of cultural, political, or personal beliefs rather than scientific reasoning or actual proof is known as ideological support.

defending your claims with your own beliefs to prove or disprove, enforce your claim is not ethical comparing your own beliefs to actual facts and evidence rather than just utilizing said facts and evidence is also a reasoning some skeptics ma y have for their arguments against pseudoscience being a real science and being believable and practiced.

# data[].attributes.body
'' unexlpained'' refers to the capacity for people to believe statements or ideas without fully understanding the reasons behind their belief.

believing the unexplained can sometimes be comforting to people when the unexplained can actually explain their situation or problem while regular, tested and explained sciences cannot or don't believe them. sometimes the unexplained aspects of life are actually the most important or impactful ones.

# data[].attributes.headline
emotional connection - reason for belief

# data[].attributes.subject
emotional connection - reason for belief

# data[].attributes.body
The significant emotional pull that pseudoscientific ideas and techniques can have on people, which causes them to believe the claims even with no kind of credible proof, is referred to as emotional connections as a justification for believing in pseudoscience.

when emotions get involved it does indeed become a tricky situation but when situations or practices have a lot of emotion behind them or are expressed as such for prolonged periods of time or intensely it can provide an easier and more common route for believers to develop a strong emotional connection to whatever the topic at hand may be.

# data[].attributes.headline
perception and observation - reason for belief

# data[].attributes.subject
perception and observation - reason for belief

# data[].attributes.body
It is common for people to accept their own experiences, perceptions, and observations as evidence for a claim even when these experiences are biased, arbitrary, or misunderstood is defined as perception and observation as an argument for belief in pseudoscience.